Wow Sony really lost alot of exclusives this generation when I think about it.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

Tekken

Virtua fighter

Devil May Cry

Final Fantasy

Resident Evil

Front Mission

Metal Gear

Assassin's Creed

Grand Theft Auto

Beautiful Katamari

Fatal Inertia

And so on.

Microsoft did well this gen :)

Avatar image for suitmypants
suitmypants

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 suitmypants
Member since 2004 • 1015 Posts

resident evil and assassin's creed are not exclusives. RE4 came out on gamecube and later came out on PS2 and Xbox.

Avatar image for YuriSH
YuriSH

1803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 YuriSH
Member since 2010 • 1803 Posts
huh couple of those weren't exclusive to sony
Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

resident evil and assassin's creed are not exclusives. RE4 came out on gamecube and later came out on PS2 and Xbox.

suitmypants

Oh yeah Nintendo stole that from Sony but Assassins creed was once playstation exclusives. Ubisoft finally saw the light :)

Avatar image for Warriorboy1990
Warriorboy1990

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 Warriorboy1990
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts

360 has lost

Bioshock

Star Ocean 4

GTA IV DLC

Lost Planet

Tales of Vesperia

Ninja Gaiden 2

Oblivion

Plays the same I'd say.

Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts

Tekken

Virtua fighter

Devil May Cry - DMC3 was on the PC

Final Fantasy - Was never exclusive to sony

Resident Evil - same as above

Front Mission

Metal Gear- MGS2 was on the xbox

Assassin's Creed - was never exclusive

Grand Theft Auto - Both on PC and xbox

Beautiful Katamari

Fatal Inertia

And so on.

Microsoft did well this gen :)

bphan

Not that i care about sony, but if you are going to make a thread, at least post correct information.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

but they gained a lot better in their first party department your point? besides a few of those in that list have actually been multiplats prior.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#8 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
Does it matter? which system is bringing in more exclusives at this point. hint hint. It's the HD console that isn't funded by microsoft.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

360 has lost

Bioshock

Star Ocean 4

GTA IV DLC

Lost Planet

Tales of Vesperia

Ninja Gaiden 2

Oblivion

Plays the same I'd say.

Warriorboy1990

A lot of those were 360/PC multiplats from day one.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Tekken

Virtua fighter (VF4 was on the cast was it not)

Devil May Cry (3 was on PC)

Final Fantasy (never ever been PS exclusive :S cept maybe 10 and 12)

Resident Evil (never been exclusive)

Front Mission

Metal Gear (never been exclusive)

Assassin's Creed

Grand Theft Auto (was on PC before it was Ps )

Beautiful Katamari

Fatal Inertia

And so on.

Microsoft did well this gen :)

bphan

just quoted for further reinforcement on why OP is flawed.

Avatar image for Shadow2k6
Shadow2k6

2283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 Shadow2k6
Member since 2005 • 2283 Posts

Tekken

Assassin's Creed

Beautiful Katamari

Fatal Inertia

And so on.

Microsoft did well this gen :)

bphan

Fixed.

GTA was on PC and original Xbox. Front Mission was originally on SNES. Resident Evil was already lost last gen with the Gamecube ports. Final Fantasy was originally on NES. DMC was on PC. Virtua Fighter was on most Sega systems before. When you said Metal Gear I guess you were referring to Metal Gear Solid either way still wasn't ever exclusive. Metal Gear has roots on MSX and NES and MGS1 was on Gamecube and MGS2 was on Xbox.

Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

Does it matter? which system is bringing in more exclusives at this point. hint hint. It's the HD console that isn't funded by microsoft. jg4xchamp

Microsoft is beating Sony in profits, total units sold, total library, total exclusives. I own Microsoft stock. This is great news for me.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

How can you lose something you never had?

Avatar image for Warriorboy1990
Warriorboy1990

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#14 Warriorboy1990
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts

[QUOTE="Warriorboy1990"]

360 has lost

Bioshock

Star Ocean 4

GTA IV DLC

Lost Planet

Tales of Vesperia

Ninja Gaiden 2

Oblivion

Plays the same I'd say.

goblaa

A lot of those were 360/PC multiplats from day one.

True, but they all went to PS3.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]Does it matter? which system is bringing in more exclusives at this point. hint hint. It's the HD console that isn't funded by microsoft. bphan

Microsoft is beating Sony in profits, total units sold, total library, total exclusives. I own Microsoft stock. This is great news for me.

Whats the point of this post? Who cares if MS is making more money besides you...? This thread isn't about sales so trolling about it's rather pointless.
Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Funny thing is Microsoft only had one major third party exclusive from last gen which got a current-gen game, Ninja Gaiden, and they quickly lost it even though the PS3 wasn't even doing well at the time Sigma was released.

Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

Funny thing is Microsoft only had one major third party exclusive from last gen which got a current-gen game, Ninja Gaiden, and they quickly lost it even though the PS3 wasn't even doing well at the time Sigma was released.

SakusEnvoy

I don't mind exclusives going to others systems. Spread the wealth I say.

Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#18 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts
You know, I think it's really better that way. The only reason why exclusives exist in the first place is because the big 3 pays them (more like the Big 2, Sony and MS) in promotion of their own console. When they go multiplatform, it gives a wider audience chances to discuss games, play games, and plus the developers make more money to make better games.
Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
Microsoft did well this gen? No. MS doing well would be coming up with new exclusives for themselves. (Which btw Sony has come up with plenty of, aswell as still retaining those games as multiplats)
Avatar image for brennan7777
brennan7777

3253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 brennan7777
Member since 2005 • 3253 Posts

Lol Microsoft did well? I would consider them "doing well" when they come out with exclusives of their own.

On a side note. Whats with all the lems being happy over MGS: Rising? Its not even being developed by Kojima. Big whoop.

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="Warriorboy1990"]

360 has lost

Bioshock

Star Ocean 4

GTA IV DLC

Lost Planet

Tales of Vesperia

Ninja Gaiden 2

Oblivion

Plays the same I'd say.

Warriorboy1990

A lot of those were 360/PC multiplats from day one.

True, but they all went to PS3.

But they weren't exclusive in the first place, so that list is useless.
Avatar image for FL_Lloyd
FL_Lloyd

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 FL_Lloyd
Member since 2010 • 68 Posts
They seem to have lost Ace Combat. :(
Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#23 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts

[QUOTE="Warriorboy1990"][QUOTE="goblaa"]

A lot of those were 360/PC multiplats from day one.

Sandvichman

True, but they all went to PS3.

But they weren't exclusive in the first place, so that list is useless.

But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Did you really think about it? Becuase I've never seen someone proven wrong so fast.

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.chrisPperson
For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.
Avatar image for Nawshus
Nawshus

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Nawshus
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

I agree microsoft bought off alot of ps3 exclusives, not just this gen but last, great games like pes and gta. Sony isn't a big company compared to microsoft, if the game does well commercialy don't expect sony to be able to hold on

Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#27 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts
[QUOTE="chrisPperson"]But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.Jynxzor
For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.

But Microsoft can pay developers to keep games on their platforms, them being XBOX 360 and PC. Alright then, I'm just saying that this is exactly what happens; have you noticed all of the games exclusive to X360 and PC, and few games exclusive to PS3 and PC?
Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisPperson"]But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.Jynxzor
For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="Warriorboy1990"]True, but they all went to PS3.chrisPperson

But they weren't exclusive in the first place, so that list is useless.

But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.

Personal computers are not MIcrosoft platforms.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Guitar Hero is another massive one.
Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#31 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts
[QUOTE="chrisPperson"]

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"] But they weren't exclusive in the first place, so that list is useless. Danm_999

But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.

Personal computers are not MIcrosoft platforms.

But Windows is. When Windows is sold, Microsoft makes money. When there are games exclusive to the platforms that Microsoft owns, them being the X360 and PC, Microsoft makes sales.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Jynxzor"][QUOTE="chrisPperson"]But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.bphan

For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="chrisPperson"] But they were exclusive to Microsoft platforms.

chrisPperson

Personal computers are not MIcrosoft platforms.

But Windows is. When Windows is sold, Microsoft makes money. When there are games exclusive to the platforms that Microsoft owns, them being the X360 and PC, Microsoft makes sales.

As do several other companies, including Sony.

You're focusing in on one companies profits to make an artificial point; Microsoft does not own or represent PC gaming.

Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#34 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts
[QUOTE="bphan"]

[QUOTE="Jynxzor"] For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.Danm_999

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.

That doesn't disprove the fact that all of these games are still running on the Windows platform. You could run virtual machines on a whole bunch of different operating systems, but it's not like the average consumer runs Linux and then installs WINE on that same Linux operating system. The average consumer will purchase a gaming Windows computer, because not only will it be far more reliable than running an emulator for high-tech games, it will also be more fitted to the casual buyer, while Linux is not.
Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

[QUOTE="bphan"]

[QUOTE="Jynxzor"] For the love of god, stop bringing up this "Microsoft platform exclusive" thing up, System war rules state PC is a seperate platform not associated with Microsoft...just because it uses windows doesn't make MS any richer from PC games.Danm_999

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.

I don't Need a sony vaio to play pc games, but I do need windows. See the difference?

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="bphan"]

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

chrisPperson

And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.

That doesn't disprove the fact that all of these games are still running on the Windows platform. You could run virtual machines on a whole bunch of different operating systems, but it's not like the average consumer runs Linux and then installs WINE on that same Linux operating system. The average consumer will purchase a gaming Windows computer, because not only will it be far more reliable than running an emulator for high-tech games, it will also be more fitted to the casual buyer, while Linux is not.

So the argument for exclusivity now is based upon what this ephemeral "average consumer" does, is it? No, we assign exclusivity based upon whether or not the software is exclusive, not whether or not you feel alternate systems are popular enough to warrant it.

Nor does this satisfactorily answer why the PC is a Microsoft system, when, as I've stated, Microsoft does not manufacture PC hardware (apart from KB/M and webcams of course).

You've simply picked one player in the PC market and 'assigned' them the title of centralized owner of the platform. This is utterly illogical, the PC is not anymore of a Microsoft system than it is any of those companies I have named.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="bphan"]

MS makes money from OS sales and development tools like DirectX.

bphan

And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.

I don't Need a sony vaio to play pc games, but I do need windows. See the difference?

As I've pointed out, no you don't. Legal emulation of software does not dissapear because you claim it isn't popular enough. And you're still ignoring the point here. Why focus on the Microsoft aspect? Certain games only run adequately on NVIDIA cards, or Intel CPUs. Are they Intel and NVIDIA exclusives? The PC is not a console. It does not have a singular owner.
Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#38 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

Grand Theft, metal gear, resident evil, assassin's creed were never exclusives, pc gaming says hi

Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#39 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts

[QUOTE="bphan"]

[QUOTE="Danm_999"] And Sony makes money from Vaio's. There is no single manufacturer of personal computers, they are not consoles. Microsoft fanboys like to lock onto the fact that they make a popular operating system and try to justify it as proving they own the platform. They don't. It's no more a Microsoft platform than it is an Intel, AMD, ATI, NVIDIA, ASUS, Dell, HP, Acer, Toshiba (etc, etc) platform. The point is especially irrelevant when you realize Linux and MAC operating systems can run PC software through emulators like WINE, meaning you don't even need Windows.Danm_999

I don't Need a sony vaio to play pc games, but I do need windows. See the difference?

As I've pointed out, no you don't. Legal emulation of software does not dissapear because you claim it isn't popular enough. And you're still ignoring the point here. Why focus on the Microsoft aspect? Certain games only run adequately on NVIDIA cards, or Intel CPUs. Are they Intel and NVIDIA exclusives? The PC is not a console. It does not have a singular owner.

Danm_999, I think you are really missing the point. Have you ever tried to run a game like Crysis, or even World of Warcraft on a Linux machine with WINE? First of all, WINE has some really, really serious compatibility issues at the moment.

Second, running a program without it being on its native platform, as in running with a third-party program on another platform, has never been able to fully emulate the native system, this goes for OSX Boot Camp as well. And as I've said before, we are discussing games exclusive to the Windows platform, and if someone is tempted to buy a platform to play a Windows game, do you honestly think that they are going to buy a Mac? "Did you see that new game on Windows? I'm totally getting a Mac now!". No.

And I see your point with the fact that other companies are making money with the sales of PCs, but as you should know, with the creation of consoles, companies like Nvidia and ATI are also making money because their products are also used in the creation of consoles. So I don't see how your argument is relevant here.

Avatar image for metalgear-solid
metalgear-solid

7001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 metalgear-solid
Member since 2004 • 7001 Posts

Well, they gained as far as their first party is concerned.

This is the generation very few third party games remain exclusive, like MGS4.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="Warriorboy1990"][QUOTE="goblaa"]

A lot of those were 360/PC multiplats from day one.

Sandvichman

True, but they all went to PS3.

But they weren't exclusive in the first place, so that list is useless.

The list has oversights, but it's not useless. Star Ocean 4, GTA IV Episodes from Liberty City, Tales of Vesperia, Ninja Gaiden 2 all hold up. It's missing games like Eternal Sonata, of course, and Dead Rising and Saints Row.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#42 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Danm_999, I think you are really missing the point. Have you ever tried to run a game like Crysis, or even World of Warcraft on a Linux machine with WINE? First of all, WINE has some really, really serious compatibility issues at the moment.

Second, running a program without it being on its native platform, as in running with a third-party program on another platform, has never been able to fully emulate the native system, this goes for OSX Boot Camp as well. And as I've said before, we are discussing games exclusive to the Windows platform, and if someone is tempted to buy a platform to play a Windows game, do you honestly think that they are going to buy a Mac? "Did you see that new game on Windows? I'm totally getting a Mac now!". No.chrisPperson



Firstly, you seem to be focusing in on the emulator point unduly.

To be honest, it's a side point. I don't accept the concept of a Microsoft exclusive in general, I only point it out to show how additionally ridiculous the concept is. Whether or not I would, or the quality of play I would receive is somewhat irrelevant. Personally, I wouldn't necessarily get a multiplatform game for a Wii, and I certainly wouldn't receive the same visual performance I would on a 360/PS3/PC, however this doesn't mean multiplatform games on the Wii do not count.

You can use emulators to play PC games without Windows. That makes those games exempt from any label of "Microsoft exclusive". The counter arguments you have given me; it isn't popular, it isn't the way to maximise performance, it isn't always easy, do not discount this fact, they merely problematise doing it.

That's all I'll say on that matter, as I feel we're going around in circles.

And I see your point with the fact that other companies are making money with the sales of PCs, but as you should know, with the creation of consoles, companies like Nvidia and ATI are also making money because their products are also used in the creation of consoles. So I don't see how your argument is relevant here.

chrisPperson

Then let me state it again.

There is no central authority to PC manufacturing like there is a console. No single corporation oversees its creation, like Sony does the Playstation and Microsoft does the Xbox. In these instances, console manufacturers will commission and pay hardware developers to create certain parts of the console, but still retain ownership of the creation.

To then claim the PC is a Microsoft system because they make the operating system is a non-sequitur. Microsoft works ALONGSIDE other companies, and in COMPETITION with some companies, in order to make PCs. The characteristic of ownership does not transfer to this type of enterprise.

Microsoft's profit from personal computers is incidental, as it is a situation Sony and Apple also benefit from (Microsoft's competitors in gaming).

The only reason operating system is selected by Microsoft fans as a proof of ownership, is because, more often than not, it's the only component Microsoft makes for personal computers.

This is the flimsy pretext for somehow considering exclusive games more 'exclusive' to the 360 despite them being on another platform. That's all I'm really willing to say on this.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Heh, so when people are playing PC games through Gaikai or Onlive on their iPads will those games still be 'Microsoft-exclusive'?

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts
[QUOTE="bphan"]

Tekken

Virtua fighter

Devil May Cry

Final Fantasy

Resident Evil

Front Mission

Metal Gear

Assassin's Creed

Grand Theft Auto

Beautiful Katamari

Fatal Inertia

And so on.

Microsoft did well this gen :)

agreed but you have brought the wrong examples DMC3 was on the PC. RE was mostly a nintindo franchise most of the last generation. MGS2 was on the xbox. assassin creed is a new IP !!!!!!!!!! GTA was always timed exclusive !!!!!! can you plzzz put more effort in ur threads, coz you seem like a fanboy now.
Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#45 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisPperson"]

And I see your point with the fact that other companies are making money with the sales of PCs, but as you should know, with the creation of consoles, companies like Nvidia and ATI are also making money because their products are also used in the creation of consoles. So I don't see how your argument is relevant here.

Danm_999

Then let me state it again.

There is no central authority to PC manufacturing like there is a console. No single corporation oversees its creation, like Sony does the Playstation and Microsoft does the Xbox. In these instances, console manufacturers will commission and pay hardware developers to create certain parts of the console, but still retain ownership of the creation.

To then claim the PC is a Microsoft system because they make the operating system is a non-sequitur. Microsoft works ALONGSIDE other companies, and in COMPETITION with some companies, in order to make PCs. The characteristic of ownership does not transfer to this type of enterprise.

Microsoft's profit from personal computers is incidental, as it is a situation Sony and Apple also benefit from (Microsoft's competitors in gaming).

The only reason operating system is selected by Microsoft fans as a proof of ownership, is because, more often than not, it's the only component Microsoft makes for personal computers.

This is the flimsy pretext for somehow considering exclusive games more 'exclusive' to the 360 despite them being on another platform. That's all I'm really willing to say on this.

Again, I see your point. Yes, Sony does manufacture the PlayStation and Microsoft manufactures the XBOX. However, I think you are straying off the main point of the entire argument here, which is why games are exclusive to the PC and XBOX. When a good PC game comes out that gives motive for consumers to buy a computer with Windows as an operating system, Microsoft makes money; end of story. Whether other companies make money for making the PC and the components is a different point, but what really matters here is that Microsoft is making money off of these sales due to these games coming out.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Whether other companies make money for making the PC and the components is a different point, but what really matters here is that Microsoft is making money off of these sales due to these games coming out.

chrisPperson

And to distill it down as simply as possible; that fact has zero to do with whether or not a game is exclusive to the 360.

A game is exclusive if it can only be found on one system.

Avatar image for chrisPperson
chrisPperson

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#47 chrisPperson
Member since 2008 • 1393 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisPperson"] Whether other companies make money for making the PC and the components is a different point, but what really matters here is that Microsoft is making money off of these sales due to these games coming out.

Danm_999

And to distill it down as simply as possible; that fact has zero to do with whether or not a game is exclusive to the 360.

A game is exclusive if it can only be found on one system.

When you say that, I realize that I may have strayed off-topic too. I guess that's what it all boils down to then.