This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.1080pOnly
Why do you care? You don't game on PC.
Its a bait thread. Light the touch paper and run.[QUOTE="1080pOnly"][QUOTE="GioVela2010"]I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.clyde46
Why do you care? You don't game on PC.
Its a bait thread. Light the touch paper and run.No sh!t lol.Â
I do love his threads though, it's great to watch the ownage he receives. I wonder when we'll get our first pictures of car seats?
My 580 was outdated when the 680 came out, the 780 will beat the 680. The relentless march of improvement continues.In 2015, it'll obviously be outdated and dwarfed by new PC hardware, but I think it'll still be able to compete with console standards and pull off some medium settings in most games...
Rocker6
Can you imagine is people trolled one another on the streets in the manor they do on web forums? Going up to a load of steroid heads and saying "yea I know you have big muscles, but I bet you have a small d*ck (no idea of the TOU of this forum). Then, as they are getting beat up they simply laugh sayig "lololol u so mad".Â
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]My 580 was outdated when the 680 came out, the 780 will beat the 680. The relentless march of improvement continues.In 2015, it'll obviously be outdated and dwarfed by new PC hardware, but I think it'll still be able to compete with console standards and pull off some medium settings in most games...
clyde46
Yeah, but your 580 still holds up rather well in most cases, and even when 700-series comes out, you'll still be able to play plenty of games at high settings, I'm sure...
Though I wonder, for how long will the tech keep improving so much, when will we reach the point where it starts being meaningless?
On the CPU side, we're already awfully close to it I'd say, most regular applications make very little use out of the more advanced mainstream chips like the 2600K, 3770K, and today, was just checking some rumored Haswell benchmarks, they pack very little improvement over 3770K, seems the biggest focus is on the IGP...
Can you imagine is people trolled one another on the streets in the manor they do on web forums? Going up to a load of steroid heads and saying "yea I know you have big muscles, but I bet you have a small d*ck (no idea of the TOU of this forum). Then, as they are getting beat up they simply laugh sayig "lololol u so mad".Â
alien1280rhys
The weird thing is that you can go to youtube and watch somebody doing exactly that :P.
My 580 was outdated when the 680 came out, the 780 will beat the 680. The relentless march of improvement continues.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]
In 2015, it'll obviously be outdated and dwarfed by new PC hardware, but I think it'll still be able to compete with console standards and pull off some medium settings in most games...
Rocker6
Yeah, but your 580 still holds up rather well in most cases, and even when 700-series comes out, you'll still be able to play plenty of games at high settings, I'm sure...
Though I wonder, for how long will the tech keep improving so much, when will we reach the point where it starts being meaningless?
On the CPU side, we're already awfully close to it I'd say, most regular applications make very little use out of the more advanced mainstream chips like the 2600K, 3770K, and today, was just checking some rumored Haswell benchmarks, they pack very little improvement over 3770K, seems the biggest focus is on the IGP...
Intel is really taking to Nvidia/AMD with these built in IGP's. It saves people a lot of money when they can just use their CPU's to run HD movies and some low stress games. Given that Intel is looking to move away from socketed chips with its OEM stuff. In terms of actually performance, I reckon with the next line of consoles having proper CPU's with at least 4 cores, the games will scale a lot better. Currently, a 4 core is only really needed but maybe in two years, 8 to maybe even 16 core CPU's will actually make a positive impact on game performance verses the negative effect on your bank account.:lol:
Riiiiight.
If you're expecting next-gen consoles to be as beefy as those cards, expect a hefty price tag. (which will not happen)
If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
[QUOTE="1080pOnly"]
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.Riadon2
Why do you care? You don't game on PC.
[QUOTE="Rocker6"][QUOTE="clyde46"] My 580 was outdated when the 680 came out, the 780 will beat the 680. The relentless march of improvement continues. clyde46
Yeah, but your 580 still holds up rather well in most cases, and even when 700-series comes out, you'll still be able to play plenty of games at high settings, I'm sure...
Though I wonder, for how long will the tech keep improving so much, when will we reach the point where it starts being meaningless?
On the CPU side, we're already awfully close to it I'd say, most regular applications make very little use out of the more advanced mainstream chips like the 2600K, 3770K, and today, was just checking some rumored Haswell benchmarks, they pack very little improvement over 3770K, seems the biggest focus is on the IGP...
Intel is really taking to Nvidia/AMD with these built in IGP's. It saves people a lot of money when they can just use their CPU's to run HD movies and some low stress games. Given that Intel is looking to move away from socketed chips with its OEM stuff. In terms of actually performance, I reckon with the next line of consoles having proper CPU's with at least 4 cores, the games will scale a lot better. Currently, a 4 core is only really needed but maybe in two years, 8 to maybe even 16 core CPU's will actually make a positive impact on game performance verses the negative effect on your bank account.Well, since Intel CPUs already do a good job at outperforming AMD offerings, guess it's not suprising they're focusing less on the actual CPU performance these days, and more on IGP, trying to give AMD a run for their money on that front as well...
But yeah, I wonder what sort of CPUs we'll be having next gen, how much will they affect our games, and will powerful 8+ cores start making their way into competent gaming PCs...
Lol alienware boy has no idea what he's talking about. Even a GTS 250 blows current gen consoles out of the water.If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
slipknot0129
[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]Lol alienware boy has no idea what he's talking about. Even a GTS 250 blows current gen consoles out of the water. It started with 8800 GTS.If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
YoshiYogurt
I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.GioVela2010
Frankly I don't think you even own a GTX 670 or even game on PC for that matter.
Is this a joke? The PS3 uses a modified GeForce 7800If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
slipknot0129
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.II-Siamak-II
Frankly I don't think you even own a GTX 670 or even game on PC for that matter.
He does, he's posted in the PC hardware board. He's also got a 920 DO and 24Gb of RAM too.If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
slipknot0129
lmao. funny yo mentioned it, Im playing GTA IV as you can see on my sig, as a matter of fact playing at 1080P @120FPS ( Asus VG278H ), FXAA, 16AF, modded and I have no issue what so ever, not even a single lag.
[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]
If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
II-Siamak-II
lmao. funny yo mentioned it, Im playing GTA IV as you can see on my sig, as a matter of fact playing at 1080P @120FPS ( Asus VG278H ), FXAA, 16AF, modded and I have no issue what so ever, not even a single lag.
120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that.[QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"][QUOTE="GioVela2010"]I don't just mean at launch, I mean will a GTX 670/680 be able to keep up with 2015 games and beyond? Frankly I don't think my GTX 670 would age well into a consoles lifetime.clyde46
Frankly I don't think you even own a GTX 670 or even game on PC for that matter.
He does, he's posted in the PC hardware board. He's also got a 920 DO and 24Gb of RAM too.True story. Microsoft Word has never looked so good for him.
Nvidia GTX 660 and better will easily keep up, especially the GeForce Titan which is rumored to be more powerful than x2 SLI GTX 680's!
[QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"][QUOTE="slipknot0129"]
If a gtx 680 is having a hard time with current gen console looking games then imagine what it will be like when there are next-gen looking console ports. Pc gamers are already complaining till this day of games like GTA IV.Â
clyde46
lmao. funny yo mentioned it, Im playing GTA IV as you can see on my sig, as a matter of fact playing at 1080P @120FPS ( Asus VG278H ), FXAA, 16AF, modded and I have no issue what so ever, not even a single lag.
120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that.the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
why would you want keep up with next Gen consoles when no one knows exactly what they are capable of?
120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"]
lmao. funny yo mentioned it, Im playing GTA IV as you can see on my sig, as a matter of fact playing at 1080P @120FPS ( Asus VG278H ), FXAA, 16AF, modded and I have no issue what so ever, not even a single lag.
II-Siamak-II
the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
You are confusing Hertz with FPS.120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"]
lmao. funny yo mentioned it, Im playing GTA IV as you can see on my sig, as a matter of fact playing at 1080P @120FPS ( Asus VG278H ), FXAA, 16AF, modded and I have no issue what so ever, not even a single lag.
II-Siamak-II
the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
How is it 120fps if the game is running at 100fps? or did you just mean that your monitor is 120Hz
[QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"][QUOTE="clyde46"] 120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that. clyde46
the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
You are confusing Hertz with FPS.yea ma bad thats what i meant, but none the less, it looks and play way better than consoles, thats the point.
[QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"]
[QUOTE="clyde46"] 120FPS? Going to need a FRAPS screenshot for that. lostrib
the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
How is it 120fps if the game is running at 100fps? or did you just mean that your monitor is 120Hz
You are confusing Hertz with FPS.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"]
the game runs at around 100 fps, I said 1080P @120FPS, even mentioned my monitor model.
II-Siamak-II
yea ma bad thats what i meant, but none the less, it looks and play way better than consoles, thats the point.
Oh I know, I normally get about 40-60FPS depending on the area. I could get more if I OC'd my CPU but I cant be bothered with doing that.[QUOTE="II-Siamak-II"][QUOTE="clyde46"] You are confusing Hertz with FPS. clyde46
yea ma bad thats what i meant, but none the less, it looks and play way better than consoles, thats the point.
Oh I know, I normally get about 40-60FPS depending on the area. I could get more if I OC'd my CPU but I cant be bothered with doing that.Why not?
A 2600K under WC... it just calls to be unleashed! :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment