Why do you pay online for Xbox 360 and not PS3

  • 158 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vulcan786
Vulcan786

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Vulcan786
Member since 2007 • 162 Posts
I have a PS3 and was really wonderin why the hell microsoft make their customers pay for playing online as a pose to Sony letting them play for free ?? its very confusing ...
Avatar image for Englando_IV
Englando_IV

4334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Englando_IV
Member since 2008 • 4334 Posts
Because Xbox Live is a much better service. You get what you pay for.
Avatar image for shaggygrosser
shaggygrosser

5871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 shaggygrosser
Member since 2003 • 5871 Posts
Because MS loves the steady inflow of cash.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Because they thought of it first?

Avatar image for trakem
trakem

3859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 trakem
Member since 2002 • 3859 Posts
Because Microsoft is milking their customers.
Avatar image for trakem
trakem

3859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 trakem
Member since 2002 • 3859 Posts

Because they thought of it first?

Riverwolf007

I don't think Microsoft is the first ever to think of charging for things that are normaly free.

Avatar image for dabear
dabear

9454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 dabear
Member since 2002 • 9454 Posts

Because Xbox Live is a much better service. You get what you pay for.Englando_IV

Yup. XBL is a lot better, and a lot more than ust "playing online".

Avatar image for blitzkid1
blitzkid1

3952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 blitzkid1
Member since 2008 • 3952 Posts

Because Microsoft is milking their customers.trakem

I agree, and i own a 360, they charge an arm and a leg for eveything on thier console.

Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#9 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar bills
Avatar image for pro-nathan-07
pro-nathan-07

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 pro-nathan-07
Member since 2007 • 1591 Posts
to make money :|
Avatar image for 360-ps3-wii-pc
360-ps3-wii-pc

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 360-ps3-wii-pc
Member since 2008 • 440 Posts
:idea: how about you read the 100,000 other simular post like this one?
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
I own both, I rarely play ps3 or psn, but im constantly on 360 and xbox live it really shows that you get what you pay for.

But then again i got my ps3 for free as well i won it some time ago, and really i've not really played it i played resistance, and a couple of other games, mgs 4 most recently but as fot that i dont play it much.
Avatar image for LoveMD
LoveMD

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LoveMD
Member since 2006 • 57 Posts
If MS was smart they'd charge more for their games, seems people are glad to pay extra without incident. All kidding aside, I have heard xbox live is better than PSN.....whether that amounts to $50 a year better I dont know, heard they have plenty of lag going on.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
For me it's cause it allows me to play Halo and Gears online. If I didn't pay then I wouldn't be able to play them online.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

Because they thought of it first?

trakem

I don't think Microsoft is the first ever to think of charging for things that are normaly free.

Well no kidding since I have a bottled water in front of me but I'm mainly thinking if Sony could have beat them to this and charged and made a pile of money from it we all know they would have done it.
Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts
Apparantly 360 is better for online play, everyone has headsets so you can trash talk all you like and hear others doing as much so too. Yep better service. 360 owners really got to stop making excuses and force Microsoft to make XBL free or alteast reduce the price becasue I don't think it's justified. PSN is just as great for online play and I experience no lag what so ever, the service is also getting better with FW updates every month or 2 while XBL gets it like once a year. PSN is catching up if not already there so saying XBL is much better doesn't hold ground anymore.
Avatar image for PvtGump8
PvtGump8

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 PvtGump8
Member since 2005 • 739 Posts
Because people are silly enough to pay.
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#19 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsheretrix

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

Avatar image for FunkyHeadHunter
FunkyHeadHunter

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 FunkyHeadHunter
Member since 2007 • 1758 Posts

MS hires people to work on LIVE. MS gets all the content for LIVE. MS keeps the servers up and running with updates ever so often. Therefore, MS should get paid for their work.

I think SONY is great for offering an online service for free. Thats great. But does SONY have the right to charge for online? Sure..BUT..Its not going to go over as well, since its been free for years now. So that would be more wrong in my eyes then MS charging for LIVE. jmho

Avatar image for knight-k
knight-k

2596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 knight-k
Member since 2005 • 2596 Posts

Because MS likes to rip you of.

No really there's no good reason why you should pay MS for online...it's free on pc,...

Just want your (easy) money.

Avatar image for shaggygrosser
shaggygrosser

5871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 shaggygrosser
Member since 2003 • 5871 Posts

Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

**facepalm**

Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#24 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
[QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsst1ka

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

I'm aware that Sony's products are expensive, but they don't try to rip you off every chance they get

Avatar image for Albanian_Killa
Albanian_Killa

1685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Albanian_Killa
Member since 2007 • 1685 Posts

Because Xbox Live is a much better service. You get what you pay for.Englando_IV

Just so you know, you're not paying for full features or anything, you're paying for online gaming and getting content on the MarketPlace 1 week earlier. Congrats on getting ripped off. You bought into all of M$'s BS

Avatar image for Albanian_Killa
Albanian_Killa

1685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Albanian_Killa
Member since 2007 • 1685 Posts
[QUOTE="st1ka"][QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

I'm aware that Sony's products are expensive, but they don't try to rip you off every chance they get

Exactly, there's a difference between ripping off and trying to sell a product. All companies try to sell a product. However, some even go as far to rip their own customers off. The PS3 is the price of crappy Blu-Ray players out now, except it's the best at Blu-Ray, and can also play games, and other multimedia functions. Don't forget Sony's keeping the price as low as possible while loosing money. Live Gold is a rip off. Paying for online is the stupidest thing ever. I laughed when M$ tried bringing it to PC too :lol:

Avatar image for redneckdouglas
redneckdouglas

2977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 redneckdouglas
Member since 2005 • 2977 Posts
It should be free. All those useless functions can be removed for all I care.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Hey everybody I don't pay for free stuff, except electricity and water and heat and petrolium products and metals and minerals and plants and animals that I eat. Nope I don't pay for anything that can be found elsewhere for free!!!

Lol, you guys seriously crack me up what with not understanding how the entire world works.

Seriously folks anyone here that pays a sewer charge technically pays to go to the bathroom. How can any group of people be this disconnected from reality?

Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts

Because Xbox Live is a much better service. You get what you pay for.Englando_IV

You speak the truth!

Avatar image for Albanian_Killa
Albanian_Killa

1685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Albanian_Killa
Member since 2007 • 1685 Posts

It should be free. All those useless functions can be removed for all I care.redneckdouglas

Those useless functions are free to Silver users though. Gold users get to access online gaming, which is free for any other platform.

Avatar image for dabear
dabear

9454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 dabear
Member since 2002 • 9454 Posts

Apparantly 360 is better for online play, everyone has headsets so you can trash talk all you like and hear others doing as much so too. Yep better service. 360 owners really got to stop making excuses and force Microsoft to make XBL free or alteast reduce the price becasue I don't think it's justified. PSN is just as great for online play and I experience no lag what so ever, the service is also getting better with FW updates every month or 2 while XBL gets it like once a year. PSN is catching up if not already there so saying XBL is much better doesn't hold ground anymore. Swift_Boss_A

See, you don't know what you are missing, and it's not the trash talk. You use the voice communication to talk to your teammates. I couldn't imagine playing Gears, Halo 3, ET:QW, CoD4, or BF:BC without coordinating strategies with my teammates.

Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#33 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
[QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="st1ka"][QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAlbanian_Killa

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

I'm aware that Sony's products are expensive, but they don't try to rip you off every chance they get

Exactly, there's a difference between ripping off and trying to sell a product. All companies try to sell a product. However, some even go as far to rip their own customers off. The PS3 is the price of crappy Blu-Ray players out now, except it's the best at Blu-Ray, and can also play games, and other multimedia functions. Don't forget Sony's keeping the price as low as possible while loosing money. Live Gold is a rip off. Paying for online is the stupidest thing ever. I laughed when M$ tried bringing it to PC too :lol:

Thank you, finally someone who agrees

Avatar image for Vulcan786
Vulcan786

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Vulcan786
Member since 2007 • 162 Posts
well since i hve a ps3 the services the PSN gives you like XBL are pretty similar....well...at least they dont charge online for PC games (other than mmorpgs ofcourse)
Avatar image for doobie1975
doobie1975

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 doobie1975
Member since 2003 • 2806 Posts

Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

sony loves us all.

Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#36 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsdoobie1975

sony loves us all.

except people who don't like what they're selling:P

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17913 Posts
I dont think anyone who has never experienced LIVE will ever understand why people pay for it. If you've played both, its no question that LIVE is better. The $50/year goes to maintain the servers for leaderboards, trueskill rankings, gamerscore/gamertag, friends list, and everything online related. MS maintains all of the online components themselves. With PSN (and to some extent Wii) this burden falls upon the developer, which costs more money and extends the development cycle.
Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#38 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts

This thread make my want to smash my head against my desk,

When PS3 came out with insane launch pricing for their console all I heard from Cow-Nation was "We are all rich and will pay for quality"

But when it comes to online play, Cows seem to have an issue wrapping their head around the same arguement. Live is better, just for what I save a month in long distance to England and Australlia chatting with friends on cross game chats it pays for itself and even if it didn't offer that the cross game invites make it worth while.

The most tragic part is that around these parts you can get a 13 month live card which is normally on sale at one of the big box stores for 49.99,

49.99 / 13 months = $3.84 per month

Sony charges me 200 bucks more then anyone else at launch for their console and we are sitting here arguing about 3.84 a month?

WOW.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

It's amazing that you believe that.You actually believe Sony doesn't look at their customers as dollar bills? How much does it cost to live in that fantasy land you reside in? I'd really like to live in a place where a business doesn't look at their customers as primarily sources of profit.
Avatar image for Vulcan786
Vulcan786

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Vulcan786
Member since 2007 • 162 Posts
exactly so eventally which console are you gonna end up paying most for...unless you dont wonna play online its gonna be 360..ok fine fair enough you bought your ps3 for 200 bucks but your gonna end up paying for 360 anyway why 1 the console 2. the games 3. online gameing
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#42 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
[QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsheretrix

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

It's amazing that you believe that.You actually believe Sony doesn't look at their customers as dollar bills? How much does it cost to live in that fantasy land you reside in? I'd really like to live in a place where a business doesn't look at their customers as primarily sources of profit.

I never said companies don't look at their customers as primary sources of profit, I just think there's a difference between making profit and milking

Avatar image for planbfreak4eva
planbfreak4eva

2856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 planbfreak4eva
Member since 2006 • 2856 Posts
[QUOTE="st1ka"][QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

I'm aware that Sony's products are expensive, but they don't try to rip you off every chance they get

true true..
Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts

pay for playing online as a pose to SonyVulcan786

System Wars at its finest.

Avatar image for Fignewton50
Fignewton50

3748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Fignewton50
Member since 2003 • 3748 Posts

What about the server side matchmaking and player data that Microsoft maintains? Someone has to pay for that.

For example, in Halo 3 you're always paired with people who have the best connection speed with you, are close to your level, are part of a party you've formed, or have played previous games with. That's not a P2P service. I'm not saying that alone is worth $50, but Microsoft isn't charging $50 for a entirely P2P network.

Does the PS3 have anything like that? Or is it like PC gaming where you're simply connected to a game and then you play? Honest question, don't own a PS3.

Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#46 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts

Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

I almost fell off my chair when I read this,

So last generation when I had to pay 429CDN for the PS2 console, and then 59.99 for a memory card, then 49.99 for a four controller adapter that Nintendo had included in its consoles since N64, and then 59.99 for a network adapter, then my favorite paying 149.99 for Final Fantasy w/ the Hard Drive that I couldn't save games to other then the final fantasy it came with and a few 2K sports games.

This was an example of Sony caring about me?

All of the big three would grind you up and use the powder in their consoles if it saved them money, they are not your friends, they don't like you, they will never like you, and all you are or will ever be is a combination of thousands of other people as a line item on an income statement.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="redneckdouglas"]It should be free. All those useless functions can be removed for all I care.Albanian_Killa

Those useless functions are free to Silver users though. Gold users get to access online gaming, which is free for any other platform.

If there weren't Gold members, many of the functions would not exist or would be poorer....just like....ummmmm...PSN.

In effect, the Gold members are subsidizing the Silver members. It is simply a pricing strategy.

MS could attempt to charge 1/2 as much, but for everyone....except they realize that many people (Silver members) aren't likely to pay anything...at least at first. So instead, they make as much as possible 'free' so that as many people as possible will use the service. And then they try to convert as many of those as possible to Gold, since on-line play is the real carrot. people will pay for on-line gaming. They won't pay for demos etc. So, first you need people to consider on-line at all....hence Silver....then you get some of them to pay for the actual gaming. That is MS strategy...and believe me Sony and Ninetendo are jealous they didn't launch that first.

Effectively there is no 'free' anything for Live. It is just being subsidized by the Gold members. Just like PSN will not remain 'free'. Ultimately it will be subsidized by advertisers or whatever strategy Sony comes up with to pay some of the bills. Ain't nothing free in life...it's just how you decide to price.

Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts
[QUOTE="st1ka"][QUOTE="AndYOU"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billsAndYOU

:lol:

Yes, the truth is sometimes very funny

oh please dont tell me you actually believe that

I'm aware that Sony's products are expensive, but they don't try to rip you off every chance they get

because DS 3 isnt milking?

Avatar image for dabear
dabear

9454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 dabear
Member since 2002 • 9454 Posts

[QUOTE="Vulcan786"]pay for playing online as a pose to SonyRuprechtMonkey

System Wars at its finest.

:lol: I missed that!
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#50 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts

[QUOTE="AndYOU"]Because Sony actually cares about the people who buy their products, and don't look at them as dollar billscosmostein77

I almost fell off my chair when I read this,

So last generation when I had to pay 429CDN for the PS2 console, and then 59.99 for a memory card, then 49.99 for a four controller adapter that Nintendo had included in its consoles since N64, and then 59.99 for a network adapter, then my favorite paying 149.99 for Final Fantasy w/ the Hard Drive that I couldn't save games to other then the final fantasy it came with and a few 2K sports games.

All of the big three would grind you up and use the powder in their consoles if it saved them money, they are not your friends, they don't like you, they will never like you, and all you are or will ever be is a combination of thousands of other people as a line item on an income statement.

I'm not Canadian, and PS products are more reliable anyway, so I'm willing to pay more