With PS3 Oblivion getting AAA, Gamespot has shown that they are NOT biased.

All of those useless threads made by cows saying "Bu bu bu but Gamespot are teh biased!!!1111!!" are void.

You now have one great game on your console (which we've played to death already).

Now stop going on about the worthless piece of crap known as "Motorstorm", and don't hail R:FOM as being better than it really is. 

PS3 still remains worthless in comparison to the Xbox 360.

But they are biased... they are human and have opinions and preferences... :|foxhound_fox

No cows imply that Gamespot has given the PS3 games lower scores on purpose. Gamespot attempts to give the reviews as unbiased a score as possible. The simple truth is that pretty much all of the games on the PS3 are just not very good.DustAmulet

 So i presume u own very few games then ...

 1 Wii game ...

 1 PS3 game ...

 5 360 games ...

    Since all non AAA games "are just not very good"

  Simply put dont judge a game too harsh due to a score of AA ... AA games are still good, A games are good aswell if it hits a topic u like ... AAA games are just meant to appeal to everyone ! 

Not really. If the game didn't get AAA even though it's clearly better than the 360 version, there would be an INCREDIBLE uproar here, people would leave, people would get fired. SergeantSnitch

Really??  There was no uproar when the Xbox version of Medal of Honor Frontline scored 8.5 and the PS2 version scored 9.0...Sure the Xbox version came out 6 months late,  but it was clearly superior,  it even added split screen multiplayer.

Hell,  even tho the Xbox version scored .5 lower it still got the "Best" tag..

Yet there was no uproar...And back in those days it was lemmings saying Gamespot is biased against Xbox.. 

really...you mean the only review not done my Grek or Gattsman? 

If big boy had reviewed it, it would have only gotten an 8.9

they got one review right but it doesnt change the fact that they floped rfom when it claerly deserved AAA.111v

they got one review right but it doesnt change the fact that they floped rfom when it claerly deserved AAA.111v

It's averaging a 8.8 from all the main websites and magazines :| 

Oblivions score proves only one of 2 things

1. That gamespot editor Greg Mueller isn't bias

or

2. They don't want to back track on a game that they gave an almost perfect score to and then only give the PS3 version AA when the entire game experience was "improved upon" (i.e. framerate, draw distance, load times, shader graphics).  

.1 LOWER WHEN THE GAME HAS BETTER GRAPHICS AND LOAD TIMES??? WTF

GS IS BIASED. 

.1 LOWER WHEN THE GAME HAS BETTER GRAPHICS AND LOAD TIMES??? WTF

GS IS BIASED.

metalmonkey268

Yeah of course NOW the Cows will praise GS for their PS3 Oblivion score, even though they trashed GS for months. FANBOYS are all about hypocrisy and convenience. Blue-Sphere

fixed:D 

[QUOTE="Blue-Sphere"]Yeah of course NOW the Cows will praise GS for their PS3 Oblivion score, even though they trashed GS for months. FANBOYS are all about hypocrisy and convenience. MikeE21286

fixed:D

All of those useless threads made by cows saying "Bu bu bu but Gamespot are teh biased!!!1111!!" are void.

You now have one great game on your console (which we've played to death already).

Now stop going on about the worthless piece of crap known as "Motorstorm", and don't hail R:FOM as being better than it really is.

PS3 still remains worthless in comparison to the Xbox 360.

DustAmulet

I still dont kno. The only reason they could give the PS3 one a lower score is because its a year late, and they doesent really matter. they said PS3 version gets DC late, but who careS? We still get it. If they weanna complain about late they could have put how its a year old on review.    PS3-The Bad: slightly annoying performance issues.

                                               Xbox 360-The Bad: Frequent though fairly brief loading times; you might run into some technical issues with performance.

If gamespot isn't biased explain this too me then...

PS3 Oblivion >> 360 Oblivion but yet they gave the PS3 version a 9.5 and 360 version a 9.6? Then your look at games like Perfect Dark and say Gamespot is not biased. They are completely biased towards 360.

[QUOTE="metalmonkey268"]

.1 LOWER WHEN THE GAME HAS BETTER GRAPHICS AND LOAD TIMES??? WTF

GS IS BIASED.

SergeantSnitch

I was being satirical, fyi. 

All of those useless threads made by cows saying "Bu bu bu but Gamespot are teh biased!!!1111!!" are void.

You now have one great game on your console (which we've played to death already).

Now stop going on about the worthless piece of crap known as "Motorstorm", and don't hail R:FOM as being better than it really is. 

PS3 still remains worthless in comparison to the Xbox 360.

DustAmulet

You sound angry. Why?

If gamespot isn't biased explain this too me then...

PS3 Oblivion >> 360 Oblivion but yet they gave the PS3 version a 9.5 and 360 version a 9.6? Then your look at games like Perfect Dark and say Gamespot is not biased. They are completely biased towards 360.

Silvereign

they got one review right but it doesnt change the fact that they floped rfom when it claerly deserved AAA.111v

I guess that's why it has a AA average on Game Rankings.

GS has never been outright biased. There have been some reviews I've disagreed with, but I've never attributed them to fanboyism. People just accuse them of bias because they tend to read reviews w/ an SW mentality.fuzzysquash

Correction, they don't read the review at all. Most people around here just look at the scores.

PS3 still remains worthless in comparison to the Xbox 360.DustAmulet

But they are biased... they are human and have opinions and preferences... :|foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="DustAmulet"]

All of those useless threads made by cows saying "Bu bu bu but Gamespot are teh biased!!!1111!!" are void.

You now have one great game on your console (which we've played to death already).

Now stop going on about the worthless piece of crap known as "Motorstorm", and don't hail R:FOM as being better than it really is.

PS3 still remains worthless in comparison to the Xbox 360.

Bam_Butch

You sound angry. Why?

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]GS has never been outright biased. There have been some reviews I've disagreed with, but I've never attributed them to fanboyism. People just accuse them of bias because they tend to read reviews w/ an SW mentality.TyrantDragon55

Correction, they don't read the review at all. Most people around here just look at the scores.

But they are biased... they are human and have opinions and preferences... :|foxhound_fox

If gamespot isn't biased explain this too me then...

 

PS3 Oblivion >> 360 Oblivion but yet they gave the PS3 version a 9.5 and 360 version a 9.6? Then your look at games like Perfect Dark and say Gamespot is not biased. They are completely biased towards 360.

Silvereign

Why are people still saying GS is biased? 60 PS2 games rated AAA by GS, 60!!!!!! jeez yeah I guess GS must hate Sony :roll: Here is your link, and your owange:

LINK