Why lemmings here think Tekken 6 will be on 360 when....

Namco / Bandai just made an agreement with Sony to use CELL technology for Tekken 6 arcade? That`s mean Tekken 6 will be absolutely will base on CELL technology for console. And we know Tekken 6 will be PS3 only. Why you lemmings believe old rumors? 

Because Their FANBOYS!!!!

Cows think GeOW is going to PS3, Lemmings think all PS3 games are going to 360, Sheep think....about Samus and Mario in HD...maybe in 5 years :( 

"I tried to talk to em" - Lil' Wayne

No, they just doing another stunt to tipp the cows. They know it's not coming. 

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

I think it'll be on the 360 - I'm not a lemming.

Why do I think that? Just like DMC the franchise it's declining in sales, and being "exclusive" doesn't seem to be helping it anymore, so I wouldn't be shocked if it went multiplat, I'd be surprised if it stayed exclusive.

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

hockeyruler12

I can only pray you not into shooters... 

Because Their FANBOYS!!!!

Cows think GeOW is going to PS3, Lemmings think all PS3 games are going to 360, Sheep think....about Samus and Mario in HD...maybe in 5 years :(

TheDemon_Nexus

I think it'll be on the 360 - I'm not a lemming.

Why do I think that? Just like DMC the franchise it's declining in sales, and being "exclusive" doesn't seem to be helping it anymore, so I wouldn't be shocked if it went multiplat, I'd be surprised if it stayed exclusive.

the-very-best

Understand the significants of the engine being built on the PS3 cell. Xbox360 can not do what cell can do. They would have to make another engine for it to port it to 360 or use an old engine. 

medicore fighters dont interest me..LinKuei_warrior

no fighters intrest me. they did like when soul caliber, mk3 and killer instincts were in arcades. 

[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

shungokustasu

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same 

[QUOTE="LinKuei_warrior"]medicore fighters dont interest me..TheBigDrat

no fighters intrest me. they did like when soul caliber, mk3 and killer instincts were in arcades. 

right on

Borat:*high five*

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

hockeyruler12

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

You really don't know? Just say you don't know about fighting games. Don't say you hate them. Admit that you ignorant to them. 

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

hockeyruler12

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same 

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

Who would want Tekken 6 on xbox360 anyways, we already have Dead or Alive 4, soon 5 and Virtua Fighter 4 (considered best fighting game even by the cows themselves.). I don't care for Tekken 6 on the xbox360, don't know why anyone else would. themyth01

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]

I think it'll be on the 360 - I'm not a lemming.

Why do I think that? Just like DMC the franchise it's declining in sales, and being "exclusive" doesn't seem to be helping it anymore, so I wouldn't be shocked if it went multiplat, I'd be surprised if it stayed exclusive.

shungokustasu

Understand the significants of the engine being built on the PS3 cell. Xbox360 can not do what cell can do. They would have to make another engine for it to port it to 360 or use an old engine.

you do know what they are saying is bullcrap for hype right? look at DOA and look at tekken 6. if you can't admit that tekken can be done your blind.

hell, theirs not that big of a jump between tekken 5 arcade and tekken 6.. and tekken 5 is a psp port.

Ace Combat went so Tekken can go as well.

[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

NeoGen85

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3. 

you don't know what your talking about. 

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

NeoGen85

The thing is concept of any game doesn't change. It is why they are put in genres. When it comes to fighters you expect a drastic concept change? Just say you not interested in fighter is a more of a complete argument. Don't say it's repetitive and then go off and play FPS #938372302. That's called a contradiction. In truth, fighters has drastically change in gameplay way more then shooters. Shooters are the most simplistic genre in gaming. The learning curve to be very good at a fighter is a lifetime.

[QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

beldugo

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3. 

you don't know what your talking about. 

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

[QUOTE="NeoGen85"]

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

shungokustasu

The thing is concept of any game doesn't change. It is why they are put in genres. When it comes to fighters you expect a drastic concept change? Just say you not interested in fighter is a more of a complete argument. Don't say it's repetitive and then go off and play FPS #938372302. That's called a contradiction. In truth, fighters has drastically change in gameplay way more then shooters. Shooters are the most simplistic genre in gaming. The learning curve to be very good at a fighter is a lifetime.

I couldn't agree more

[QUOTE="beldugo"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

NeoGen85

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3.

you don't know what your talking about.

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

It's coming.  Trust me ;)Yellow_Rose

I dont think so. It'sgoing to arcades first and it's being released in 2008. the PS3 would have sold enough to carry its own by that time, esp. if there is a price drop.

Umm..... to get your goat? Hell, I dunno man. Maybe they didn't know about that little tidbit of info you just gave us. Or maybe they have been huffing gasoline. Who can say for certain?

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]It's coming. Trust me ;)SupraGT

I dont think so. It'sgoing to arcades first and it's being released in 2008. the PS3 would have sold enough to carry its own by that time, esp. if there is a price drop.

The PS3 would've sold more by then, but so would've the 360 ;) 

[QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="beldugo"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

shungokustasu

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3.

you don't know what your talking about.

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

Hehe. Well, that's not quite what I was getting at. But maybe being able to create new moves with existing ones through real-time with a preset of actions already available to a existing character design. Not sure how it would work but.. :P

[QUOTE="beldugo"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

NeoGen85

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3.

you don't know what your talking about.

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

with the right set of moves and your skill it's call your own style of fighting. my fighting style is to predict my oponnents movement.

i got some friends that play the waiting style lol, the crap talker style, some play the offence, some play the defensive.. i don't know what to call them but everyone in a fighting game has it's own fighting style or fighting strategy.

you want to go from area to area? then play tekken, they have a mode for that, DOA4 theirs a lot of interaction with the environment.. and of course that what makes fighting game so special the one on one fights, for bragging rights.

[QUOTE="SupraGT"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]It's coming. Trust me ;)Yellow_Rose

I dont think so. It'sgoing to arcades first and it's being released in 2008. the PS3 would have sold enough to carry its own by that time, esp. if there is a price drop.

The PS3 would've sold more by then, but so would've the 360 ;)

I really don't care if it goes multi-plat, but the evidence says it cant. Also, I love your sig. Shows how much you care for the PS3. 

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="beldugo"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

NeoGen85

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3.

you don't know what your talking about.

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

Hehe. Well, that's not quite what I was getting at. But maybe being able to create new moves with existing ones through real-time with a preset of actions already available to a existing character design. Not sure how it would work but.. :P

that's actually called a combo dude. 

VF5 said to be an Exclusive PS3 game too. Oh and Ace Combat 6 is on the 360 so I don't see why Tekken 6 might not be either.

Namco / Bandai just made an agreement with Sony to use CELL technology for Tekken 6 arcade? That`s mean Tekken 6 will be absolutely will base on CELL technology for console. And we know Tekken 6 will be PS3 only. Why you lemmings believe old rumors? 

Heri012

the first game that came from that team work is Gundam:Musuo

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"][QUOTE="SupraGT"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]It's coming. Trust me ;)shungokustasu

I dont think so. It'sgoing to arcades first and it's being released in 2008. the PS3 would have sold enough to carry its own by that time, esp. if there is a price drop.

The PS3 would've sold more by then, but so would've the 360 ;)

I really don't care if it goes multi-plat, but the evidence says it cant. Also, I love your sig. Shows how much you care for the PS3.

you have to admit though this one is funny. i been laughing the whole time.

f that i'm stealing your sig. 

Well, if that's the case, then it's probably a lot less likely that it will get ported. Not impossible, but it might not be worth the trouble to move a game made ground-up for the Cell to the 360.

I don't care too much either way. I don't really like the Tekken series. I got Tekken 5, and it felt very clunky to me. Like your character was basically stuck in mud unless they were doing a 10-hit combo.  

with the right set of moves and your skill it's call your own style of fighting. my fighting style is to predict my oponnents movement.

i got some friends that play the waiting style lol, the crap talker style, some play the offence, some play the defensive.. i don't know what to call them but everyone in a fighting game has it's own fighting style or fighting strategy.

