This topic is locked from further discussion.
No, because Square-Enix hasn't made a game I really, really liked since the first Kingdom Hearts.
Maybe if they were going to go back to the days when they released great games that didn't have "Final Fantasy" in the title, but certainly not now.
No, because Square-Enix hasn't made a game I really, really liked since the first Kingdom Hearts.
Maybe if they were going to go back to the days when they released great games that didn't have "Final Fantasy" in the title, but certainly not now.
CelineDion
True i am a squaresoft fan more than a Square-Enix i agree with you. but at the same time SE would be first party and probably make all their game exclusive as a marketing strategy. So KH3, FF14, DQ10 and other I can't think of would be for the Sqaure Console only. Would you get it then? Alot of people would (I think lol)
Square Enix needs to start resurrecting its older franchises first. I understand that spinoffs ar easy to make and give you lots of money SE, but you are slowly destroying the FF name your company is built on. Put some money into making a new chrono game, or a new console FFT game, or maybe a decent Mana game, among many other franchises that are great and which you have let die.
I would also be nice if you made the FF sidequests fun instead of tedious. FF IX's card game was the last fun FF sideques/minigame i remember. FF X's sidequests 'capture 10 of every monster!', 'dodge 200 lightning bolts!', 'butterfly game!' minigame sidequests were exceptionally terrible.
Square Enix needs to start resurrecting its older franchises first. I understand that spinoffs ar easy to make and give you lots of money SE, but you are slowly destroying the FF name your company is built on. Put some money into making a new chrono game, or a new console FFT game, or maybe a decent Mana game, among many other franchises that are great and which you have let die.
I would also be nice if you made the FF sidequests fun instead of tedious. FF IX's card game was the last fun FF sideques/minigame i remember. FF X's sidequests 'capture 10 of every monster!', 'dodge 200 lightning bolts!', 'butterfly game!' minigame sidequests were exceptionally terrible.
osirisomeomi
Didn't Mistwalker buy the Chrono License a year ago?
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]No. It would be RPGs and... that crappy Chocobo racing game?strahd01Well they would have 3rd party games also but yes all first party will be RPG ActionRPGs Action games (Bouncer) and Chocbo racing games lol.
I personally couldn't see any 3rd Party support coming to a console made by Square Enix. They would need a huge gimmick in order for it to sell.
[QUOTE="CelineDion"]No, because Square-Enix hasn't made a game I really, really liked since the first Kingdom Hearts.
Maybe if they were going to go back to the days when they released great games that didn't have "Final Fantasy" in the title, but certainly not now.
strahd01
True i am a squaresoft fan more than a Square-Enix i agree with you. but at the same time SE would be first party and probably make all their game exclusive as a marketing strategy. So KH3, FF14, DQ10 and other I can't think of would be for the Sqaure Console only. Would you get it then? Alot of people would (I think lol)
I'd buy it in a heartbeat.
All this talk about the DC2 Rumor made me remember a article in GI a few months back. The article had a few quotes from Square Enix saying that they want to get into the console war. I am sure you could google the quotes anyways I was wondering if anyone would get this and why?strahd01
They would have to do more than just RPGs to be viable as a console.
Hahah Fantasy LadyBoy made me laugh.God no.
And it'd probably be named something like FANTASY LADYBOY.
BambooBanger
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment