From the developers of last gen classics:

Killzone = 6.9

Shellshock: Nam '67 = 5.4

AAA is out of the question, I am going with 8.0 or 8.5.

killzone for psp was AA tc =failTnasty11

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

killzone for psp was AA tc =failTnasty11

Read much?

Will Killzone 2 be Guerilla's first console AA (8.0) game?

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failDr_Drooom

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

[QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failGzus666

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

[QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failGzus666

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

I'll tell you after E3.

Stop making threads about Killzone, people. There is nothing to hype right now. Mine as well hype Duke Nukem Forever :|

killzone for psp was AA tc =failTnasty11

He did say first console AA!

Sony fans own themselves around here with each and every thread.:D

But I'll still give Killzone 2 a chance. It will score about 8.2

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failhtekemerald

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

so making a game that scales back, plays well on weaker hardware, has less controls, and has to be portable friendly isnt harder than making one on a console?

I'm saying AAA and no I'm not biased.

- The team is almost completely different (150 people). And that means Sony probably looked for really talented devs for this game since it (the team) was made just for this game.

- 30 milion $ budjet. That probably means maxed out graphics, outstanding music and more features than you can even imagine.

- Sony is looking at it very, very, VVVVVVEEEEEERRRRRRRYYYYYY close. They just WON'T let this game fail. It's kinda like their ''secret weapon'' and their ''Jesus*'' at the same time. (it's their last chance to reallyblow us away in the short term)

Hell, I don't even know how this game could get below AA

*No offense to Jesus!

*No offense to Jesus!

Timesplitter14

all is forgiven my son

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failDr_Drooom

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

Killzone 2 already is AA by a lot of reviewer's standards, since Killzone Liberation is technically Killzone 2. :P

The question now is, will Killzone 3 (PS3 game) be AA or AAA? I'm pretty confident it will at least be AA, but given that Geurilla has been improving since the first KZ, I wouldn't put a AAA past them. 9.0 would be a pleasant surprise.

[QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failFrenziedRaldo24

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

What? read the title of the thread man. That's why it's not relavant. Console, not handelds.

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failSpartanx23

He did say first console AA!

Sony fans own themselves around here with each and every thread.:D

But I'll still give Killzone 2 a chance. It will score about 8.2

8.2 = impossible now :D

[QUOTE="htekemerald"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failGzus666

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

so making a game that scales back, plays well on weaker hardware, has less controls, and has to be portable friendly isnt harder than making one on a console?

I would assume its easier than making a console game. How many games are like Killzone: L on handhelds? Now, comepare that to the ammount of FPS and TPS on the markey. You would have to have good graphics, good controls, good story, good replay value, good LASTING online (sometimes) , to get AA and AAA.

I think they'd be happy if they made into the 7.0 range...Verge_6

I think you'd be happy if people called you ''not THAT fanboyish''

And BTW, is that a.... Killzone anime in your sig? It sure looks like it...

wow, lots of votes for AAA...cows setting themselves up for ownage? Or do they know something I don't about Killzone 2?MADVLAD123

they will be owned.

its sad they are hyping a game they know nothing about

From the developers of last gen classics:

Killzone = 6.9

Shellshock: Nam '67 = 5.4

AAA is out of the question, I am going with 8.0 or 8.5.

Dr_Drooom

The game is probably going to get a solid AAA score, son. Maybe not at 360Spot, but add up the average from the other sites (maybe toss the 360Spot score aside).

At this point and time, I'm giving Killzone 2 the same score as Killzone 1, a 6.9. We'll know the real prediction of the score this E3.

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Dr_Drooom"]

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"]killzone for psp was AA tc =failVandalvideo

Notice the word "console" in the thread title.

why would the medium matter? logically you would think a game on a handheld is harder to make well.

From the developers of last gen classics:

Killzone = 6.9

Shellshock: Nam '67 = 5.4

AAA is out of the question, I am going with 8.0 or 8.5.

Dr_Drooom

no wonder cows are hyping killzone 2

that trackrecord Guerrilla has there is impressive

I dont think i would be dissapointed if it got AA or high AA atleast. It would still probably be a pretty good game.