This topic is locked from further discussion.
Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
[QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
actually shu was 16
and its not likeshepard isnt saving humanity just like every rpg.
[QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
deavincalhoun
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
actually shu was 16
and its not likeshepard isnt saving humanity just like every rpg.
even if he was 80 he looked like an 8year old noob
and shepard is badass (unless ur a sissy, then its just ew)
[QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
[QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
ArisShadows
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
would you mind master chief being 10 years?
btw
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
I disagree. The bosses had more anime-look than realistic looking, theywere suppose to look like that. They looked great I thought. What was so bad about the dragons, its how they attacked and fought?
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
would you mind master chief being 10 years?
btw
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
Age don't depict heroism.
[QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
deavincalhoun
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
actually shu was 16
and its not likeshepard isnt saving humanity just like every rpg.
mm Shepard didnt save humanity.. he just gave the galaxy more time to prepare on what is gonna happen..
[QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
ArisShadows
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
would you mind master chief being 10 years?
btw
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
Age don't depict heroism.
heroism without maturity is like a lucky headshot
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
would you mind master chief being 10 years?
btw
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
Age don't depict heroism.
heroism without maturity is like a lucky headshot
Maturity is anaction, action can be tooken by anyone. So that explains all the events I heard in my life with children being heros.
[QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
ArisShadows
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
I wasn't crap. Age has nothing to do with that.
would you mind master chief being 10 years?
btw
the battle system was horrible
most bosses looked like taken out of a clay-do ad
characters look so dam stupid when the dragon atacks
no thanks
Age don't depict heroism.
heroism without maturity is like a lucky headshot
Maturity is anaction, action can be tooken by anyone. So that explains all the events I heard in my life with children being heros.
i dont think a 10 year old can lift up a bazooka or gravity hammer
even if they did in a vg that would b stupid
i think you see to many naruto
[QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]Maybe because mass effect isnt aaa material to the reviewer.
just like my poor blue dragon(i lovedthis game)
Kaosed
i think it was crap
10 year olds save the day?
*****
Guess you also don't like Earthbound. Therefore, you should have your license to play games removed :)
seriously every respected game reviewer gave Mass Effect 9 or above! Is there something wrong with GS whyTF do they feel the need to be diff for some reason! This is a game of the year nominee and such a damn good game. guess its still better than UT3 getting a 8.5!Vulcan110
Now you know how cows feel, they have the most flops so far this gen.!
Heroism has nothing to do with doing that. Picking up a gun is an off way to think of it, trying to do something good is what a hero is. Its has nothing to do with knowing how to point a gun, or lifting heavy things. A child could intervene infront of his mother to protect her from an abrusive father.
seriously every respected game reviewer gave Mass Effect 9 or above! Is there something wrong with GS whyTF do they feel the need to be diff for some reason! This is a game of the year nominee and such a damn good game. guess its still better than UT3 getting a 8.5!Vulcan110
Um not every reviewer gave it 9's out of 10. Gamespt in fact were one of the few reviews who said they can't see a game with all the techinical issues like slowdown and glitches getting an 9.0 as well as not liking the combat and vehicles, something I agree with.
Put simply unlike other publications Gamespot didn't fall for the hype.
UT3 didn't get a 9.0 becaus it doesn't deserve it, lack of evolution etc.
GS don't need to be different, they just review games on a strict basis. That's how it is now, that's how it's been for quite a while now (even though it might seem like they've gotten harsher recently) I actually like GS because of it, cuz when a game scores AAA here, you KNOW it's a good game. When you see a site where games get 90+ left and right, you can never be sure which of those games truly deserved those scores.Exeed_Orbit
*cough* Perfect Dark Zero *cough*
[QUOTE="Vulcan110"]seriously every respected game reviewer gave Mass Effect 9 or above! Is there something wrong with GS whyTF do they feel the need to be diff for some reason! This is a game of the year nominee and such a damn good game. guess its still better than UT3 getting a 8.5!Eothein
Um not every reviewer gave it 9's out of 10. Gamespt in fact were one of the few reviews who said they can't see a game with all the techinical issues like slowdown and glitches getting an 9.0 as well as not liking the combat and vehicles, something I agree with.
Put simply unlike other publications Gamespot didn't fall for the hype.
UT3 didn't get a 9.0 becaus it doesn't deserve it, lack of evolution etc.
cough cough assassins creed cough cough
[QUOTE="Eothein"][QUOTE="Vulcan110"]seriously every respected game reviewer gave Mass Effect 9 or above! Is there something wrong with GS whyTF do they feel the need to be diff for some reason! This is a game of the year nominee and such a damn good game. guess its still better than UT3 getting a 8.5!Shift05
Um not every reviewer gave it 9's out of 10. Gamespt in fact were one of the few reviews who said they can't see a game with all the techinical issues like slowdown and glitches getting an 9.0 as well as not liking the combat and vehicles, something I agree with.
Put simply unlike other publications Gamespot didn't fall for the hype.
UT3 didn't get a 9.0 becaus it doesn't deserve it, lack of evolution etc.
cough cough assassins creed cough cough
Touche.
Although Ass Creed didn't have as many technical flaws as Mass Effect and while some of the missions were boring the main gamepay was still fun.
[QUOTE="Shift05"][QUOTE="Eothein"][QUOTE="Vulcan110"]seriously every respected game reviewer gave Mass Effect 9 or above! Is there something wrong with GS whyTF do they feel the need to be diff for some reason! This is a game of the year nominee and such a damn good game. guess its still better than UT3 getting a 8.5!Eothein
Um not every reviewer gave it 9's out of 10. Gamespt in fact were one of the few reviews who said they can't see a game with all the techinical issues like slowdown and glitches getting an 9.0 as well as not liking the combat and vehicles, something I agree with.
Put simply unlike other publications Gamespot didn't fall for the hype.
UT3 didn't get a 9.0 becaus it doesn't deserve it, lack of evolution etc.
cough cough assassins creed cough cough
Touche.
Although Ass Creed didn't have as many technical flaws as Mass Effect and while some of the missions were boring the main gamepay was still fun.
I havn't got around to play Mass effect yet (Damn you gamefly), but assassins creed is one of the only games that I have seen have glitch warnings in the beginning of the game. I wouldn't think that Mass effect would be to far from assassins creed.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment