We are currently coming off of one of the best gens ever with the PS3 and Xbox 360. And it's all down to one thing, competition.
Sony and MS have both pushed each other so hard to do better and improve.
What would the PS3 have been like without MS forcing Sony to get up off their ass and fight for their lives, because at the beginning of this gen, Sony were so used to being default market leaders, they weren't doing much.
For a start PSN would still be pretty basic, I doubt PSN Plus would have ever happened. Would Sony have felt the need to really improve/evolve itself or the feature set of the console. The PS4 would never have been designed the way it was. The PS4 looks to really be a competition console (business model and architecture), where as the PS3 was forced to compete, when Sony hadn't expected to.
Likewise without Sony, MS would NEVER have evolved from the first Xbox to the Xbox 360 (not talking about hardware here) and continued after that. Why would they have felt the need.
With MS jumping off the cliff, who will push Sony to evolve past the PS4s initial state.
Competitions healthy and MSs failure is nothing to celebrate or laugh at, because it's the gamer that losses.
This isn't damage control, i've already said i'm leaning towards the PS4.
Log in to comment