Will Microsoft use Blu-Ray in Xbox 3?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
People keep saying that if Microsoft does this, Sony will get profits. But there are 9 companies that own blu-ray, so Microsoft can just ask Samsung or Pioneer to make the Blu-Ray drives and then PlayStation 4 wont' have a disk advantage on Xbox 3 and Sony won't have the contract with MS to make the drives. I think that in a struggling economy, the Xbox 360 and PS3 will be in for a long stay (as in until 2012-2014 possibly) to sell as many cheap units (that don't cost as much to make) as they can until Blu-Ray becomes standard.
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#2 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

People keep saying that if Microsoft does this, Sony will get profits. But there are 9 companies that own blu-ray, so Microsoft can just ask Samsung or Pioneer to make the Blu-Ray drives and then PlayStation 4 wont' have a disk advantage on Xbox 3 and Sony won't have the contract with MS to make the drives. I think that in a struggling economy, the Xbox 360 and PS3 will be in for a long stay (as in until 2012-2014 possibly) to sell as many cheap units (that don't cost as much to make) as they can until Blu-Ray becomes standard. RyuHayabusaX

I don't think they will add Blu-Ray.

Avatar image for XTy
XTy

2434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 XTy
Member since 2006 • 2434 Posts

M$ is using DVD's, and paying out to companies, including sony, so that doesn't matter.

If Micros uses blu, which is likely, they will have to pay sony and others for the format, royalties. the actual manufacturer will get the most though, and im sure that won't be sony.

Avatar image for Parasomniac
Parasomniac

2723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Parasomniac
Member since 2007 • 2723 Posts
Sony has to pay Microsoft a little bit to ship their computers with Vista. It would be the same type of deal with Blu-Ray.
Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts
i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?
Avatar image for fluxorator
fluxorator

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fluxorator
Member since 2008 • 887 Posts
People keep saying that if Microsoft does this, Sony will get profits. But there are 9 companies that own blu-ray, so Microsoft can just ask Samsung or Pioneer to make the Blu-Ray drives and then PlayStation 4 wont' have a disk advantage on Xbox 3 and Sony won't have the contract with MS to make the drives. I think that in a struggling economy, the Xbox 360 and PS3 will be in for a long stay (as in until 2012-2014 possibly) to sell as many cheap units (that don't cost as much to make) as they can until Blu-Ray becomes standard. RyuHayabusaX
Why does everyone think that Sony and MS are like childish rivals, and will do anything to have to not talk to each other? They're both buisnesses, and if it was in MS's best interests to partner up with Sony to secure profits, they would. They're not run by a bunch of 14 year old girls fighting for the same guy.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

They said they wouldn't. I find it stupid that they are so against aid Sony in any possible way that they would completely disreguard Blu-Ray as a media format.

M$ also wants to push DD and microtransactions as much as possible.

Avatar image for XTy
XTy

2434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 XTy
Member since 2006 • 2434 Posts

i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?st1ka
NO, the cycle for a new format is 10 years not five.

It's possible, but extremely unlikely, since BluRay can hold up to 400gigs now.

Yes, 400 gigs.

Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts

[QUOTE="st1ka"]i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?XTy

NO, the cycle for a new format is 10 years not five.

It's possible, but extremely unlikely, since BluRay can hold up to 400gigs now.

Yes, 400 gigs.

400 gigs? holy mother of :o
Avatar image for c1o2d3y
c1o2d3y

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 c1o2d3y
Member since 2006 • 470 Posts
i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?st1ka
most likely it will be another form of a Blu-ray
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#11 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
[QUOTE="XTy"]

[QUOTE="st1ka"]i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?st1ka

NO, the cycle for a new format is 10 years not five.

It's possible, but extremely unlikely, since BluRay can hold up to 400gigs now.

Yes, 400 gigs.

400 gigs? holy mother of :o

Actually that number is over 1 TB of space. Though its not really marketable.
Avatar image for -Dark-Light-
-Dark-Light-

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -Dark-Light-
Member since 2008 • 58 Posts
Blu-ray 400gb is expensive. Though pioneeer made 1tb it coost ove 500 dollars to make each disk.
Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?st1ka
One that will cost a lot more. In such a bad economy already people are reluctant to buy a $200+ disk player and $30 disks just to watch dvds in 720p or 1080p, blu-ray needs to get a really strong base first b/c DVDs are still strong.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#14 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
Blu-ray 400gb is expensive. Though pioneeer made 1tb it coost ove 500 dollars to make each disk.-Dark-Light-
The technology could come way down in price.
Avatar image for XTy
XTy

2434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 XTy
Member since 2006 • 2434 Posts

Blu-ray 400gb is expensive. Though pioneeer made 1tb it coost ove 500 dollars to make each disk.-Dark-Light-
Of course, It's expensive TODAY, but the future sees price drops. Also, maybe the Nextbox720 will just use 50gig or 100 gig discs.

Don't you know that DVD's were expensive before the tech took off? That's how technology works. Today's prices are tomorrows bargain bins.

I know M$ wants to push DD, but HDD space is too limited for that to effectively work, not to mention devs like Id are just the beginning.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#16 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="st1ka"]i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?XTy

NO, the cycle for a new format is 10 years not five.

It's possible, but extremely unlikely, since BluRay can hold up to 400gigs now.

Yes, 400 gigs.

