These games ruined franchises, tuds, so bad yet so overrated. I can't believe in some cases how these games got high scores, anyways
![](http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/8/926538_62987_front.jpg)
![](http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/1/919901_front.jpg)
![](http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/7/927167_65866_front.jpg)
![](http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/bigboxshots/2/926632_63166_front.jpg)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
These games ruined franchises, tuds, so bad yet so overrated. I can't believe in some cases how these games got high scores, anyways
Halo 3!? What!? If you're going to bash one of the Halo sequels, it'll have to be Halo 2 because unlike Halo 3, it didn't have a good single player campaign.TechnoweirdoHalo 3 had a good Single player? THe only redeeming point that would make the single player better than halo 2, was that it had 4p multiplayer. Halo 2 also had better multiplayer than halo 3, by a significant margin.
Halo 3!? What!? If you're going to bash one of the Halo sequels, it'll have to be Halo 2 because unlike Halo 3, it didn't have a good single player campaign.Technoweirdo
And Halo 3 did? :lol:
...anyways...not that is was a bad game, but a lot of people including myself were disappointed by KOTOR2
[QUOTE="Technoweirdo"]Halo 3!? What!? If you're going to bash one of the Halo sequels, it'll have to be Halo 2 because unlike Halo 3, it didn't have a good single player campaign._en1gma_
And Halo 3 did? :lol:
...anyways...not that is was a bad game, but a lot of people including myself were disappointed by KOTOR2
IMO, yes, well, maybe aside the first two and second-last levels *shudders*.
Can't say I remember much of KOTOR 2, though from what I do remember, I'd have to agree that it was disappointing.
[QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="Technoweirdo"]Halo 3!? What!? If you're going to bash one of the Halo sequels, it'll have to be Halo 2 because unlike Halo 3, it didn't have a good single player campaign.Technoweirdo
And Halo 3 did? :lol:
...anyways...not that is was a bad game, but a lot of people including myself were disappointed by KOTOR2
IMO, yes, well, maybe aside the first two and second-last levels *shudders*.
Can't say I remember much of KOTOR 2, though from what I do remember, I'd have to agree that it was disappointing.
Ha ha well I guess I just have a thing against Halo's campaigns. I did enjoy Halo CE, but that was a long time ago and my tastes havechanged drastically.
Actually...I have always thought that Halo 3's campaign was VERY similar to Halo 2's.
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Halo 2
Grandia 3
Mario Kart: Double Dash
_en1gma_
In no way was Halo 2 disappointing.
If anything...it was a vast improvement.
I'm talking sp campaign only because I couldn't care less about online multiplayer shooters. Halo CE was great, 2 was nothing special imo.[QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Halo 2
Grandia 3
Mario Kart: Double Dash
Bigboi500
In no way was Halo 2 disappointing.
If anything...it was a vast improvement.
I'm talking sp campaign only because I couldn't care less about online multiplayer shooters. Halo CE was great, 2 was nothing special imo.What was downgraded in terms of the campaign, then?
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Halo 2
Grandia 3
Mario Kart: Double Dash
_en1gma_
In no way was Halo 2 disappointing.
If anything...it was a vast improvement.
I'm talking sp campaign only because I couldn't care less about online multiplayer shooters. Halo CE was great, 2 was nothing special imo.What was downgraded in terms of the campaign, then?
I just didn't find it as fun. Too many indoor environments with steely corridors, the arbiter, etc.Somehow you picked the best games of each series and stated they were the worst? MGS3 >>> MGS>>>MGS2. GTA SA>>>VC>>>GTA 3>>> GTA4. Ratchet and Clank TOD >>> R&C UA>>> R&C GC >>> R&C >>> R&C D. Sly 2>>> Sly 3>>>> Sly. FF4>>>FF3>>>FF6>>FF10>>>FF12>>> FF7>>>FF5>>FF2>>>>FF1. It was hard to fail this much. The failure here is extrodinary levels.
^
BioShockOwnz
[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Somehow you picked the best games of each series and stated they were the worst? MGS3 >>> MGS>>>MGS2. GTA SA>>>VC>>>GTA 3>>> GTA4. Ratchet and Clank TOD >>> R&C UA>>> R&C GC >>> R&C >>> R&C D. Sly 2>>> Sly 3>>>> Sly. FF4>>>FF3>>>FF6>>FF10>>>FF12>>> FF7>>>FF5>>FF2>>>>FF1. It was hard to fail this much. The failure here is extrodinary levels.
