Why do ps3 fanboys automatically assume...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mephisto_11
mephisto_11

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mephisto_11
Member since 2008 • 1880 Posts

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

Avatar image for d3thm0nkey
d3thm0nkey

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 d3thm0nkey
Member since 2006 • 615 Posts

Young man, what did I tell you about common sense and unbias analysis.

You know it has no place in System Wars.

Now go wash up for the flame war.

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts
Well when you say the 360 is the new ps2 you are wrong it doesnt have enough exclusives since all multiplats usually always also go to the ps3. The reason the ps2 was such a good console was its exclusives. It had the most. But i do agree the PS3 wont surpass the Xbox but i could really care less. I like reliable hardware and thats why i play my ps3 more then the xbox. Plus psn is free and it works just fine for me.
Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15057 Posts

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

Avatar image for Patatopan
Patatopan

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Patatopan
Member since 2008 • 1890 Posts
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

SOedipus

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

No, it makes perfect sense, as in there is a better console out there but xbox 360 is getting all the attention.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

I agree about the console life span. I always see a cow go "well Microsoft's first system lasted only 4 years." and I always say" Well if you wanted a 10 year cycle, then why dont you and your buddies buy the damn console"

Its not that SONY knows nothing about economics, its that they know their fans are not too bright.

Avatar image for zomgwtfbbqlol1
zomgwtfbbqlol1

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 zomgwtfbbqlol1
Member since 2008 • 1226 Posts

#1 360 is not even on track to be nethign near PS2

#2 Sony hasnt sold over 200+ million playstation products out of dumb luck, sony's 1st and 2nd console owned the market they are not going to let the Playstation brand die so fast, my problem is why lemmings always think sony is done for.... honestly its a joke, big American company that makes OS's comes in and suddenly sony is done for... what a joke

#3 only a matter of time b4r PS3 overtakes 360, why may u ask? 1st party games, sony has lost some exclusive 3rd party games, but they are building there 1st party....the thing is they did this on purpose, they could have easily purchased exclusives like MS, but they didnt they clearly know something u dont, and dont argue that bcz im not listening to a fanboy on SW tell me how a billion dollar corporation is failing. again this is not some small company that u'r dealing with this company has been around since 1946.

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

Patatopan

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

No, it makes perfect sense, as in there is a better console out there but xbox 360 is getting all the attention.

yet the wii still outsells it by thousands the wii is the only one that might be the new ps2 in the sales catagory

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
Member since 2005 • 4624 Posts

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. there wil never be another ps2.

mephisto_11

OK, all fixed. Everything else I agree with.

Avatar image for mephisto_11
mephisto_11

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mephisto_11
Member since 2008 • 1880 Posts
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

SOedipus

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15057 Posts
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

Patatopan

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

No, it makes perfect sense, as in there is a better console out there but xbox 360 is getting all the attention.

I don't get it...PS2 wasn't the best console last gen :o ? The 360 isn't the best console this gen :o ? Sir, that is blasphemy.

Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts
The 360, Wii, and PS3 will never be as great as PS2. A low price cut, a few sales, and a little bit of jrpg DOES NOT make 360 the PS2. I hate when people ruin PS2's reputation by comparing it to these crappy 7th gen consoles.
Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15057 Posts
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

Yeah, well the PS2 had both, soooooo....yeah, still not with you on that one.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

I know right but you just gotta let these people think that because it makes System Wars a bit more interesting.

Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

PS2 jrpg>360 jrpg PS2 was never big on rts PS2 was never big on fps PS2 racers>360 racers The 360 ISN'T the PS2. If you think that then go get help.
Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

we really cant say Jrps are better on the 360 due to the ps3 not having any lol. A lot of the Jrpgs on the 360 are not very good except ES and Tales (score wise). Persona 3 on ps2 beats most of the 360's jrpgs (score wise) and thats last gen. Racing is a toss up it depends do you like wipeout and GT or Forza? Action is another toss up ps3 has some great action titles. And "better quality" is not true it really depends what console and games you like more.

Avatar image for SpinoRaptor
SpinoRaptor

2419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SpinoRaptor
Member since 2006 • 2419 Posts

There still isn't a console half as good as the PS2.

