A lot of those complaining about Metro haven't actually sat down and given it a fair chance. I'm sitting here on the desktop side of Windows 8 and the only obvious signs that this isn't Windows 7 are the missing Start button and slightly tweaked Aero UI. When you're on the desktop side you'll only see Metro when launching or searching through the Start Screen (which replaces the Start Menu). If you absolutely hate everything about Metro you can stick to the desktop and hardly see it at all. Windows 8 isn't all about Metro either; there are many nice improvements for the desktop side such as faster start up/shut down.
The Start Screen looks very different from the Start Menu, but it still retains all expected behaviour, features and keyboard shortcuts. The only feature that has not made a seamless transition is the All Programs menu which was rarely used by Vista/7 users; it is now hidden away but can be easily accessed with the mouse or the new Win+Q keyboard shortcut.
Regardless of preference for visuals the Metro model allows for all sorts of interesting possibilities. You can share content from any app to any other app that accepts that type of content without the developers having to specifically make their apps able to work with each other. You can also launch a search inside an app from anywhere, e.g. I can enter "chocolate" as a keyword and then click on a dictionary app to see a definition, a cookbook app to see recipes, an ebook app to see books about chocolate, etc.
The animated, colorful square boxes are also kind of ugly. And each app requiring full screen does seem like a waste of screen real estate unless it's an application that would best be used that way. Oh well. Guess I'll stick to Windows 7 then. No sense in buying worthless upgrades.LovePotionNo9
Metro apps can also be set to a sidebar view (about 1/4 of the screen) to use alongside another Metro app and/or the desktop. Desktop apps continue to work in individual windows as expected.
Log in to comment