link
thats aweful for those who keep bashing the wii for crappy games when cleary if a dev takes their time to make a good game, it will be good.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
link
thats aweful for those who keep bashing the wii for crappy games when cleary if a dev takes their time to make a good game, it will be good.
Whats aweful?I've had the game for a month now.
The game works GREAT.
Howeverrrr the game doesn't have enough oomph.
You have the campaign which is an extremely childish tutorial and then Endless Play.
And that's it.
I would have liked some more campaign stuff, a little variation.
I can't recommend it for full price, but it definitely shows RTS could work great on the wii.
That's the problem isn't it? So much potential...
If there is going to be a next gen motion system some time (i don't think the devs have the required insight this gen) it will be my new hearted RTS and FPS platform.
I've had the game for a month now.
The game works GREAT.
Butttttttttt the game doesn't have enough oomph.
You have the campaign which is an extremely childish tutorial and then Endless Play.
And that's is.
I would have liked some more campaign stuff, a little variation.
I can't recommend it for full price, but it definitely shows RTS could work great on the wii.
That's the problem isn't it? So much potential...
If there is going to be a next gen motion system some time (i don't think the devs have the required insight this gen) it will be my new hearted RTS and FPS platform.KungfuKitten
I find that with quite a few Wii games, it's clear that Wii is amazing for FPS, for RTS, for most genres, yet nobody takes advantage of that, 360 and PS3 are good for FPS but Wii is a lot more fun in that genre, yet PS3 and 360 get a new FPS every 2 weeks, and Wii's lucky to get 2 a year.
[QUOTE="Communistsheep"]
They give halo wars a 6.5 but anno 8.0 what is gamespot smoking?
kingkui
Halo Wars sucked, Anno was good. See the light?
Have you played the game?let me just say what we are all thinking...that game looks lame. Sony and Microsoft created their consoles with good immune systems to prevent diseases like that game infecting them.
Where have you been? They've been doing this for years now. And the only awful thing in this topic is TC's spelling.They give halo wars a 6.5 but anno 8.0 what is gamespot smoking?
Communistsheep
the game would have gotten a 9.0 if it was on ps3 or xbox360DeadEndPandaNot really, i wonder what halo wars would get if it was on wii?
[QUOTE="Communistsheep"]Where have you been? They've been doing this for years now. And the only awful thing in this topic is TC's spelling. I found it great that it got an 8.0, but i'm still mad that they gave halo wars a 6.5They give halo wars a 6.5 but anno 8.0 what is gamespot smoking?
fenwickhotmail
[QUOTE="DeadEndPanda"]the game would have gotten a 9.0 if it was on ps3 or xbox360CommunistsheepNot really, i wonder what halo wars would get if it was on wii?
yes really, why dont you just face it. halo wars is a bad game, halo in the name dosent make it good, in fact, it makes it worse.
its just like something with the name wii on it, WII Wars would have sold alot, but would have been as crappy as halo
[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"][QUOTE="Communistsheep"]Where have you been? They've been doing this for years now. And the only awful thing in this topic is TC's spelling. I found it great that it got an 8.0, but i'm still mad that they gave halo wars a 6.5 There are always going to be scores that you disagree with. Were the two games reviewed by the same person?They give halo wars a 6.5 but anno 8.0 what is gamespot smoking?
Communistsheep
Not really, i wonder what halo wars would get if it was on wii?[QUOTE="Communistsheep"][QUOTE="DeadEndPanda"]the game would have gotten a 9.0 if it was on ps3 or xbox360DeadEndPanda
yes really, why dont you just face it. halo wars is a bad game, halo in the name dosent make it good, in fact, it makes it worse.
its just like something with the name wii on it, WII Wars would have sold alot, but would have been as crappy as halo
Nope. Have you even played halo wars`In what position are you to say what games suck and what don't. Halo wars should have been a 8, but no, crappy gamespot reviewer compares it to a pc game instead, and not the 8 different console rts. I didn't buy it because it had halo on it, i bought it because i tried the demo. and enjoyed it. An AAA franchise makes a game worse? Say what? Halo is not crappy, a crittacally aclaimed series, vs conduit for example.He was complaining about now being able to play as different races in the campaign, and not having enough modes even though the dlc came out 3 months ago.
Was it DLC that did not come with the game? A number of people do not have their 360 connected to the internet, so it would be more fair to base a review on how a game is from the day it's bought and not what it is like after DLC. I say this because I do not have my 360 connected to the internet.He was complaining about now being able to play as different races in the campaign, and not having enough modes even though the dlc came out 3 months ago.
Communistsheep
There also may be your reason why Ammo got a better score it had more modes from the start.
Was it DLC that did not come with the game? A number of people do not have their 360 connected to the internet, so it would be more fair to base a review on how a game is from the day it's bought and not what it is like after DLC. I say this because I do not have my 360 connected to the internet.[QUOTE="Communistsheep"]
He was complaining about now being able to play as different races in the campaign, and not having enough modes even though the dlc came out 3 months ago.
HarlockJC
There also may be your reason why Ammo got a better score it had more modes from the start.
Possible, but that does not justify the rest you could get atleast 8-10 hours through the campaign, and a skirmish mode that is alot of fun, the review was terrible, the worst part was when he compared them to pc games.[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Low standards FTW!Communistsheepsadly.
yup, thats also why LBP got an 9.0 , on the wii it would have gotten a 7.5 since it actully has good platformers :P
fanboyism is fun, even if there is only 1 standard, game sites rate games at the same standards
He was reviewing the complete game upon release. Its his opinion if you dont agree with it, wth does it matter? just play the game instead of complaining about its score.He was complaining about now being able to play as different races in the campaign, and not having enough modes even though the dlc came out 3 months ago.
Communistsheep
I don't know why people are associating Anno with low standards. Maybe it's because they are ignorant and have never heard of the franchise. Either way, it's very prominent in Germany and is pretty much an AA franchise.
If only a thread was made whenever the PS3/360 get another AA.
Oh no that's right, lemmings and cows don't feel the need to prove their consoles have games every chance they get.STRETCH-E
Correction have good games :D and what is happening in your avatar? has she just been maced?
If only a thread was made whenever the PS3/360 get another AA.
Oh no that's right, lemmings and cows don't feel the need to prove their consoles have games every chance they get.STRETCH-E
That's because cows and lemmings refuse to accept that the Wii has good games by focusing on shovelware. Perhaps if they would stop showing how horribly misinformed they are, Wii owners wouldn't need to open threads to prove them wrong.
If only a thread was made whenever the PS3/360 get another AA.
Oh no that's right, lemmings and cows don't feel the need to prove their consoles have games every chance they get.STRETCH-E
Most games that gamespot scores an 8.0 or above get at least one thread in system wars. Call of Juarez and Fight Night both got threads.
If only a thread was made whenever the PS3/360 get another AA.
Oh no that's right, lemmings and cows don't feel the need to prove their consoles have games every chance they get.STRETCH-E
if only cows and lemmins would concentrate on not bashing the wii, oh ya, the wii is currently the best console thats why they need to bash it to feel better :P
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Low standards FTW!HaziqonfireIts on the PC too - I guess the PC has low standards too huh? Not to mention there are quite a few RTS's on the Wii already released, so comparisons on the platform can be made. Games such as LKS, Fire Emblem and Batallion Wars II.
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Low standards FTW!Communistsheepsadly. Anyone else see the contradiction here? You accuse the Wii review of having low standards, yet complain that they DIDN'T lower the standards when reviewing Halo Wars.
sadly.[QUOTE="Communistsheep"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"] [QUOTE="DeadEndPanda"]
[QUOTE="Communistsheep"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Low standards FTW!DeadEndPanda
yup, thats also why LBP got an 9.0 , on the wii it would have gotten a 7.5 since it actully has good platformers :P
fanboyism is fun, even if there is only 1 standard, game sites rate games at the same standards
It got a 9.0 for it's multiplayer and creativity, the platforming was just good. Fanboyism what, that i was pissed that gamespot reviewed a game based on pc standards and not console standards.
[QUOTE="DeadEndPanda"]
[QUOTE="Communistsheep"] sadly.Communistsheep
yup, thats also why LBP got an 9.0 , on the wii it would have gotten a 7.5 since it actully has good platformers :P
fanboyism is fun, even if there is only 1 standard, game sites rate games at the same standards
It got a 9.0 for it's multiplayer and creativity, the platforming was just good. Fanboyism what, that i was pissed that gamespot reviewed a game based on pc standards and not console standards.
How do you know they didn't review Anno Wii based on PC standards? :| The IR pointer sure as hell makes it a lot better than any normal console RTS.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment