Wii U's 8GB internal storage... brilliant move

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

This is a great decision, showing that Nintendo want to do what is best for the consumer. Behold (All pricing in New Zealand Dollars):

Console vendor and model, description of part, cheapest price per gig you can get, and the capacity such a drive would have at the lowest price/gig (reference).

Nintendo Wii U, Any external USB Hard Disk, $0.08/GB, 2000GB (reference)

Windows/Mac PC, for n00bs any external USB hard disk, same as the Wii U - $0.08/GB, 2000GB (reference)

Windows/Mac PC, for people who can open them up and put a SATA 3.5 inch in there, $0.07/GB, 2000GB (reference)

Sony Playstation 3, internal laptop hard disk, $0.14/GB, 750GB (reference) Also a comment about the PS3, you can use external drives, not not to install or save to.

Microsoft Xbox 360, requires a proprietary hard disc, $0.41/GB, 320GB (reference)

In conclusion:

  • Obviously the technically inclined herms outright win as the internal SATA drive is the most cost effective option.
  • A respectable second place to both Nintendo's Wii U and the n00b Herms (or the herms who transport their media place to place without first grabbing a screwdriver).
  • Sorry Microsoft, but you did this to yourself, you are right out of touch on price here, losing by a massive margin.
  • Sony, well what can I say, they are almost twice the price/GB of Nintendo/Herms here, but they should feel good to 'dominate' the other HD twin.

Nevertheless, the news story I linked at the beginning suggests that Nintendo have planned from the ground up for people to use USB external hard discs for their downloaded retail games from the eShop etc. It just so happens that I have at least one USB hard disk at home just waiting to be utilised, and I have several spare 3.5 inch hard disks I could purchase a 3.5inch external USB enclosure for - I am sorted.

Even if a Wii U adopter needed additional storage and they didn't have anything lying around like yours truly, isn't it great that consumers will be able to accessorise their Wii U with additional storage capacity without paying a superfluous price premium?

And another question, as 8GB of flash memory must cost a massive buyer like Nintendo next to nothing (eg the console's bill of materials doesn't waste money on storage) could we assume that the console will represent exceptional value?

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

That's what I like about the WiiU.

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#3 YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9731 Posts

Doubt I'm going to use a hard drive for it. Chances are, when I pop a 64GB SD card(bringing system mem up to 72GB) in that thing, I won't need any more space.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#4 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Nintendo isn't one to knock People off when it comes to storage space.

The Wii was capable of storing 32GB in SD Card storage.

The 3DS is able to do the same and the kicker is that it's not some "New" Media Storage device either, It's a regular any ol' SD card you can get at Walmart and you can transfer the data easily to your Computer with ANY SD card Reader.

Nintendo doesn't Bull Crap when it comes to Media Storage, No "Specific over priced Hard Drive or Memory Stick." just any old SD Card or USB will do.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

this might be a good thing since it means DLC won't be as popular on wii u, hopefully less trivial garbage and more put into the game at release. On the otherhand they might not want to make expansion packs as much pushing awesome stuffi into a sequal

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#6 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts

Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.

PS: your font colour sucks and is making the text difficult to read.

Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts
People will argue that paying $80-$130 for a more expensive, less memory on a HDD is more convienent but I call having $50-$70 extra in the bank FAR more convienent in the long run. I'll probably just use a big flash drive personally but I also think the usage of USB storage is great.
Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts

this might be a good thing since it means DLC won't be as popular on wii u, hopefully less trivial garbage and more put into the game at release. On the otherhand they might not want to make expansion packs as much pushing awesome stuffi into a sequal

savagetwinkie
The fact that Nintendo hasn't jumped on the day one, on disc PAID DLC for Smash Bros, Mario Kart, Pokemon, etc and still gives away free content on a regular basis should be something people are thankful for. At least one of the major three is still doing it.
Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.

PS: your font colour sucks and is making the text difficult to read.

GhoX

I highly doubt it.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.

PS: your font colour sucks and is making the text difficult to read.

GhoX

Your font colour sucks! hehe, I will try to fix that ... which ones are you struggling with man?

I suppose that if it is an external SSD plugged in by USB 2.0 it will recognise it, but you'd lose top end transfer rates. But of course the SSD should have much lower latency.

Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts

Nintendo isn't one to knock People off when it comes to storage space.

The Wii was capable of storing 32GB in SD Card storage.

The 3DS is able to do the same and the kicker is that it's not some "New" Media Storage device either, It's a regular any ol' SD card you can get at Walmart and you can transfer the data easily to your Computer with ANY SD card Reader.

Nintendo doesn't Bull Crap when it comes to Media Storage, No "Specific over priced Hard Drive or Memory Stick." just any old SD Card or USB will do.

LegatoSkyheart
That's the great thing about them. They are a video game company, they have no interest in making you buy a format or accessory they've invested millions in. (Looking at Sony)
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#12 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.

PS: your font colour sucks and is making the text difficult to read.

GhoX

not sure if it will support Solid State Drives. though I'm certain that if it can be in a USB form it can work, but nothing I'm finding says WHAT can be used.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

this might be a good thing since it means DLC won't be as popular on wii u, hopefully less trivial garbage and more put into the game at release. On the otherhand they might not want to make expansion packs as much pushing awesome stuffi into a sequal

bonesawisready5
The fact that Nintendo hasn't jumped on the day one, on disc PAID DLC for Smash Bros, Mario Kart, Pokemon, etc and still gives away free content on a regular basis should be something people are thankful for. At least one of the major three is still doing it.

well they didn't make the HD jump while console game engines weren't ready for it... there was a massive investment at the beginning of this gen to rewrite everything for ps360 that was ridiculous.
Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts
It's a very smart move. I wish Sony would sell a cheap ps3 model with no hdd for $150. Then I would buy one and buy a 1 TB hdd for $80 and have 9x the space as the 160GB model which currently sells for $250.
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#15 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
[QUOTE="GhoX"]

Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.

PS: your font colour sucks and is making the text difficult to read.

psymon100
Your font colour sucks! hehe, I will try to fix that. I suppose that if it is an external SSD plugged in by USB 2.0 it will recognise it, but you'd lose top end transfer rates. But of course the SSD should have much lower latency.

Oh, it supports only 2.0? Hm.. 3.0 has been out for quite awhile.

not sure if it will support Solid State Drives. though I'm certain that if it can be in a USB form it can work, but nothing I'm finding says WHAT can be used.

LegatoSkyheart
There are a lot of external SSDs using USB, and they aren't as expensive as they used to be a couple years ago. http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A3015429011
Avatar image for Audacitron
Audacitron

991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Audacitron
Member since 2012 • 991 Posts

if it's compatible with SDXC cards, the theoretical limit is 2 Terrabytes.

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

It just sucks that it will probably be USB 2.0 since it's relatively slow for constant HDD access and data movement. If it was USB 3.0 or eSATA, I would have no qualms.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
Yeah 8GB should be enough (unless games decide to do stupid Battlefield sized patches) for basic use and being able to use so many formats is great, especially SD cards since they're so cheap.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18248 Posts
Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.GhoX
It seems to only support USB 2. if thats the case then an SSD would be a waste of money for the wiiu. Personally i am very dissapointed with this decision. The wiis storage solution is woeful and here we have ninty making the same mistake again. It not storage capacity that annoys me though (i dont tend to store a lot of media on my consoles) its performance. with no removable HDD as standard devs will have nowhere to cache data. this essentially means the wiiu will be relying entirely on its disc drive to load games. So a game like elder scrolls, for example, would just be hell to manage on the console. Yes the wii does have more ram (2X-3X that of a 360 according to rumor) and that will certainly allow devs to create bigger buffers...but thats not a great use of ram. I would prefer ram to be used for higher res textures and so on. Although they could technically use a part of the internal 8GB i doubt ninty will allow it. It would just cause the memory to fail faster and that would mean the entire console needs to be repaired/replaced so its a non runner. Hopefully they will let devs use the SD card and/or external HDD to cache data but its not ideal since its not standard. The wiiu could very well end up having worse loading times than the 360 or PS3 in some games as a result.
Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts
Yeah 8GB should be enough (unless games decide to do stupid Battlefield sized patches) for basic use and being able to use so many formats is great, especially SD cards since they're so cheap.bobbetybob
Those stupid patches are the expansions.
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#21 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

this might be a good thing since it means DLC won't be as popular on wii u, hopefully less trivial garbage and more put into the game at release. On the otherhand they might not want to make expansion packs as much pushing awesome stuffi into a sequal

bonesawisready5

The fact that Nintendo hasn't jumped on the day one, on disc PAID DLC for Smash Bros, Mario Kart, Pokemon, etc and still gives away free content on a regular basis should be something people are thankful for. At least one of the major three is still doing it.

I'm going to stop you right there.

While most of the Time, in Pokemon, The Special Events aren't "Paid" Events, but I think just about EVERY POKEMON GAME there has been locked content in them.

Mew was the first, you have to do some werid Ritual to get it in Red, Blue, Green, and Yellow.

Silver, Gold, and Crystal have Celebi and you have to Mystery Gift to get it I believe.

Ruby and Sapphire you have to go to a special Pokemon Event to get Deoxys, BUT FOR JIRACHI! YOU HAVE TO HAD PAID FOR IT! Jirachi was a Preorder Bonus for Pokemon Colossuem and another way of getting Jirachi was to play that awful Pokemon Channel game for the Gamecube. There are no other Options except Gameshark or Action Replay for it.

Further more, The DS titles have events too where you have to have a SPECIFIC Legendary to get another Legendary to come out (Shiny Legendary Dog to Zoroark) Victini, Manphany, Shamune, etc, etc.

To say there isn't "On Disc DLC" for freakin' Pokemon is absolutely WRONG. All the Pokemon are in the Game, you just need to go to a special event or download the key to activate the event.

Nintendo just doesn't charge you for it most of the time.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

Oh, it supports only 2.0? Hm.. 3.0 has been out for quite awhile.GhoX
Yeah, would be nice to have 3.0 but I don't think it will hurt them in the 8th gen. USB 2.0 confirmation.

6ea3c17d.png

Avatar image for TwistedShade
TwistedShade

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 TwistedShade
Member since 2012 • 3139 Posts

If it leads to cheaper pricing on it i think it's a good idea. I will likely just get a 64gb sd card, for around 60 dollars and that will be all i need.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

[QUOTE="GhoX"]Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.osan0
It seems to only support USB 2. if thats the case then an SSD would be a waste of money for the wiiu. Personally i am very dissapointed with this decision. The wiis storage solution is woeful and here we have ninty making the same mistake again. It not storage capacity that annoys me though (i dont tend to store a lot of media on my consoles) its performance. with no removable HDD as standard devs will have nowhere to cache data. this essentially means the wiiu will be relying entirely on its disc drive to load games. So a game like elder scrolls, for example, would just be hell to manage on the console. Yes the wii does have more ram (2X-3X that of a 360 according to rumor) and that will certainly allow devs to create bigger buffers...but thats not a great use of ram. I would prefer ram to be used for higher res textures and so on. Although they could technically use a part of the internal 8GB i doubt ninty will allow it. It would just cause the memory to fail faster and that would mean the entire console needs to be repaired/replaced so its a non runner. Hopefully they will let devs use the SD card and/or external HDD to cache data but its not ideal since its not standard. The wiiu could very well end up having worse loading times than the 360 or PS3 in some games as a result.

Yeap, you raise some good points there about potential caveats. Hopefully the read speed of the optical drive is top notch. And also hopefully, one will have the option to install their games to the hard disk to speed up loading times.

It might seem a bit gimped, but look at BF3 on the 360, if you want the top notch graphics you need to install a graphics cache. Look at MGS4 on the PS3, you have to do hard drive installations between levels.

