I mean both systems, although different internally are all going for the same goal (besides consumer's money), they want HD games with superior ai and physics that will give games that immersive feel in the coming years that wii queers cannot even hope to have. And wii homos keep saying that "gameplay matters more over graphics", yes, but gameplay involves more than just a gimmiky controller. Try getting a wii to be able to use advances physics simulation like Euphoria which provides realistic body motions and movements that really tires the cpu, but makes it so no two actions gives u the same results like animation does. But remember that its a stress on the cpu that only the ps3 and 360 can handle, thats why the new star wars game coming out is only coming out for those systems (well actually its coming out for all systems but the wii wont have euphoria).In fact look at all the graphically and gameplay intense games coming out for only ps3 and 360, the darkness, gta iv, devil may cry 4, virtua fighter 5, battlefield bad company, unreal tournament 3, etc. Hell, guys who made the unreal 3 engine admitted the wii couldent handle its advanced physics and graphics abilities.
And also the ps3 and 360 (if not for patent laws) could easily adopt the wii controller as their own because the controller is just an input that developers make games for. Just wait 2 years when we see how great a multiplatform game looks for ps3/360 and how bad it looks on wii and how it lacks physics.
And remember that the only reason nintendo didnt sup-up their system is because they dont have the money to make losses like sony and microsoft does. Hell, it used to thrive on being superior technically to other systems, remember nintendo 64 with a 64 bit processor unlike playstation 32 bit one. They would be dead meat if they didnt come up with this gimmick because all u would have left then is crappy graphics. Hell, thats why nintendo doesent really stress the internal power of its system like it used to.
Oh and why is it selling so good? Price point and casual gamers, casual gamers dont care about evolution in games really, they'll just look to get the cheapest system out there to play when their bored. it may have some good first party games, like zelda, and mario, but they would look much better on a ps3. Its also a good party system, when i invite my friends over we may play wii sports but we dont jump around like idiots, we sit on our coaches and play em because u dotn really need to move around alot to play it. But after that and zelda, my wii is just sitting there.
PS3/360 owners have to stop bashing each others systems with stupid comparisons of games, who cares if there are slight difference, they both still look pretty damn good. At least they are trying, unlike nintendo. I dont care if Mass Effect looked a bit crappier than the original screens, it still looks like its the **** compared to a wii title. But i do care if kill zone 2 doesent live up to its trailer, because sony said it was realtime and they lied, so if it doesent deliver what was promised, i will be sorely dissapointed at them.
Oh and any fanboy that says that calls someone else a fanboy for bashing a certain system is also a fanboy who is offended by their system being bashed and only says that to appear to be a neutral party. It becomes apparent when u see a guy calling a ps3 supporter a "silly fanboy" when the guy has a halo 3 sig with a halo avatar. I am not a fanboy of any sorts, im just a wii hater. And the only reason i hate wii is because it didnt even try to compete graphically, but had to resort to gimmicky inputs that will become an apparently weak selling point in the long run.
Log in to comment