Why does No Wii game look as good or better than an Xbox game??

Seriously, isn't the system suppose to be better than the original xbox?? why does every game look like PS2/cube title??? Geez, Games like God of war 2, Silent hill 3, MGS3 whoops any game on the wii, graphically.

Make you think why didn't Ninty add more better hardware along side the wiimote..that way it has more of a lifecycle. Because seriously with these visuals i don't expect it to last, expecially if the whole wiimote experience gets alil old..what can you fall back on???

BTW, didn't regge say something about gamers saying WOW! once we see its graphics?? cause thats far from it. Thats not to say it isn't a great console..its fun, i'll admit it..but without a nice visual look it gets stale, expecially for a new gen system.

I also hear that MP3 corruptions is suppose to look better than halo 2...but so far nothing proves this, and keep in mind there were better looking games on the xbox than Halo 2.

Thoughts, reason???????????

seriously  it dosent take 5 moths for great great games to come out IT TAKES TIME TIME

its not much better than regular xbox

god you people think its easy to make games for wii... the other problem is 3rd party developers didnt see Nintendo getting so much demand.

Now shutup

classic controller god of war 2 :roll:

please dont bring that up we all know cube was more powerful than ps2 zelda beats it

slient hill 3 not even out yet :|  same gose with mgs

Wii = Gamecube 1.5 and probably won't have games that look better than Xbox1 until SMG or MP3.

Graphics are subjective. 

seriously it dosent take 5 moths for great great games to come out IT TAKES TIME TIME

its not much better than regular xbox

 

god you people think its easy to make games for wii... the other problem is 3rd party developers didnt see Nintendo getting so much demand.

Now shutup

classic controller god of war 2 :roll:

please dont bring that up we all know cube was more powerful than ps2 zelda beats it

slient hill 3 not even out yet :| same gose with mgs

wavebrid

What?? Silent Hill 3 debuted on the PS2 in 2003, silly. Why can't it take 5 months?? Halo on Xbox was a launch title and still beats any wii game...and that was 2001..you fail. 

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3. 

^ no they don't, linkify. 

Metroid Prime 3, already said to be better looking graphically than Halo 2.

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

xxThyLordxx

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.  

To tell you the truth ,why nintendo never released Wii spec. because It's gamecube inside , and ign made up those spec. for wii because no one will bay same console twice.mad_max1

BINGO!

[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.  

i just told you what the devs were doing

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

samusarmada

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad.  How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.  

Seriously, isn't the system suppose to be better than the original xbox?? why does every game look like PS2/cube title??? Geez, Games like God of war 2, Silent hill 3, MGS3 whoops any game on the wii, graphically.

Make you think why didn't Ninty add more better hardware along side the wiimote..that way it has more of a lifecycle. Because seriously with these visuals i don't expect it to last, expecially if the whole wiimote experience gets alil old..what can you fall back on???

 

BTW, didn't regge say something about gamers saying WOW! once we see its graphics?? cause thats far from it. Thats not to say it isn't a great console..its fun, i'll admit it..but without a nice visual look it gets stale, expecially for a new gen system.

I also hear that MP3 corruptions is suppose to look better than halo 2...but so far nothing proves this, and keep in mind there were better looking games on the xbox than Halo 2.

 

Thoughts, reason???????????

 

-Maddog-

[QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

Seriously, isn't the system suppose to be better than the original xbox?? why does every game look like PS2/cube title??? Geez, Games like God of war 2, Silent hill 3, MGS3 whoops any game on the wii, graphically.

Make you think why didn't Ninty add more better hardware along side the wiimote..that way it has more of a lifecycle. Because seriously with these visuals i don't expect it to last, expecially if the whole wiimote experience gets alil old..what can you fall back on???

 

BTW, didn't regge say something about gamers saying WOW! once we see its graphics?? cause thats far from it. Thats not to say it isn't a great console..its fun, i'll admit it..but without a nice visual look it gets stale, expecially for a new gen system.

I also hear that MP3 corruptions is suppose to look better than halo 2...but so far nothing proves this, and keep in mind there were better looking games on the xbox than Halo 2.

 

Thoughts, reason???????????

 

NRGCDS

Errr, what does my nick have to do with my age?? your obviouslly a sheep...so tell me, how does wii have VERY good graphics?? you really must have low expectations if yout think so. Did you just recently buy a N64 or something?? 

[QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Nintendo makes games, consoles, and the accessories, that's it. They didn't have the money to invest in a high powered system because they would take a loss on each console for some time, like Sony and MS do.Spag1091

Oh no no no no no... don't let Nintendo's friendly, little mom-and-pop shop demeanor fool you, they have tons of cash.  Pools and pools of cash, in fact, with which they could have invested to better the technology or lower the price... they just knew they could get away with not having to.  And its true; the Wii is selling like bottled water.

*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.Metroid_Time

 I'm not talking about RE4..but the wii, heII RE4 looks better than any Wii game at the moment..lol. as for Mario galaxy..your kidding?? conker on xbox looks as good if not better. DOA on xbox whoops it. nuff said. 

[QUOTE="Spag1091"]Nintendo makes games, consoles, and the accessories, that's it. They didn't have the money to invest in a high powered system because they would take a loss on each console for some time, like Sony and MS do.Corvin

Oh no no no no no... don't let Nintendo's friendly, little mom-and-pop shop demeanor fool you, they have tons of cash. Pools and pools of cash, in fact, with which they could have invested to better the technology or lower the price... they just knew they could get away with not having to. And its true; the Wii is selling like bottled water.

really?? talk about brainwashed sheep. LOL. But if anyone thinks these sales will continue for long are in denial. Its still early...if these games for the wii keep coming and at this slow rate...don't expect it to sell as much and things to go slower for nintendo.  

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.-Maddog-

 I'm not talking about RE4..but the wii, heII RE4 looks better than any Wii game at the moment..lol. as for Mario galaxy..your kidding?? conker on xbox looks as good if not better. DOA on xbox whoops it. nuff said. 

Because you can totally compare a fighting game like DOA to an adventure game??? And I was talking  about the Wii too, the Wii can play Gamecube games and RE4 looked best on Gamecube by FAR.

*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.Metroid_Time

have you seen the jaggies in that game? smg doesnt look better than most xbox games like ummm NG for instance so until a game on wii looks better than NG shut up sit down cause we are right and you are wrong

[QUOTE="Corvin"]

[QUOTE="Spag1091"]Nintendo makes games, consoles, and the accessories, that's it. They didn't have the money to invest in a high powered system because they would take a loss on each console for some time, like Sony and MS do.-Maddog-

Oh no no no no no... don't let Nintendo's friendly, little mom-and-pop shop demeanor fool you, they have tons of cash. Pools and pools of cash, in fact, with which they could have invested to better the technology or lower the price... they just knew they could get away with not having to. And its true; the Wii is selling like bottled water.

really?? talk about brainwashed sheep. LOL. But if anyone thinks these sales will continue for long are in denial. Its still early...if these games for the wii keep coming and at this slow rate...don't expect it to sell as much and things to go slower for nintendo.

Are you kidding?  The Wii momentum shows no signs of slowing down right now, its going to be insane next holiday season and just when anyone thinks the momentum has died down, Nintendo have plenty of breathing room to lower the price and spark it all back up again.  The Wii is going to remain huge for a while and thats fine with me as long as it doesn't destroy the hardcore gaming market, which is already being torn apart since hardcore gamers have a split ticket between the 360, PS3 and PC. 

I can put RE4 in my Wii and it looks better than the vast majority of Xbox games or I can put Rogue Squadron in with the same result.

There you go. 

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

Taz-Bone

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.  

I can put RE4 in my Wii and it looks better than the vast majority of Xbox games or I can put Rogue Squadron in with the same result.

There you go.

pacopoolio

RE4 does not look better thank DOOM 3, Halo 2, FarCry, Half life, Ninja Gaiden...sorry.  

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.V_Zarnold_N

have you seen the jaggies in that game? smg doesnt look better than most xbox games like ummm NG for instance so until a game on wii looks better than NG shut up sit down cause we are right and you are wrong

I disagree I am right and you are wrong. See how I can say that without any supporting
evidence too? 

[QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

[QUOTE="NRGCDS"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

Seriously, isn't the system suppose to be better than the original xbox?? why does every game look like PS2/cube title??? Geez, Games like God of war 2, Silent hill 3, MGS3 whoops any game on the wii, graphically.

Make you think why didn't Ninty add more better hardware along side the wiimote..that way it has more of a lifecycle. Because seriously with these visuals i don't expect it to last, expecially if the whole wiimote experience gets alil old..what can you fall back on???

 

BTW, didn't regge say something about gamers saying WOW! once we see its graphics?? cause thats far from it. Thats not to say it isn't a great console..its fun, i'll admit it..but without a nice visual look it gets stale, expecially for a new gen system.

