Which do you think is part of Nintendo's "Triforce" of their IPs?

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#1 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts

A while ago, I was in an argument of what games are part of something called "Nintendo's Triforce", where it's decided what Nintendo's most important IPs are (or something like that). And I ask this, which are the three that belong in this so called "Triforce".

Well, I think Mario and Zelda belong up there as those two franchises that still remain in their states of popularity (that and Mario is the main man of Nintendo gaming pretty much). But I think the third piece of the triforce belongs to Pokemon now. Many will probably argue it's Metroid due to the high scores the games get (saying Prime was the best game of it's generation because of Metacritic and Gamerankings) and there will also be arguments that Pokemon is mainly a handheld series, so it doesn't count. But I think due to Metroid's absence from the N64 and Pokemon gaining a massive amount of popularity (surpassing Metroid) since then.

That, and Nintendo didn't even bother to celebrate Metroid's anniversary, while they did Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon.

What do you think?

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#3 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

Personal bias goes for Donkey Kong.

but look at the bigger picture for Nintendo, it's definently Pokemon.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#4 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Depends. In terms of quality I would say Metroid. In terms of popularity its Pokemon.

Personally I´d go with Metroid.

Avatar image for D4W1L4H
D4W1L4H

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 D4W1L4H
Member since 2011 • 1765 Posts

It's on like Donkey kong.
But sadly, it isn't being as pushed anymore like it once was. They should make a Donkey kong 64 sequel, then I would be in heaven.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#6 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Yeah, I came here to say Mario/Zelda/Pokemon.

They're all:

  1. Quality
  2. Popular
  3. Active on consoles
  4. Active on handhelds

I don't think there's a better fit.

Slashkice

This, I like for it to be Metroid but Metroid isn't that popular. :(

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

I always tought that Nintendo's "holy trinity" were Mario, Zelda and Metroid. But if we're speaking popularity it's probably Pokemon, yea.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45495 Posts
for me personally it's Metroid... for everyone else, and even for company figures, it's probably Pokemon
Avatar image for SuperFlakeman
SuperFlakeman

7411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SuperFlakeman
Member since 2011 • 7411 Posts

I don't get why you would pick Pokemon, it wasn't even Nintendo's idea.

Metroid was created during the same time period as TLoZ and SMB, and they have all just had their 25th anniversary. They all originally shared many similarities in gameplay mechanics. I would even go as far as to say that they are based on the same foundation, but each series puts focus on different aspects of it to varying degrees. Kid Icarus was a game that equally blended the main elements of these three games (platforming, shooting, exploration)

I think it's just more fitting to have Metroid.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

in terms of money? pokemon. But actually? Metroid.

Mario, Zelda, Metroid. easily.

Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

Pokemon as a franchise didnt yet get proper installation on any home console, thats why its out. Out of Donkey Kong and Metroid, I would say its Metroid.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#12 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

I don't get why you would pick Pokemon, it wasn't even Nintendo's idea.

Metroid was created during the same time period as TLoZ and SMB, and they have all just had their 25th anniversary. They all originally shared many similarities in gameplay mechanics. I would even go as far as to say that they are based on the same foundation, but each series puts focus on different aspects of it to varying degrees. Kid Icarus was a game that equally blended the main elements of these three games (platforming, shooting, (dungeon) exploration)

I think it's just more fitting to have Metroid.

SuperFlakeman

You would think that, but in reality it's Pokemon.

Avatar image for WarTornRuston
WarTornRuston

2712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 WarTornRuston
Member since 2011 • 2712 Posts

Mario

Pokemon

Mario Kart

Those are the 3 franchises that make Nintendo the most money.

Mario

Zelda

Metroid

Those are the 3 fanboys love

Donkey Kong

Mario

Pokemon

Those are the most important

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#14 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Personally it's Metroid. Metroid is up to the quality of Mario and Zelda.

Although, Pokemon is without a doubt one of Nintendo's most important IP's. Probably more so than Mario or Zelda.

Avatar image for SuperFlakeman
SuperFlakeman

7411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SuperFlakeman
Member since 2011 • 7411 Posts

You would think that, but in reality it's Pokemon.

LegatoSkyheart

I honestly didn't read the OP talking about popularity, obviously :P

If you read the thread title alone, I don't think sales and popularity are relevant factors.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#16 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts
I knew this was going to turn into a Metroid vs Pokemon debate. :P Still, I still believe Pokemon bears the Triforce and Metroid doesn't due to popularity, and that plays a big part here and in this case, it really doesn't matter what kind of platform it's on (Handheld vs console).
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#17 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

You would think that, but in reality it's Pokemon.

SuperFlakeman

I honestly didn't read the OP talking about popularity, obviously :P

If you read the thread title alone, I don't think sales and popularity are relevant factors.

everytime I think of Nintendo's "Triforce" I think of Mario, Zelda, and Metroid.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

Pokemon. I'd prefer to say Metroid, but Pokemon is a beast.

Avatar image for ugoo18
ugoo18

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ugoo18
Member since 2010 • 1005 Posts

Mario

Zelda

Metroid

Metroid because it has been there from the very start and is active on both home and handheld. Being a handheld focussed franchise should automatically disqualify Pokemon.

Quality wise: Metroid smokes Pokemon with ease

Popularity: Pokemon on handhelds is arguably more popular than even Mario and takes this with ease however on home consoles Metroid should take it since it actually has mainline games on home consoles unlike Pokemon that is known only for spinoffs on home consoles.

Activeness: This is clearly unfair to Metroid, the argument that Metroid wasn't on the N64 is incorrect since Metroid 64 was planned but due to lack of concrete ideas as well as Sakamoto's own qualms about Metroid, Movement and the N64 controller. He felt that the N64 was to early for a true 3D Metroid title and he was damm right, 1 gen wait for a more powerful system was the right move since we got the masterpiece that was Metroid Prime. Metroid was not shelved because of lack of popularity during the N64 era (Considering the success of Super Metroid) it was simply postponed for better hardware.

Pokemon was not active at all during the NES era and about 85 to 90% of the SNES era so if Metroid gets docked points for missing 1 era then Pokemon should definitely get docked points for missing nearly 2.

Home Console: Metroid without a doubt, home consoles are what Nintendo started with and on a home console Metroid clearly outshines Pokemon

Handheld Console: Pokemon takes this with ease due to it being a handheld focussed console.

A triforce piece must maintain it's quality across both home and handheld console. Metroid does that, Pokemon does not. The 2 series that showed what the Wii was capable of controlwise were Metroid and Zelda, Pokemon was not even a blip on the radar. Every Nintendo Home console's best game has come from either the Mario series (Wii), Zelda series (N64) or Metroid series (NES, SNES), Pokemon has not even come within spitting distance of the quality that these 3 titles consistently put out even with it's handheld mainline games.

Also before someone starts touting sales as the determining factor, when did we start sacrificing quality for sales power. If that's true then COD is clearly better than every other shooter available because it sells the most.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Metroid is too low key and Donkey Kong is on life support. Pokemon wins easily. I also think it is definitely higher up than Zelda. If Nintendo was forced to two choices out of the three, I bet Nintendo picks Pokemon and Mario all day everyday.
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 ArchoNils2
Member since 2005 • 10534 Posts

it's obviously Pokemon when it comes to the popularity and units sold

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
In terms of quality: Mario, Metroid and Zelda In terms of sales: Mario Kart, Pokemon, Wii_____
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#23 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
Active on consolesSlashkice
...Pokemon? : \ I would say Kirby. Kirby has really come up in the last few years.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#24 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
For me the Nintendo Triforce is Mario/Zelda/Pokemon.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#25 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts
[QUOTE="Slashkice"]Active on consolesCherokee_Jack
...Pokemon? : \ I would say Kirby. Kirby has really come up in the last few years.

Main problem is that Kirby isn't as popular in the west as it is in Japan.
Avatar image for simomate
simomate

1875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 simomate
Member since 2011 • 1875 Posts

My fav IP in that list is Metroid though I will answer with: Pokemon. Its a huge money maker and quite possibly their most important franchise apart from Mario.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#27 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Slashkice"]Active on consolesnintendoboy16
...Pokemon? : \ I would say Kirby. Kirby has really come up in the last few years.

Main problem is that Kirby isn't as popular in the west as it is in Japan.

Still, it's the only franchise that still fits into that "This is one of our main franchises, we are going to do things with it" area. Pokemon is weird because it sells a ton and a lot of releases carry the Pokemon name, but it feels more like its own franchise than a Nintendo franchise. Every few years the latest main Pokemon game just sort of happens, whereas with Kirby they're more proactive about bringing fresh ideas into the series (Epic Yarn and Mass Attack, for example) IDK, maybe I'm not making any sense. I just think it's interesting how Kirby has been promoted from the Donkey Kong/Star Fox/F-Zero zone this generation, while Metroid has pretty much been demoted.
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts
It's Pokemon. Nintendo doesn't even make Metroid games, they farm the ip out.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

Yeah, I came here to say Mario/Zelda/Pokemon.

They're all:

  1. Quality
  2. Popular
  3. Active on consoles
  4. Active on handhelds

I don't think there's a better fit.

Slashkice
this. metroid got a lot of focus recently, but it's still not as big as pokemon or as remarkable as zelda.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="Slashkice"]Active on consolesCherokee_Jack
...Pokemon? : \ I would say Kirby. Kirby has really come up in the last few years.

pokemon's absurd handheld sales (and merchandise sales) make up for the lack of console content :P even then, the spin-offs sell well.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#31 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
It's Pokemon. Nintendo doesn't even make Metroid games, they farm the ip out.mbrockway
They co-develop it. Farming out is what they do with the Mario sports games.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="mbrockway"]It's Pokemon. Nintendo doesn't even make Metroid games, they farm the ip out.Cherokee_Jack
They co-develop it. Farming out is what they do with the Mario sports games.

those are still mostly in-house, done by second parties last i checked
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts
So which part of Other M did Nintendo develop? Submissive Samus or the gameplay?
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#34 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts
So which part of Other M did Nintendo develop? Submissive Samus or the gameplay?mbrockway
Sakamoto (from Nintendo) did the story. Team Ninja handled the gameplay.
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts
That answer kinda sickened me a bit. So I can't blame TN for raping gaming's original female protagonist. Wow.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#36 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="mbrockway"]It's Pokemon. Nintendo doesn't even make Metroid games, they farm the ip out.BrunoBRS
They co-develop it. Farming out is what they do with the Mario sports games.

those are still mostly in-house, done by second parties last i checked

Lately the only one Nintendo worked on was Mario Sports Mix. It's all been Namco, Square, Camelot, and Next Level (who they don't own, oddly enough)
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

nintendogs

wii fit

wii music

keep making those casual games nintendo. no one would beat you :)

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#38 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
Pokemon, Metroid had a hiatus of around ten years and Donkey Kong didn't have a real platformer for years before DKCR. Coincidentally, Retro Studios is responsible for both of the series revival.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] They co-develop it. Farming out is what they do with the Mario sports games.

those are still mostly in-house, done by second parties last i checked

Lately the only one Nintendo worked on was Mario Sports Mix. It's all been Namco, Square, Camelot, and Next Level (who they don't own, oddly enough)

camelot is definitely nintendo. they're the golden sun guys. and i'm pretty sure next level is nintendo now (even though they suck)
Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#40 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

Metroid. Haven't played the supposedly disappointing Other M, but Metroid Prime Trilogy is the single best thing available on the Wii, bar none.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#41 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] those are still mostly in-house, done by second parties last i checkedBrunoBRS
Lately the only one Nintendo worked on was Mario Sports Mix. It's all been Namco, Square, Camelot, and Next Level (who they don't own, oddly enough)

camelot is definitely nintendo. they're the golden sun guys. and i'm pretty sure next level is nintendo now (even though they suck)

Technically Nintendo doesn't own Next Level, they just partner with them a lot. That Captain America game that came out on 360 and PS3 was made by them.

But anyway, they farm out the baseball games for sure, to Namco. Much different from the situation with Metroid.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] Lately the only one Nintendo worked on was Mario Sports Mix. It's all been Namco, Square, Camelot, and Next Level (who they don't own, oddly enough)Cherokee_Jack

camelot is definitely nintendo. they're the golden sun guys. and i'm pretty sure next level is nintendo now (even though they suck)

Technically Nintendo doesn't own Next Level, they just partner with them a lot. That Captain America game that came out on 360 and PS3 was made by them.

But anyway, they farm out the baseball games for sure, to Namco. Much different from the situation with Metroid.

baseball game. there was only one :P
Avatar image for zmbi_gmr
zmbi_gmr

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 zmbi_gmr
Member since 2008 • 3590 Posts

Mario / Zelda /Metroid...do we really need to question this? I don't believe so.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
It's Mario-Zelda-Mario Spin Offs. No other franchises are given as much attention by Nintendo as these three. I would say Pokemon if it was a console title.
Avatar image for ugoo18
ugoo18

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ugoo18
Member since 2010 • 1005 Posts

Why do i get the feeling that if Samus was a guy this wouldn't even be up for discussion.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#46 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] baseball game. there was only one :P

Naw man, there was Superstar Baseball on the Gamecube. Actually I'm surprised there's only 2. Japan really goes in for the yakyuu.
Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

It's pretty much Metroid.

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#48 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
Pokemon because of its popularity and the fact that even people who DON'T PLAY THE GAME know what it is.
Avatar image for Devil-Itachi
Devil-Itachi

4387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Devil-Itachi
Member since 2005 • 4387 Posts
Pokemon certainly to me. Metroid really isn't big enough plus it doesn't seem to fit in, Donkey Kong is sort of included in the Mario portion.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
pokemon clearly...