 

you want to interact with the environment? then play tekken, they have a mode for that, DOA4 theirs a lot of interaction with the environment.. and of course that what makes fighting game so special the one on one fights, for bragging rights.

beldugo

Offensive style = Beast
Defensive = Turtle
Balance = Tiger
Trash Talker = Headmaster ( I like to call the noobs)
Under pressure = Possum

[QUOTE="NeoGen85"]

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

shungokustasu

The thing is concept of any game doesn't change. It is why they are put in genres. When it comes to fighters you expect a drastic concept change? Just say you not interested in fighter is a more of a complete argument. Don't say it's repetitive and then go off and play FPS #938372302. That's called a contradiction. In truth, fighters has drastically change in gameplay way more then shooters. Shooters are the most simplistic genre in gaming. The learning curve to be very good at a fighter is a lifetime.

   Learning curve in fighters? LMAO, the learning 'curve' in any Tekken game is learn 2 or 3 moves and do them over and over again.

    When will cows realize that when people don't care about teh almighty Tekken, it's because it's been the same game recycled and rehashed per each iteration... Now VF has evolved...

[QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="beldugo"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

I dont care if it comes to the 360

Tekken is boring, all fighting games are. They are so repetative, and every game is the same, just with more fighters and better graphics.

beldugo

I can only pray you not into shooters...

at least some shooters add new gameplay elements. Fighters are just all the same

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

they bring new moves, new strategys and new characters to improve on that strategy and a great addition to the double team moves arsenal if the game has it.

tekken 4 doesn't have all the throws and moves tekken 5 implemented.. street fighter 3 with ryu and ken they have different moves you excecuted like forward and kick for a heal drop etc.. you miss on a whole lot if last fighting game you played was tekken 3.

you don't know what your talking about.

Thanks. But while reading I think I've found out why I don't play fighters. I like the idea that new strategies and fighting moves are added to increase the action in the game. But what I believe is missing is the ability to "heavily" interact with a larger environment. Perhaps being able to move through one area to another and back again. Or using things in that area to create advantages. But I think hardcore fighting gamers are more into the one on one bout for a more personal experience. What would be awesome is the ability to create your own style of fighting.

Hehe. Well, that's not quite what I was getting at. But maybe being able to create new moves with existing ones through real-time with a preset of actions already available to a existing character design. Not sure how it would work but.. :P

that's actually called a combo dude. 

Haha. I should just simply said.."create new moves in real time". lol

I wouldn't mind getting Tekken on the 360....but I don't see how I'll work my way around the 360 controller....

all in all....yes, fighters are probably the most boring games I've ever played....but then again...the minute I'm with someone or a large amount of people and it's a one on one fight togather it can be the most intense, fun and fast gaming experience you can have..( with the right kind of fighting game of course) but the minute everyone is gone....it just goes back to being plain ol' boring.....that's the problem with gaming these days....with the introduction of online gaming...it's really rare to see people actually come togather and play togather...I miss those days of Street Fighter, Killer Instinct, Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 or MK2... tekken 3 was great too. Good good times. 

Learning curve in fighters? LMAO, the learning 'curve' in any Tekken game is learn 2 or 3 moves and do them over and over again.

When will cows realize that when people don't care about teh almighty Tekken, it's because it's been the same game recycled and rehashed per each iteration... Now VF has evolved...

DXGreat1_HGL

Females with sharp tounges...I'm not getting in a discussing with Tekken growth in gameplay. You can't deny that 360 fans are begging for this game to come. 

Like. Look at MMORPGs. People want real-time action with a stat/level-based system but at the sametime they want it based off of skill. If someone can do that you could consider that drastic. Maybe I am taking the new additional functions in fighters too lightly, when they are truely considered drastic change. But, well..I don't know. I haven't played enough fighters recently to determine that.NeoGen85

in street fighter 3 i never done the combo shungokustasu has on his sig with akuma. if your looking for a fighter with stats/lv and all of that get DBZ Tenkaichi or Soul Calibur 3. 

i gave you all kind of example of what you ask for in a fighter so no excuses for you not to try them out ;) now. never too late to get your skills up. 

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"]

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

DXGreat1_HGL

The thing is concept of any game doesn't change. It is why they are put in genres. When it comes to fighters you expect a drastic concept change? Just say you not interested in fighter is a more of a complete argument. Don't say it's repetitive and then go off and play FPS #938372302. That's called a contradiction. In truth, fighters has drastically change in gameplay way more then shooters. Shooters are the most simplistic genre in gaming. The learning curve to be very good at a fighter is a lifetime.

Learning curve in fighters? LMAO, the learning 'curve' in any Tekken game is learn 2 or 3 moves and do them over and over again.

When will cows realize that when people don't care about teh almighty Tekken, it's because it's been the same game recycled and rehashed per each iteration... Now VF has evolved...

but the graphics are up and the fun factor is still there so it's all good to look forward to it.. plus, they add new moves in every single number they put. if i'm gonna complain about tekken i would say to fix the story because that crap doesn't make no sence at all. overall is a good game.

[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="NeoGen85"]

For the first time every, I will agree to something like that. When I was younger it was all about Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat. The concept of a fighting game was fresh in peoples heads. But sadly I really can't tell the different between Tekken, SC, and VF. I know that's sad. I haven't actually sat down a play a fighting game since Tekken 3[well it feels like it]. I honestly think fighting games died along with Arcades. BUT! Super Smash Bros. is really interesting compared to everything else I've seen. Pleas don't slap me for saying this but when I do look at the new Tekken for the PS3 I always ask myself is there a new way to play it? If so, someone tell me please. Thank you.

DXGreat1_HGL

The thing is concept of any game doesn't change. It is why they are put in genres. When it comes to fighters you expect a drastic concept change? Just say you not interested in fighter is a more of a complete argument. Don't say it's repetitive and then go off and play FPS #938372302. That's called a contradiction. In truth, fighters has drastically change in gameplay way more then shooters. Shooters are the most simplistic genre in gaming. The learning curve to be very good at a fighter is a lifetime.

   Learning curve in fighters? LMAO, the learning 'curve' in any Tekken game is learn 2 or 3 moves and do them over and over again.

    When will cows realize that when people don't care about teh almighty Tekken, it's because it's been the same game recycled and rehashed per each iteration... Now VF has evolved...

when you have no knowledge of something, keep your mouth shut, or you look like a fool. but it's too late for that.

but the graphics are up and the fun factor is still there so it's all good to look forward to it.. plus, they add new moves in every single number they put. if i'm gonna complain about tekken i would say to fix the story because that crap doesn't make no sence at all. overall is a good game.

beldugo

In my honest opinion. Every fighter story should be like Ryu. There should be no motive in fighting than the glory of victory. I see fighting as a sport. There are no stories in football, basketball or baseball. They do it because they love it. 

[QUOTE="beldugo"]

but the graphics are up and the fun factor is still there so it's all good to look forward to it.. plus, they add new moves in every single number they put. if i'm gonna complain about tekken i would say to fix the story because that crap doesn't make no sence at all. overall is a good game.

shungokustasu

In my honest opinion. Every fighter story should be like Ryu. There should be no motive in fighting than the glory of victory. I see fighting as a sport. There are no stories in football, basketball or baseball. They do it because they love it.

 in sports game their story is already there.. their stats.. remember sports like boxing have interviews, background stories, wins, losses.. that's their story.

 if myke tyson appears in a game and his stats say example 60 wins 3 losses.. we know the story behind 3 losses. 2 with hollyfield and 1 with lewis.

[QUOTE="beldugo"]

but the graphics are up and the fun factor is still there so it's all good to look forward to it.. plus, they add new moves in every single number they put. if i'm gonna complain about tekken i would say to fix the story because that crap doesn't make no sence at all. overall is a good game.

shungokustasu

In my honest opinion. Every fighter story should be like Ryu. There should be no motive in fighting than the glory of victory. I see fighting as a sport. There are no stories in football, basketball or baseball. They do it because they love it.