Why is Resistence 40 MP players and Halo 3 only 16 MP players?

While Resistence looks better ?

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

Halo >>>> R:FOM sales...

personally, I don't wanna play either one.

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

-D3MO-

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

DarthaPerkinjan

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

Umm... I don't remember destructable environments in R:FOM....unless you count glass and a box here and there...

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

-D3MO-

don't forget better story as well. And master chief, restance dont got master chief.

Because thats always been Halo?

I don't even like the 16 player games.

Halo=Greatest FPS franchise. 9.5!:lol:

RFOM=Poor Man's Halo

"However, R:FOM did manage to beat Halo 3 in number of cupholders, ahem, players online."

Obscure?

Live is p2p that's why so it has issues with lag while psn has servers and about RFOM looking better imo they are about a tie.ChiChiMonKilla

So, where does the Live fee go?

640p > 720p?DarthaPerkinjan

Live is p2p that's why so it has issues with lag while psn has servers and about RFOM looking better imo they are about a tie.ChiChiMonKilla

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

oomph_aah

don't forget better story as well. And master chief, restance dont got master chief.

master chief dont got gramar

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

-D3MO-

Halo MP boring and dull...unless you consider getting

Resistence came out 06' and H3 came out 07'....Resistence does have better graphics...9.5?Who cares about another persons opinion of game?Obviously you...

Resistence has more players...

One game is just plain boring and the other one is overated, I'll leave you to figure out....

[QUOTE="ChiChiMonKilla"]Live is p2p that's why so it has issues with lag while psn has servers and about RFOM looking better imo they are about a tie.lordxymor

So, where does the Live fee go?

[QUOTE="DarthaPerkinjan"]640p > 720p?joey101010

I'll take high definition over standard defintion anyday

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

DarthaPerkinjan

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

Perfect Dark was 32 players online with no lag... your logic is flawed

[QUOTE="joey101010"][QUOTE="DarthaPerkinjan"]640p > 720p?DarthaPerkinjan

I'll take high definition over standard defintion anyday

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

DarthaPerkinjan

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

1 frame buffer > 2 frame buffers? See I can do it too.

I think halo 3 is only 12 player.yoshi-lnex

They just updated it. Couple days ago it was only 12, now its 16:)
Shotty Snipers got and update aswell, now it appears less often and slayer appears more often in ranked matches.

Were there even 40 players in one party in that game online ?killaj2786

uh yeah, all the time. Max players you can have on a team is 20. Max you can have in a party is 20. Total players in the larger maps would be 40.

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]I think halo 3 is only 12 player.Pro_wrestler

They just updated it. Couple days ago it was only 12, now its 16:)
Shotty Snipers got and update aswell, now it appears less often and slayer appears more often in ranked matches.

Nothing wrong with that. Halo isn't a game that works best like that... Resistance is a game themed in War, so I'd imagine if you are playing a war game. more players seems likely for online play, cause it creates that "wartime" feel. MoH: Heroes 2 on Wii will have 32 players as well, another War themed game.

Halo isn't exactly like that. It's more a methodical shooter, that takes a dip in the more strategic zone. Knowiing when to use grenades and not, what weapons to carry on in the battlefield, and so on. 16 players is just more sweet, cause when you have buddies working together, it feels good. Like me, I like playing with three of my other friends online and going on ranked matches. We do very well, and it just feels right. There's no need to have a massive amount of people like 40 in Halo, because it's not needed. The maps are designed well enough to make the battles feel intense, and that next corner supenseful.

I personally don't need too many people online either, because then vehicles and other things become useless. It just becomes a waveless death after death of people.

More players doesn't mean a better experience.funnymario

Halo 3 looks better than Resistance.

But that's not the point here.

More players =/= better game. Bungie themselves stated they didn't want an overload of people, because it would take away from the personal level, and it would be too hectic anyway.
MoldOnHold

LOL ,yet lemmings will say the scale in single player is awesome because soo much action and big levels. Sadly that couldnt carry over to multiplayer, 16 players and last-gen size maps, 640p and zero anti aliasing.

RFOM was just plain fun to play. Nothing innovative but just plain fun.

Pretty impressive though how 40 player online is so lag free for the most partand runs so smooth.

Guess Bungie could't do that with XBL's peer to peer networking??

[QUOTE="ChiChiMonKilla"]Live is p2p that's why so it has issues with lag while psn has servers and about RFOM looking better imo they are about a tie.lordxymor

So, where does the Live fee go?

Making up for selling the 360 for a loss.

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

DarthaPerkinjan

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

That's not what the developers said. ;) Resistance also scored lower then Halo 3 even with 64 player online support. Go figure.

[QUOTE="ChiChiMonKilla"]Live is p2p that's why so it has issues with lag while psn has servers and about RFOM looking better imo they are about a tie.lordxymor

So, where does the Live fee go?

See my SIG.

[QUOTE="funnymario"]More players doesn't mean a better experience.ChiChiMonKilla

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

-D3MO-

I personally think Resistance has better graphics compared to Halo 3.

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

DarthaPerkinjan

640p > 720p?

Resistance looks better, has destructable enviorments and has more units on screen at once.

Since you won't answer him I will

The reason why Resistance has more players online is because the laggy peer to peer online play of Xbox Live would create too much lag. Also the 360 can barely handle the game as it is, that's why they down scaled it to non HD standard defintion 640p

fanboy any one?

Halo=Greatest FPS franchise. 9.5!:lol:

RFOM=Poor Man's Halo

Art_424

[QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Graphically

Halo 3 >>>> R:FOM Gameplay wise

R:FOM >>>> Halo 3 in amount of players in a multiplat match

hmmm

sainraja

I personally think Resistance has better graphics compared to Halo 3.

Not at all. They were good, but RFOM was less colorful game than halo. A desaturated game tends to look better on screen, (Gears of War). Halo is very colorful, just alone the first level shows it. I dont think they can be fairly comparable.

Resistance

Halo