^
BioShockOwnz
Your opinion is not factual. All subjective.;)
well i completely agree with him....do you really think those games are franchise ruining sequels?[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Somehow you picked the best games of each series and stated they were the worst? MGS3 >>> MGS>>>MGS2. GTA SA>>>VC>>>GTA 3>>> GTA4. Ratchet and Clank TOD >>> R&C UA>>> R&C GC >>> R&C >>> R&C D. Sly 2>>> Sly 3>>>> Sly. FF4>>>FF3>>>FF6>>FF10>>>FF12>>> FF7>>>FF5>>FF2>>>>FF1. It was hard to fail this much. The failure here is extrodinary levels.
^
redandblack23
Your opinion is not factual. All subjective.;)
well i completely agree with him....do you really think those games are franchise ruining sequels?DMC4 sucked. Sly 2 was one of the best platformers ever made. On the level of rayman 2, and super mario 64 :(.You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.Blue-Sky
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.PandaBear86
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
Nah, I play games from 7 to 10. Played blue dragon, folklore, etc. But in most cases sequels are games that sold signifcantly, and have huge reception. You don't see games like lair get sequels.[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.PandaBear86
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
well his standards were high because he was comparing the halo 3 experience with the two others (which were probably awesome)[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.numba1234
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
Nah, I play games from 7 to 10. Played blue dragon, folklore, etc. But in most cases sequels are games that sold signifcantly, and have huge reception. You don't see games like lair get sequels.LAIR needs a patch to fix the control system, only after then it deserves a sequel. lol
[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.PandaBear86
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
Nah, I play games from 7 to 10. Played blue dragon, folklore, etc. But in most cases sequels are games that sold signifcantly, and have huge reception. You don't see games like lair get sequels.LAIR needs a patch to fix the control system, only after then it deserves a sequel. lol
Forgot PDZ, but that game sucked so bad, I forget I even played it.Forgot PDZ, but that game sucked so bad, I forget I even played it.
numba1234
You obviously dislike awesome blockbuster masterpieces. PDZ is AAA and full of win!
[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.PandaBear86
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
Nah, I play games from 7 to 10. Played blue dragon, folklore, etc. But in most cases sequels are games that sold signifcantly, and have huge reception. You don't see games like lair get sequels.LAIR needs a patch to fix the control system, only after then it deserves a sequel. lol
It has an analog stick patch, and it's worse than the motion control in my opinion.
I actually didnt think using the sixaxis to steert was hard at all. Hovering in that game was the biggest problem.
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]You obviously never played a real bad game. Try lowering your standards son.carljohnson3456
True. I can't understand how Halo 3 was bad when it scored 9.5 and actually deserved it. The TC probably only plays high-end AAA games.
Nah, I play games from 7 to 10. Played blue dragon, folklore, etc. But in most cases sequels are games that sold signifcantly, and have huge reception. You don't see games like lair get sequels.LAIR needs a patch to fix the control system, only after then it deserves a sequel. lol
It has an analog stick patch, and it's worse than the motion control in my opinion.
I actually didnt think using the sixaxis to steert was hard at all. Hovering in that game was the biggest problem.
I heard you had to smash X the whole time to flap your wings. That was a brilliant design choice....My troll-ness needs to be seen. I basically named all ps2 games, and one xbox 360 game :(.epic fail, I loved Jak 3 and Super Mario Sunshine, if that's what SMS is. Thanks for confirming your troll-ness by putting up Halo 3, too.
beast667
http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26418894&page=2
I'm not like this topic though.
Gunstar Super Heroes. It ended up being a remake of the original but inexplicably was about half as long...how'd that happen? I would've been fine if the game was oriented around speedruns and timeattack, but the lousy ejection to the main screen made it a chore to play short segments repeatedly to get a better score or time.
Sonic Advance also. The physics from the original Sonic games were gone, the gravity was different making the characters jumping feel oddly bloated and yet they weren't mobile enough at the same time. They also saw fit to remove any platforming/minor branching paths worth exploring; and simply replaced it with holding right on the d-pad. Sonic Advance plays like a fan-game because that is precisely what it is.
[QUOTE="beast667"]My troll-ness needs to be seen. I basically named all ps2 games, and one xbox 360 game :(.epic fail, I loved Jak 3 and Super Mario Sunshine, if that's what SMS is. Thanks for confirming your troll-ness by putting up Halo 3, too.
numba1234
http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26418894&page=2
I'm not like this topic though.
maybe I was quick to judge, but I cannot see how those games are the worst sequels. You aren't really a troll, but your thread still fails.A game that actually deserves to be on that list though? This:
Rayman 2 was one of the best platformers ever, and this was barely playable.
jak3? ... really? ... i was thinking of picking it up.humber_matusjak 3 was just amazing as 2...dont listen to him...pick the game up
[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]wow MGS3? please do your self a favor and put yourself to sleep...forever...MGS3 is easily the best in the franchise
^
GazzaB
I agree. If anything, it was MGS2 that was a tad disappointing.
exactly..MGS2 was the weakest link IMOPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment