Do you think that when 2009 is over, Crysis will still be called graphics king? Or another game, finally?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Do you think that when 2009 is over, Crysis will still be called graphics king? Or another game, finally?
*sigh* just look at my 1680x1050 all at very high DX10 with 4XAA screenshots and tell me if anything is even "catching up"
No cross platform game is going to exceed Crysis, their very nature prevents that from happening. Something that exceeds Crysis will have to be PC native, frankly I haven't seen anything meeting that criteria yet.AnnoyedDragonWhat about Project Offset? Wasn't it canned on the 360? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkoi6WCCJHY&fmt=18 (ancient footage as you know)
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]No cross platform game is going to exceed Crysis, their very nature prevents that from happening. Something that exceeds Crysis will have to be PC native, frankly I haven't seen anything meeting that criteria yet.Master-Thief-09What about Project Offset? Wasn't it canned on the 360? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkoi6WCCJHY&fmt=18 (ancient footage as you know) if im not mistaken project offset is now pc exclusive to showcase intel's larabee
What about Project Offset? Wasn't it canned on the 360? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkoi6WCCJHY&fmt=18 (ancient footage as you know)Master-Thief-09
We haven't seen anything from that in a year, not one screenshot or video. That and it is being used to promote Intels new GPU, which has never been seen in action.
Like I said I haven't seen anything matching/beating Crysis, if PO wants to be that game all it has to do is actually show something.
I dont think it will,
2010 will probably bring new graphics cards like it always does, and with that come games with new graphics
lol in your dreamsThe Question is all wrong.
Will Killzone 2 remain graphics King in 2010? Yes, until KZ3 is released.
cuddlesofwar
when the hell did KZ2 ever even becomes the graphics king? There should be an IQ test and age limit for people to sign up on forums. The consoles simply CANNOT do ANY of the "Very High" effects of crysis (textures, lighting, etc.). The GPUs just dont have the technology inside of them to do it! especially on a ridiculously large scale. Crysis will always be WAY ahead of naything these consoles can EVER put out.The Question is all wrong.
Will Killzone 2 remain graphics King in 2010? Yes, until KZ3 is released.
cuddlesofwar
[QUOTE="cuddlesofwar"]when the hell did KZ2 ever even becomes the graphics king? There should be an IQ test and age limit for people to sign up on forums. The consoles simply CANNOT do ANY of the "Very High" effects of crysis (textures, lighting, etc.). The GPUs just dont have the technology inside of them to do it! especially on a ridiculously large scale. Crysis will always be WAY ahead of naything these consoles can EVER put out. It seems it's you who needs the IQ test. Killzone textures are 2 or even 3 times better then Crysis. The Power of the Cell, coupled with Blu-Ray allows the PS3 to render on average, up to 10 times that of so called super computers.The Question is all wrong.
Will Killzone 2 remain graphics King in 2010? Yes, until KZ3 is released.
ArchDeathK
The Question is all wrong.
Will Killzone 2 remain graphics King in 2010? Yes, until KZ3 is released.
cuddlesofwar
Killzone 2? :o
What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
They have a vested interest to lie. Besides, like I said, your average gaming rig can eaisly outperform a PS3.What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
cuddlesofwar
[QUOTE="cuddlesofwar"]They have a vested interest to lie. Besides, like I said, your average gaming rig can eaisly outperform a PS3. So you say ... But who am i to believe. You, or Sony? Hmmm, i think i know.What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
Vandalvideo
What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
cuddlesofwar
KZ2's graphics are a testament to the devs, how they managed to make a game look that good on such average hardware is a great achievment. Also how they used every trick in the book to fool the ignorant console gamers into believing the game truly is a technical powerhouse on a par with Crysis or Empire.
Now, just imagine how this game would look on a PC at 1920x1080 with 16xAf and 8xAA, probably crap actually, i mean then you'd really see just how crap the textures are lol.
so sad......... Sony's marketing got the best of you. You are basically their goal. make fans believe what they say. heres a little fact from someone doing international business commerce in college kiddo. Cell was put into the PS3 not for gaming but do they can get it out into the market as a leading CPU for things in products such as in health care, military, and televisions. Blu Ray was put into the PS3 in order for them to win a format war. Again, nothing to do with gaming, and they would have never done it if they just didnt want profits from a format they control. All the superiority talk about the cell and blu ray fro gaming was a lie to get people to back it, and it worked. so good for them. not so good for small minded fans though..........in fact no matter what developers say, they are both useless to gaming. UTTERLY USELESS. The Playstation 3 does not exist because they wanted to make a 3rd gaming console. They sat in their board room and literaly said "how can we win a format war and create a new CPU that would be the basis of all technology (hopefully)? Well put them into the PS3 and pretend like they are there for gaming!" sucks i know. Microsoft also wants profits, but they didnt go as far and to scrap an ENTIRE console generation in order to further other product means.What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
cuddlesofwar
What i find funny is that you people DONT believe Sony. Have they ever lied? Is Killzone 2 not a testament to the PS3's superior power? Especially compared to that of the Xbox, and to a elsser extent that of "Gaming Rigs" You're so called Super Computers are yet to match Disgaea 3 in terms of graphics.
cuddlesofwar
PlayStation 3 is powerful, yes. Killzone 2, therefore, on it looks beautiful and stunning.
But this is still Crysis on a PC with extreme settings...
*sigh* just look at my 1680x1050 all at very high DX10 with 4XAA screenshots and tell me if anything is even "catching up"
GTR2addict
Nice pictures. It seems to be pretty cosy. :)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment