http://www.mobilenapps.com/articles/3058/20120712/wii-u-clock-speed-lower-xbox-360-playstation-3-tekken-street-fighter.htm
Well at least the dev is wishful thinking
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm no hardware expert but doesn't lower clock speed just mean that they have the Wii-U set to use less of its avalible power for the default in comparison to the 360? So are they even proportional? A underclocked Wii U wcould still be more powerful then a overclocked 360 because the hardware isn't the same right?
I'm no hardware expert but doesn't lower clock speed just mean that they have the Wii-U set to use less of its avalible power for the default in comparison to the 360? So are they even proportional? A underclocked Wii U wcould still be more powerful then a overclocked 360 because the hardware isn't the same right?
inb4uall
Yep!But sadly people on SW don't understand that.
That's sad and frankly, quite pathetic really. Especially when you compare it to 6-7 year old consoles like PS3 and 360.
360 has quite an efficient dev friendly architecture, Nintendo couldn't atleast follow a modest more powerful route?
Going on about clock speeds? Clock speed is important, but not so much any more, in fact I remember clock speed becoming less of an issue from when Athlon released the Athlon XP range of processors. These days clock speed is not that meaningful.
Besides, the 360 is clocked at 3.2Ghz. In my PC I run a Pentium G840 which is 2.8GHz, but that combined with the Radeon 7870 and I defecate all over my 360's graphics. Batman Arkham City, more pixels, frames, and detail on my PC, but with a lower clock speed.
No it seems, going for the casual pot and abandon hardcore fans from the old days like me (n64, gamecube).That's sad and frankly, quite pathetic really. Especially when you compare it to 6-7 year old consoles like PS3 and 360.
360 has quite an efficient dev friendly architecture, Nintendo couldn't atleast follow a modest more powerful route?
KingsofQueens
its possible, there is a lot to take into account, if your looking at just pure clock speed, there is one other aspect that is heavily related, cycles/instruction, if you have a 1ghz processor with a deeper pipeline that take 5 cycles for one instrucntion, and another processor that is 200mhz and only takes 1 cycle per instruction, you essentially could have the same performance.I'm no hardware expert but doesn't lower clock speed just mean that they have the Wii-U set to use less of its avalible power for the default in comparison to the 360? So are they even proportional? A underclocked Wii U wcould still be more powerful then a overclocked 360 because the hardware isn't the same right?
inb4uall
edit: I take that back, they wouldn't be the same performance, the first instrunction would take the same amount of time to process but instrucntions after that will pop out faster on teh 1ghz cpu. It'll have a higher throughput, but from start to finish each individual command will take as long as the 200mhz verions. 5 commands will be latched in the pipe though.
[QUOTE="inb4uall"]
I'm no hardware expert but doesn't lower clock speed just mean that they have the Wii-U set to use less of its avalible power for the default in comparison to the 360? So are they even proportional? A underclocked Wii U wcould still be more powerful then a overclocked 360 because the hardware isn't the same right?
super600
Yep!But sadly people on SW don't understand that.
I figured, but I jsut wanted to make sure I had it correctly:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
This is old. It's already been confirmed that the Wii U is stronger than current consoles in some aspects and weaker in others.
Doolz2024
The existant of Wii U graphical debate tells you something about the system...And judging by the screenshots and videos, its slightly weaker than the PlayStation 3 and much much weaker than the Xbox 360.
Third time this joke has been used in the thread...It wasn't funny the first time it was used.Wii-Underpowered
Tikeio
:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
This is old. It's already been confirmed that the Wii U is stronger than current consoles in some aspects and weaker in others.
Bigboi500
That gaming PC won't play Tekken God Tournament 2, or many other high-profile console exclusives.
How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.
Tikeio
That gaming PC won't play Tekken God Tournament 2, or many other high-profile console exclusives.
People can't have their cake and eat it too. Every system can't do everything for everyone.How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.
Tikeio
That gaming PC won't play Tekken God Tournament 2, or many other high-profile console exclusives.
Lol at anyone who only plays on one system.>.>:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.You're ok with a next generation console, releasing 7 years after the Xbox 360, being weaker in some aspects? :? This seriously does not seem even the slightest bit pathetic to you?[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
This is old. It's already been confirmed that the Wii U is stronger than current consoles in some aspects and weaker in others.
Bigboi500
How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.You're ok with a next generation console, releasing 7 years after the Xbox 360, being weaker in some aspects? :? This seriously does not seem even the slightest bit pathetic to you?No because I don't automatically equate "power" with "good". Like I said, if I was a graphics whore and cared about raw power, I'd be a PC gamer. I don't, so I'm not.[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]:lol: That is just sad. Guess that U does stand for Underpowered.
Doolz2024
[QUOTE="Tikeio"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.
mitu123
That gaming PC won't play Tekken God Tournament 2, or many other high-profile console exclusives.
Lol at anyone who only plays on one system.>.>You're ok with a next generation console, releasing 7 years after the Xbox 360, being weaker in some aspects? :? This seriously does not seem even the slightest bit pathetic to you?No because I don't automatically equate "power" with "good". Like I said, if I was a graphics whore and cared about raw power, I'd be a PC gamer. I don't, so I'm not. So if Wii U had atari graphics you would be fine? :lol: Soem people actually have expectations for Nintendo. Being better than 7 year old hardware is one of them. Being worse is a joke.[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]How is it "sad" ? It's just different. If you want a super duper powerful gaming machine go get a gaming PC.
Bigboi500
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]No because I don't automatically equate "power" with "good". Like I said, if I was a graphics whore and cared about raw power, I'd be a PC gamer. I don't, so I'm not. So if Wii U had atari graphics you would be fine? :lol: Soem people actually have expectations for Nintendo. Being better than 7 year old hardware is one of them. Being worse is a joke.It's not worse. Being a blind fanboy such as yourself just allows your brain to stop functioning properly. That must be the case when you are led to beleive that seven year old hardware could be better than a new system.[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]You're ok with a next generation console, releasing 7 years after the Xbox 360, being weaker in some aspects? :? This seriously does not seem even the slightest bit pathetic to you?
reach3
All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2005 (ThanksTikeio)released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
psymon100
All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
psymon100
360 came out in 2005.
[QUOTE="psymon100"]No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.so lower clock speed = weaker system even though it's been said time and time again that it outpaces the 360 in dozens of other areas? Gotta love that lem logicAll right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
reach3
[QUOTE="psymon100"]No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.Tom Cruise will be President of the United States in 2016 and Pink Pepsi will be the most popular drink.All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
reach3
Lol at anyone who only plays on one system.>.> I'm not used to owning single systems, to me missing out on games you really, really want and can't play them because you dedicate yourself to one system isn't worth it.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="Tikeio"]
That gaming PC won't play Tekken God Tournament 2, or many other high-profile console exclusives.
Tikeio
The fact that we even HAVE to debate if the WiiU is weaker or more Powerful then the current HD twins in itself is pretty pathetic on Nintendo's part. PS4, and Xbox720 are releasing (I assume) in a year and a half meaning they can put better hardware in it then they would have if they released them at the same time as the wiiU, they won't have a tablet holding back any of the power unlike the WiiU, AND the won't have to spend (idk how much the tablet it) I say 1/3 of the system for a half ass tablet so they can focus on better hardware. While the next gen jump might not be as big as this gen the WiiU will lag behind when the HD twins release their next console. I assume the difference in power would be like roughly comparing the PS2 to the Gamecube?
[QUOTE="psymon100"]
All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
Tikeio
360 came out in 2005.
Yes, you're right. Thank you.I would say (power wise) wii u = ps2 ps4 = gamecube xbox 720 = 360 in difference of performanceThe fact that we even HAVE to debate if the WiiU is weaker or more Powerful then the current HD twins in itself is pretty pathetic on Nintendo's part. PS4, and Xbox720 are releasing (I assume) in a year and a half meaning they can put better hardware in it then they would have if they released them at the same time as the wiiU, they won't have a tablet holding back any of the power unlike the WiiU, AND the won't have to spend (idk how much the tablet it) I say 1/3 of the system for a half ass tablet so they can focus on better hardware. While the next gen jump might not be as big as this gen the WiiU will lag behind when the HD twins release their next console. I assume the difference in power would be like roughly comparing the PS2 to the Gamecube?
Blake135
[QUOTE="Blake135"]I would say (power wise) wii u = ps2 ps4 = gamecube xbox 720 = 360 in difference of performanceThe fact that we even HAVE to debate if the WiiU is weaker or more Powerful then the current HD twins in itself is pretty pathetic on Nintendo's part. PS4, and Xbox720 are releasing (I assume) in a year and a half meaning they can put better hardware in it then they would have if they released them at the same time as the wiiU, they won't have a tablet holding back any of the power unlike the WiiU, AND the won't have to spend (idk how much the tablet it) I say 1/3 of the system for a half ass tablet so they can focus on better hardware. While the next gen jump might not be as big as this gen the WiiU will lag behind when the HD twins release their next console. I assume the difference in power would be like roughly comparing the PS2 to the Gamecube?
reach3
Lol dude I was happy you were agreeing with me..until I saw the last part of your sentence:(
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="psymon100"]No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.so lower clock speed = weaker system even though it's been said time and time again that it outpaces the 360 in dozens of other areas? Gotta love that lem logicAll right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
Shinobishyguy
If that were true Ninja Gaiden wouldn't be running at 30 frames and Batman would look better than the PS3 version. Even Pikmin, a 1st party game looks pretty pathetic, only saved by the art-style.
so lower clock speed = weaker system even though it's been said time and time again that it outpaces the 360 in dozens of other areas? Gotta love that lem logic[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="reach3"] No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.Gue1
Batman looks worse than the PS3 version and Ninja gaiden runs at 30 frames. If that were true this wouldn't be happening.
+1 sheep trying to making excuses as usualso lower clock speed = weaker system even though it's been said time and time again that it outpaces the 360 in dozens of other areas? Gotta love that lem logic[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="reach3"] No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.Gue1
If that were true Ninja Gaiden wouldn't be running at 30 frames and Batman would look better than the PS3 version. Even Pikmin, a 1st party game looks pretty pathetic, only saved by the art-style.
Ninja gaiden also has alot more activity going on compared to the original versions on the ps3/360[QUOTE="Gue1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]so lower clock speed = weaker system even though it's been said time and time again that it outpaces the 360 in dozens of other areas? Gotta love that lem logicShinobishyguy
If that were true Ninja Gaiden wouldn't be running at 30 frames and Batman would look better than the PS3 version. Even Pikmin, a 1st party game looks pretty pathetic, only saved by the art-style.
Ninja gaiden also has alot more activity going on compared to the original versions on the ps3/360 :lol: and if it was stronger it would be able to handle it[QUOTE="psymon100"]No. Xbox 1 had better graphics than wii and wii released 5 years after. pathetic. Same will happen with Wii U and 360. And 720 will destroy them all next year.All right. Just stop a minute. How is the Wii U going to have weaker graphical output than a 2006 released Microsoft Xbox 360? How? Can't people see that such a claim is nonsensical conjecture?
When Wii U is released it will take the second place title away from the 360 and PS3 (obviously Hermits will forever hold onto the graphics crown). I would be willing to put a hefty wager on such a prediction.
reach3
They were literally tied in graphically capabilities except the Wii had a slightly better GPU and a slower CPU that was better then the xbox's cpu.The xbox had two advantages over the Wii.Programmable shaders and 720P outputThe wii also had more ram.But the best looking games on the console only used like 50% of the system from what I heard.
There are already multiple threads on this topic, even on the first page. No need for other threads when they are right there.
And I'm hating to have to keep repeating this but the Wii U uses newer tech. The CPU is likely superior to 360/PS3 even at a lower speed (Likely 2.4Ghz or at lowest I imagine) and you'd be crazy if you think the PS4/720 will have Quad/Six Core CPUs anywhere near 3.2Ghz.
The Tekken producer didn't even say underpowered, you're literally putting words into his mouth.
The existant of Wii U graphical debate tells you something about the system...And judging by the screenshots and videos, its slightly weaker than the PlayStation 3 and much much weaker than the Xbox 360.
Click_Clock
The WiiU uses a GPGPU probably and a somewhat different CPU.No port or game at launch will take advantage of this difference.
That sucks, notice though it's only being compared to the 360 and not the PS3. That's because the PS3 is far more powerful and not done yet, if devs focused on only the PS3 all games would look like Uncharted or TLOU level. You'll never get that with the 360 or Wii U.
PS3 is capable of doing games right up there with high end PC games like Witcher 2. Uncharted, TLOU, GOWA, KZ ect...all rival many high end PC games out there, and in some areas the PS3 does it better, TLOU character models and animations look better than Witcher 2 PC.
The PS3 is in a league of it's own. It's the truth and you all know it, now come at me butt hurt fanboys! (Put's on Flame Shield)
Hermits will deny it. PS3 graphics are just as good as PCThat sucks, notice though it's only being compared to the 360 and not the PS3. That's because the PS3 is far more powerful and not done yet, if devs focused on only the PS3 all games would look like Uncharted or TLOU level. You'll never get that with the 360 or Wii U.
PS3 is capable of doing games right up there with high end PC games like Witcher 2. Uncharted, TLOU, GOWA, KZ ect...all rival many high end PC games out there, and in some areas the PS3 does it better, TLOU character models and animations look better than Witcher 2 PC.
The PS3 is in a league of it's own. It's the truth and you all know it, now come at me butt hurt fanboys! (Put's on Flame Shield)
ShadowMoses900
That sucks, notice though it's only being compared to the 360 and not the PS3. That's because the PS3 is far more powerful and not done yet, if devs focused on only the PS3 all games would look like Uncharted or TLOU level. You'll never get that with the 360 or Wii U.
PS3 is capable of doing games right up there with high end PC games like Witcher 2. Uncharted, TLOU, GOWA, KZ ect...all rival many high end PC games out there, and in some areas the PS3 does it better, TLOU character models and animations look better than Witcher 2 PC.
The PS3 is in a league of it's own. It's the truth and you all know it, now come at me butt hurt fanboys! (Put's on Flame Shield)
ShadowMoses900
The WiiU will destroy the PS3.So stop bragging.:P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment