Wii Game Graphics > PS3, 360

And what I mean by that is games that shoot for an art style will look better then the games that go for photo realism ten years from now. Mario Galaxy, DKCR, Kirby EY, Metroid Prime 3 etc. will always...ALWAYS will look good. Assasin's Creed, Call of Duty and the like will age quickly and look bad in a few years from now. What i've learned from this genereation: Nintendo Always Knows What They're Doing...Trust Them.

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

Kirby and Mario, yes. But, I think Metroid art is rather generic.magicalclick

How can those games look good years from now if they don't look good now?

Well, lemme just put aside graphics and note that in ten years, Mario, DKC Returns, New Super Mario Bros Wii, etc will be "those awesome games I grew up with" and "those fun games I remember" to an entire generation. People will forget about Modern Warfare 2, Killzone, and even Halo ODST and Halo Reach, because there isn't a single thing those games do that FPSs in the future won't be able to do better. I think Portal and the first Modern Warfare will be remembered because those games were phenomenons in their time.Mrmccormo

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

Teufelhuhn

How can those games look good years from now if they don't look good now?

Grawse

How can those games look good years from now if they don't look good now?

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

Blabadon

For an unreleased game?

In that case, Battlefield 3 AA confirmed?

Yep, i'm agree, games like SMG, DCKR and even TP has some amazing artstyle, however saying that Wii>PS3/360 in that department is wrong, sure there are bland games like GEOW and Killzone, but there are also games like Bayonetta and Prince of Persia with amazing art style.

yeah, because HD system have no games with artstyle

I'm pretty sure they'll all look better than any Wii game if we look back to them in the future thanks to the higher resolution. Yeah I do get your point with photo realism, but c'mon, you can't just asume only the Wii has games with art****/p>

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

[QUOTE="Mrmccormo"]Well, lemme just put aside graphics and note that in ten years, Mario, DKC Returns, New Super Mario Bros Wii, etc will be "those awesome games I grew up with" and "those fun games I remember" to an entire generation. People will forget about Modern Warfare 2, Killzone, and even Halo ODST and Halo Reach, because there isn't a single thing those games do that FPSs in the future won't be able to do better. I think Portal and the first Modern Warfare will be remembered because those games were phenomenons in their time.TigerWars

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

Artistic style? In that case, the system that Team Ico develops for wins.

PS3, please step up and take your medal!!! ;)

yeah, because HD system have no games with artstyle

I'm pretty sure they'll all look better than any Wii game if we look back to them in the future thanks to the higher resolution. Yeah I do get your point with photo realism, but c'mon, you can't just asume only the Wii has games with art****/p>

ArchoNils2

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Grawse"]

How can those games look good years from now if they don't look good now?

TigerWars

http://img858.imageshack.us/img858/5179/img00832.jpg

[QUOTE="TigerWars"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] So you're saying Kirby's Epic Yarn, Donkey Kong Country Returns, Super Mario Galaxy etc don't look good? Is this for real?Grawse

http://img858.imageshack.us/img858/5179/img00832.jpg

[QUOTE="ArchoNils2"]

yeah, because HD system have no games with artstyle

I'm pretty sure they'll all look better than any Wii game if we look back to them in the future thanks to the higher resolution. Yeah I do get your point with photo realism, but c'mon, you can't just asume only the Wii has games with art****/p>

TigerWars

I completely agree with you in this regard, but several of the PS3 and 360 games have great artistic style like Valkyria.

Making games that you'll remember is still Nintendo's specialty and I don't feel that they get enough credit for that from the PS3/360 fanboys.

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

charizard1605

▲ Well, seeing as how the N64 was more powerfull than the PSone, I think that's kind of a given. ▲

Why is realism not considered a style?forgot_it

▲ Because the people who say so have the weakest console. ▲

And what I mean by that is games that shoot for an art style will look better then the games that go for photo realism ten years from now. Mario Galaxy, DKCR, Kirby EY, Metroid Prime 3 etc. will always...ALWAYS will look good. Assasin's Creed, Call of Duty and the like will age quickly and look bad in a few years from now. What i've learned from this genereation: Nintendo Always Knows What They're Doing...Trust Them.

TigerWars

what you are arguing is visuals, not graphics.

EDIT: and you are also implying that there are no games on the 360/ps3 that are artistically stunning as well, which is also false.

I am rooting for this. They are always adorable. :oops:

magicalclick

that looks awful. who got vaseline on the pinata's?! (and the rest of the image) :P

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

Teufelhuhn

Art direction is subjective.

Some may not like having games with color in them, then what?

Art direction is subjective.

Some may not like having games with color in them, then what?

mitu123

chase them down with fire and pitchforks.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Art direction is subjective.

Some may not like having games with color in them, then what?

theuncharted34

chase them down with fire and pitchforks.

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Art direction is subjective.

Some may not like having games with color in them, then what?

mitu123

chase them down with fire and pitchforks.

yeah, I know :P for ex. I think madworld had a cool artstyle, and that was just black and white. would really love to see a game like that on a stronger system.

Some may not like having games with color in them, then what?

mitu123

They are dead inside. They don't count.

Also, to be honest, I don't really get this whole art styl3 = colors trend. Your game can have colors and be cartoony or your game can be brown and gray. I prefer colorful games and I do think they age better, but saying "art styl3" instead of color is pretentious and kind of dumb.

Nintendo Games rarely age well, you look at Oot,Super Mario 64 and Golden Eye they look pretty bland.

The only Nintendo game that has aged well is

RE1 remake for the GC.

Ps3 your turn:

vs

Wii's attempt:

Results:

Ps3 wins

How can those games look good years from now if they don't look good now?

Grawse

heck even goldeneye wii looks better then those halo 3 graphics meh look at em not even realistic like ms claims 360 is supposed to be ,

-u wanna see a proper 360 fps---cod mw is it or bf2

so with that said wii is a very capable system if in the right hands , ,

---heck if timesplitters future perfect can look as good as it did ,, then there is nothing wrong with it

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

charizard1605

But they only do because the N64 had better graphics than PS. The same thing people said about Yoshi's Island and other games on SNES like Chrono Trigger , now they look so ugly with pixelated sprites.

But they only do because the N64 had better graphics than PS.

glez13

Back then, teenagers kept saying that the PS had better graphics than the Nintendo 64 because they were more realistic and had a crapload of full motion videos and pre-rendered backgrounds. Plus, the N64 was teh kiddy. And so was the Gamecube because it looked like a lunch box.

And what I mean by that is games that shoot for an art style will look better then the games that go for photo realism ten years from now. Mario Galaxy, DKCR, Kirby EY, Metroid Prime 3 etc. will always...ALWAYS will look good. Assasin's Creed, Call of Duty and the like will age quickly and look bad in a few years from now. What i've learned from this genereation: Nintendo Always Knows What They're Doing...Trust Them.

TigerWars

Well, lemme just put aside graphics and note that in ten years, Mario, DKC Returns, New Super Mario Bros Wii, etc will be "those awesome games I grew up with" and "those fun games I remember" to an entire generation. People will forget about Modern Warfare 2, Killzone, and even Halo ODST and Halo Reach, because there isn't a single thing those games do that FPSs in the future won't be able to do better. I think Portal and the first Modern Warfare will be remembered because those games were phenomenons in their time.Mrmccormo

this.

but i can see brink also being considered as a benchmark if the "execution" is right

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

Teufelhuhn

Yeah Mario and the likes are great, but I don't see why people make a fuss about Metroid atmosphere. It's average IMO

I don't think that Mario 64 and Zelda OOT still look good. :?

Teufelhuhn

It may be nostalgia, but I think OoT still looks great.

yeah, because HD system have no games with artstyle

*snip*

I'm pretty sure they'll all look better than any Wii game if we look back to them in the future thanks to the higher resolution. Yeah I do get your point with photo realism, but c'mon, you can't just asume only the Wii has games with art****/p>

ArchoNils2

How come whenever someone posts a picture of Braid, it isn't the final build?