Avatar image for mephisto_11
mephisto_11

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 mephisto_11
Member since 2008 • 1880 Posts
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

DeadSpaceXIII

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

PS2 jrpg>360 jrpg PS2 was never big on rts PS2 was never big on fps PS2 racers>360 racers The 360 ISN'T the PS2. If you think that then go get help.

lol i like how instead of putting 360>ps2 for shooters and rts you simply said ps2 wasn't big on them. i didnt even have to expose your bias.

this is the 360's 3rd year the ps2 is on its eighth. all things considered its doing pretty damn well and with time it may even surpass the ps2

Avatar image for d3thm0nkey
d3thm0nkey

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 d3thm0nkey
Member since 2006 • 615 Posts

#1 360 is not even on track to be nethign near PS2

#2 Sony hasnt sold over 200+ million playstation products out of dumb luck, sony's 1st and 2nd console owned the market they are not going to let the Playstation brand die so fast, my problem is why lemmings always think sony is done for.... honestly its a joke, big American company that makes OS's comes in and suddenly sony is done for... what a joke

#3 only a matter of time b4r PS3 overtakes 360, why may u ask? 1st party games, sony has lost some exclusive 3rd party games, but they are building there 1st party....the thing is they did this on purpose, they could have easily purchased exclusives like MS, but they didnt they clearly know something u dont, and dont argue that bcz im not listening to a fanboy on SW tell me how a billion dollar corporation is failing. again this is not some small company that u'r dealing with this company has been around since 1946.

zomgwtfbbqlol1

So when the 360 outsells it by a large margin this XMas (and you know it will) 3 holiday seasons in a row. Next year right.
You could use a little math skills.
Sony has outsold 360 in the months it won this year by aprox 10k a month. That is during the biggest game for PS3 being launched as well.

So your right it should catch it in about 20 years.

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts
I love playing sales this game is the best one out
Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts
For the 360 to be a PS2 it would need the following Final Fantasy, not just one port from PS3 Kingdom Hearts Disgaea Persona Shin Megami Tensei A Jak game A Sly Cooper game A Team Ico game VERY GOOD sales, stop hiding behind Wii's sales. A MUCH bigger library of games. Sure 360 owns PS3 in the library of games department but PS2 owns 360 in that department. The 360 is being an Xbox 360. It nor anything else will never be as great as PS2. Also don't you ever compare 360's jrpg to PS2's. Thats pure fanboyism and ignorance.
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

Avatar image for zomgwtfbbqlol1
zomgwtfbbqlol1

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 zomgwtfbbqlol1
Member since 2008 • 1226 Posts
[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

#1 360 is not even on track to be nethign near PS2

#2 Sony hasnt sold over 200+ million playstation products out of dumb luck, sony's 1st and 2nd console owned the market they are not going to let the Playstation brand die so fast, my problem is why lemmings always think sony is done for.... honestly its a joke, big American company that makes OS's comes in and suddenly sony is done for... what a joke

#3 only a matter of time b4r PS3 overtakes 360, why may u ask? 1st party games, sony has lost some exclusive 3rd party games, but they are building there 1st party....the thing is they did this on purpose, they could have easily purchased exclusives like MS, but they didnt they clearly know something u dont, and dont argue that bcz im not listening to a fanboy on SW tell me how a billion dollar corporation is failing. again this is not some small company that u'r dealing with this company has been around since 1946.

d3thm0nkey

So when the 360 outsells it by a large margin this XMas (and you know it will) 3 holiday seasons in a row. Next year right.
You could use a little math skills.
Sony has outsold 360 in the months it won this year by aprox 10k a month. That is during the biggest game for PS3 being launched as well.

So your right it should catch it in about 20 years.

yea but 360 has had big hits, and for PS3 games like GT5, GOW3 are so big they sell like what gears did for 360, not to mention the fact PS3 has had like 1 hit title MGS4, and games like FFXIII/FFXIII versus, LBP, Killzone 2, Resistance 2. seriously even a game like KZ1 was a flop on PS2, it still sold some million

also PS3 will most likely have price drops, u dont think these through do u?

Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts
[QUOTE="DeadSpaceXIII"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11

Yeah....I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the last point.

if we go by game libraries yes. if sales, its the wii.

jrpgs, wrpgs, rts, action, shooters, racing, all more abundant and better quality on 360. its only missing stealth and platformers which are coming in the form of sc convictions and banjo.

PS2 jrpg>360 jrpg PS2 was never big on rts PS2 was never big on fps PS2 racers>360 racers The 360 ISN'T the PS2. If you think that then go get help.

lol i like how instead of putting 360>ps2 for shooters and rts you simply said ps2 wasn't big on them. i didnt even have to expose your bias.

this is the 360's 3rd year the ps2 is on its eighth. all things considered its doing pretty damn well and with time it may even surpass the ps2

PS2's 3rd year squashed what PsWii60 have right now combined. The 360's third year is a flaming pile of **** compared to PS2's. All i'm hearing out of you is “just wait” 360 will be PS2.
Avatar image for zomgwtfbbqlol1
zomgwtfbbqlol1

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 zomgwtfbbqlol1
Member since 2008 • 1226 Posts

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

ReverseCycology
u forgot the *sarcasm*
Avatar image for mephisto_11
mephisto_11

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 mephisto_11
Member since 2008 • 1880 Posts

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

ReverseCycology

i agree but you better get your flame shield.

there were some gems on the ps2 like gow1+2, sotc, twisted metal, gta3 but this gen is simply a level above what the ps2 offered.

