[QUOTE="Frunku"][QUOTE="CLuget"]I wouldn't use this software to claim some sort of performance advantage the PS3 has over the XBox 360. Folding@home also has an ATI x1900 GPU enhanced version of the software which uses that GPU's streaming processors to increase speed 20-30 fold, which is comparable to the speed increase in the Cell (another streaming processor) version of the software. And as most know, the 360 uses an ATI R600 class GPU, which is a generation ahead of the X1900 GPU's.
http://folding.stanford.edu/FAQ-ATI.html
CLuget
Why are you comparing GPUs? The Cell is a CPU. GPUs today are monsterific and dwarf CPUs in sheer math power.
Because graphics performance in games is not dependent on CPU alone, and is dependent more on GPU, which you've basically just admitted to yourself in the above statement. Yes, graphics do not come from the CPU... and? Are graphics the only measure of a processor's power? I'd think it would have more to do with physics and hard math. I don't know if the RSX is any good at running this program, but I do know that 150 000 pcs working for year just got beaten by 13 000 PS3's in two days.
The PS3's Cell is more powerful. This is hard fact. That won't translate into better graphics but guess what, I don't care.
Also, excuse me but the Xenos does not equal every new GPU that comes out. This has been going on for too long. First the lemmings said the Xenos equaled an x800 when that came out, then an x1800, then an x1900 when in came out, and now it's supposed to equal a r600. Xenos is a r500 modified with some direct-x 10 features.
Log in to comment