Xbox One should drop its price to $299.

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

I know it would never happen because Microsoft would refuse to sell at a loss, but let's just break it down really simply.

PS4 is substantially more powerful than Xbox One.

PS4 costs $399.

Xbox One costs $499.

A $100 price cut would not even suffice because in my world of logic, having the PS4 and Xbox One at the same price would make no sense because the PS4 is a more powerful console, it should be more expensive. That's how electronics work. An Nvidia GTX 780 is more expensive than a GTX 480 because it's more powerful.

Bottom line, Xbox One should be the same price as the Wii U. Wii U has the excuse for being so expensive because of the tablet controller and backwards compatibility. Everyone knows Wii U is selling at a profit and Nintendo doesn't sell at a loss. I don't believe that Kinect costs as much as that tablet controller.

After seeing what the Xbox One is capable of and the specs under the hood, it's a $299 console. In a couple years, it should be $199.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

I would prefer if you stopped making threads.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

By your logic then the XO should be selling higher than $300 as it comes with kinect.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts
@soulitane said:

By your logic then the XO should be selling higher than $300 as it comes with kinect.

They messed up big time putting all of their eggs in one basket with Kinect. MOST people do not want Kinect. When you alienate your fan base like that, bad things happen.

It's like going to 2 different car dealerships where 1 dealership has the car you want for $20,000 and the other dealership has the exact same car but you need to buy a horse with it for an additional $10,000. Wait a minute, I don't want a horse. Where am I going to put this horse? WTF!?

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

I would prefer if you stopped making threads.

I don't think cows ever leave system wars. It's just non-stop 24/7 for some of them.

Maybe if they get a game to play someday............... Ah, who am I kidding? Even when the PS3 would get a game cows would still flood these forums rather than actually play the game.

It's gonna be a loooooooong gen.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

Actually, that example was favoring the XB1 because to make it more accurate, the dealership forcing a horse on you with the purchase of the car would also have somehow managed to remove like 100 horsepower from the car engine as well.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

@arkephonic said:
@soulitane said:

By your logic then the XO should be selling higher than $300 as it comes with kinect.

They messed up big time putting all of their eggs in one basket with Kinect. MOST people do not want Kinect. When you alienate your fan base like that, bad things happen.

It's like going to 2 different car dealerships where 1 dealership has the car you want for $20,000 and the other dealership has the exact same car but you need to buy a horse with it for an additional $10,000. Wait a minute, I don't want a horse. Where am I going to put this horse? WTF!?

and that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

X1 is the only console of the big twins to offer an exclusive that's about to "shatter" the MP gaming world. Not that I enjoy Mp or intend on getting an X1 anytime soon. But it's an entirely new game, on a new console, something the PS4 lacks after 3 months. Just saying.

For MP fans and X1 owners, at least they have something to look forward to in a few weeks. That $499 price tag, at least, would seem more "money well spent" for them. Again, just saying.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

@soulitane said:

and that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

LOL, I know, I was just ignoring you.

You said that the Xbox One should sell more than $300 because it comes with Kinect.

Guess what, genius? It sells for $499!

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

@arkephonic said:

@soulitane said:

and that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

LOL, I know, I was just ignoring you.

You said that the Xbox One should sell more than $300 because it comes with Kinect.

Guess what, genius? It sells for $499!

Man you're not very smart are you? Try reading a little next time, it can help.

Avatar image for effec_tor
Effec_Tor

914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#12 Effec_Tor
Member since 2014 • 914 Posts

They should release another console in 4 years.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

I haven't been on this site in a while. Who are the Lems now? What kind of ammo could they possibly have? Worst multiplats? Same tired played out exclusives? Way less power under the hood? $100 bucks more? Kinect? Worse controller? Worse, more expensive online? AA batteries? Power bricks? Where are the Lemmings? I wanna see what they say. In my opinion, last gen was a battle whereas this generation is just one sided. Not only was last gen neck and neck with PS3 and 360, but the Wii was the real seller. This gen, Wii U is out of the way, Xbone is failing seemingly worse than Wii U and PS4 is in a league of its own. When was the last time there was a generation with this kind of disparity? PS2?

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

@arkephonic said:

I know it would never happen because Microsoft would refuse to sell at a loss, but let's just break it down really simply.

And aren't that stupid?

Yes logic wise the PS4 justifies it's pricetag more. Problem? The severity of losing money at 299 is a lot higher than losing money at 399(and I think they lose money at 499 no?). They are not in the business to out right bleed money. Plus making a staggering price cut will hold off steady spikes they can get from 449, 399, and 349 as they keep going.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

@jg4xchamp:

I'm not saying they would drop to $299, I'm saying that they should. It's what the system is worth.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

@arkephonic said:

@jg4xchamp:

I'm not saying they would drop to $299, I'm saying that they should. It's what the system is worth.

Except they shouldn't, because that would be atrocious business.

The ideal quality of that box? sure. You would have a point if that's your wording. They "should". No, they shouldn't. That's bleeding a lot of money with no reason to do that. They can pace this box's price out over time to actually make a profit, not have it bleed money for years while they are working on trying to make it cost effective. It would be completely illogical move.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

lol, arkephonic thread

/thread

Avatar image for Sweenix
Sweenix

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#18 Sweenix
Member since 2013 • 5957 Posts

@arkephonic said:

Actually, that example was favoring the XB1 because to make it more accurate, the dealership forcing a horse on you with the purchase of the car would also have somehow managed to remove like 100 horsepower from the car engine as well.

Don't listen to treedor, he's the biggest lem in system wars.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

@jg4xchamp said:

@arkephonic said:

@jg4xchamp:

I'm not saying they would drop to $299, I'm saying that they should. It's what the system is worth.

Except they shouldn't, because that would be atrocious business.

The ideal quality of that box? sure. You would have a point if that's your wording. They "should". No, they shouldn't. That's bleeding a lot of money with no reason to do that. They can pace this box's price out over time to actually make a profit, not have it bleed money for years while they are working on trying to make it cost effective. It would be completely illogical move.

K, you're still not getting what I'm saying. I'm not saying that they would or that they should in that it would make good business sense. I'm saying that $299 is what the Xbox One is worth.

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#21 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

@arkephonic said:

@jg4xchamp said:

@arkephonic said:

@jg4xchamp:

I'm not saying they would drop to $299, I'm saying that they should. It's what the system is worth.

Except they shouldn't, because that would be atrocious business.

The ideal quality of that box? sure. You would have a point if that's your wording. They "should". No, they shouldn't. That's bleeding a lot of money with no reason to do that. They can pace this box's price out over time to actually make a profit, not have it bleed money for years while they are working on trying to make it cost effective. It would be completely illogical move.

K, you're still not getting what I'm saying. I'm not saying that they would or that they should in that it would make good business sense. I'm saying that $299 is what the Xbox One is worth.

Which is fine, i do not disagree with that assessment(matter of fact, agreed? at the least it needs more games to justify 500 bucks. like a boat load).

But should would imply that it be a smart move on their part. Which it wouldn't be. Hence my disagreement. It's more a wording thing.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Xbox One should drop its price to $299.

Wouldn't it be nice...Maybe with new Xbox Head appointment Elop and a year with the Xbox brand, who knows.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for rjdofu
rjdofu

9171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rjdofu
Member since 2008 • 9171 Posts

\

@KingsofQueens said:

X1 is the only console of the big twins to offer an exclusive that's about to "shatter" the MP gaming world. Not that I enjoy Mp or intend on getting an X1 anytime soon. But it's an entirely new game, on a new console, something the PS4 lacks after 3 months. Just saying.

For MP fans and X1 owners, at least they have something to look forward to in a few weeks. That $499 price tag, at least, would seem more "money well spent" for them. Again, just saying.

Please don't tell me you're talking about titanfall....

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

Your threads are terrible.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@arkephonic said:

I know it would never happen because Microsoft would refuse to sell at a loss, but let's just break it down really simply.

PS4 is substantially more powerful than Xbox One.

PS4 costs $399.

Xbox One costs $499.

A $100 price cut would not even suffice because in my world of logic, having the PS4 and Xbox One at the same price would make no sense because the PS4 is a more powerful console, it should be more expensive. That's how electronics work. An Nvidia GTX 780 is more expensive than a GTX 480 because it's more powerful.

Bottom line, Xbox One should be the same price as the Wii U. Wii U has the excuse for being so expensive because of the tablet controller and backwards compatibility. Everyone knows Wii U is selling at a profit and Nintendo doesn't sell at a loss. I don't believe that Kinect costs as much as that tablet controller.

After seeing what the Xbox One is capable of and the specs under the hood, it's a $299 console. In a couple years, it should be $199.

By that logic Sony should have killed the Playstation brand with the PS3. It was overpriced and started out weaker then the XBox 360 as well.

Gamers worry to much about nothing. By this time next year everyone will be singing a different tune.

Avatar image for MisterXMedia
MisterXMedia

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 MisterXMedia
Member since 2013 • 233 Posts

Believe it or not, the Xbone is so poorly engineered that it costs more to manufacture it's APU than to manufacture the PS4 APU.

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@arkephonic said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

In short... you saying button mobile is better than touch screen phones.

Xbox One has great exclusive games that PC or PS4 does not have. Xbox One has more bigger AAA games coming that is not coming on PS4.

I talked with people who owns Xbox One and they all say that they can´t imagine Xbox One without Kinect because Kinect makes everything so much better. For example, voice chat is faster and clear when you playing multiplayer games while PS4 dosent. Video chat, 1080p clean picture while PS4 dosent even have a video chat.

Kinect not throws controller out the window, Kinect is extra.

By your logics Sony should have killed PS3 because price was higher than Xbox 360, had less games and weaker

Avatar image for MisterXMedia
MisterXMedia

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 MisterXMedia
Member since 2013 • 233 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

In short... you saying button mobile is better than touch screen phones.

Xbox One has great exclusive games that PC or PS4 does not have. Xbox One has more bigger AAA games coming that is not coming on PS4.

I talked with people who owns Xbox One and they all say that they can´t imagine Xbox One without Kinect because Kinect makes everything so much better. For example, voice chat is faster and clear when you playing multiplayer games while PS4 dosent. Video chat, 1080p clean picture while PS4 dosent even have a video chat.

Kinect not throws controller out the window, Kinect is extra.

They can't imagine Xbone without Kinect because the OS is so goddamn slow, awful and poorly coded (Ironic coming from the king of software) that it's near impossible to use it with a controller.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

I hope it stays at its current ridiculous price point and goes under.

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@MisterXMedia said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

In short... you saying button mobile is better than touch screen phones.

Xbox One has great exclusive games that PC or PS4 does not have. Xbox One has more bigger AAA games coming that is not coming on PS4.

I talked with people who owns Xbox One and they all say that they can´t imagine Xbox One without Kinect because Kinect makes everything so much better. For example, voice chat is faster and clear when you playing multiplayer games while PS4 dosent. Video chat, 1080p clean picture while PS4 dosent even have a video chat.

Kinect not throws controller out the window, Kinect is extra.

They can't imagine Xbone without Kinect because the OS is so goddamn slow, awful and poorly coded (Ironic coming from the king of software) that it's near impossible to use it with a controller.

Stop lying troll. You got 12 posts and you don´t even have a console. So far Xbox One OS is faster, easier and nicer.

Avatar image for MisterXMedia
MisterXMedia

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 MisterXMedia
Member since 2013 • 233 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

In short... you saying button mobile is better than touch screen phones.

Xbox One has great exclusive games that PC or PS4 does not have. Xbox One has more bigger AAA games coming that is not coming on PS4.

I talked with people who owns Xbox One and they all say that they can´t imagine Xbox One without Kinect because Kinect makes everything so much better. For example, voice chat is faster and clear when you playing multiplayer games while PS4 dosent. Video chat, 1080p clean picture while PS4 dosent even have a video chat.

Kinect not throws controller out the window, Kinect is extra.

They can't imagine Xbone without Kinect because the OS is so goddamn slow, awful and poorly coded (Ironic coming from the king of software) that it's near impossible to use it with a controller.

Stop lying troll. You got 12 posts and you don´t even have a console. So far Xbox One OS is faster, easier and nicer.

You are the biggest fakeboy on this board.

No honest owner of the Xbone and PS4 would say the Xbone OS is "faster, easier and nicer" than the PS4 OS. Jesus f*cking christ, the Xbone fails so f*cking hard at multitasking. You can't even install 1 f*cking thing and multitask without having the entire system stutter like a 200 GF GPU playing Crysis 3 at max settings.

On the PS4, you're able to install 7 games at once and there's not even a SINGLE stutter and that's due to superior, efficient coding as well as the secondary processor + RAM that the PS4 has. Microsoft didn't think that far ahead, so they crammed that feature down at the last minute.

And god, don't dare say the Xbone OS is "easier" to use. The PS4 UI is the epitome of simplicity. Whether people like the path SONY is taking is another matter, but you can't deny that the PS4 UI is much easier to use than the Xbone UI. The Xbone UI is a cluttered mess.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48947 Posts

Make it 199 and include a (good) game and I'd buy it.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Weak, unwanted, no future. I agree, $299 or go home.

Avatar image for Rage010101
Rage010101

5470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Rage010101
Member since 2006 • 5470 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

I would prefer if you stopped making threads.

^

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

There is a difference in power between those consoles, but not one worth 100$.

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9731 Posts

It would be nice if the Xbox One was $299.

It would be nice if the Wii U was $150.

It would be even nicer if they were all fucking free, but you know, businesses need to at least make an attempt to make money.

Avatar image for starwolf474
starwolf474

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 starwolf474
Member since 2013 • 989 Posts

@arkephonic said:
A $100 price cut would not even suffice because in my world of logic, having the PS4 and Xbox One at the same price would make no sense because the PS4 is a more powerful console, it should be more expensive. That's how electronics work. An Nvidia GTX 780 is more expensive than a GTX 480 because it's more powerful.

The original Xbox was a lot more powerful than the PS2 (a gap much wider than the gap between Xbox One and PS4), yet they both sold at the exact same price. Based on your world of "logic", shouldn't the PS2 have been cheaper?

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#39 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

@arkephonic:

just because you want a xbox one but poor don't mean Microsoft should have to suffer

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts

Probably wouldn't help them since SONY is on ROLL and dominating so much.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-5f26ef21d6f71
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

@rjdofu said:

\

@KingsofQueens said:

X1 is the only console of the big twins to offer an exclusive that's about to "shatter" the MP gaming world. Not that I enjoy Mp or intend on getting an X1 anytime soon. But it's an entirely new game, on a new console, something the PS4 lacks after 3 months. Just saying.

For MP fans and X1 owners, at least they have something to look forward to in a few weeks. That $499 price tag, at least, would seem more "money well spent" for them. Again, just saying.

Please don't tell me you're talking about titanfall....

I am talking about Titanfall.

You seem upset.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
kinectthedots

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 kinectthedots
Member since 2013 • 3383 Posts

@KingsofQueens said:

X1 is the only console of the big twins to offer an exclusive that's about to "shatter" the MP gaming world.\

What exclusive is that?

Avatar image for kinectthedots
kinectthedots

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By kinectthedots
Member since 2013 • 3383 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@arkephonic said:

The success of the Kinect last gen will be the reason Microsoft does poorly this gen. The success of it got to their heads and now they think it's the future of gaming. It's a terrible video game controller at best. People want 1080p graphics and 60 frames per second, not to be able to talk to their console.

Microsoft does poorly this gen? Microsoft is doing very well. Microsoft is the only company who earns profit on every Xbox One sold while Sony and Nintendo loses money on every console sold.

Xbox One price is 590 euros, PS4 is 400 euros and still Xbox One sells very well. How having Second place is poorly? If we take Mobile sale then Sony is 4rd, this means Sony should leave and sell off mobiles and TVs too.

Not to be able to talk their console? It´s called Kinect, Kinect is supported every second game. Skyrim, Mass Effect and more... Kinect only games are great. Kinect Sports Rivals is another quality AAA game. If people want 1080p and 60fps then people buy PC, not PS4. PS4 games runs 1080p and 60fps only when settings are low. If we had Crysis max settings then PS4 wouldnt run 30fps 1080p still. Kinect is very good thing. Skype is also very good.You don´t own Xbox One, so stfu because you don´t know anything.

I really don't buy this Wii mindset that I keep hearing. All the sudden after the Wii success last gen, some people like you say that graphics and performance are meaningless now on consoles. Now, the only point of a console is to get gimmicky new ways to play like motion controls and the like. Who cares what it looks like, just as long as there's some sort of gimmick in how I control the game, preferably something that I've never done before and I'm not used to. Add in the fact that the controls have to be significantly worse than what they would have been with a standard controller.

Kinect takes everything we've learned about controllers for the last 40 years and throws it out the window. I'm not at a point in my life where I wanna reinvent the wheel. I'm happy with a controller and I want my games to control like they always have. PC is my favorite, but that doesn't mean that consoles can't have good graphics too. When I bought my PS4, I wanted it for the games I will never be able to get on PC. I want them to have good graphics and controls with NO MOTION CONTROLS OR VOICE COMMANDS. I know that motion controls and voice commands have a future, but that time and place is neither here or now. It's quite simply not good enough yet.

Xbox One has great exclusive games that PC or PS4 does not have. Xbox One has more bigger AAA games coming that is not coming on PS4.

lol, like what?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#45 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts

I'm actually stumped if this is a serious thread or not.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
kinectthedots

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 kinectthedots
Member since 2013 • 3383 Posts

@KingsofQueens said:

@rjdofu said:

\

@KingsofQueens said:

X1 is the only console of the big twins to offer an exclusive...

For MP fans and X1 owners, at least they have something to look forward to in a few weeks. That $499 price tag, at least, would seem more "money well spent" for them. Again, just saying.

Please don't tell me you're talking about titanfall....

I am talking about Titanfall.

You seem upset.

No he realizes you are a desperate idiot

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@arkephonic said:

I know it would never happen because Microsoft would refuse to sell at a loss, but let's just break it down really simply.

PS4 is substantially more powerful than Xbox One.

PS4 costs $399.

Xbox One costs $499.

A $100 price cut would not even suffice because in my world of logic, having the PS4 and Xbox One at the same price would make no sense because the PS4 is a more powerful console, it should be more expensive. That's how electronics work. An Nvidia GTX 780 is more expensive than a GTX 480 because it's more powerful.

Bottom line, Xbox One should be the same price as the Wii U. Wii U has the excuse for being so expensive because of the tablet controller and backwards compatibility. Everyone knows Wii U is selling at a profit and Nintendo doesn't sell at a loss. I don't believe that Kinect costs as much as that tablet controller.

After seeing what the Xbox One is capable of and the specs under the hood, it's a $299 console. In a couple years, it should be $199.

They should sell it without a kinect at that price, they wouldn't make a loss, people who want the xbox controller and/or xbox exclusives and don't want that spycam in their houses would not start playing on the pc or be buying a ps4.

And it would be much more reasonable price indeed.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

The price drop would be nice and all, but without removing Kinect, I will still have no interest.

Avatar image for ShutUpFanboys
ShutUpFanboys

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 ShutUpFanboys
Member since 2013 • 61 Posts

@arkephonic said:

last gen was a battle whereas this generation is just one sided. Not only was last gen neck and neck with PS3 and 360, but the Wii was the real seller.

you do realize at this time last gen, there was no "BATTLE" as you say. It was one sided towards the 360 at first, much like it is for the PS4 right now. It took years for the PS3 to catch up to the 360 in sales. OH how we forget so quickly. You make it seem like it never happened that way.

do you not remember the PS3 launch at all? Sony was never "neck and neck" with MS until way later in the gen when the 360 had no more exclusives and the PS3 just kept delivering more and more of them.

the same thing could happen if MS gets their shit together and makes smarter moves the rest of the way.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts

@arkephonic said:

I haven't been on this site in a while. Who are the Lems now? What kind of ammo could they possibly have? Worst multiplats? Same tired played out exclusives? Way less power under the hood? $100 bucks more? Kinect? Worse controller? Worse, more expensive online? AA batteries? Power bricks? Where are the Lemmings? I wanna see what they say. In my opinion, last gen was a battle whereas this generation is just one sided. Not only was last gen neck and neck with PS3 and 360, but the Wii was the real seller. This gen, Wii U is out of the way, Xbone is failing seemingly worse than Wii U and PS4 is in a league of its own. When was the last time there was a generation with this kind of disparity? PS2?

What does the Wii U offer than the Wii did? The tablet controller, that's a no brainer. What does the Xbox One offer than the Xbox 360 didn't? A much more integrated, and enhanced Kinect sensor. Not worth the $499 that MS wants to charge, but it's an interesting console. What does the Ps4 offer that the Ps3 didn't? Improved graphics?

The Wii U offers a unique control method for a game console. The Xbox One not so much unique, but still a different experience for a game console. What does the ps4 offer? Improved graphics.

The Wii U is selling poorly right now, lack of games is a major reason for this. The Xbox One is selling below expectations, but not selling poorly by any means, price point is the reason. The Ps4 with it's improved graphics is selling pretty well, Why? It can't be the games out for it, what game is out that warrants paying $460 to play it?

For that matter, what game warrants paying $560 for an Xbox One? $300-$310 for a Wii U? Or $460 for a Ps4? I would love for someone to answer that.