Why Didn't X360 Outsell PS3?

  • 138 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MightyMuna
MightyMuna

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MightyMuna
Member since 2008 • 1766 Posts

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War. 

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
It sucked.
Avatar image for chapnzaba
chapnzaba

2302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#3 chapnzaba
Member since 2005 • 2302 Posts
The Playstation brand is still a stronger one worldwide. 360 totally should've smoked PS3, though. But it didn't.
Avatar image for blamix99
blamix99

2685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 blamix99
Member since 2011 • 2685 Posts

in short 

ps3>xbox360

Avatar image for GravityX
GravityX

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GravityX
Member since 2013 • 865 Posts

It lacked a Blu Ray player and Japan.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

Avatar image for reaver-x
reaver-x

2795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 reaver-x
Member since 2005 • 2795 Posts
too much focus on kinect and on the same 3 franchises over and over again. in that time sony concentrated on more games and diversifying its library while MS only cared about the shooter and casual crowd which was good for ppl in the states because americans like guns. but the rest of the world felt alienated which is why they bought PS3
Avatar image for MightyMuna
MightyMuna

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MightyMuna
Member since 2008 • 1766 Posts
It sucked. Badosh
Please stop
Avatar image for BlackShirt20
BlackShirt20

2631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 BlackShirt20
Member since 2005 • 2631 Posts

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War.

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

MightyMuna

Facts?

The PS2 is and was the greatest gaming console. Sony had a huge fanbase. The fanboys waited and didn't buy the 360 until the PS3 was released. The PS3 then sucked and everyone went back to the 360.

Avatar image for MightyMuna
MightyMuna

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MightyMuna
Member since 2008 • 1766 Posts

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

WilliamRLBaker
No way, PS3 is in the lead. If so, Sony would be shouting from the roof. X360 is clearly in the lead but maybe by a mill or two.
Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

Short answer:

Avatar image for nyzma23
nyzma23

1003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 nyzma23
Member since 2013 • 1003 Posts

xbox 360 now in 77 million vs ps3 75-78 million (sony never release actual numbers)

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

It sucked. Badosh

Avatar image for BlackShirt20
BlackShirt20

2631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 BlackShirt20
Member since 2005 • 2631 Posts

xbox 360 now in 77 million vs ps3 75-78 million (sony never release actual numbers)

nyzma23

Xbox 360 is over 78mil, sony wont release its actual PS3 number because they include PS2 sales as part of there estimated 77Mil lol.

Avatar image for olart4618
olart4618

478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 olart4618
Member since 2010 • 478 Posts

Because de Ps2, 

Avatar image for BlessedChill
BlessedChill

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 BlessedChill
Member since 2013 • 697 Posts

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War.

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

BlackShirt20

Facts?

The PS2 is and was the greatest gaming console. Sony had a huge fanbase. The fanboys waited and didn't buy the 360 until the PS3 was released. The PS3 then sucked and everyone went back to the 360.

Lol
Avatar image for BlessedChill
BlessedChill

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BlessedChill
Member since 2013 • 697 Posts

Because de Ps2, 

olart4618
Is that why the Wii sold so much compared to the GameCube? People stop using that excuse most consumers don't have plastic toy loyalty like a lot of people on these forums do.
Avatar image for MightyMuna
MightyMuna

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 MightyMuna
Member since 2008 • 1766 Posts

[QUOTE="nyzma23"]

xbox 360 now in 77 million vs ps3 75-78 million (sony never release actual numbers)

BlackShirt20

Xbox 360 is over 78mil, sony wont release its actual PS3 number because they include PS2 sales as part of there estimated 77Mil lol.

78.2 to be precise
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#19 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Looking at Sony and MS console portfolio, and the hype supporting PS3 in 2005/06, a better question would be: Why didn't PS3 outsell 360 like 4-1?

360 was a great console (especially in the first half of the gen), and sold alot compared to MS's previous console.

Avatar image for Sweenix
Sweenix

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#20 Sweenix
Member since 2013 • 5957 Posts

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War.

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

BlackShirt20

Facts?

 

The PS2 is and was the greatest gaming console. Sony had a huge fanbase. The fanboys waited and didn't buy the 360 until the PS3 was released. The PS3 then sucked and everyone went back to the 360.

