Why Sony is losing "Exclusive games to 360"

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for acidic_dude
acidic_dude

1713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 acidic_dude
Member since 2003 • 1713 Posts

The reason why sony is losing games that have been exclusive on the PS and PS2 is because back say 5 years ago, sony was out selling all the consoles by a landslide, it was a joke and a lot of sony's big exclusives were from Japan where the xbox did close to nothing and the gamecube was also not selling nearly as good as the PS2. The game companies would make a game for the PS2 like VF4, tekken 4, tekken 5, MGS 2, MGS 3, and Devil may cry, and they did not even waste their time trying to port them over because there was so little money to make selling on xbox and gamecube so they did not even waste their time porting the game over and just moved on the the next game. Now games like MGS2 and Onimusha proved that it was not worth porting a huge PS2 game to the xbox or gamecube when they introduced MGS2:substance and Genma Onimush for the xbox gaming system, and pretty much any1 who was interested in those games already had a PS2 and the games did not sell very well at all and MGS3 and all other onimushas stayed put on PS2. So you see, sony did not even open up their pocket books to their so called "exclusives", the companies were pretty much forced to stay exclusive because it wasent worth the time to make a big hit game multiplatform. Take VF4, VF3 was on the dreamcast, VF1and 2was on the Saturn so the first VF game on sony platform was VF4 on the PS2 and when you look at the numbers it would have been a waste of time and resources to put the effort into porting it to the xbox and gamecube cause it would sell very low. So when VF5 was announced for 360 they did not end any exclusive deal with sony, it was just a third pary game going multiplatform just like all the other games shifting form sony exclusive to multiplatform, they are all actuallythird party games just finally going muliplatform because right now the 360 is selling very good and is in the lead right now and at this point in time there is little money to be made keeping a third party game exclusive to playstation 3 unless sony throws gobs of cash at you which they wont because they said they wouldnt.

So really what people are doing is confusing First party with third party. A sony first party game would be Socom or Resistance, and a third party game would be MGS4, Grand Turismo 5, Final Fantasy 13, devil may cry 4, tekken 6, virtua fighter 5, resident evil 5, and grand theft auto 4. Now in the past theyve been exclusive but by choice and not because of sony giveing them money. So these games have had and still have the right to go on any console they want, and now they are because of the way the consoles are selling now.

This is pretty much all in a mess, but I was in a hurry and it is very hard for me to type out what is in my head because there is so much to explain but if i could talk and tell you in person it would take me like 5 mins and you would fully understand and agree with me and in the end it is not really a big deal and sony must think its not a big deal to because they could easily throw money at some of these third party developers and get their past and current big gun games exclusive to their new system.

Avatar image for d3cus
d3cus

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 d3cus
Member since 2007 • 217 Posts
jes as long as mgs4 and ff stays wit ps3, i have no problem wit it loosing exlcusives.
Avatar image for resistancemang
resistancemang

430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 resistancemang
Member since 2007 • 430 Posts
ACTUALLY the 360 has lost more exclusives to the PC and the ps3 then the ps3 has to the PC and the 360. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT PLEASE THANKS
Avatar image for zidan4000
zidan4000

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#4 zidan4000
Member since 2006 • 3167 Posts
what you said is right . the ps2 and ps1 had a lot of exclusives because of the selling of the consoles now its the xbox360 turn to get some more games
Avatar image for Bluestorm-Kalas
Bluestorm-Kalas

13073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Bluestorm-Kalas
Member since 2006 • 13073 Posts
I'm sorry, I'm much to lazy to read that, but I will say this, both consoles have lost exclusives to eachother.
Avatar image for lantus
lantus

10591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 lantus
Member since 2006 • 10591 Posts

I'm sorry, I'm much to lazy to read that, but I will say this, both consoles have lost exclusives to eachother.Bluestorm-Kalas

Ditto.

Avatar image for r_h_i_e
r_h_i_e

149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 r_h_i_e
Member since 2005 • 149 Posts
Gran Turismo 5 is actually exclusive. You won't see it on the 360 or the Wii.
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )
Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts

its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts
money is the name of the cause ,M$ is a software scavenger and they always use this tactics to knock-down competitors
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Yellow_Rose

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts

its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts
[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive

Not the point. They paid them to make sure people who wanted to play GTA bought a PS2.

