Who else dislikes the Unreal Engine 3?

Wii owners cause they cant get it in their games?

How can u hate a engine???? It isnt a living thing. What did it do to make u angry at it????!!!!!!!!!

lol joking but seriosuly, its an engine, leave the engine alone!!!

I dislike the look of it, and it seems like alot of games are beggining to use it, and considering the fact I already dislike it, isn't a good thing for me ONLYDOD

how it looks????? Games like Lost Odessey and Gears of War, two completely different games, each look spectacular in their own right.

I dont understand how u dislike how it looks. Be more specific.

Source Engine FTW!bizkit_limp

I hate how most devs use it.

Bioshock used it well though.

Source Engine FTW!bizkit_limp

The only modern games my PC can run are the ones using Source.

[QUOTE="bizkit_limp"]Source Engine FTW!Nintendo_Ownes7

Lost Oddesy, blue dragon, The Last Remenant and Vegas use it.

All look waaaay different to UT and Gears ¬_¬

[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="bizkit_limp"]Source Engine FTW!toxicmog

Lost Oddesy, blue dragon, The Last Remenant and Vegas use it.

All look waaaay different to UT and Gears ¬_¬

THE White Engine from square owns all engines.Lebron181

Nope. The CryEngine 2 is easily the best engine out there at the moment.

The Source Engine is pretty damn good too, though.

Yeah it kinda sucks. Reminds me of Xbox1 PC ports. Looks amazing at the time because of some tacked on effects but 3 years down the line when there's better effects it just looks like dated garbage. Custom engines and games with nice art style survive the test of time much better.Lazy_Boy88

Same could be said for every technologically-graphical game released. Crysis is the most technologically-advanced game on the market today yet I can guarantee that within the next 3 years we'll look back on it and say "Wow, I can't believe that crap use to be cutting edge."

Wii owners cause they cant get it in their games?

How can u hate a engine???? It isnt a living thing. What did it do to make u angry at it????!!!!!!!!!

lol joking but seriosuly, its an engine, leave the engine alone!!!

-GhostMLD-

Same way fanboys can hate systems somehow.

[QUOTE="Lebron181"] THE White Engine from square owns all engines.-Jiggles-

Nope. The CryEngine 2 is easily the best engine out there at the moment.

The Source Engine is pretty damn good too, though.

The unreal engine 3 is an impressive engine that can benchmark itself on many mediums. Unfortunately, many developers that use it for their games don't implement their own artstyles and techniques and rely on the "base engine" of UE3.

What I admire with developers like Square-Enix, Capcom and Rockstar Games is how they go out of their way to build their own engines for making their games. It adds more diversity to the oversaturation of UE3-rendered games.

THE White Engine from square owns all engines.Lebron181

Nah, CryEngine 2 and Dunia will probably be the best for a while (Dunia is the engine used for Far Cry 2). Besides mate, White Engine is called "Crystal Tools" now.

[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]

[QUOTE="Lebron181"] THE White Engine from square owns all engines.bizkit_limp

Nope. The CryEngine 2 is easily the best engine out there at the moment.

The Source Engine is pretty damn good too, though.

It takes a pretty powerful computer to run Crysis... on all Very High at an upper-class resolution (1650 x 1024 or higher). Crysis can run pretty well on a low end machine as long as you run it on the preferred settings (if you're going to use a 6800 card, you're going to be running it on all low, case closed).

Source Engine is great for scaling back a few years as you said, though. Games still look great even today with the right hardware.

I like it. It really looks great and it seems to do gangbusters for textures.

I also like the Source engine since it does the dirty and gritty look real well.

But what was the engine Crackdown used? That whole cell-shaded, marker outlined look was real slick and stylish.

Also Dead Rising had some great visuals and the amount of zombies on screen was amazing (last level with the tank was incredible...must've been like hundreds of zombies around you).

being as I make my own models and use ut3 engine and have tired source ut3 is a dream compared to source all, you do is export as a acs file and bam i you can get it into ut3, whereas source is a pain to use and inferior to ut3. Which is why unreal engine is popular-its easy and shows off models well

I like it. It really looks great and it seems to do gangbusters for textures.

I also like the Source engine since it does the dirty and gritty look real well.

But what was the engine Crackdown used? That whole cell-shaded, marker outlined look was real slick and stylish.

Also Dead Rising had some great visuals and the amount of zombies on screen was amazing (last level with the tank was incredible...must've been like hundreds of zombies around you).

MADVLAD123

Call me crazy but I found UT3 visually underwhelming. Sure UE3 can pull off some nice normal maps but I'm more impressed by lighting and effects like motion blur and depth of field. espoac

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"]I sure doAmyMizuno

Agreed, in fact a lot of next gen games look like this, it's kinda annoying in my eyes, I don't get amazed at people who look like they are made from metal, it's fine if they are wearing metal armour, but when surfaces like stone somehow look shiny, it's just like "WTF?"

[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="bizkit_limp"]Source Engine FTW!toxicmog

Lost Oddesy, blue dragon, The Last Remenant and Vegas use it.

All look waaaay different to UT and Gears ¬_¬

and lost odyssey lags xD

2 of my fav games this gen use it, Gears and Mass Effect.

So I wouldn't say I hate it.. overused maybe.

how can you hate an engine? :?

i love the unreal 3 engine and i cant wait to see how gears of war 2 looks with the update.