Then once it hit 2010, they realized the 360 sucked and switched back to playstation :roll:

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
Because the 360 doesn't sell in Japan.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#22 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Live fee, less nongeneric quality exclusives, hardware issues.

Avatar image for WeepsForFools
WeepsForFools

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 WeepsForFools
Member since 2012 • 793 Posts

Looking at Sony and MS console portfolio, and the hype supporting PS3 in 2005/06, a better question would be: Why didn't PS3 outsell 360 like 4-1?

360 was a great console (especially in the first half of the gen), and sold alot compared to MS's previous console.

PAL360

Was going to say something similar. Cows should be embarrassed they have to try and find some sort of ownage by being "close" to 360 sales, considering the previous gen. 360 became the standard, whether you accept it or not.

 

And just last week there was an article on GS saying the 360 had like a million more than the ps3.. once again cows live in their own world.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7056 Posts

Sony had a much greater brand advantage in gaming worldwide. Also, Sony had existing distribution channels for game and other hardware products in far more countries than MS.

360 was never going to sell in Japan against 2 entrenched homegrown products

RROD was an epic level fiasco that went on and on for years

Sony reacted early with a significant price reduction

Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

WilliamRLBaker

Shut up dude! We know you love Microsoft and the 360! Move on! They only copied SONY!!! Get over it!

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#26 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
PS is a bigger/more popular brand WW than XB. That be the short answer.
Avatar image for happyduds77
happyduds77

1688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 happyduds77
Member since 2012 • 1688 Posts

It had terrible games. And also people wanted to play quality games so they had to by a Playstation 3.

Avatar image for MightyMuna
MightyMuna

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MightyMuna
Member since 2008 • 1766 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Looking at Sony and MS console portfolio, and the hype supporting PS3 in 2005/06, a better question would be: Why didn't PS3 outsell 360 like 4-1?

360 was a great console (especially in the first half of the gen), and sold alot compared to MS's previous console.

WeepsForFools

Was going to say something similar. Cows should be embarrassed they have to try and find some sort of ownage by being "close" to 360 sales, considering the previous gen. 360 became the standard, whether you accept it or not.

 

And just last week there was an article on GS saying the 360 had like a million more than the ps3.. once again cows live in their own world.

Yes. There's no denying that Sony lost literally half of its customers to Microsoft. Hence their different strategy for this upcoming generation. Also, what does this thread have to do with cows, lemmings and other creatures.

 

Going by previous generations, consoles that launched first, usually won. Except for Sega due to its severe financial troubles.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
360 won. The real question is why couldn't sony defeat the 360 despite having more than twice the fanbase and selling in more countries?
Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

WilliamRLBaker

DUDE! You gave God of War 2 a 4.5! Never play a game again! Go look in the mirror cause you need a serious remake!

Avatar image for metal_zombie
metal_zombie

2288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 metal_zombie
Member since 2004 • 2288 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

MasterX666

DUDE! You gave God of War 2 a 4.5! Never play a game again! Go look in the mirror cause you need a serious remake!

Fair and balance score :lol:
Avatar image for stayhigh1
stayhigh1

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 stayhigh1
Member since 2008 • 724 Posts

xbox fanboys got tired of buyin the same console after their old one died on them..

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

MasterX666

Go look in the mirror cause you need a serious remake!

:lol:

Avatar image for blamix99
blamix99

2685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#34 blamix99
Member since 2011 • 2685 Posts

most people get like 2-3 xbox360. bad quality..

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="MightyMuna"][QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]

[QUOTE="nyzma23"] 78.2 to be precise

lol vghchartz.

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

MasterX666

Shut up dude! We know you love Microsoft and the 360! Move on! They only copied SONY!!! Get over it!

lol he doesn't know does he? lol dumbass.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

metal_zombie

DUDE! You gave God of War 2 a 4.5! Never play a game again! Go look in the mirror cause you need a serious remake!

Fair and balance score :lol:

7.0 for god of war 1. I do think its a fair and balanced score, the second game had no reason for development the story had been finished with god of war 1
Avatar image for vpacalypse
vpacalypse

589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 vpacalypse
Member since 2005 • 589 Posts

I think their tied atm.

I don't see why it should concern a normal person anyway.

 

All I know is the ps3 looks, all things considered seems to have been/ is the better investment thus far this gen.

