why all the far cry 2 hate?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lm2f
lm2f

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 lm2f
Member since 2007 • 1272 Posts
its worth getting just for the map editior
Avatar image for dgsag
dgsag

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 93

User Lists: 0

#2 dgsag
Member since 2005 • 6760 Posts
Not really if nobody plays your maps.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
*shrug* I can understand not loving it. But I don't understand hating it.
Avatar image for Panther501
Panther501

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Panther501
Member since 2007 • 1990 Posts
its worth getting just for the map editiorlm2f
no coop made me not buy it. that game could have been godly if it was given an online coop feature, some variation in difficulty, and some quick save points.
Avatar image for jerzyb0rn
jerzyb0rn

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jerzyb0rn
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
single player is wats up, but the online is very frustratin
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
It just wasn't fun. Plain and simple.
Avatar image for di_sgt_barber
di_sgt_barber

1082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 di_sgt_barber
Member since 2008 • 1082 Posts
too realistic.
Avatar image for gasmaskman
gasmaskman

3463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 gasmaskman
Member since 2005 • 3463 Posts

Respawning enemies and too much focus on the little details. I don't care about watching myself pull a bullet out of my leg when the voice acting is terribleandtheytalkreallyfast.

Avatar image for musicaz70
musicaz70

1949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 musicaz70
Member since 2007 • 1949 Posts
It felt like it was a game that had a lot of great ideas, and all sounded good on paper, but then the overall game just seemed pretty generic and average. I really think they should have given the game a few more months and released it in early 09'.
Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts

what? no one is even there to play on your maps, and the editor isn't even that advanced. sandbox 2.0 is much better

as for the sp, fc2 is just WAY too repetitive. I'm just glad i didn't have to pay for it, it came with my gtx 260

Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

Because the whole game is lame and unfun, including the map editor.

Avatar image for habkeinbock
habkeinbock

1189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 habkeinbock
Member since 2009 • 1189 Posts

i dont think they hate it :|

its more that they dont like it so much as other games !

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#13 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?
Avatar image for lantus
lantus

10591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 lantus
Member since 2006 • 10591 Posts
It's the same problem with Assassin's Creed, WAY too repetitive. You always get the same kind of missions, and you can't drive for 5 minutes without being ambushed, which is why I never drove, which alleveated that problem, but then it becomes way too slow. On top of all of that, the multiplayer isn't that good.
Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?Vandalvideo

I cannot understand why everybody hates the driving in this game so much... I mean, I can understand all the complaints about the "antiquated" gunplay, the repetetive missions, respawning enemies, etc. but I just don't get why people hate the driving so much. You can drive from one corner of the map to the other in 5 minutes, and you can avoid almost every single checkpoint/enemy on the way...

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17908 Posts
only thing i hate is the respawning enemy posts, and the constant random attacks, and too much driving, other than that, the game is awesome. I think most people have become used to linear, "COD4" type shooters, so when you play far cry 2, its going to seem boring. I think that if it had a fast travel system like fallout 3, where once you visit an area, you can fast travel close to it, but not actually there, then the game would be more accessable to everybody. Either that, or they shouldve added some RPG elements so your guy can level up or something, then it would make the slow pace make sense.
Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
All of that god damn driving and plus I can't log onto multiplayer for some stupid ass reason.
Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#18 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
The mad editor was a simple distraction. The game itself is good but boring.
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?MetroidPrimePwn

I cannot understand why everybody hates the driving in this game so much... I mean, I can understand all the complaints about the "antiquated" gunplay, the repetetive missions, respawning enemies, etc. but I just don't get why people hate the driving so much. You can drive from one corner of the map to the other in 5 minutes, and you can avoid almost every single checkpoint/enemy on the way...

Because when driving an assault jeep with poor physics towards another checkpoint with respawning enemies hellbent on seeing you dead, yet another jeep patrol pops up in front of you, forcing you to man the turret and jump out to repair for the 48th time, you realize that when you finally reach your objective on the other end of the map, you have to go all the way back again.

There is nothing about it that's even close to resembling any sort of fun. When you're not asking yourself if you're there yet you want to punch your screen in the face, hoping Ubisoft feels it. Buses help somewhat.

only thing i hate is the respawning enemy posts, and the constant random attacks, and too much driving, other than that, the game is awesome. I think most people have become used to linear, "COD4" type shooters, so when you play far cry 2, its going to seem boring. I think that if it had a fast travel system like fallout 3, where once you visit an area, you can fast travel close to it, but not actually there, then the game would be more accessable to everybody. Either that, or they shouldve added some RPG elements so your guy can level up or something, then it would make the slow pace make sense.navyguy21
What they should've done is

  • add a faction system where as you earn respect for the two factions you get various favors and upgrades. Like their jeep patrols not running you down for instance.
  • Not have jeep patrols popping up in your face all the time "for variety" when in fact the only they accomplish is ruin the sense of exploration and the ability for you to do things at your own pace. And after the 15th jeep it doesn't feel varied at all.
  • Outposts you could overtake for whatever faction, or bribe, or whatever. It makes zero sense how they relentlessly try to kill you as soon as they see your assault jeep closing in.
  • Add civilians. After the introduction they all just mysteriously disappear.
  • Instead it's just these two "warring" factions. Could be one faction for all you care, they all drive around in jeeps and they're all trying to kill you, and only you. Make it look like there is a bloody conflict going on.
  • And actually make two distinct factions, then have the faction that respects you the most not try to kill you all the time. Maybe they could even come and help you out once you've earned enough respect.
  • As for the driving. You have a cellphone. Worked pretty well in GTAIV. Whenever the hell you're in the vicinity of a mission, call up the guy or have the guy call you up with a briefing, instead of you having to drive all the way over to his lazy ass all the time. Maybe present you with several missions at once so you get to pick the one closest to you. Also, have the objectives placed more closely together.
  • And if that's not enough, fast travel.
Avatar image for Mario2007
Mario2007

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 Mario2007
Member since 2005 • 2520 Posts
Why do you guys hate driving? You could just take a bus you know. Or walk.
Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#21 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts
FC2 = ACreed with guns
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Got sick of the silly design flaws. Why such decisions were made baffles me. I think ill get back to it in a few weeks time.
Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
Why do you guys hate driving? You could just take a bus you know. Or walk. Mario2007
You still have to drive to one of the corners of the map to take a bus
Avatar image for lm2f
lm2f

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 lm2f
Member since 2007 • 1272 Posts
[QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]

I cannot understand why everybody hates the driving in this game so much... I mean, I can understand all the complaints about the "antiquated" gunplay, the repetetive missions, respawning enemies, etc. but I just don't get why people hate the driving so much. You can drive from one corner of the map to the other in 5 minutes, and you can avoid almost every single checkpoint/enemy on the way...

InsaneBasura

Because when driving an assault jeep with poor physics towards another checkpoint with respawning enemies hellbent on seeing you dead, yet another jeep patrol pops up in front of you, forcing you to man the turret and jump out to repair for the 48th time, you realize that when you finally reach your objective on the other end of the map, you have to go all the way back again.

There is nothing about it that's even close to resembling any sort of fun. When you're not asking yourself if you're there yet you want to punch your screen in the face, hoping Ubisoft feels it. Buses help somewhat.

only thing i hate is the respawning enemy posts, and the constant random attacks, and too much driving, other than that, the game is awesome. I think most people have become used to linear, "COD4" type shooters, so when you play far cry 2, its going to seem boring. I think that if it had a fast travel system like fallout 3, where once you visit an area, you can fast travel close to it, but not actually there, then the game would be more accessable to everybody. Either that, or they shouldve added some RPG elements so your guy can level up or something, then it would make the slow pace make sense.navyguy21
What they should've done is

