Why do some people act like it impossible to like both GTA and Saints Row or

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

...see them as seperate games.

You can never go into a Saints row thread, without someone bringing up GTA. Even when they do it just to criticise GTA, it is still dumb. I went into a lot of SR2 threads attempting to get a point across that, they are two different franchises that should be looked at as so. It is like when people are talking about a console, and then someone bursts into a thread to talk about the PC. All it does is derail people from the topic at hand.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Never got into SR. But the next one looks awesome! I find the comments about the ones being first silly too. Or copied or it's not original because someone else has done it before. It's just trash.

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

i stop caring about what people think or do along time ago

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Never got into SR. But the next one looks awesome! I find the comments about the ones being first silly too. Or copied or it's not original because someone else has done it before. It's just trash.

LOXO7

Sorry maybe i'm haveing trouble interpreting your post, were you caalling the first game trash or the comments about it trash.

Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

Slow , Steady, and Open World Gameplay vs Fast, Rough, and Slightly Smaller World.
Its a matter of preference. I love SR2 , and a scene in the game made me sadder than both endings of GTA4. Doesnt mean GTA is in no way a bad game though.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

i stop caring about what people think or do along time ago

Chris_Williams

Brilliant and with most games I do the same. But a certain few(viewtiful joe, Metroid, kirby, Golden Sun) I can not help myself :P

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Slow , Steady, and Open World Gameplay vs Fast, Rough, and Slightly Smaller World.
Its a matter of preference. I love SR2 , and a scene in the game made me sadder than both endings of GTA4. Doesnt mean GTA is in no way a bad game though.

TrapJak

Agreed, also I really do not get why people say SR has no depth. The scene in SR2 that you are talking about was pretty heart wrenching.

Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

[QUOTE="TrapJak"]

Slow , Steady, and Open World Gameplay vs Fast, Rough, and Slightly Smaller World.
Its a matter of preference. I love SR2 , and a scene in the game made me sadder than both endings of GTA4. Doesnt mean GTA is in no way a bad game though.

Mercenary848

Agreed, also I really do not get why people say SR has no depth. The scene in SR2 where you had to mercy kill one of your best men was pretty heart wrenching.

Spoilers brah.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Sorry I edited it, I figured it was one of those things everyone knew, like Obi Wan dies.

Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
^^ Another Spoiler!
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
^^ Another Spoiler!dramaybaz
A long time ago in a galaxy far far away. I guess it is a spoiler if someones 'long time' is 20 years.
Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

It is the same with battlefield 3 and COD.

Poople think that COD and GTA4 are so bad(which they aren't) that they will love and defend and hype battlefield and Saint's row til the end of time. Then realize that the games are a bit of a let down. I personally think GTA is much better that saints row, but I really don't care to be honest.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

I liked the first game well enough, I thought the second gsme wasn't all that great, the 3rd looks insane, in a good way.

You can't copy a game's format and not expect to be compraed to it, unfortunately. I think GTA has better production values, but I also think that SR is being smart by going in another direction and finding it's own identity.

Avatar image for famunda666
famunda666

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 famunda666
Member since 2010 • 167 Posts

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out classes it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out clas-ses it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

famunda666

That's clas-sy alright!:

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out classes it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

famunda666

My problem with Saint's Row against GTA is I always got the feeling that Saints Row always tries too hard to be over the top and doesn't have the skillset to pull of the subtle things that GTA has effortlessly (or at least they make it look that way) pulled off. The reason doing all the crazy stuff in the GTA games was so cool was because the place that you were doing it in was kind of awesome. The cities in the GTA games are as much a character as Nico Bellic or Tommy Vercetti.