Avatar image for zomgwtfbbqlol1
zomgwtfbbqlol1

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 zomgwtfbbqlol1
Member since 2008 • 1226 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

mephisto_11

i agree but you better get your flame shield.

there were some gems on the ps2 like gow1+2, sotc, twisted metal, gta3 but this gen is simply a level above what the ps2 offered.

failure....
Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts
You'd have to be the biggest of all fanboys if you think 360 is better then PS2 or will be better then PS2. The 360 is nothing but a failed attempt at being the PS2 with less games and added features.
Avatar image for Sushimaster
Sushimaster

2671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 Sushimaster
Member since 2003 • 2671 Posts

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11
:lol:

so true!! :D

the 360 as a re-tooling of last gen

:P

Avatar image for zomgwtfbbqlol1
zomgwtfbbqlol1

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 zomgwtfbbqlol1
Member since 2008 • 1226 Posts
You'd have to be the biggest of all fanboys if you think 360 is better then PS2 or will be better then PS2. The 360 is nothing but a failed attempt at being the PS2 with less games and added features.DeadSpaceXIII
ignore them no point in arguing wiht sum1 who thinks 360 wiht 2 big hits halo and gears is better than PS2 with its hits, heck even Killzone 1 (EPIC FLOP) sold 2 million copies
Avatar image for mephisto_11
mephisto_11

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 mephisto_11
Member since 2008 • 1880 Posts

You'd have to be the biggest of all fanboys if you think 360 is better then PS2 or will be better then PS2. The 360 is nothing but a failed attempt at being the PS2 with less games and added features.DeadSpaceXIII

na you're a fanboy for assuming that there's no possibility that it will. like you worship the ps2 and see it as infallible. the 360 is still very young compared to the ps2 and has a lot of AAA games.

Avatar image for FragTycoon
FragTycoon

6430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 FragTycoon
Member since 2008 • 6430 Posts
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

zomgwtfbbqlol1

i agree but you better get your flame shield.

there were some gems on the ps2 like gow1+2, sotc, twisted metal, gta3 but this gen is simply a level above what the ps2 offered.

failure....

I expect the fanboy comments from these two but this is a whole new level of....

Avatar image for DeadSpaceXIII
DeadSpaceXIII

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DeadSpaceXIII
Member since 2008 • 363 Posts

that because sony won the last 2 gens, that its only a matter of time before they win this one as if sony is simply entitled to win. look at the "10 year cycle" bullcrap they're spewing for example. apparently sony needs to take basic economics courses because market determines demand and product lifecycle, not you sony. the price is too high, the game selection is somewhat sparse and we're heading towards a recession. sony is clearly losing this gen and won't be catching up to the 360 or wii anytime soon.

not saying the ps3 is a bad system or a failure. it will probably break even and possibly make them money but to assume that its going to close the 5.5 million lead gap in a year or two despite the 360's price drop and stellar yearly lineups is absurd. this is just in response to all the "when is ps3 going to surpass the 360" threads.

times change. the 360 is the new ps2.

mephisto_11
Why do lems automatically assume that 360 has this gen in the beg because of a price cut and stealing exclusives? You can't say the 10 year cycle is crap, you comeback and call it crap when it ends. Unless you can see the future. The PS3 can always get a price cut and obtain new exclusives to replace the ones that went multi The price may be high but Sony is still making a profit now. Mind you the PS3 always had a higher price then 360 yet it managed to beat 360 overall in 2007 and it beat 360 for more then half of 2008 with the higher price. Again stop hiding behind Wii's sales. PS3 has already closed the gap in half in just 2 years. Maybe it can do it again. You're acting as if PS3 will never get a price cut and the sales will stay the same forever. Your thread is talking about cows automatically assuming the PS3 will win because its Sony. Yet you're being a hypocrite because you're assuming the 360 will win and be the next PS2. This gen isn't even over. You're as bad as the people you're talking about dude =/
Avatar image for MrSlippery39
MrSlippery39

730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 MrSlippery39
Member since 2004 • 730 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

To be honest, the 360 is better than the PS2.

zomgwtfbbqlol1

u forgot the *sarcasm*

I liked Gamecube better than both :/