  • add a faction system where as you earn respect for the two factions you get various favors and upgrades. Like their jeep patrols not running you down for instance.
  • Not have jeep patrols popping up in your face all the time "for variety" when in fact the only they accomplish is ruin the sense of exploration and the ability for you to do things at your own pace. And after the 15th jeep it doesn't feel varied at all.
  • Outposts you could overtake for whatever faction, or bribe, or whatever. It makes zero sense how they relentlessly try to kill you as soon as they see your assault jeep closing in.
  • Add civilians. After the introduction they all just mysteriously disappear.
  • Instead it's just these two "warring" factions. Could be one faction for all you care, they all drive around in jeeps and they're all trying to kill you, and only you. Make it look like there is a bloody conflict going on.
  • And actually make two distinct factions, then have the faction that respects you the most not try to kill you all the time. Maybe they could even come and help you out once you've earned enough respect.
  • As for the driving. You have a cellphone. Worked pretty well in GTAIV. Whenever the hell you're in the vicinity of a mission, call up the guy or have the guy call you up with a briefing, instead of you having to drive all the way over to his lazy ass all the time. Maybe present you with several missions at once so you get to pick the one closest to you. Also, have the objectives placed more closely together.
  • And if that's not enough, fast travel.

you shouldnt be playing if you need to drive from one side of the map to the other, and instead of being attacked would you like if better if there isnt a soul to be seen for 2 miles and the guard posts are all empty?

Avatar image for lm2f
lm2f

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 lm2f
Member since 2007 • 1272 Posts
which is not even that much driving
Avatar image for bearbones
bearbones

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 bearbones
Member since 2006 • 1332 Posts
I don't hate it, I just don't think it works in a sandbox environment.
Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
which is not even that much drivinglm2f
For every mission, yes it is. You still have to drive from the bus station to the mission as well. Also I did beat Mile High on Veteran.
Avatar image for Droopeh
Droopeh

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Droopeh
Member since 2008 • 638 Posts
Too open world, WTF story, and the sprinting sucked.
Avatar image for krp008
krp008

4341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 krp008
Member since 2006 • 4341 Posts
The map editor is amazing, but the gameplay is not... The controls are too sluggish. If it controlled like H3 or COD4 then it would be a lot better game
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="lm2f"]its worth getting just for the map editiorPanther501
no coop made me not buy it. that game could have been godly if it was given an online coop feature, some variation in difficulty, and some quick save points.

there is something called quick save which lets you save anywhere but yeah coop would have made the game so much better.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?Vandalvideo
but doing the same thing in gta4 is somehow fun? it is just as boring as all the driving round you do in any gta game.
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

you shouldnt be playing if you need to drive from one side of the map to the other, and instead of being attacked would you like if better if there isnt a soul to be seen for 2 miles and the guard posts are all empty?

lm2f

It doesn't matter whether you have to drive from one end of the map to the other or not. No matter what you will be driving a lot and for long distances in Far Cry 2, and it is not fun for the reasons I mentioned and you chose to ignore.

Unlike what you seem to believe, it's not having enemies constantly shoved in your face, or no enemies at all. It is possible to have a middle ground there, other shooters and open world games have proven this. These aren't enemies which you seek out, they come hunting for you, They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead. That is the problem, not that they're there. That and they are not entertaining encounters that spice up the gameplay, they're repetitive annoyances which ruin the pacing and grow increasingly boring and frustrating. The jeep patrols in particular. Outposts can be dealt with differently, but rarely are as you're on your way to somewhere and these things are in the way.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?imprezawrx500


but doing the same thing in gta4 is somehow fun? it is just as boring as all the driving round you do in any gta game.


The physics are more detailed and actually entertaining, as is the environment to drive through, as you need to make active decisions, take corners, shortcuts, dodge vehicles n ****. You don't just put the pedal to the medal and tap left and right every now and then. If you're bored you can always run some poor fool over or powerslide into a wall because the damage system is pretty neat. Also, you're not chased to death unless you want to be, i.e. getting 2+ stars. And then it is actually rather fun to deal with the mess too.

GTAIV would surely be a bit designed like ass too if you had a cop car appearing out of nowhere every three minutes, ramming into you and trying to kill you, shooting out your tyres so you had to stop and steal a new car. And a roadblock once every mile. For no reason whatsoever. And don't give me the "realism, it's a war zone" bs. This is a game. The realism card wouldn't work anyway. I think I mentioned the "you're driving the same jeep as the bloody factions, so why the hell would they fire on sight?" thing somewhere already. Then there's the fact that there is no actual war in this supposed war zone.

Avatar image for metalgear-solid
metalgear-solid

7001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#33 metalgear-solid
Member since 2004 • 7001 Posts
Because it actually was an incredibly boring game?
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Because traveling in that game makes you want to track down the game developers and run them off the road every five minutes?imprezawrx500
but doing the same thing in gta4 is somehow fun? it is just as boring as all the driving round you do in any gta game.

Difference is in GTA4 you drive around what seems like a living breathing word. Far Cry 2's is magnificent to look at, but marred by the patrols, and checkpoints - and the world just feels like a hostile unexplorable one, that is annoying to traverse. Another problem is the vehicles arent that enjoyable to drive around in, compared to GTA. The physics seem a bit odd, and the speed of them has been slowed to cope with the on the fly loading.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#35 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Stalker had a gigantic world, no vehicles, and it still wasn't boring to walk.

Why?

Because GSC have talent. Stalker feels like a game made by true artists that have no idea how to program software, while FC2 feels like a game made by engineers that have no idea how to make something fun.

Avatar image for mlisen
mlisen

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 mlisen
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
FC2 = ACreed with gunsswazidoughman
No that's mirror's edge. Far Cry 2 was fun for the first quarter of even half of the game but then it just kept going with the same mission in different places. Truth is, I never even got to the end.
Avatar image for PokerPirate
PokerPirate

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 PokerPirate
Member since 2009 • 115 Posts
Maybe because it was a far cry from fun
Avatar image for Cooldude224
Cooldude224

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 Cooldude224
Member since 2005 • 3116 Posts

Am I the only one that enjoyed the game?

Avatar image for Nick_75
Nick_75

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Nick_75
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I like it, put a lot of time into the single player. It has some very annoying respawning enemies, and you travel around far to much in cars, but I love sniping people in the long grass and setting fire to crap. Online is ok, could be better, could be worse.

Overall I think it's a very solid 8/10. It has problems but they're not enough to ruin the game, but they shouldn't have been there in the first place, game could have been fantastic without them. The African setting is one of the best game worlds I've ever seen.

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
I don't "hate" it but it was very flawed.
Avatar image for NoCoverNeeded
NoCoverNeeded

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 NoCoverNeeded
Member since 2009 • 66 Posts
i bought it and it was ok. i thought it would be better to be honest. It just gets boring sometimes
Avatar image for RadioGooGoo
RadioGooGoo

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 RadioGooGoo
Member since 2007 • 253 Posts
An extremely boring game. Technically, its sound; but the game isn't much fun. Had to give up after a solid 40 odd minutes
Avatar image for Nick_75
Nick_75

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Nick_75
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
At least he played it for 40 minutes, most gamers trash talk games they have never played. But seriously, 40 minutes isn't enough time to judge anything. Come back when you've played the game. Or don't play it, your call. It's no more boring than other non linear games.
Avatar image for senses_fail_06
senses_fail_06

7033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 senses_fail_06
Member since 2006 • 7033 Posts
That map system was sh-terrible and the game had way to much driving.
Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Syferonik
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts
Single player is awesome playing on HARDCORE (not normal) is realistic and just exploring places is fun. Ohh and weapons in this game are great to
Avatar image for Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Gh0st_Of_0nyx

8992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Member since 2007 • 8992 Posts
I think Far Cry 2 was the worst full game Ive played In a while.