Saints Row is nowhere near what any of the GTA games were. It's fun but it's missing a lot of what makes a GTA game a GTA game...PERSONALITY.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
A crime game is best when it's heavily story driven. SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. SR is neat in it's own way. But it shouldn't be placed in the category of crime dramas.
Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#20 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

My most anticipated game this year is Saints Row The Third. My most anticipated game of next year is Grand Theft Auto V(yes I'm aware the game hasn't actually been announced. It just seems like a logical release date). Yeah, I really don't get why people act like there can only be one game of its type. It's possible to like both. It's ridiculous. SR and GTA aren't the only games to suffer from this. Remember the whole Infamous/Prototype thing? Both games were NOTHING alike. They both had super powers of some sort in an open world, and because of that one similarity people always acted like it was war between the two and you could only like one of the games. It's stupid. Just like the whole BF3 vs MW3 thing that's going on right now. People act like you have to pick one. It's kinda dumb bit there you go. You've just gotta ignore these things and if you happen to like both, play both.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

I liked the first game well enough, I thought the second gsme wasn't all that great, the 3rd looks insane, in a good way.

You can't copy a game's format and not expect to be compraed to it, unfortunately. I think GTA has better production values, but I also think that SR is being smart by going in another direction and finding it's own identity.

heretrix

Thats the thing Saints Row never copied GTAs format. If the first one did that it would have had bikes, and boats, and planes. SR was originally in production for the original xbox right before San andreas came out. That is why in the early saints row screens the main gang wore green, they decided to change that so people would not think they were ripping San andreas.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out classes it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

heretrix

My problem with Saint's Row against GTA is I always got the feeling that Saints Row always tries too hard to be over the top and doesn't have the skillset to pull of the subtle things that GTA has effortlessly (or at least they make it look that way) pulled off. The reason doing all the crazy stuff in the GTA games was so cool was because the place that you were doing it in was kind of awesome. The cities in the GTA games are as much a character as Nico Bellic or Tommy Vercetti.

Saints Row is nowhere near what any of the GTA games were. It's fun but it's missing a lot of what makes a GTA game a GTA game...PERSONALITY.

See thats where YOU are doing it wrong. Why should Saints Row have GTAs personality and sudlty when it is not GTA or subtle.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

A crime game is best when it's heavily story driven. SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. SR is neat in it's own way. But it shouldn't be placed in the category of crime dramas.LOXO7

Exactly it is more hyper-reality like the movies sin city and shoot'em up, the visuals and actions and general over the top personality of the characters are what matter and what the creators strive for. It is like comparing MGS to Splinter Cell. MGS has a great story and depth, but is hyper real and over the top. SP is extremly serious and tries to put you in the real world.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out classes it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

Mercenary848

My problem with Saint's Row against GTA is I always got the feeling that Saints Row always tries too hard to be over the top and doesn't have the skillset to pull of the subtle things that GTA has effortlessly (or at least they make it look that way) pulled off. The reason doing all the crazy stuff in the GTA games was so cool was because the place that you were doing it in was kind of awesome. The cities in the GTA games are as much a character as Nico Bellic or Tommy Vercetti.

Saints Row is nowhere near what any of the GTA games were. It's fun but it's missing a lot of what makes a GTA game a GTA game...PERSONALITY.

See thats where YOU are doing it wrong. Why should Saints Row have GTAs personality and sudlty when it is not GTA or subtle.

I never said it should copy GTAs personality. I said it doesn't have as good a personailty as GTAs. Big difference.

The cities or the characters that inhibit the Saint's Row games aren't nearly as interesting or as well realized as the cities and characters in the GTA games..

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

I hate SR2 with a passion, and love GTA4 quite alot. I don't know many people who like both.

That being said, I think SR3 looks pretty fun and awesome. The gameplay and graphics looks pretty damn good.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

I liked the first game well enough, I thought the second gsme wasn't all that great, the 3rd looks insane, in a good way.

You can't copy a game's format and not expect to be compraed to it, unfortunately. I think GTA has better production values, but I also think that SR is being smart by going in another direction and finding it's own identity.

Mercenary848

Thats the thing Saints Row never copied GTAs format. If the first one did that it would have had bikes, and boats, and planes. SR was originally in production for the original xbox right before San andreas came out. That is why in the early saints row screens the main gang wore green, they decided to change that so people would not think they were ripping San andreas.

Hmmm. Open world crime games. looks like the EXACT same format.

Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#27 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. LOXO7
You know, that's the one thing I don't like about the SR series and I seriously hope they've improved that with the third. Somehow I doubt it though. The thing I love about GTA is that when I go on rampages, I get punished for it. The cops are a real threat and it adds a whole awesome addition to gameplay. Saints Row doesn't have the GTA how long can I survive thing. The cops aren't a threat at all in the SR games. I really hope they've changed that with SR3 and make it so that cop chases can actually be exciting. It's the one thing holding the series back imo.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

I liked the first game well enough, I thought the second gsme wasn't all that great, the 3rd looks insane, in a good way.

You can't copy a game's format and not expect to be compraed to it, unfortunately. I think GTA has better production values, but I also think that SR is being smart by going in another direction and finding it's own identity.

heretrix

Thats the thing Saints Row never copied GTAs format. If the first one did that it would have had bikes, and boats, and planes. SR was originally in production for the original xbox right before San andreas came out. That is why in the early saints row screens the main gang wore green, they decided to change that so people would not think they were ripping San andreas.

Hmmm. Open world crime games. looks like the EXACT same format.

That is another flawed mindset, people make it seem as if GTA owns the open world genre. Not to mention they play differently. For now on I will go into every Halo thread and say this is a DOOM rip.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. burgeg

You know, that's the one thing I don't like about the SR series and I seriously hope they've improved that with the third. Somehow I doubt it though. The thing I love about GTA is that when I go on rampages, I get punished for it. The cops are a real threat and it adds a whole awesome addition to gameplay. Saints Row doesn't have the GTA how long can I survive thing. The cops aren't a threat at all in the SR games. I really hope they've changed that with SR3 and make it so that cop chases can actually be exciting. It's the one thing holding the series back imo.

I dont know if you have high notiriety the cops will seriosly come after you. The shooting has always been better in Saints row so it is easier to kill them. Not to mention in the missions in SR you are mostly swarmed by bad guys, so being swarmed by cops wont be a surprise.

Avatar image for rybe1025
rybe1025

6362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 rybe1025
Member since 2004 • 6362 Posts

[QUOTE="15strong"]

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

I used to like both. Actually really liked the GTA 4 expansions way better than the main game it self. The main game in GTA 4 was butchered in favor of a shorter more serious yet casual experience, as where SR is what GTA used to be, over the top fun! Awesome customization etc. I agree they are 2 different games these days but GTA used to be what Saints Row is today.

Saints Row brings back fond memories of playing GTA San Andreas and the games before that. GTA 4 just went in the wrong Direction for a lot of people in my opinion. its ok to like both, a lot of us just don't. A lot of people like the more serious tones of GTA 4 too and hate Saints row and view it as a GTA abortion.

For me it is impossible to like both anymore, Saints Row has improved so vastly on what I feel GTA should be that there is just no reason to own GTA anymore. I believe Saints Row out clas-ses it in every way. A crime game should be fun over the top crazyness, For me if i want serious story driven play I will play Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or the mass effect series. Just my thoughts on it.

famunda666

That's clas-sy alright!:

Yup sure is! Some times a ho needs to be slapped!

This man knows the truth

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#31 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

People like what they like. I love GTA games and DESPISE Saint's Row games.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

People like what they like. I love GTA games and DESPISE Saint's Row games.

Bigboi500

I agree and people are entitled to their opinion.

Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#33 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. Mercenary848

You know, that's the one thing I don't like about the SR series and I seriously hope they've improved that with the third. Somehow I doubt it though. The thing I love about GTA is that when I go on rampages, I get punished for it. The cops are a real threat and it adds a whole awesome addition to gameplay. Saints Row doesn't have the GTA how long can I survive thing. The cops aren't a threat at all in the SR games. I really hope they've changed that with SR3 and make it so that cop chases can actually be exciting. It's the one thing holding the series back imo.

I dont know if you have high notiriety the cops will seriosly come after you. The shooting has always been better in Saints row so it is easier to kill them. Not to mention in the missions in SR you are mostly swarmed by bad guys, so being swarmed by cops wont be a surprise.

Well I think the simple fact you have regenerating health plays a large part in the fact I almost never die in Saints Row. Just don't get shot for a few seconds and I'm back to full health. It also helps that in SR2 your helth even gets upgraded so your health recovers even quicker. Plus you can use health items! In GTA, if you get shot it matters. Your health doesn't automatically recover and there aren't many places to recover your health, especially when crazy stuff is going down on the higher wanted levels. I never feel threatened in SR by the cops. Considering how generous the game is with health, cops aren't anywhere near crazy enough to be considered a threat even on the highest wanted level. When I get a wanted level in GTA, I care.When I get a wanted level in SR I jusu carry on as normal.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

[QUOTE="burgeg"]You know, that's the one thing I don't like about the SR series and I seriously hope they've improved that with the third. Somehow I doubt it though. The thing I love about GTA is that when I go on rampages, I get punished for it. The cops are a real threat and it adds a whole awesome addition to gameplay. Saints Row doesn't have the GTA how long can I survive thing. The cops aren't a threat at all in the SR games. I really hope they've changed that with SR3 and make it so that cop chases can actually be exciting. It's the one thing holding the series back imo.

burgeg

I dont know if you have high notiriety the cops will seriosly come after you. The shooting has always been better in Saints row so it is easier to kill them. Not to mention in the missions in SR you are mostly swarmed by bad guys, so being swarmed by cops wont be a surprise.

Well I think the simple fact you have regenerating health plays a large part in the fact I almost never die in Saints Row. Just don't get shot for a few seconds and I'm back to full health. It also helps that in SR2 your helth even gets upgraded so your health recovers even quicker. Plus you can use health items! In GTA, if you get shot it matters. Your health doesn't automatically recover and there aren't many places to recover your health, especially when crazy stuff is going down on the higher wanted levels. I never feel threatened in SR by the cops. Considering how generous the game is with health, cops aren't anywhere near crazy enough to be considered a threat even on the highest wanted level. When I get a wanted level in GTA, I care.When I get a wanted level in SR I jusu carry on as normal.

I hear what your saying, in SR you are basically a tank.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] SR isn't really crime because there is no punishment with the actions. burgeg

You know, that's the one thing I don't like about the SR series and I seriously hope they've improved that with the third. Somehow I doubt it though. The thing I love about GTA is that when I go on rampages, I get punished for it. The cops are a real threat and it adds a whole awesome addition to gameplay. Saints Row doesn't have the GTA how long can I survive thing. The cops aren't a threat at all in the SR games. I really hope they've changed that with SR3 and make it so that cop chases can actually be exciting. It's the one thing holding the series back imo.

What I would like to see is that if the police would actually perform chases in these games. There are scenarios where you see a fat cop running after a civilian in GTAIV but there are no police car chases. In GTA:SA when you hit a police car with your car the sirens go off. But then I try to bash another car into a police car nothing happens. What the?! In the first level of The Godfather... [spoiler] there is a police car chase going down the street, but that's more of a welcome to New York City in 1945 thing than it actually happening all of the time. [/spoiler] They are improving...slowly.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

Thats the thing Saints Row never copied GTAs format. If the first one did that it would have had bikes, and boats, and planes. SR was originally in production for the original xbox right before San andreas came out. That is why in the early saints row screens the main gang wore green, they decided to change that so people would not think they were ripping San andreas.

Mercenary848

Hmmm. Open world crime games. looks like the EXACT same format.

That is another flawed mindset, people make it seem as if GTA owns the open world genre. Not to mention they play differently. For now on I will go into every Halo thread and say this is a DOOM rip.

If you think Saint's Row was not influenced by GTA, I got a bridge in Staunton Island to sell you. Of course they copied the format.Just like True Crime and every other failure that tried to emulate GTA's success.

Copying GTA isn't a necessarily a bad thing, SR just doesn't pull it off as well imo. If you want to go into other threads and make ridiculous arguments because of what I'm saying in this thread, be my guest.

Avatar image for Ikouze
Ikouze

2027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Ikouze
Member since 2009 • 2027 Posts

I think both are great games. GTA has better story elements but Saints Row's gameplay is more fun.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]Hmmm. Open world crime games. looks like the EXACT same format.

heretrix

That is another flawed mindset, people make it seem as if GTA owns the open world genre. Not to mention they play differently. For now on I will go into every Halo thread and say this is a DOOM rip.

If you think Saint's Row was not influenced by GTA, I got a bridge in Staunton Island to sell you. Of course they copied the format.Just like True Crime and every other failure that tried to emulate GTA's success.

Copying GTA isn't a necessarily a bad thing, SR just doesn't pull it off as well imo. If you want to go into other threads and make ridiculous arguments because of what I'm saying in this thread, be my guest.

First calm it down a notch, its just a disscusion.

Second, of course it was influenced by GTA, but that does not mean it was trying to be the same game. And you have a serious issue with stating your opinion as fact, just because you do not like the game does not mean it was a failure. True Crime was a rushed lame glitchfest put out by weak devs. Volition actually takes time to freaking work on their games and make them playable. Again apart from being influended in open world mission based mechanics, I am still not seeing how SR is a complete copy of GTa or trying to copy its style.

The first one is an xbox game that had to be moved to 360. The 2nd one had a completly different feel then any GTA I have played, honestly it fely more like a relaxed version of mercenaries.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

Seriously, I didn't like SR2... but SR3 looks awesome!

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

That is another flawed mindset, people make it seem as if GTA owns the open world genre. Not to mention they play differently. For now on I will go into every Halo thread and say this is a DOOM rip.

Mercenary848

If you think Saint's Row was not influenced by GTA, I got a bridge in Staunton Island to sell you. Of course they copied the format.Just like True Crime and every other failure that tried to emulate GTA's success.

Copying GTA isn't a necessarily a bad thing, SR just doesn't pull it off as well imo. If you want to go into other threads and make ridiculous arguments because of what I'm saying in this thread, be my guest.

First calm it down a notch, its just a disscusion.

Second, of course it was influenced by GTA, but that does not mean it was trying to be the same game. And you have a serious issue with stating your opinion as fact, just because you do not like the game does not mean it was a failure. True Crime was a rushed lame glitchfest put out by weak devs. Volition actually takes time to freaking work on their games and make them playable. Again apart from being influended in open world mission based mechanics, I am still not seeing how SR is a complete copy of GTa or trying to copy its style.

The first one is an xbox game that had to be moved to 360. The 2nd one had a completly different feel then any GTA I have played, honestly it fely more like a relaxed version of mercenaries.

First of all, I'm not being hyper. Secondly, I never said I didn't like SR as a series, I just said it wasn't as good as GTA to me.Third, I never said SR was trying to be GTA, I clearly stated that they copied the format and tweaked it.

You were the one that stated you were going to go into another thread and claim Halo ripped off Doom. Don't say silly things if you don't want to be called out on them as being silly. So who really needs to calm down here? You seem to be reading into my comments about SR as me disliking the game instead of what they are,my personal criticisms. I never stated them as fact.

"SR just doesn't pull it off as well IMO"

That doesn't look like me stating my opinon as fact, It just looks like you are reading what you want to.If you really want to have a discussion, try having one about things that are actually stated instead of your interpetation of what was stated.

