Will Gran Turismo 5 be realistic?

Cause if Prolouge is any indication then wow they are way off on being realistic. No damage, hit detection crap, cars do not handle realisticly it still feels like Gran Turismo 4 to me which is not very realistic.

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

Sserv

GT has never really been about being ultra realistic, so I doubt it. It will most likely have a wonderful career mode though.nmaharg

The only thing GT has ever had going for it is the amount of cars and the ability to bounce off walls

GT was and never will be realistic ! pushing buttons just dont feel real :o

GT was and never will be realistic ! pushing buttons just dont feel real :o

habkeinbock

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

Sserv

[QUOTE="Sserv"]

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

nmaharg

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]GT has never really been about being ultra realistic, so I doubt it. It will most likely have a wonderful career mode though.whitetiger3521

The only thing GT has ever had going for it is the amount of cars and the ability to bounce off walls

[QUOTE="whitetiger3521"]

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]GT has never really been about being ultra realistic, so I doubt it. It will most likely have a wonderful career mode though.FirstDiscovery

The only thing GT has ever had going for it is the amount of cars and the ability to bounce off walls

Ya that too :lol: screw hitting the brakes just slam into the car beside u!

I find it to be the most realistic console car sim game, not that realism makes games better. The presentation of this game and the verity are done so well. Also tweaking cars is one hell of a feature and it's made very well with so many options. An AAA title in my book. (don't quote me and start blabla about it not having damage..)abuabed

I find it to be the most realistic console car sim game, not that realism makes games better. The presentation of this game and the verity are done so well. Also tweaking cars is one hell of a feature and it's made very well with so many options. An AAA title in my book. (don't quote me and start blabla about it not having damage..)abuabed

[QUOTE="Sserv"] [QUOTE="nmaharg"][QUOTE="Sserv"]

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

micky4889

Forza 2 had great damage, ofcourse u can drive awaywhen you crash but that significantly slows down ur car speed when engine is damaged. what did you expect? the driver to die? if anything, forza 2 is 1000x more realistic compared to GT5

Cause if Prolouge is any indication then wow they are way off on being realistic. No damage, hit detection crap, cars do not handle realisticly it still feels like Gran Turismo 4 to me which is not very realistic.

whitetiger3521

GT series has been like Tactical-FPS. Of all FPS they are the most realistic, yet, in an overall manner, they are unrealistic.

GT makes you feel it's realistic, but it is not.

Cause if Prolouge is any indication then wow they are way off on being realistic. No damage, hit detection crap, cars do not handle realisticly it still feels like Gran Turismo 4 to me which is not very realistic.

whitetiger3521

********************************************************************

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

Sserv

Because were in the year 2000's now and racing games like Rad Racer & Outrun (without damage) went out in the 80's and 90's.

Polyphony claims their game is the most realistic racer ever, but that's far from the truth when their cars run into a wall as 150mph, doesn't get damage and loses only 5% of there speed. The game was never realistic except in the visual of the cars.

Not if its anything like GT3 and 4 in terms of gameplay. Racing sims have moved on since the 1990's... GT has not.

GT has never really been about being ultra realistic, so I doubt it. It will most likely have a wonderful career mode though.nmaharg

[QUOTE="abuabed"]I find it to be the most realistic console car sim game, not that realism makes games better. The presentation of this game and the verity are done so well. Also tweaking cars is one hell of a feature and it's made very well with so many options. An AAA title in my book. (don't quote me and start blabla about it not having damage..)FirstDiscovery

i agree career mode is probably best thing about GT series !_rpg_FAN

It is from my prospective. I have played others(dunno if you'd consider, NFS, Motorstorm, Forza, and another one on PC(forgot the name) racing sims..) but when it comes to console racing sims, GT tops all of them, heck it is the best racing sim that I have ever played. This is my opinion so I can't be right or wrong neither is yours for that matter of course ;) abuabed

i dont really care, it'll be fun, thats all that really matters. i think damage has been confirmed for it anyway.

Cause if Prolouge is any indication then wow they are way off on being realistic. No damage, hit detection crap, cars do not handle realisticly it still feels like Gran Turismo 4 to me which is not very realistic.

whitetiger3521

[QUOTE="whitetiger3521"]

Cause if Prolouge is any indication then wow they are way off on being realistic. No damage, hit detection crap, cars do not handle realisticly it still feels like Gran Turismo 4 to me which is not very realistic.

Jrfanfreak88

[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Sserv"] I don't see why is isn't to you.sikanderahmed

Forza 2 had great damage, ofcourse u can drive awaywhen you crash but that significantly slows down ur car speed when engine is damaged. what did you expect? the driver to die? if anything, forza 2 is 1000x more realistic compared to GT5

That's my point, its not realistic, if i were to crash going 100mph+ straight into a wall the car would be totaled, there is no " carry on driving but with a slight performance penalty"

So to me forza is just as unrealistic for having fake damage as GT is for having no damage.

That's my point, its not realistic, if i were to crash going 100mph+ straight into a wall the car would be totaled, there is no " carry on driving but with a slight performance penalty"

So to me forza is just as unrealistic for having fake damage as GT is for having no damage.

micky4889

The only thing that most of you mention when it comes to realism is damage, it is important but it is not the only factor people..abuabed

I always find it funny that all these "new features" are "confirmed" ..but Poly cant confirm a release date??..Sure the game will have X buuut..yea won't see it until ahhh we don't know ....that's TBA...

It's epic you people still believe them after countless delays...A vaporware PSP version..and promised features that never saw the light of day in GT4 and GT5P...

It's gonna be a Kart Racer:lol:

GT 5 is the best driving game I have played using a steering wheel, and frankly, I can't play the GT series without a steering wheel. It just is'nt the same. Arcade racers on the other hand is quite different. And people don't seem to realize there is two handling options in GT5p, it is the normal one and the professional one. There is quite the difference between the two, and though the new handling option is a little bit harder, I like it.

Polyphony has stated they could add damage to GT5, but they would have to go down to 8 cars per race instead of 16. And I don't see them adding some bad unrealistic damage just to please the arcade racing fans. If they add damage they would have to make it realistic. so when you hit a wall in 50mph you are out of the race. Would people want that?? The sales in controllers and steering wheels would increase by 100% because of everybody who would throw them around after crashing in the last round.

Polyphony has stated they could add damage to GT5, but they would have to go down to 8 cars per race instead of 16. And I don't see them adding some bad unrealistic damage just to please the arcade racing fans. If they add damage they would have to make it realistic. so when you hit a wall in 50mph you are out of the race. Would people want that?? The sales in controllers and steering wheels would increase by 100% because of everybody who would throw them around after crashing in the last round.

Martin_G_N

"And I don't see them adding some bad unrealistic damage just to please the arcade racing fans. If they add damage they would have to make it realistic. so when you hit a wall in 50mph you are out of the race. Would people want that??"

You have that backwards....It's the proper SIM fans that are looking for long term consequences (damage). It's the arcade racers that don't want (damage) basically for this very reason, long term consequences...Because in games like GTR/Rfactor/Iracing(proper sims) and to a lesser extent FM2..You hit a wall at 50 your race is done.....and believe me there are a lot of people who want that...

[QUOTE="abuabed"]The only thing that most of you mention when it comes to realism is damage, it is important but it is not the only factor people..Jrfanfreak88

the game is on ps3 so it must be looks realistic

[QUOTE="Sserv"]

I don't see why damage is so important to you people.

nmaharg

I always find it funny that all these "new features" are "confirmed" ..but Poly cant confirm a release date??..Sure the game will have X buuut..yea won't see it until ahhh we don't know ....that's TBA...

It's epic you people still believe them after countless delays...A vaporware PSP version..and promised features that never saw the light of day in GT4 and GT5P...

masiisam