who thinks activision blizzard is a good idea?

who thinks the massive hybrid company will still produce the quality games?

will blizzards franchises keep their level of polish?

or will they be courrupt by the othe companies?

activison blizzard is such a horrible name,

it should have been blizvission or blission, now that sounds great.

but ontopic I think it is a horrible idea, I mean come on do we seriously need to see starcraft every year now.

blizzard bought activision?

I just think they should keep the Activision name alone. Activision Blizzard? Its too long of a name.hiho24

Should change name to Blizzard Activated. The blizzard of EA's doom! SNAP.

Impossible to say at this point

I just think they should keep the Activision name alone. Activision Blizzard? Its too long of a name.hiho24

BlizzardVision FTW :o

[QUOTE="hiho24"]I just think they should keep the Activision name alone. Activision Blizzard? Its too long of a name.tomarlyn

BlizzardVision FTW :o

I second this! BlizzardVision!

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

[QUOTE="hiho24"]I just think they should keep the Activision name alone. Activision Blizzard? Its too long of a name.Jynxzor

BlizzardVision FTW :o

I second this! BlizzardVision!

nah I'd stay with bliz-vision

I think that Blizz will concentrate on making games on PC and then will let some Activision dev's port them to consoles. Games like Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 ;)hailltoyou

Blizzard, is bassiclly an independent developer....they may be owned by viviendi, but they get so much control they even publish their own games....

Blizzard has also said that they are not doing anything on consoles.

As an Activision shareholder, I think it is a great idea.

The addition of Blizzard and WoW to the Cod and GH franchises should have EA shaking.

Blizzard games will be kept blizzard
and activision games will be kept activision

Acti-Bliz, Blizzion, orBlizzAct