why is it that the resident evil franchise was on the gamecube?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#1 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts
jealous?
Avatar image for alcarazo9
alcarazo9

7104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 alcarazo9
Member since 2005 • 7104 Posts
do i sense jealousy?
Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#4 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts
jealous?Tauruslink
obviously
Avatar image for fiscope
fiscope

2426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 fiscope
Member since 2006 • 2426 Posts

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

Avatar image for SeanBond
SeanBond

2136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SeanBond
Member since 2003 • 2136 Posts

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

mish55

The Gamecube was a more powerful console than the PS2, so Capcom could get more juice out of the GC to make the games better looking. Remember Resident Evil for the GC? Everyone was blown away by its graphics. Same goes for RE4, which had to be slightly downgraded graphically (the cutscenes were even pre-rendered) to be ported to the PS2.Getting the RE franchise was one way Nintendo tried to stop ignorant fanboys from believing that Nintendo was for kids, in the hopes of securing a larger fanbase (after having lost out to the PS1). And as a GC owner, I'm glad Nintendo and Capcom did what they did... ;)

Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#7 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

fiscope

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....
mish55

If you're commenting on the Gamecube being "kiddy," wouldn't exclusive RE games help it in being non-kiddy?  

Anyway, there was a contract betweet Capcom and Nintendo in regards to new RE games last gen.  Why didn't the Gamecube "deserve" those games?  Just because the Gamecube wasn't very successful?
Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#9 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts
[QUOTE="mish55"]

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

SeanBond

The Gamecube was a more powerful console than the PS2, so Capcom could get more juice out of the GC to make the games better looking. Remember Resident Evil for the GC? Everyone was blown away by its graphics. Same goes for RE4, which had to be slightly downgraded graphically (the cutscenes were even pre-rendered) to be ported to the PS2.Getting the RE franchise was one way Nintendo tried to stop ignorant fanboys from believing that Nintendo was for kids, in the hopes of securing a larger fanbase (after having lost out to the PS1). And as a GC owner, I'm glad Nintendo and Capcom did what they did... ;)

hah, silent hill 3 looks so much better than resident evil on gc

and it doesnt even have prerendered anything

and besides, whats so great about what they did?

Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#10 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts
[QUOTE="mish55"]
those games were violent and you know the gamecube....
Svarthek

If you're commenting on the Gamecube being "kiddy," wouldn't exclusive RE games help it in being non-kiddy?

Anyway, there was a contract betweet Capcom and Nintendo in regards to new RE games last gen. Why didn't the Gamecube "deserve" those games? Just because the Gamecube wasn't very successful?

it does deserve em, not exclusively
Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts
[QUOTE="SeanBond"][QUOTE="mish55"]

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

mish55

The Gamecube was a more powerful console than the PS2, so Capcom could get more juice out of the GC to make the games better looking. Remember Resident Evil for the GC? Everyone was blown away by its graphics. Same goes for RE4, which had to be slightly downgraded graphically (the cutscenes were even pre-rendered) to be ported to the PS2.Getting the RE franchise was one way Nintendo tried to stop ignorant fanboys from believing that Nintendo was for kids, in the hopes of securing a larger fanbase (after having lost out to the PS1). And as a GC owner, I'm glad Nintendo and Capcom did what they did... ;)

hah, silent hill 3 looks so much better than resident evil on gc

and it doesnt even have prerendered anything

and besides, whats so great about what they did?

Avatar image for fiscope
fiscope

2426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 fiscope
Member since 2006 • 2426 Posts
[QUOTE="fiscope"]

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

mish55

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

Then what right do you have to complian?!

Sheesh..

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts
[QUOTE="Svarthek"][QUOTE="mish55"]
those games were violent and you know the gamecube....
mish55

If you're commenting on the Gamecube being "kiddy," wouldn't exclusive RE games help it in being non-kiddy?

Anyway, there was a contract betweet Capcom and Nintendo in regards to new RE games last gen. Why didn't the Gamecube "deserve" those games? Just because the Gamecube wasn't very successful?

it does deserve em, not exclusively


Why?
Avatar image for Riviera_Phantom
Riviera_Phantom

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Riviera_Phantom
Member since 2006 • 3658 Posts
[QUOTE="fiscope"]

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

mish55

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

It was also pretty stupid to put the only good Zelda clone on PS2 * cough * Okami *Cough. But no i disagree, RE did well on GC, it wasn 't abandoneing ANY fans. REremake was a remake...onyl new game you might have missed out on is RE0 and that wasn't very popular anyway. Re4 was released on PS2.

Avatar image for Gallion-Beast
Gallion-Beast

35803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Gallion-Beast
Member since 2005 • 35803 Posts
[QUOTE="mish55"][QUOTE="fiscope"]

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

fiscope

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

Then what right do you have to complian?!

Sheesh..

The right of free speech?
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts
I suppsoe the publisher wanted it on there?
Avatar image for Riviera_Phantom
Riviera_Phantom

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 Riviera_Phantom
Member since 2006 • 3658 Posts

[QUOTE="Tauruslink"]jealous?mish55
obviously

This is an A grade example of a true fanboy or rather an anti fanboy. You OWN a GC yet you were jelous it was on there because you wanted it on PS2? Please. Who gives a **** what system it's for if you own one you can play the games.

Avatar image for silversurfergold
silversurfergold

476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 silversurfergold
Member since 2004 • 476 Posts
Fanboys really really really do miss out. Resident Evil 4 is one of my top 10 games, now fix the ring of death and I can finally get 360 so I don't miss out.
Avatar image for TacoJelly
TacoJelly

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 TacoJelly
Member since 2005 • 1723 Posts

Resident evil games (0, remake, and 4) were awesome on gamecube. All i had last gen was a gamecube (technically i had a PS2 also, but i bought so few games I don't even count it) and those fit in quite nicely... It also made me just confused as to why everybody was on this "Nintendo is for kids" thing when i was playing PoP, RE, Killer 7, Eternal Darkness, and other Mature games on the cube, in addition to the fantastic games that happened to be rated E or T (can adding violence or drugs really make Pikmin better?).

To answer your question as to why they were exclusive to GC... cuz nintendo paid for an exclusive deal.

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
Well, I'm all for people enjoying great games but they'd always be superior on the Cube with more power. Maybe if they ported to the XBOX too it would have been better?
Avatar image for mish55
mish55

6995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#21 mish55
Member since 2005 • 6995 Posts

[QUOTE="mish55"][QUOTE="Tauruslink"]jealous?Riviera_Phantom

obviously

This is an A grade example of a true fanboy or rather an anti fanboy. You OWN a GC yet you were jelous it was on there because you wanted it on PS2? Please. Who gives a **** what system it's for if you own one you can play the games.

no its not that i wanted on ps2, just

why was it just on the gamecube when before they were pretty much on every system

and i really felt cheated after only buying the gamecube for like 4 games

Avatar image for TacoJelly
TacoJelly

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 TacoJelly
Member since 2005 • 1723 Posts
[QUOTE="mish55"][QUOTE="fiscope"]

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

Riviera_Phantom

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

It was also pretty stupid to put the only good Zelda clone on PS2 * cough * Okami *Cough. But no i disagree, RE did well on GC, it wasn 't abandoneing ANY fans. REremake was a remake...onyl new game you might have missed out on is RE0 and that wasn't very popular anyway. Re4 was released on PS2.

That was really really stupid... didn't that game not sell that great? could've benefited from the audiance that's know to like those types of game (not to mention how much prettier it could've been on the cube). And did anybody also figure out that Viewtiful Joe only sold well on Cube? why make their second game PS2 exclusive?

The only thing that'd be a bigger mistake would be not making a sequel (or even a Wii-make) of Okami for Wii.. a caligraphy based game that can be played on a console that allows for caligraphy to be drawn? crazy.

Avatar image for TacoJelly
TacoJelly

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 TacoJelly
Member since 2005 • 1723 Posts
[QUOTE="Riviera_Phantom"]

[QUOTE="mish55"][QUOTE="Tauruslink"]jealous?mish55

obviously

This is an A grade example of a true fanboy or rather an anti fanboy. You OWN a GC yet you were jelous it was on there because you wanted it on PS2? Please. Who gives a **** what system it's for if you own one you can play the games.

no its not that i wanted on ps2, just

why was it just on the gamecube when before they were pretty much on every system

and i really felt cheated after only buying the gamecube for like 4 games

I dont know what 4 games you got for gamecube, but you cheated yourself, there are way more than 4 games worth getting.

Pikmin 2, F-Zero, Waverace, Eternal Darkness, Zelda WW (and TP if you didn't buy a Wii), Soul Calibur (best on GC), Metroid Prime 1 + 2, Super Mario Sunshine, Paper Mario, Batalion Wars, Donkey Kong: Jungle Beat, Killer 7, Super Monkey ball, Veiwtiful Joe, etc.

go buy some and enjoy some of the best games of the last generation.

Avatar image for fiscope
fiscope

2426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 fiscope
Member since 2006 • 2426 Posts
[QUOTE="fiscope"][QUOTE="mish55"][QUOTE="fiscope"]

It was that way because it just was. Why is halo only on XBOX, why is finnal fantasy usually on Playstations. Gamecubes are cheapt now go buy one, cheap-o.

Gallion-Beast

i do have one....

just think its stupid that is was on there,

Then what right do you have to complian?!

Sheesh..

The right of free speech?

You got me there! :)

Avatar image for Hoobinator
Hoobinator

6899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Hoobinator
Member since 2006 • 6899 Posts
Some Nintendo people went to some Capcom people and handed them some money. The rest is history.
Avatar image for cfamgcn
cfamgcn

5587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 cfamgcn
Member since 2004 • 5587 Posts

jealous?Tauruslink

You guessed it right

Avatar image for deactivated-586249e1b64ba
deactivated-586249e1b64ba

7629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-586249e1b64ba
Member since 2004 • 7629 Posts
Because Nintendo handed Capcom money for "The Capcom 5".
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The realism achieved with the GC would have been nearly impossible on the PS2. Capcom also thought the GC might have been more successful than it actually was.
Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
The realism achieved with the GC would have been nearly impossible on the PS2. Capcom also thought the GC might have been more successful than it actually was.foxhound_fox
thing i noticed that the ps2 couldnt do for sqout is lighting effect, which i think resident evil remake couldnt have been done properly. i know resident evil 4 on the ps2 wasnt truly the original resident evil 4, since it lacked lighting effect of the gamecube version.
Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

mish55

the developer of the game didn't like how ps2 was designed and loved the gamecube.. the isawhole new team making resident evil 5 so i don't exspect it will be as revolutionary to the series as 4 was.

Avatar image for ProductNumber49
ProductNumber49

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 ProductNumber49
Member since 2006 • 3840 Posts
Who cares, all i want is RE 5 :D
Avatar image for manicfoot
manicfoot

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 manicfoot
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts
Let me get this straight, you're whining about the GC RE's not being exclusive when the PS2 had SO MANY MORE exclusives that never left the system throughout it's lifecycle? At least Resi4 was ported eventually (against the creators wishes, I might add). What the hell is the problem with them being exclusive to the Cube anyway? 4 years on RE-make blows me away every time I play it. The creepy lighting is fantastic and the high-polygon character models simply could not have been done on the PS2.
Avatar image for ROCKINGFOOL
ROCKINGFOOL

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 ROCKINGFOOL
Member since 2005 • 1795 Posts

actually nintendo made deal with capcom to make resident evile games only for nintendo gamecub for the next 5 years

and it ended in 2006 so resident evile 4 came to the ps2 :)

Avatar image for duble_Needler23
duble_Needler23

5200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 duble_Needler23
Member since 2004 • 5200 Posts
[QUOTE="SeanBond"][QUOTE="mish55"]

that really bothered me before

when i see the ports of the playstation 1 resident evil games (which are almost impossible to find), resident evil remake, 0, and 4 were solely for the wii

whos brilliant idea was that??

seriously, though, so many people love resident evil and it kills me that it had to be exclusive to the gamecube

not hating or anything but the gamecub really didnt deserve those games, it deserved to have them butnotexclusively for it

those games were violent and you know the gamecube....

(even the creator of 4 was crying about it being ported to the ps2, why?? so more people can enjoy that masterpiece?)

mish55

The Gamecube was a more powerful console than the PS2, so Capcom could get more juice out of the GC to make the games better looking. Remember Resident Evil for the GC? Everyone was blown away by its graphics. Same goes for RE4, which had to be slightly downgraded graphically (the cutscenes were even pre-rendered) to be ported to the PS2.Getting the RE franchise was one way Nintendo tried to stop ignorant fanboys from believing that Nintendo was for kids, in the hopes of securing a larger fanbase (after having lost out to the PS1). And as a GC owner, I'm glad Nintendo and Capcom did what they did... ;)

hah, silent hill 3 looks so much better than resident evil on gc

and it doesnt even have prerendered anything

and besides, whats so great about what they did?

Thats your opinion. I'm a big Resident Evil fan...but I'm a Silent Hill NUT lol. Biggest fan ever (silent hill 2 is my favorite game of all time :)...lol), and saying that, i've also beaten Silent hill 3 at least 10 times...AT LEAST. And imo, there's no way it looks better than RE remake for the cube. It has its own art style, its a lot darker and grittier, and definitely scarier (and imo a better game)...but technically, graphically...REmake for the Cube has so much more going on.

Avatar image for Super-Skunk420
Super-Skunk420

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Super-Skunk420
Member since 2007 • 235 Posts
Nintendo and Capcom made a deal before last gen to make the main series exclusive.