Avatar image for berserker2389
berserker2389

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 berserker2389
Member since 2010 • 4627 Posts
I loved the first saints row, hated the second one, and hyped for the third one.
Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

Sorry I edited it, I figured it was one of those things everyone knew, like Obi Wan dies.

Mercenary848
Well i knew Darth Vader dies. thanks...:)
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#43 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38062 Posts
Our society is obsessed with "best" in anything. So people seem to want to prove there preferences are what's best. I look at games like I do ice cream....i like one flavor best but still enjoy others. What is the point of caring about which is better or the original if you can have fun with either?
Avatar image for EliteM0nk3y
EliteM0nk3y

3382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 EliteM0nk3y
Member since 2010 • 3382 Posts

Slow , Steady, and Open World Gameplay vs Fast, Rough, and Slightly Smaller World.
Its a matter of preference. I love SR2 , and a scene in the game made me sadder than both endings of GTA4. Doesnt mean GTA is in no way a bad game though.

TrapJak

Mind me asking what scene that was?

Anyways, I got into Saints Row 2 really quickly. I have never liked any of the GTA games, they always seemed boring to me.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#45 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Our society is obsessed with "best" in anything. So people seem to want to prove there preferences are what's best. I look at games like I do ice cream....i like one flavor best but still enjoy others. What is the point of caring about which is better or the original if you can have fun with either?cainetao11
Well you can agree both can be good, but there are things you like more about one than you do the other. I enjoy the gameplay of Saints Row just as much as I do GTA but I think the overall experience of GTA is better to me.

My problem with all of this is you can't have a resonable conversation about it without soemone branding you a hater.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25264 Posts

I liked GTA, but GTA4 put me off from the series for good. I didnt play SR1 but with Gentlement of the Row SR2 became one of the most fun games I have played in a long while. Looking forward to SR3 and if they can fix the awful, repetitive mission design, I will look forward to GTA5 as well.

GTA4 was a good game ruined by one massive flaw, the mission design.

Avatar image for berserker2389
berserker2389

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 berserker2389
Member since 2010 • 4627 Posts

I liked GTA, but GTA4 put me off from the series for good. I didnt play SR1 but with Gentlement of the Row SR2 became one of the most fun games I have played in a long while. Looking forward to SR3 and if they can fix the awful mission design, I will look forward to GTA5 as well.

GTA4 was a good game ruined by one massive flaw, the mission design.

Maroxad
You should play sr1 it's awesome :)
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25264 Posts

[QUOTE="Maroxad"]

I liked GTA, but GTA4 put me off from the series for good. I didnt play SR1 but with Gentlement of the Row SR2 became one of the most fun games I have played in a long while. Looking forward to SR3 and if they can fix the awful mission design, I will look forward to GTA5 as well.

GTA4 was a good game ruined by one massive flaw, the mission design.

berserker2389

You should play sr1 it's awesome :)

After playing SR2, with the Gentlemen of the Row mod. I wanted to, but I dont have a xbox 360 anymore. :(

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#49 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

I like Saints Row, but I don't love it. The game lacks the polish of the current GTA games, while the story, graphics, depth and mechanics all don't work as well.

That said, I love both games. One more then the other (GTA IV more then Saints Row), but SR is still a blast. Its hard to understand why GTA gets the hate, its damn near perfect (or at least was when it came out), and I can't wait for GTA V.

Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

I like Saints Row, but I don't love it. The game lacks the polish of the current GTA games, while the story, graphics, depth and mechanics all don't work as well.

That said, I love both games. One more then the other (GTA IV more then Saints Row), but SR is still a blast. Its hard to understand why GTA gets the hate, its damn near perfect (or at least was when it came out), and I can't wait for GTA V.

SPYDER0416

You couldn't punch people in the balls or run around in a thong. That's what people consider fun these days.