[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="darkspineslayer"] First of all, define next gen games to me. Let me in on whatever is going on in your mind, because I'm losing track. Please don't just say visuals. Secondly, hell of a crystal ball you got there. 360 started off slowly, with games looking barely better than previous generation titles. You don't have any idea what the Wii U is capable of, none of us do, and likely only Nintendo ever will. Your making assumptions based on demos from E3 on hardware that's only recently been finalized, and from dev teams just learning the hardware. The fact we already have ports that look better than the current gen is an excellent start (and that's what it is, a start)Stratacoustic
Maybe you were too young for e3 2005. Everone was amazed at all the next gen games. Cod 2 was a launch game that ran at double the resolution of games on prevoius gen consoles. You needed a high end pc to play cod 2 at the same setting as 360. Thats a next gen console. Wii underpowered e3 showing is completely underwhelmeing and does nothing newThese Wii U ports don't look much better then current gen, and look worse then their PC counterparts with AA and Physix in Batman. I remember when I had to attach a 3D video card to my 2D card to play Dark Forces 2, Half Life 2 came out, Doom 3, Crysis, World In Conflict, and then Battlefield 3. Each time these jumps made people's gaming systems and wallets cry.
There is nothing like that right now and hasn't been other then BF3 for years.
Also, as my picutre noted, the Wii U is coming out between generations (just like Dreamcast did). That's a horrible plan, especially this far ahead of it's competition. Nintendo has the software (just as Sega did), and the money (that Sega didn't). They'd be best off at this point going Sega's router and save the money on hardware and develop software only. They'd make billions in profit.
Next gen started. The LAUNCH games look like ps3 and 360 games but wait for a few years ;)
Log in to comment