No different than what MS is doing.

Avatar image for Acenso
Acenso

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Acenso
Member since 2006 • 2355 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Yellow_Rose

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

Funny...Sony is also providing Namco Tech for Tekken 6 Arcade...I wonder at how much of a discount to keep it exculsive?

And how about all that Factor 5 Crap....Funny once your on Sony's Payroll...They seem to start singing.

Atleast we can say MS is investing wisely...Sony...Lets get a timed exculsive on UT3...Haze...Invest money into games comming out two years from now!!!

Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts

money is the name of the cause ,M$ is a software scavenger and they always use this tactics to knock-down competitorsdelol

Notice that studios can always turn down the money. So you can't just fault MS

It takes two to tango.

Avatar image for DXGreat1_HGL
DXGreat1_HGL

7543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 DXGreat1_HGL
Member since 2003 • 7543 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Yellow_Rose

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive

Not the point. They paid them to make sure people who wanted to play GTA bought a PS2.

No different than what MS is doing.

But on Planet Bovine, it's always OK when Sony does it...

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="delol"]money is the name of the cause ,M$ is a software scavenger and they always use this tactics to knock-down competitorsYellow_Rose

Notice that studios can always turn down the money. So you can't just fault MS

It takes two to tango.

Studios may not have the option to turn down the money. More and more independent studios are struggling, being bought out by the big boys or simply shuttering up altogether.
Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts

[QUOTE="delol"]money is the name of the cause ,M$ is a software scavenger and they always use this tactics to knock-down competitorsYellow_Rose

Notice that studios can always turn down the money. So you can't just fault MS

It takes two to tango.

Not in this crazy world Who has the money take the ´´girl`` is just a question of rise up the numbers
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Yellow_Rose

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive

Not the point. They paid them to make sure people who wanted to play GTA bought a PS2.

No different than what MS is doing.

yea there is sony paid em just to keep it on ps2 for a while while microsoft goes out and buys entire studios and pays to have games EXCLUSIVLY ( ONLY ON XBOX 360 )
Avatar image for darkmanure
darkmanure

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 darkmanure
Member since 2007 • 548 Posts
[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Acenso

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

Funny...Sony is also providing Namco Tech for Tekken 6 Arcade...I wonder at how much of a discount to keep it exculsive?

And how about all that Factor 5 Crap....Funny once your on Sony's Payroll...They seem to start singing.

Atleast we can say MS is investing wisely...Sony...Lets get a timed exculsive on UT3...Haze...Invest money into games comming out two years from now!!!

I don't think paying 50 mill for a couple of exclusive content is wise, it's more in the retarded I got money and you don't spending moments.
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Magical_Zebra

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

You should know that "common knowledge" doesnt exist on SW. Do you have a link? :shock:

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive

Not the point. They paid them to make sure people who wanted to play GTA bought a PS2.

No different than what MS is doing.

yea there is sony paid em just to keep it on ps2 for a while while microsoft goes out and buys entire studios and pays to have games EXCLUSIVLY ( ONLY ON XBOX 360 )

Call me crazy, then, but what do you call Polyphony Digital, Incognito Entertainment, Naughty Dog, Zipper Interactive, and (oh yes) Guerilla Games?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

Insomniac is a friendly third party (but then, Microsoft has Bizarre Creations, so turnabout is fair play). The rest are all Sony subsidiaries, which means Sony either formed them or bought them out when they were once independent.
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )Magical_Zebra

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

You should know that "common knowledge" doesnt exist on SW. Do you have a link? :shock:

a link to say that companies go to sony without them being brought out????? look back in the early ps1 days namco,insomniac,square,naughtydog they jumped aboard even though the sony was new to the market and no im not giving a LINK its not my fault u cant see it for yourself and have no common sense go look it up for urself
Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts
[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

thats timed exclusive which isnt exclusive

Not the point. They paid them to make sure people who wanted to play GTA bought a PS2.

No different than what MS is doing.

yea there is sony paid em just to keep it on ps2 for a while while microsoft goes out and buys entire studios and pays to have games EXCLUSIVLY ( ONLY ON XBOX 360 )

http://news.zdnet.com/2110-9595-527434.html

" Sony moved further into the video-game software business Monday with the purchase of game developers Red Zone Interactive and Naughty Dog " - circa 2001

Avatar image for Acenso
Acenso

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Acenso
Member since 2006 • 2355 Posts
[QUOTE="Acenso"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )darkmanure

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

Funny...Sony is also providing Namco Tech for Tekken 6 Arcade...I wonder at how much of a discount to keep it exculsive?

And how about all that Factor 5 Crap....Funny once your on Sony's Payroll...They seem to start singing.

Atleast we can say MS is investing wisely...Sony...Lets get a timed exculsive on UT3...Haze...Invest money into games comming out two years from now!!!

I don't think paying 50 mill for a couple of exclusive content is wise, it's more in the retarded I got money and you don't spending moments.

Funny...Only Sony fanboys seem to be protraying it like that now. Almost every analyist seemed to know about it before it came out and made no big deal about...Probably because they did not pay them 50mil. They loaned them 50mil. MS will get back the 50 mil. Either the Content itself on 360 generates them money...or Rockstar pays the difference back. Either way MS loses nothing and gains a major selling point for the biggest consule franchise. I would say that is called a smart business decision. More reason now to buy the 360 version over PS3. And MS can earn more money on both fronts. If the content grosses pass 50mil for MS...All of that is pure profit^^ Not to mention royalities on the game selling. More copies sold on your system means more money.

Also lets look at what else MS is funding

Gears of Wars....Mass Effect...Infinite Discovery(TriAce RPG)...Mystwalker(Blue Dragon, Lost Odyssy, Cry On)

I would say MS is being very smart now about it all. Now if you want to talk about stupid pricing...I would agree MS is morons. 6months late for a price drop, Stupid elite model, Vastly overpriced Accessory, XBL including XBLA to play online...Milkage to the extreme. But in terms of software...How can I complain? MS is investing thier interests extremely well.

Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

You should know that "common knowledge" doesnt exist on SW. Do you have a link? :shock:

a link to say that companies go to sony without them being brought out????? look back in the early ps1 days namco,insomniac,square,naughtydog they jumped aboard even though the sony was new to the market and no im not giving a LINK its not my fault u cant see it for yourself and have no common sense go look it up for urself

Translation: Im talking out the side of my neck in hopes that someone wont call my bluff. I dont have a link, nor can I produce one so I will tell other users to go find the info themselves. :shock:

Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )HuusAsking

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

Insomniac is a friendly third party (but then, Microsoft has Bizarre Creations, so turnabout is fair play). The rest are all Sony subsidiaries, which means Sony either formed them or bought them out when they were once independent.

i think naughtydog are owned buy sony now but when it was independant it went to sony like i said in brackets going back to psone days
Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts
[QUOTE="Acenso"][QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )darkmanure

You do know Sony paid Rockstar a lot of money to keep GTA a Playstation exclusive until 2004 right?

Funny...Sony is also providing Namco Tech for Tekken 6 Arcade...I wonder at how much of a discount to keep it exculsive?

And how about all that Factor 5 Crap....Funny once your on Sony's Payroll...They seem to start singing.

Atleast we can say MS is investing wisely...Sony...Lets get a timed exculsive on UT3...Haze...Invest money into games comming out two years from now!!!

I don't think paying 50 mill for a couple of exclusive content is wise, it's more in the retarded I got money and you don't spending moments.

Did you actually read the criterias of that 50 million deal?

Avatar image for Yellow_Rose
Yellow_Rose

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Yellow_Rose
Member since 2002 • 16739 Posts

a link to say that companies go to sony without them being brought out????? look back in the early ps1 days namco,insomniac,square,naughtydog they jumped aboard even though the sony was new to the market and no im not giving a LINK its not my fault u cant see it for yourself and have no common sense go look it up for urself-MoOkS-

Sorry kid, it doesn't work like that. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Debating 101.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

Insomniac is a friendly third party (but then, Microsoft has Bizarre Creations, so turnabout is fair play). The rest are all Sony subsidiaries, which means Sony either formed them or bought them out when they were once independent.

i think naughtydog are owned buy sony now but when it was independant it went to sony like i said in brackets going back to psone days