I also hear that MP3 corruptions is suppose to look better than halo 2...but so far nothing proves this, and keep in mind there were better looking games on the xbox than Halo 2.

 

Thoughts, reason???????????

 

-Maddog-

Errr, what does my nick have to do with my age?? your obviouslly a sheep...so tell me, how does wii have VERY good graphics?? you really must have low expectations if yout think so. Did you just recently buy a N64 or something?? 

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.V_Zarnold_N

have you seen the jaggies in that game? smg doesnt look better than most xbox games like ummm NG for instance so until a game on wii looks better than NG shut up sit down cause we are right and you are wrong

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

Taz-Bone

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

LOL, but the game looks awesome still..you fail. Theres not much of a difference. SC for the PS3 was a 360 port....and designed for the 360 in mind. you can say it was a bad port. its nothing like Redsteel for the wii....it was its own game made for a particular system called the WII...and still looks horrible. you fail.  

[QUOTE="V_Zarnold_N"]

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.ithilgore2006

have you seen the jaggies in that game? smg doesnt look better than most xbox games like ummm NG for instance so until a game on wii looks better than NG shut up sit down cause we are right and you are wrong

Acutally SMG is a jaggie fest....it might look nice and bright but nothing much beyond sunshine...seriouslly. Conker on xbox looks as good and NG whoops it to peices...nuff said.  

[QUOTE="Spag1091"]Nintendo makes games, consoles, and the accessories, that's it. They didn't have the money to invest in a high powered system because they would take a loss on each console for some time, like Sony and MS do.Corvin

Oh no no no no no... don't let Nintendo's friendly, little mom-and-pop shop demeanor fool you, they have tons of cash.  Pools and pools of cash, in fact, with which they could have invested to better the technology or lower the price... they just knew they could get away with not having to.  And its true; the Wii is selling like bottled water.

 I'm not saying they don't have a good amount of Working Capital to invest in a new system, but the technological manufacturing of these new HD capable, high complexity CPU/GPU consoles that MS and Sony came out with would destroy a huge percentage of their profits that cannot be recovered in another department of such a specialized company.

MS reported an overall loss of $286 mil in their game division last fiscal year, Sony is most likely losing quite a bit too, but those are small detriments to the huuuuge amount of Working Capital that both of these companies possess.  Nintendo can't take a hit that big after the Gamecube.

[QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

LOL, but the game looks awesome still..you fail. Theres not much of a difference. SC for the PS3 was a 360 port....and designed for the 360 in mind. you can say it was a bad port. its nothing like Redsteel for the wii....it was its own game made for a particular system called the WII...and still looks horrible. you fail.

Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.Michael85

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.  

[QUOTE="Michael85"]Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.-Maddog-

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.  

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

Taz-Bone

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

LOL, but the game looks awesome still..you fail. Theres not much of a difference. SC for the PS3 was a 360 port....and designed for the 360 in mind. you can say it was a bad port. its nothing like Redsteel for the wii....it was its own game made for a particular system called the WII...and still looks horrible. you fail.

Have you actually played the game on the PS3...i doubt it. Point is redsteel isn't a port nor is it PS2 hardware...why does it still look like a PS2 game??? and most of the ported wii titles look so bad i can't explain it..worser than the PS2 version. its hilarious. 

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

[QUOTE="Michael85"]Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.NRGCDS

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.

I'm 20...see just fine. You sound like your 12...whats with the OLD talk??? geez.  

[QUOTE="V_Zarnold_N"]

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]*pops in RE4 Gamecube version* oh look its more powerful than the PS2.
*shows screenshot of Mario Galaxy* now its far more powerful than the xbox.Metroid_Time

have you seen the jaggies in that game? smg doesnt look better than most xbox games like ummm NG for instance so until a game on wii looks better than NG shut up sit down cause we are right and you are wrong

I disagree I am right and you are wrong. See how I can say that without any supporting
evidence too? 

look at NG then look at SMG thats my evidence.... geez has crappy games gotten to your head so that you can no longer read?

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="NRGCDS"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

Seriously, isn't the system suppose to be better than the original xbox?? why does every game look like PS2/cube title??? Geez, Games like God of war 2, Silent hill 3, MGS3 whoops any game on the wii, graphically.

Make you think why didn't Ninty add more better hardware along side the wiimote..that way it has more of a lifecycle. Because seriously with these visuals i don't expect it to last, expecially if the whole wiimote experience gets alil old..what can you fall back on???

