WTF is going on? is 600-640p slowly becoming standard in console gaming?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BitterExtract
BitterExtract

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BitterExtract
Member since 2007 • 102 Posts

The ****.... :?

I just heard COD4 on both consoles runs at 1024x600p 2xAA

All I can say is **** that ****.

I know this thing can run it at 1280x720p for **** sake...

Avatar image for kingfire11
kingfire11

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kingfire11
Member since 2005 • 1498 Posts

No, this peice of **** isn't enough to run your games at 720P, you need a good CPU, Ram, HDD, and Windows XP or Vista.

Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts

No, this peice of **** isn't enough to run your games at 720P, you need a good CPU, Ram, HDD, and Windows XP or Vista.

kingfire11
so basically you need a PC to play pc games? well gee :roll:
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
720P, 600P. Dosnt change the way it plays. Also, I would expectmore expesive nerwe hardware to outperform older cheaper hardware.
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
I run CoD4 @ 1680x1050 ( 1050p) maxxed with 2xAA and 8xAF with over 60FPS with dips to 50, on my 8800GT, now How can consolites say that consoles can run Crysis( well maybe @ 480i)
Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
:lol: Ok...now on the DS it runs at 320x240 or something :P So 240p ftw!
Avatar image for TClms5400
TClms5400

527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TClms5400
Member since 2007 • 527 Posts

that sucks for you guys

i play most my games natively 1900 X 1200 (which is higher than 1080p) with 16x Qaa

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

I run CoD4 @ 1680x1050 ( 1050p) maxxed with 2xAA and 8xAF with over 60FPS with dips to 50, on my 8800GT, now How can consolites say that consoles can run Crysis( well maybe @ 480i)muscleserge
Even with 480i consoles will still have a hard time with crysis due to the physics and scale of the levels

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
so much for "hd" my 7800gt can run cod4 fine @ 1280x1024 and console can't even 1024 x760 :lol:

No, this peice of **** isn't enough to run your games at 720P, you need a good CPU, Ram, HDD, and Windows XP or Vista.

kingfire11
Avatar image for MrEpyx
MrEpyx

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 MrEpyx
Member since 2007 • 716 Posts
Funny how Monsters Inc. at 480p looks better than CRYSIS at 1920x1080 or any other PC video resolution your $500 video card can output.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
I guess developers are finally realizing that this generation is NOT the HD generation for consoles.
Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts

I guess developers are finally realizing that this generation is NOT the HD generation for consoles.mjarantilla

Thats probably more likely now seeing as alot of games are not natively in HD. They can be upscaled but they won't be native 720p and 1080p. Oh well it still looks good on my HDTV. I think consoles are still a generation off of doing true HD games.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

:lol: Ok...now on the DS it runs at 320x240 or something :P So 240p ftw!-CheeseEater-

Actually each of the DS's screens is 256x192, so the total resolution would be 256x384 (or 384x256, for games that play "sideways").

Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]I guess developers are finally realizing that this generation is NOT the HD generation for consoles.sirk1264

Thats probably more likely now seeing as alot of games are not natively in HD. They can be upscaled but they won't be native 720p and 1080p. Oh well it still looks good on my HDTV. I think consoles are still a generation off of doing true HD games.

Forza 2 is true 720p.

Avatar image for sirk1264
sirk1264

6242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 sirk1264
Member since 2003 • 6242 Posts
[QUOTE="sirk1264"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]I guess developers are finally realizing that this generation is NOT the HD generation for consoles.PS3_3DO

Thats probably more likely now seeing as alot of games are not natively in HD. They can be upscaled but they won't be native 720p and 1080p. Oh well it still looks good on my HDTV. I think consoles are still a generation off of doing true HD games.

Forza 2 is true 720p.

Yes it is I think. But there are a good number of games that aren't. While there will be games that will be native 720p or even 1080p, there will be games that aren't native 720p and 1080p. Hopefully by the end of these consoles lifecycles they will have every game in at least native 720p.

Avatar image for mikemil828
mikemil828

7024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 mikemil828
Member since 2003 • 7024 Posts

The ****.... :?

I just heard COD4 on both consoles runs at 1024x600p 2xAA

All I can say is **** that ****.