Point. ND was a friendly third party until Sony bought them in 2001, about the time the original Jak and Daxter was released.
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts

why do i need a link to proove anyting and hows it a bluff????? i never said i had a link, oh i no what this is over did i upset the wittle fwanboy with my comment about M$ having to paying to get studios onboard??? aawwwwwww poor wittle fwanboy-MoOkS-

When owned, resort to dribble talk. Let me give you some advice. Before you countinue to own yourself, you should know that Im a Manticore. You made the claim, I merely asked for a link to support YOUR claim. You obviously cant do that so "cow logic 101" tells me its time for the da da damage control dance! :shock:

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts

The only exclusive which Sony has lost which I wish they didn't lose is GTAIV...

But having said that, I trust Rockstar and know they'll be able to handle making such a complex game on 2 consoles at the same time so I'm still extremely excited about it.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]Point. ND was a friendly third party until Sony bought them in 2001, about the time the original Jak and Daxter was released.-MoOkS-
freindly as in made games for other companies?

A "friendly" third party is one who, despite being independent, has a working relationship with one of the console manufacturers such that most if not all the games they make are for that one platform. Naughty Dog was independent during the PS1 era when they created Crash Bandicoot. They were bought out by Sony in 2001 and changed to a subsidiary for Jak and Daxter. Now, Microsoft has its own share of friendly third parties, IIRC. Bizarre Creations is MS-friendly (they make the Project Gotham Racing series). Nintendo doesn't have many friendly third parties. They trend towards contracted (or second-party) developers who then let Nintendo publish the game (meanwhile, Mistwalker is a contracted second-party dev for Microsoft).
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

I love to see fanboys clammer about how M$ is paying devs to bring over games, and yet Sony just got those games out of the goodness of the devs hearts... :roll: gimme a break.

Bottom line.. The 360 came out first and had like a 7-8 million unit lead before the others even launched. So in turn the devs started to give more and more support to the 360 because THAT'S WHERE THE $$$$$ AT! Say what you want about "dev loyalty" and such but at the end of the day it's all about greenbacks.. M$ made the right move by launching first, and it's paying off.

Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives, while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

You have a link that these gamin studios just "flock" to Sony? :shock:

a link? its just common knowledge, square , naughty dog , insomniac ( going back to psone days )they jumped on board and there main titles are sony exclusive

You should know that "common knowledge" doesnt exist on SW. Do you have a link? :shock:

a link to say that companies go to sony without them being brought out????? look back in the early ps1 days namco,insomniac,square,naughtydog they jumped aboard even though the sony was new to the market and no im not giving a LINK its not my fault u cant see it for yourself and have no common sense go look it up for urself

Here, Ill help you. Dont speak on things which you have no knowledge of.

SONY Gaming Studios:

Naughty Dog

SCE Bend Studio

Zippy Interactive

Guerilla Games

^^ Oh yea. You definately may wanna click that link on Guerilla games and how Sony BOUGHT them to exclusively make games for ONLY SONY PRODUCTS.... You were saying? :shock:

Avatar image for Kevanio
Kevanio

580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Kevanio
Member since 2006 • 580 Posts
okay, name me the AAA titles that sonys great and talented first party devs have created? dont say ms doesnt have any cos they are ' useless and buy them' merely back up that statement
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"] why do i need a link to proove anyting and hows it a bluff????? i never said i had a link, oh i no what this is over did i upset the wittle fwanboy with my comment about M$ having to paying to get studios onboard??? aawwwwwww poor wittle fwanboyMagical_Zebra

When owned, resort to dribble talk. Let me give you some advice. Before you countinue to own yourself, you should know that Im a Manticore. You made the claim, I merely asked for a link to support YOUR claim. You obviously cant do that so "cow logic 101" tells me its time for the da da damage control dance! :shock:

when did i get owned? if u were a manticore surely youd have knowledge on the video game industry, and a big part of the industry was when sony launched a console and developers went to it even though it wasnt a prooven platform or had very little backing then went on to destroy sega and nintendo
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"] why do i need a link to proove anyting and hows it a bluff????? i never said i had a link, oh i no what this is over did i upset the wittle fwanboy with my comment about M$ having to paying to get studios onboard??? aawwwwwww poor wittle fwanboy-MoOkS-

When owned, resort to dribble talk. Let me give you some advice. Before you countinue to own yourself, you should know that Im a Manticore. You made the claim, I merely asked for a link to support YOUR claim. You obviously cant do that so "cow logic 101" tells me its time for the da da damage control dance! :shock:

when did i get owned? if u were a manticore surely youd haveknowledge on the video game industry, and a big part of the industry was when sony launched a console and developers went to it even though it wasnt a prooven platform or had very little backing then went on to destroy sega and nintendo

Look above, I pulled the info you so desperately wanted. Oh, SONY doesnt outright purchase game studios for exclusitivity. Check the above links for your Self Ownage..... :shock:

Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts

its loosing exclusives because microsoft studios has NO talent at all and has to paystudios money to keep there games as 360 exclusives,while sony doesnt do that the studios come to them ( will used to anyway )-MoOkS-

O really? :shock:

Guerilla Games- Killzone Series

"In 2004, Guerrilla Games signed an exclusive deal with Sony Computer Entertainment. Under the deal, Guerrilla will develop games exclusively for Sony's consoles"

Oops! :shock:

a link to say that companies go to sony without them being brought out????? look back in the early ps1 days namco,insomniac,square,naughtydog they jumped aboard even though the sony was new to the market and no im not giving a LINK its not my fault u cant see it for yourself and have no common sense go look it up for urself-MoOkS-

I looked it up for you. And sorry, you owned yourself. You were better off just providing a link or recanting your statement. :shock:

Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"] why do i need a link to proove anyting and hows it a bluff????? i never said i had a link, oh i no what this is over did i upset the wittle fwanboy with my comment about M$ having to paying to get studios onboard??? aawwwwwww poor wittle fwanboyMagical_Zebra

When owned, resort to dribble talk. Let me give you some advice. Before you countinue to own yourself, you should know that Im a Manticore. You made the claim, I merely asked for a link to support YOUR claim. You obviously cant do that so "cow logic 101" tells me its time for the da da damage control dance! :shock:

when did i get owned? if u were a manticore surely youd haveknowledge on the video game industry, and a big part of the industry was when sony launched a console and developers went to it even though it wasnt a prooven platform or had very little backing then went on to destroy sega and nintendo

Look above, I pulled the info you so desperately wanted. Oh, SONY doesnt outright purchase game studios for exclusitivity. Check the above links for your Self Ownage..... :shock:

im sure zipper made socom 1 then sony brought them( 1 example sony didnt pay that company to bring socom 1 to the ps2 like M$ does) guerilla made killzone a ps2 exclusive then sony brought them out if i remember correctly from an article in an old ps2 mag( once again guerilla chose sony even though sony didnt pay em to keep it exclusive unlike M$'s tactics) go back to my 1st post a read what i wrote
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"] why do i need a link to proove anyting and hows it a bluff????? i never said i had a link, oh i no what this is over did i upset the wittle fwanboy with my comment about M$ having to paying to get studios onboard??? aawwwwwww poor wittle fwanboy-MoOkS-

When owned, resort to dribble talk. Let me give you some advice. Before you countinue to own yourself, you should know that Im a Manticore. You made the claim, I merely asked for a link to support YOUR claim. You obviously cant do that so "cow logic 101" tells me its time for the da da damage control dance! :shock:

when did i get owned? if u were a manticore surely youd haveknowledge on the video game industry, and a big part of the industry was when sony launched a console and developers went to it even though it wasnt a prooven platform or had very little backing then went on to destroy sega and nintendo

Look above, I pulled the info you so desperately wanted. Oh, SONY doesnt outright purchase game studios for exclusitivity. Check the above links for your Self Ownage..... :shock:

im sure zipper made socom 1 then sony brought them( 1 example sony didnt pay that company to bring socom 1 to the ps2 like M$ does) guerilla made killzone a ps2 exclusive then sony brought them out if i remember correctly from an article in an old ps2 mag( once again guerilla chose sony even though sony didnt pay em to keep it exclusive unlike M$'s tactics) go back to my 1st post a read what i wrote

Dude, stop while your behind. The post is above yours.....