Will Halo Wars be AAA like all the other Halo games?

Its not being made by Bungie so idk, what do you guys think?

i doubt it will even get an 8.0

AA at best I think.

After seeing some of the Gameplay on it I don't think it looks good... I loved Halo 2 and 3, but this is just an insult to the halo name...W1ckedGo0se

yea thats what im thinkin, if it sucks we'll just act like it never happened. keep it clean will be out soon after

Probably but sale wise and popularity wise it won't even be 1/5 the game halo is. It's just not an FPS.Kratos_OMEGA

On XBL whenever Halo Wars is brought up in a conversation I mostly hear people not being thrilled that it is an RTS game.

Game looks cool(the units and artstyle) and I like Halo, but I wish this game was on pc so I can use k/m. I haven't played a game which I enjoyed playing rts on a console yet.

Just because its base on Halo doesn't automatically guarantee it to be AAA. Halo Wars just has to prove itself thats all. But there's already a couple of AAA caliber RTS games, so if Halo Wars can pulling off an AAA caliber RTS game, then thats all that matters and not because its based on Halo. But I think it'll sell more than other RTS games because of Halo.

I feeling AA

Halo Chronicles, despite the fact that we dont know anything about it, should get a 9.0, me thinks

[QUOTE="Kratos_OMEGA"]Probably but sale wise and popularity wise it won't even be 1/5 the game halo is. It's just not an FPS.istreakforfood

On XBL whenever Halo Wars is brought up in a conversation I mostly hear people not being thrilled that it is an RTS game.

Game looks cool(the units and artstyle) and I like Halo, but I wish this game was on pc so I can use k/m. I haven't played a game which I enjoyed playing rts on a console yet.

that's another reason it will flop. RTS exlcusive to a console. lol. If this game didn't have Halo in it noone would care....literally.

Considering Ensemble's past sucess, i think it'll receive a 9.7 or 9.8.stappy

[QUOTE="stappy"]Considering Ensemble's past sucess, i think it'll receive a 9.7 or 9.8.Vandalvideo

How is Age of Empires III a failure?

Considering Ensemble's past sucess, i think it'll receive a 9.7 or 9.8.stappy

How is Age of Empires III a failure?stappy

[QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?Vandalvideo

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually. Gamer4535

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?Gamer4535

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?Gamer4535

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

[QUOTE="Gamer4535"]those games suck. pretty damn badly actually. Vandalvideo

The Total War franchise doesn't even count as a true "RTS". It's just setting up your army, and then attacking. There's no resource-building, micro-managing, or anything the Age of Empires franchise had.

[QUOTE="Gamer4535"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?mo0ksi

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

I actually have both thank you.
First of all Sins is turn based, not even a rts. It's so boring imo.

Empire is meh. More of an army building game in a way. Not very fun either.

Company of Heroes on the other hand kicks those games *****

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Gamer4535"]those games suck. pretty damn badly actually. stappy

The Total War franchise doesn't even count as a true "RTS". It's just setting up your army, and then attacking. There's no resource-building, micro-managing, or anything the Age of Empires franchise had.

AKA its aint a pathetic DUne2 clo(w)ne....

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="Gamer4535"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?Gamer4535

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

I actually have both thank you.
First of all Sins is turn based, not even a rts. It's so boring imo.

Empire is meh. More of an army building game in a way. Not very fun either.

Company of Heroes on the other hand kicks those games *****

Now you are talking out of your ass.. Sins of a Solar Empire is a RTS.. There is no end turn function its all in real time..

Empire hasn't come out yet.. Rome Total War and Medieval 2 total war both got high marks.. Though they arn't exactly rts games..

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Gamer4535"]those games suck. pretty damn badly actually. stappy

The Total War franchise doesn't even count as a true "RTS". It's just setting up your army, and then attacking. There's no resource-building, micro-managing, or anything the Age of Empires franchise had.

Thats a gross misinterpreation of the Total War series, and shows how ignorant you are.. Total War is a completely different game, there are resources to the game, there is diplomacy.. And numerous other aspects.. Its not a traditional RTS game though.. And I consider combat really only a 3rd of the fun, its the fac tyou set it up and moved them around and the battle has a greater mean tha tmake it interesting.

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="Gamer4535"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="stappy"]How is Age of Empires III a failure?Gamer4535

those games suck. pretty damn badly actually.

I actually have both thank you.
First of all Sins is turn based, not even a rts. It's so boring imo.

Empire is meh. More of an army building game in a way. Not very fun either.

Company of Heroes on the other hand kicks those games *****

Its this mentality that keeps the dragging the genre back to 1998...

[QUOTE="stappy"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Gamer4535"]those games suck. pretty damn badly actually. sSubZerOo

The Total War franchise doesn't even count as a true "RTS". It's just setting up your army, and then attacking. There's no resource-building, micro-managing, or anything the Age of Empires franchise had.

Thats a gross misinterpreation of the Total War series, and shows how ignorant you are.. Total War is a completely different game, there are resources to the game, there is diplomacy.. And numerous other aspects.. Its not a traditional RTS game though.. And I consider combat really only a 3rd of the fun, its the fac tyou set it up and moved them around and the battle has a greater mean tha tmake it interesting.

If i wan't diplomacy, i'll play Europa Universalis III. Which, according to you then, also counts as a RTS.

Like i just wanna know why i would want to play this game as a halo fan, no master chief, The story is not worth anything because its a prequel and you know your going to loose in the end so what the hells the point? im not able to actually shoot anything, all im able to do is command a bunch of guys to have all the fun for me, like i mean Like the command and conquer series. when i wanna play halo i dont want it to play like command and conquerVendettaRed07

what? You do understand that the whole deactivation of the halos is nothing?
Its like saying Romeo and Juliet is a pointless story because you already know the end,

and pss.... you realize that the covenant, overall lost right with the halos breaking down and whatnot?

i doubt but i hope so!

I actually have both thank you.
First of all Sins is turn based, not even a rts. It's so boring imo.

Gamer4535

It will be good on PC standards and AMAZING on console standards

Doubt it.

It will be good on PC standards and AMAZING on console standards

WarDog1994

It will be terrible on PC standards and bad on console.