I thought B-Ray was simply a storage disk. Just find out it's a format.
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#17 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="-Dark-Light-"]Blu-ray 400gb is expensive. Though pioneeer made 1tb it coost ove 500 dollars to make each disk.XTy

Of course, It's expensive TODAY, but the future sees price drops. Also, maybe the Nextbox720 will just use 50gig or 100 gig discs.

Don't you know that DVD's were expensive before the tech took off? That's how technology works. Today's prices are tomorrows bargain bins.

I know M$ wants to push DD, but HDD space is too limited for that to effectively work, not to mention devs like Id are just the beginning.

Exactly. When DVD came out man was it expensive. Now lol, you laugh at DVD prices, same thing's happening with Blu-Ray.
Avatar image for XTy
XTy

2434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 XTy
Member since 2006 • 2434 Posts
[QUOTE="XTy"]

[QUOTE="st1ka"]i don't know, i mean by 2012 there should be a media format that can hold more space then blu-ray... right?DeadMan1290

NO, the cycle for a new format is 10 years not five.

It's possible, but extremely unlikely, since BluRay can hold up to 400gigs now.

Yes, 400 gigs.

I thought B-Ray was simply a storage disk. Just find out it's a format.

I dont know what that means, other than to say, now you know. congrats.

It's both, hurray.

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts
I doubt MS will use blu-ray and for that matter I doubt Sony will use it either.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Sony and MS and bedfellows just like all of us are. They need each other to do well just like I need some other crazy fanboy that I argue with here that lives 5000 miles from where I do and makes the widgets that goes into the gadget that I build for a living.

If someone is doing badly it drags us all down.

Sw is fun and all but try not to lose sight of the big picture here folks.

Avatar image for druggyjoe3000
druggyjoe3000

1523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 druggyjoe3000
Member since 2006 • 1523 Posts
They better have it cause if its dvd or dd im going to not even think about getting one
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts

I think they'll use blu-ray unless ALL of the following are met:

  1. They still work with Netflix and being able to stream newly released mainstream content becomes the norm.
  2. The average broadband connection is fast enough to stream at least 720p content
  3. Flash media becomes incredibly cheap for at least 50gb of content
  4. Blu-Ray drives are still slow to where you can't have acceptable (load times on a 360 or Wii)

If all that is the case, I can see them not using Blu-Ray. They could actually go back to cartridges in the form of flash media since that would load at near hard drive speed and assuming the media has become incredibly cheap, it'll be faster than BD and affordable. If the average american household has internet connection fast enough to stream 720p content and hollywood finally jumps on the bandwagon and you can get a stream of a new movie basically day and date with the blu-ray release... well i think you're in a good spot and you don't need Blu-Ray.

However, if any of that isn't the case, I think only a complete fool would pass over on blu-ray for the next gen.

Plus, Sony goes to MS all the time so I doubt they are really gonna have a grudge match over this. Its not like Sony VAIO's come with Linux and OpenOffice. Its also doubtful that the corporate offices are running Macs.

Avatar image for ps3_owns_360Wii
ps3_owns_360Wii

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 ps3_owns_360Wii
Member since 2008 • 2289 Posts

MS is already paying for DVD9, so why would it matter to pay them next generation?

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
I don't know. But I know one thing, it won't use Digital Distribution. The bandwidth is way to low.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
they won't and they don't need it.
Avatar image for Screamteam411
Screamteam411

1087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#27 Screamteam411
Member since 2003 • 1087 Posts
I must say, I am interested to see what they'll do. I'm thinking it will either be a Steam-like DD system where each console has hard drives that store their games that are linked to their accounts, Blu-Ray discs replacing DVD9, or sone sort of solid-state distribution system. Or some combination. Or maybe there will be kiosks in stores where you can buy a game and get it transferred right to your hard drive! Like DD but no internets needed! Of course, that would be supersucky inconvenient.
Avatar image for tupapi006
tupapi006

2980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 tupapi006
Member since 2003 • 2980 Posts
i think they are goin with some sort of flash drive
Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
No need. DVD's are fine for installing games to a HDD, which all console games will do next gen.
Avatar image for swade
swade

1515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 swade
Member since 2003 • 1515 Posts

People keep saying that if Microsoft does this, Sony will get profits. But there are 9 companies that own blu-ray, so Microsoft can just ask Samsung or Pioneer to make the Blu-Ray drives and then PlayStation 4 wont' have a disk advantage on Xbox 3 and Sony won't have the contract with MS to make the drives. I think that in a struggling economy, the Xbox 360 and PS3 will be in for a long stay (as in until 2012-2014 possibly) to sell as many cheap units (that don't cost as much to make) as they can until Blu-Ray becomes standard. RyuHayabusaX

Sony owns 45% of blu ray and yes no matter what MS would have to pay them.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

"But there are 9 companies that own blu-ray, so Microsoft can just ask Samsung or Pioneer to make the Blu-Ray "

It doesn't work think that , it all goes by what share each company owns and the profits are split according to that , it doesn't matter if Microsoft goes to Pioneer or samsung , Sony along with the rest of the company's on the BD board will still get a piece of the pie

And i presume Sony holds the majority of shares so they will make the most profit if Microsoft uses Blu ray next gen, Microsoft doesn't want this so i doubt there will be a Blu ray drive in the next Xbox

Id say theres 70% to 30% chance that there will be no blu ray drive in the next xbox

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
[QUOTE="EuroMafia"]No need. DVD's are fine for installing games to a HDD, which all console games will do next gen.

I hope not some PC games take nearly an hour to install , id hate to have to wait that long