I know this thing can run it at 1280x720p for **** sake...

BitterExtract

Actually it gonna get worse as time goes on, soon enough current gen console graphics would be completely standard definition, little better than what the PS2 normal puts out, only upscaled to high def, which console sheep will apparently be perfectly fine with.

Meanwhile, Hermits are demanding their games to run well at 1900x1200 resolution

Avatar image for BEAN_LARD_MULCH
BEAN_LARD_MULCH

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
Funny how Monsters Inc. at 480p looks better than CRYSIS at 1920x1080 or any other PC video resolution your $500 video card can output.MrEpyx

Im sorry, but obiously you have absolutely no knowledge when it comes to the difference between games and movies.... wow...
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="MrEpyx"]Funny how Monsters Inc. at 480p looks better than CRYSIS at 1920x1080 or any other PC video resolution your $500 video card can output.BEAN_LARD_MULCH

Im sorry, but obiously you have absolutely no knowledge when it comes to the difference between games and movies.... wow...

You missed his point. Let's look at offline rendering - take a highly detailed scene, and put it through a high-quality renderer at 480p. It may take an hour or two to render a frame, but the results will look fantastic - way better than any real-time renderer, regardless of resolution.

Alternately, let's skip rendering and go right to film, transferred at 480p. It'll still look more lifelike than the output of any real-time renderer on the market, regardless of the rendered resolution.

Avatar image for Arsenal325
Arsenal325

4899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Arsenal325
Member since 2005 • 4899 Posts
lol TC.. why do i love your sig.. it is so random and funny
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
Yet no one could tell until some forum dude counted every pixel....:roll:
Avatar image for -Tretiak
-Tretiak

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 -Tretiak
Member since 2007 • 2416 Posts

Yet no one could tell until some forum dude counted every pixel....:roll: BioShockOwnz

:lol: Someone actually did that!? LMAO!

Avatar image for waza000
waza000

1906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 waza000
Member since 2005 • 1906 Posts

Funny how Monsters Inc. at 480p looks better than CRYSIS at 1920x1080 or any other PC video resolution your $500 video card can output.MrEpyx

you don't know what you are talking about

monster inc is a movie
crysis has : physics, tons of plants, A.I. ...
and right now, graphic cards can't run crysis at MAX graphics AND with anti-alliasing .... give time for nvidia and ati to release big nice and new cards

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#23 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
If this is true that explains a lot. Halo 3 looks like crap and I always thought the CoD 4 mp beta looked really bad as well.
Avatar image for darklord888
darklord888

8382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 darklord888
Member since 2004 • 8382 Posts
Who the hell cares? People couldn't even tell with Halo 3 until someone said it "OMFG THIS IS SOOO BAD! WTF!" now the same with CoD4.

Seriously it's fine we don't need bloody 1080p or every game.
Avatar image for JocktheMotie
JocktheMotie

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 JocktheMotie
Member since 2007 • 660 Posts

I run CoD4 @ 1680x1050 ( 1050p) maxxed with 2xAA and 8xAF with over 60FPS with dips to 50, on my 8800GT, now How can consolites say that consoles can run Crysis( well maybe @ 480i)muscleserge

Would you like a medal? I can mail it in a box, or give you e-props.

Avatar image for nytrospawn
nytrospawn

3962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 nytrospawn
Member since 2003 • 3962 Posts
Funny how Monsters Inc. at 480p looks better than CRYSIS at 1920x1080 or any other PC video resolution your $500 video card can output.MrEpyx
Did it bother you that every time you pressed the action button it skipped to the next chapter of the movie? Worst controls ever.
Avatar image for OremLK
OremLK

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 OremLK
Member since 2007 • 745 Posts
Even at 600-640p, it's still a pretty big leap over past consoles. However, I personally think that console developers should drop polygons and texture detail before they dock the resolution--but maybe that's just me.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts

Even at 600-640p, it's still a pretty big leap over past consoles. However, I personally think that console developers should drop polygons and texture detail before they dock the resolution--but maybe that's just me.OremLK

Disagree COMPLETELY.

Resolution is the LEAST important feature when determining visual quality. Ok, well, not the least important. Maybe second or third least important.