But even if someone did buy the 360 in the past... it's hardly the end of the world or something to fret about.

 

congrats if you bought your ps3, well done... I don't care.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#38 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator  Online
Member since 2004 • 50095 Posts
It hasn't had a price drop in four years... Which is kind of crazy.
Avatar image for Coolyfett
Coolyfett

6277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#39 Coolyfett
Member since 2008 • 6277 Posts

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War. 

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

MightyMuna

R. R. O. D. the only many people actually bought more than one Xbox 360 to replace their first Xbox 360.

Avatar image for asylumni
asylumni

3304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 asylumni
Member since 2003 • 3304 Posts

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

WilliamRLBaker

  Yeah.  It's kinda like how lemmings say the 360 is in the lead without any proof.

 

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War. 

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

Coolyfett

R. R. O. D. the only many people actually bought more than one Xbox 360 to replace their first Xbox 360.

*laughs hard* oh my, morons actually still believe this?
Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="metal_zombie"][QUOTE="MasterX666"]

DUDE! You gave God of War 2 a 4.5! Never play a game again! Go look in the mirror cause you need a serious remake!

WilliamRLBaker

Fair and balance score :lol:

7.0 for god of war 1. I do think its a fair and balanced score, the second game had no reason for development the story had been finished with god of war 1

Your comments are sooooo fking boring i yawn everytime i read one!!

Might i suggest you start going on dating sites cause your so biter it shows how much you lack sex in life! 

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#43 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
The Playstation brand is still a stronger one worldwide. chapnzaba
This. In many countries the 360 and any other Microsoft console is a complete joke.
Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="Coolyfett"]

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War. 

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

WilliamRLBaker

R. R. O. D. the only many people actually bought more than one Xbox 360 to replace their first Xbox 360.

*laughs hard* oh my, morons actually still believe this?

No, morons deny it!!

Avatar image for stayhigh1
stayhigh1

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 stayhigh1
Member since 2008 • 724 Posts
[QUOTE="Coolyfett"]

[QUOTE="MightyMuna"]

Right now they are pretty much tie or the difference between them is miniscule.

I ask this question because in NA X360 launched a year earlier and here in Europe X360 launched 16 months before PS3. But most importantly, when PS3 launched it was £425 and X360 was £209(Core) and £279(Premium). In addition to that, X360 has enjoyed two holiday seasons and had killer titles such as Gears of War. 

 

Therefore, with all these advantages, why didn't it maintain its worldwide lead? I really can't see any reason why. Blu-ray?

WilliamRLBaker

R. R. O. D. the only many people actually bought more than one Xbox 360 to replace their first Xbox 360.

*laughs hard* oh my, morons actually still believe this?

i dont maybe cuz its the truth?? wake up xboner lovers.. http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/08/17/report-xbox-360-failure-rate-reaches-54
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

lol I love how no proof is given they are tied...or that the ps3 sold more which we know is what the TC really wants to say.

asylumni

  Yeah.  It's kinda like how lemmings say the 360 is in the lead without any proof.

 

lol wow yeah because they haven't given the offiical released 360 numbers, as compared to the ps3 numbers where sony included ps2 numbers. *shakes head* moron.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Coolyfett"]R. R. O. D. the only many people actually bought more than one Xbox 360 to replace their first Xbox 360.stayhigh1
*laughs hard* oh my, morons actually still believe this?

i dont maybe cuz its the truth?? wake up xboner lovers.. http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/08/17/report-xbox-360-failure-rate-reaches-54

...lol lol lol its just a regular moron gathering today isn't it?
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

sony goes from 70% market share and the undisputed king of home gaming to less than a 30% share of the market and you call out the 360 for its failure?

really?

:lol:

 

Avatar image for WeepsForFools
WeepsForFools

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 WeepsForFools
Member since 2012 • 793 Posts

most people get like 2-3 xbox360. bad quality..

blamix99
most people bought a ps3 as a cheap bluray player early on.
Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="stayhigh1"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] *laughs hard* oh my, morons actually still believe this?WilliamRLBaker
i dont maybe cuz its the truth?? wake up xboner lovers.. http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/08/17/report-xbox-360-failure-rate-reaches-54

...lol lol lol its just a regular moron gathering today isn't it?

As long as you and your lem friends are here, I GUESS SOOO!!