This topic is locked from further discussion.
All because of the original and innovative titles, focusing more on team work rather than killstreaks and all that other shyte, but that isn't to say that other consoles don't have their good online games for example the PS3 with Demons Souls and Killzone and the Xbox with Halo, and Final Fantasy XI, but none of the games on those systems come even close to comparing with the follwing titles....
None of those are original or innovative. They're all sequels. :|
Shad0ki11
Wow! TC got owned with the first post.
[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]
None of those are original or innovative. They're all sequels. :|
lucky_star
Wow! TC got owned with the first post.
And Yet they are all still more innovative than all the PS3 / Xbox 360 counterparts, and being a sequel has nothing to do with being innovative / unique I mean just, look at the all time great games, like Super Metroid, which pretty much created the 2D RPG Sidescrolling genre, and COD4 which created the whole killstreaks and loadouts craze with fps these days, so I don't really see why calling a game a sequel immediatly clasifies it as not able to be innovative.
[QUOTE="lucky_star"]
[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]
None of those are original or innovative. They're all sequels. :|
Megaman5364
Wow! TC got owned with the first post.
And Yet they are all still more innovative than all the PS3 / Xbox 360 counterparts, and being a sequel has nothing to do with being innovative / unique I mean just, look at the all time great games, like Super Metroid, which pretty much created the 2D RPG Sidescrolling genre, and COD4 which created the whole killstreaks and loadouts craze with fps these days, so I don't really see why calling a game a sequel immediatly clasifies it as not able to be innovative.I think you give the Wii's library supposed innovation way more credit than it deserves.
Log in to comment