 

BTW, didn't regge say something about gamers saying WOW! once we see its graphics?? cause thats far from it. Thats not to say it isn't a great console..its fun, i'll admit it..but without a nice visual look it gets stale, expecially for a new gen system.

I also hear that MP3 corruptions is suppose to look better than halo 2...but so far nothing proves this, and keep in mind there were better looking games on the xbox than Halo 2.

 

Thoughts, reason???????????

 

NRGCDS

Errr, what does my nick have to do with my age?? your obviouslly a sheep...so tell me, how does wii have VERY good graphics?? you really must have low expectations if yout think so. Did you just recently buy a N64 or something?? 

[QUOTE="NRGCDS"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

[QUOTE="Michael85"]Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.-Maddog-

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.

I'm 20...see just fine. You sound like your 12...whats with the OLD talk??? geez.  

dont you get it man? its a sheep they are the ones that cant see well thats why they cant see how old you are or how crappy their games are and on top of that their arguments are weaker than bill gates upper body strength

[QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

-Maddog-

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

LOL, but the game looks awesome still..you fail. Theres not much of a difference. SC for the PS3 was a 360 port....and designed for the 360 in mind. you can say it was a bad port. its nothing like Redsteel for the wii....it was its own game made for a particular system called the WII...and still looks horrible. you fail.

Have you actually played the game on the PS3...i doubt it. Point is redsteel isn't a port nor is it PS2 hardware...why does it still look like a PS2 game??? and most of the ported wii titles look so bad i can't explain it..worser than the PS2 version. its hilarious.

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="NRGCDS"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

[QUOTE="Michael85"]Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.V_Zarnold_N

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.

I'm 20...see just fine. You sound like your 12...whats with the OLD talk??? geez.

dont you get it man? its a sheep they are the ones that cant see well thats why they cant see how old you are or how crappy their games are and on top of that their arguments are weaker than bill gates upper body strength

Well said...There totally eye screwed by all the low rez and ugly jaggie fest games, that are on the wii.  

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="Taz-Bone"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="xxThyLordxx"]

because Xbox is more powerful :|

just a thought. Wii is under powered.

I went to the Wii forum sometime ago and I could not stop laughing, some people there actually believe Wii can do HD graphics and produce graphics like Gears of War :lol: they actually believe Wii is as powerful as X360/PS3.

Taz-Bone

LMFAO! your kidding right?? those sheep are seriously blind. BTW, i'm sure it was confirmed that the wii was better than the xbox. I just can't believe how bad the games look. What are devs doing??? Makes you think why nintendo didn't release the final specs, because its probably real bad.

i just told you what the devs were doing

I'm sorry thats No excuse..the wiis out the hardwares there. for example Red steel looks like a PS2 title to me..why is that?? I remember the devs talking about its hardware and how the game will look great. Ubisoft usually make impressive looking titles..but that was so bad. How can Not one dev get a good graphical that matches xbox atleast within 5 months???

Wii=cube..nuff said.

Umm...SC on the PS3 looks just as good..what you on about??? I'm talking graphics and the wii since its suppose to be better than the xbox....but yes the game might of been alil rushed since ubisoft seem to favour SC on the Xbox more..but thats it. Its still a awesome looking game for the PS3.

LOL, but the game looks awesome still..you fail. Theres not much of a difference. SC for the PS3 was a 360 port....and designed for the 360 in mind. you can say it was a bad port. its nothing like Redsteel for the wii....it was its own game made for a particular system called the WII...and still looks horrible. you fail.

Have you actually played the game on the PS3...i doubt it. Point is redsteel isn't a port nor is it PS2 hardware...why does it still look like a PS2 game??? and most of the ported wii titles look so bad i can't explain it..worser than the PS2 version. its hilarious.

I fail..yet you can't prove me wrong. Sit down.  

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"][QUOTE="NRGCDS"][QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

[QUOTE="Michael85"]Wii's best-looking games will outdo xbox's best-looking games. It doesn't take Scooby Doo to solve that mystery.V_Zarnold_N

lol, I seriouslly doubt that....whats been showed so far, throws that claim out the window..since Xbox's launch titles still beat the wiis by a long shot.

I'm 20...see just fine. You sound like your 12...whats with the OLD talk??? geez.  

dont you get it man? its a sheep they are the ones that cant see well thats why they cant see how old you are or how crappy their games are and on top of that their arguments are weaker than bill gates upper body strength