and again. Beside a few arcade games that got (awful) ports to consoles later on like Pacman how many more of them stood the test of time like Mario did (and it did it more than once)? The first generation of consoles was basically you putting a piece of paper on the screen of the TV to play pong. The second one finally resembled video games but the gameplay was still very very very bad and unresponsive. Only a few games like Pitfall were marginally good because developers had to be very creative with their games and that isn't something that grows on trees you know.
Gue1
the Atari 2600 generation had tons of games that weren't from arcades :|Pitfall
Pitfall 2
Keystone Kapers
Medieval Mayhem
River Raid
Adventure
Dragonfire
Frogs and Flies
Gunfight
Kaboom!
Dragonstomper
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
Yars' Revenge
Wizard of Wor
Air Raiders
Haunted House
Thunder Castle
Snafu
Night Stalker
Tower of Doom
Swords and Serpents
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons
The Castles of Doctor Creep
Space Taxi
Airborne Ranger
Cauldron
Boulderdash
Elite
Delta
Bounder
Chuckie Egg
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons: Treasure of Tarmin
and that was ust at the top of my head
It wasn't until the Nes that we finally got games that were playable. And that is my opinion and whole point about why nobody talks about the first or second generation of video games. The few that does talk about it is to tell how bad it was back then, or about all the imagination you had to use in order to blind your eyes enough to enjoy it. But you can bet you can find any little kid right now and show him the first Mario game on the Nes and he will like it.Gue1
nah, it wasn't until the PS1 that games became playable dawg
2D games suck dawg
besides, all the NES got was piss poor ports of arcade games, Contra, super C, Life force, Gradius, Double Dragon, etc.
Log in to comment