Surely in initial consultation with devs and hardware vendors someone might have come up with solutions to the potential problem you describe? If they didn't, well they should employ someone insightful such as yourself!

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Yeah 8GB should be enough (unless games decide to do stupid Battlefield sized patches) for basic use and being able to use so many formats is great, especially SD cards since they're so cheap.PC_Otter
Those stupid patches are the expansions.

Exactly so why does EVERYONE need to download them? It's such a nonsensical way of patching it, I now have about 6GB worth of pointless data on my Xbox hard drive.
Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
Running games from an external hard drive is really slow. :/
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#27 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts
That's not a bad deal at all. They should do the same with PS4 & 720.
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#28 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

So, it's the same as the 360 Slim 4GB with the ability to use any usb-based storage solution?

Avatar image for derptholomew
derptholomew

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 derptholomew
Member since 2012 • 326 Posts

WILL OWN A WII U DAY ONE IF i CAN, IF NOT SECOND SHIPMENT

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#30 GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9855 Posts

The 3DS can use a 128GB SD card. The Wii U might be able to do that too.

Using a 128GB SD card in your 3DS

Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts

The 3DS can use a 128GB SD card. The Wii U might be able to do that too.

Using a 128GB SD card in your 3DS

GameboyTroy

$120+ for 128GBs69.gif

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

So, it's the same as the 360 Slim 4GB with the ability to use any usb-based storage solution?

gamecubepad

No sir.

Only up to sixteen gigabytes on the 360.

816e7607.png

Battlefield 3 will only install its content onto an Xbox 360 HD. Even the Slim's internal memory is no good.

bc835081.png

But the good news is, XBLA titles can be stored on flash drives, I assume DLC can too.

8b214495.png

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#33 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

psymon100

Forgot about the 16GB limit. nvm.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

[QUOTE="GameboyTroy"]

The 3DS can use a 128GB SD card. The Wii U might be able to do that too.

Using a 128GB SD card in your 3DS

MFDOOM1983

$120+ for 128GBs69.gif

Oh yes, if I were to add that option to the OP Nintendo doesn't seem so crash hot!

But then again why would I? I have purposefully, consistently chosen the best value storage units in each category to make this as fair a comparison as possible. Incidentally, SDHC would be even worse value that MS' Xbox 360 hard disc. Providing storage at $0.53/GB, a 32GB SDHC would be the best value if one were going for an SD card...

(In New Zealand 128GB SDHC's aren't even on the market)

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#35 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

Seeing as how I was able to get through most of this gen with a 360 20 GB HDD (only switched to a 60GB recently), I don't think it will be a problem with a SD card.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#36 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="GhoX"]Interesting. Will the Wii U support external SSD as well? If so then Wii U may be the first console platform to destroy loading times.osan0
It seems to only support USB 2. if thats the case then an SSD would be a waste of money for the wiiu. Personally i am very dissapointed with this decision. The wiis storage solution is woeful and here we have ninty making the same mistake again. It not storage capacity that annoys me though (i dont tend to store a lot of media on my consoles) its performance. with no removable HDD as standard devs will have nowhere to cache data. this essentially means the wiiu will be relying entirely on its disc drive to load games. So a game like elder scrolls, for example, would just be hell to manage on the console. Yes the wii does have more ram (2X-3X that of a 360 according to rumor) and that will certainly allow devs to create bigger buffers...but thats not a great use of ram. I would prefer ram to be used for higher res textures and so on. Although they could technically use a part of the internal 8GB i doubt ninty will allow it. It would just cause the memory to fail faster and that would mean the entire console needs to be repaired/replaced so its a non runner. Hopefully they will let devs use the SD card and/or external HDD to cache data but its not ideal since its not standard. The wiiu could very well end up having worse loading times than the 360 or PS3 in some games as a result.

Huh...I was all set to agree with the TC upon coming into the thread but that's an interesting point.

Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]

[QUOTE="GameboyTroy"]

The 3DS can use a 128GB SD card. The Wii U might be able to do that too.

Using a 128GB SD card in your 3DS

psymon100

$120+ for 128GBs69.gif

Oh yes, if I were to add that option to the OP Nintendo doesn't seem so crash hot!

But then again why would I? I have purposefully, consistently chosen the best value storage units in each category to make this as fair a comparison as possible. Incidentally, SDHC would be even worse value that MS' Xbox 360 hard disc. Providing storage at $0.53/GB, a 32GB SDHC would be the best value if one were going for an SD card...

(In New Zealand 128GB SDHC's aren't even on the market)

You can buy a 3rd party 360 HDD or just the enclosure for considerably less money. 320GB HDD for $48. $0.15 per GB. Amazon.com
Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#38 GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9855 Posts

Seeing as how I was able to get through most of this gen with a 360 20 GB HDD (only switched to a 60GB recently), I don't think it will be a problem with a SD card.

Bigboi500
A 16GB or 32GB SD card would be a great choice for you.
Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

You can buy a 3rd party 360 HDD or just the enclosure for considerably less money. 320GB HDD for $48. $0.15 per GB. Amazon.comMFDOOM1983
American dollars and stuff. Would be good if someone would do the same exercise with american suppliers. I am not familiar with who the best suppliers are etc, or which is the best ferrit to use (Pricespy is NZ's best ferrit). If someone points me in the right direction, I don't mind doing the research and simple math again. Is Amazon.com good enough?

Huh...I was all set to agree with the TC upon coming into the thread but that's an interesting point.The_Game21x

Yeah, I didn't see that coming. He makes a very compelling point.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
guess this is for teh casual crowd that got 4gig 360s but all wii u owners will be casual ;O [spoiler] seriously...**** that...ill wait for the 100+gig sku [/spoiler]
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

8gb is honestly a pittance nowadays.

As usual ninty skimp on more aspects, a reccuring trend with Wii U.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#42 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

guess this is for teh casual crowd that got 4gig 360s but all wii u owners will be casual ;O campzor
Seriously?

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Brilliant move writing in purple/black knowing every1 uses black font.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts

[QUOTE="campzor"]guess this is for teh casual crowd that got 4gig 360s but all wii u owners will be casual ;O Bigboi500

Seriously?

no
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="campzor"]guess this is for teh casual crowd that got 4gig 360s but all wii u owners will be casual ;O campzor

Seriously?

no

I figured as much. :P

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

Brilliant move writing in purple/black knowing every1 uses black font.silversix_

Edited because silversix_ had a point to this, but from my perspective of the beige gamespot theme I couldn't see it. Sorry silversix_.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]Brilliant move writing in purple/black knowing every1 uses black font.psymon100

Ah I almost forgot, thank you. I hadn't had my daily dose of irony yet today. Wouldn't want to get low irony levels. Your signature was more colourful than New Super Mario Bros U.

Very hard to be butthurt by an insult when it is executed so poorly.

not really considering a vast amount of us stuck with the black theme.Which is a 100x better looking.

See those 2 little A's beside your profile on the page, and once you go black you'll never go back,its just so much more sleek looking and reminds me of gamespot of days gone by.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

not really considering a vast amount of us stuck with the black theme.Which is a 100x better looking.

See those 2 little A's beside your profile on the page, and once you go black you'll never go back,its just so much more sleek looking and reminds me of gamespot of days gone by.

razgriz_101

Thanks!

Now I actually understand why some people were complaining about the fonts. Before, I was clueless because - I never customise anything, so I was on the default theme (which you could see before, in the picture I have since removed). Short story for the most part I just go with the default, so to me the OP text looked crystal clear.

As an apology, I will edit my post. But still, had the topic been approached with less sarcasm by Silversix, I might have taken it more objectively.

Avatar image for Chemical_Viking
Chemical_Viking

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Chemical_Viking
Member since 2010 • 2145 Posts
I already have the storage I'm going to use! Good going Nintendo!
Avatar image for nchan
nchan

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 nchan
Member since 2004 • 1059 Posts
I think this is a very bad move by Nintendo. The casuals or the tech illiterates won't know how to use this feature.