Number of AAs
VC: 7
XBLA: 5
Highest Score
VC 8.9
XBLA: 8.5
Number of months it's been out.
VC: 4
XBLA: 16
VC has better numbers and has been able to do it in 1/4 the time.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
But XBL lets you play games online. Wii....not for awile. lolNumber of AAs
VC: 7
XBLA: 5
Highest Score
VC 8.9
XBLA: 8.5
Number of months it's been out.
VC: 4
XBLA: 16
VC has better numbers and has been able to do it in 1/4 the time.
NATATO
[QUOTE="NATATO"]Number of AAs
VC: 7
XBLA: 5
Highest Score
VC 8.9
XBLA: 8.5
Number of months it's been out.
VC: 4
XBLA: 16
VC has better numbers and has been able to do it in 1/4 the time.
MavsFan2007
Good online would boost XBLA scores, aparently not enough. VC can beat them even without online.
Meh... scores mean nothing...
Super Metroid
Super Mario 64
Ocarina of Time
A Link to the Past
Super Mario Bros.
Super Mario Bros. 3
Super Mario World
Donkey Kong Country
Super Mario RPG Legend of the Seven Stars
Starfox 64
Sonic the Hedgehog
Gunstar Heroes
Metroid
Punch Out!!
Zombies Ate My Neighbours
That is why VC > XBLA
Not just because of scores, but the games are overall better because I grew up playing them. nyoroismYep, that's exactly the reason.. I'm looking forward to seeing what they do with the original content though...
[QUOTE="NATATO"]Number of AAs
VC: 7
XBLA: 5
Highest Score
VC 8.9
XBLA: 8.5
Number of months it's been out.
VC: 4
XBLA: 16
VC has better numbers and has been able to do it in 1/4 the time.
MavsFan2007
The virtual console games will never be playable online. Nintendo's whole effort is to sell the complete original game that you would remember from a kid on the service.
I personally think that the Wii's Virtual Console is better because the massive library that is being uploaded to it, with some of the best games ever made.
[QUOTE="NATATO"]Number of AAs
VC: 7
XBLA: 5
Highest Score
VC 8.9
XBLA: 8.5
Number of months it's been out.
VC: 4
XBLA: 16
VC has better numbers and has been able to do it in 1/4 the time.
MavsFan2007
XBLA=Live arcade, not the online multiplayer.
Sry, I'm using numbers because thats the only way to argue with cows or lemmings. If i was to list all the great games VC has they'd just come out and say "those are all crap, Nintendo VC is teh milkage" NATATO
Thats why you dont bother arguing in the first place. :P
While I will admit that the Virtual Console is overall better than Xbox Live Arcade, they both have their positives and negatives.
On the flip side, XBLA revamps the graphics, adds new features (online play, leader-boards, achievements) and are usually a pretty fair price (sometimes free: ie Texas Hold Em' Poker).
[QUOTE="TrueReligion_"]Owning the actual game for its appropriate console is better than both of those.gromit007
Not really. My SNES is no longer working and games with actual 3D rendering look better on the Wii. SM64 best example.
SM64 is an example of how things are sometimes too clear with emulation. If you get the camera out far enough, you can see Mario's model actually change from detailed to a blocky Mario. Keep an eye on the nose and the hat, because it's easier to see change.EDIT: Forgot to mention that this was less apparent on an actual copy of the game.
Owning the actual game for its appropriate console is better than both of those.TrueReligion_
The whole idea is that Wii will have the largest library of games by the end of this gnerations (all Wii and GCs games + VC).
It's a lot better to have games from like 7 different concoles on one machine, than having all those concoles hooked up at the same time.
Owning the actual game for its appropriate console is better than both of those.TrueReligion_Agreed.
The problem is they're ports with no updates what so ever unlike xbla. I mean xbla has improved graphics in hd, leaderboards, co-op and vc doesn'tklabut
1) improved graphics in HD for arcade games? I don't htink classic arcade games need to be played in HD, I they're actually better left alone (see the southpark with George Lucus and making fun of him upgrading star wars, they make a great point)
2) Leaderboards... So what. Like i need to know im 12304956 in world at geomerty wars
3) There are VC games with multiplayer feautres.
VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.FlawlessSeasons
Come one now. Gotta throw Wii a bone. The quality of VC has to make up for the lack of games on the Wii itself. It's just too bad that Nintendo has to regurgitate old games, with little to no improvements over being simple ports.
VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.FlawlessSeasons
[QUOTE="FlawlessSeasons"]VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.foxhound_fox
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="FlawlessSeasons"]VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.Panzer_Zwei
Right now I'll take Xbox Live because of Geometry Wars, however as soon as Super Mario RPG is released that will change.Sparky04amen
I thought ROMS were illegal period even if you own the actual original game.Panzer_Zwei
Depends on your country, and how you're copying. In the the US of A, we have a wonderful little provision called the Digital Millenium Copyright Act which makes it illegal to circumvent any form of copy-prevention. However, at the same time we're legally allowed to make backup copies of copyrighted material, as long as there's no copy-protection. Yes, its stupid.
Anyway just about all video games have some fom of copy-protection on them, so in the States you can't make backup copies.
[QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="FlawlessSeasons"]VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.drewtwo99
[QUOTE="drewtwo99"][QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="FlawlessSeasons"]VC sucks because you waste your money on games you can get... *ehem* otherways. XBLA is the best because you get new games along with others.Panzer_Zwei
Yeah it's the same here. It's a moral choice, not so much one about whether or not you'll get caught or penalized. I agree with you though, it's not a valid reason to claim that VC is useless because you can just download them for free, and you are right again, VC are expensive, and in most cases, just over priced.drewtwo99
Most of them are overpriced. Some of them are well worth the purchase. I think they should do a pricing scheme where the less popular ones go down in price over time. Like the guns in CSS. I still have yet to buy any, seeing as how I have played most of them. But when Majora's Mask, Super Metroid, Metroid, Zombies Ate My Neighbors and a couple other come out, I am definitely setting down some cash.foxhound_foxYeah. I bought Sonic and Bonks (Sonic because I just LOVE the debug mode and still play it a lot, and Bonks because everyone said it was so awesome and I wanted to play it). There are a few more that are probably well worth the price (LoZ: a link to the past is one I really want). It seems that the only thing they have in place is that the really popular games are always like 1 or 2 dollars more, or something stupid like that. It's weird.
Both of them are like too entirely different markets. XBLA is like updating the classics, adding new content(kind of likeRemakes to say) and new games. VC is pretty much just a huge Rom/Emulator service...Legally.
PSN on the other hand....Just a crap version of both
Both of them are like too entirely different markets. XBLA is like updating the classics, adding new content(kind of likeRemakes to say) and new games. VC is pretty much just a huge Rom/Emulator service...Legally.
PSN on the other hand....Just a crap version of both
Acenso
:lol:
I think you summed that up quite nicely. PSN's really gotta get its act together.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment