This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
They are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possible Xbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
Raymundo_Manuel
Or it could be because of a new SKU.
Seriously, the amount of 360 hate threads have been higher than usual
Remember when they said that with Kinect gaming wasn't just for sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t-shirts. Something like that.I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
Raymundo_Manuel
Why are there so many Dogs running around SW? SilverChimeraWaits excitedly in anticipation for a "Who let the dogs out" reference
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"]Why are there so many Dogs running around SW? skinny_man_69Waits excitedly in anticipation for a "Who let the dogs out" reference You are so clever Mr. Skinny.
Why are there so many Dogs running around SW? SilverChimera
Same dog with multiple accounts cause he probably doesn't have anything to do so he trolls gaming sites :lol:
EDIT- here's a good video
[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]Remember when they said that with Kinect gaming wasn't just for sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t-shirts. Something like that.I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
hexashadow13
That's actually kinda funny, but not as bad as Sony.
When they released the Lavender PSP their website said "Games for Gurlz" and one of the links was "Simple Games for Gurlz"
Let's just say it was edited within that same day :DThat was a long time ago.
[QUOTE="skinny_man_69"][QUOTE="SilverChimera"]Why are there so many Dogs running around SW? SilverChimeraWaits excitedly in anticipation for a "Who let the dogs out" reference You are so clever Mr. Skinny. You're just jealous you didn't think of it first ;)
Ewww!!! :P jk Seriously though, I think they finally got rid of the hardware problems.I love my 360 maybe other ppl do too! :o
chikenfriedrice
[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]Ewww!!! :P jk Seriously though, I think they finally got rid of the hardware problems.I love my 360 maybe other ppl do too! :o
lbjkurono23
not in that way :oops:
[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]They are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possibleXbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
DogOfWarIII
All PS3 devs say that, if it was true, 360 would have zero games
Pretty sure Valve hate PS3 more than any problem they have with Xbox Live, and besides, those games aren't exclusive
Isn't that the Wii? Since 360 can do everything PS3 can (gaming wise) and vice versa?
Ewww!!! :P jk Seriously though, I think they finally got rid of the hardware problems.[QUOTE="lbjkurono23"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]
I love my 360 maybe other ppl do too! :o
chikenfriedrice
not in that way :oops:
Don't lie :x :PThey are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possibleXbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2[QUOTE="DogOfWarIII"][QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]
I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
Funconsole
All PS3 devs say that, if it was true, 360 would have zero games
Pretty sure Valve hate PS3 more than any problem they have with Xbox Live, and besides, those games aren't exclusive
Isn't that the Wii? Since 360 can do everything PS3 can (gaming wise) and vice versa?
1. Hardware isn't a simple one is more powerful then the other. It's possible that techniques used on the PS3 can't be done on the 360. 2. Where have you been? EA has been sucking up to Sony since last E3. Valve is partnered with EA, so they've been praising the PS3 a lot since then. 3. idk[QUOTE="Funconsole"][QUOTE="DogOfWarIII"] They are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possibleXbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2hexashadow13
All PS3 devs say that, if it was true, 360 would have zero games
Pretty sure Valve hate PS3 more than any problem they have with Xbox Live, and besides, those games aren't exclusive
Isn't that the Wii? Since 360 can do everything PS3 can (gaming wise) and vice versa?
1. Hardware isn't a simple one is more powerful then the other. It's possible that techniques used on the PS3 can't be done on the 360. 2. Where have you been? EA has been sucking up to Sony since last E3. Valve is partnered with EA, so they've been praising the PS3 a lot since then. 3. idk Since when has Valve been partnered with EA? I think you confused Valve with Bioware[QUOTE="hexashadow13"][QUOTE="Funconsole"]1. Hardware isn't a simple one is more powerful then the other. It's possible that techniques used on the PS3 can't be done on the 360. 2. Where have you been? EA has been sucking up to Sony since last E3. Valve is partnered with EA, so they've been praising the PS3 a lot since then. 3. idk Since when has Valve been partnered with EA? I think you confused Valve with BiowareAll PS3 devs say that, if it was true, 360 would have zero games
Pretty sure Valve hate PS3 more than any problem they have with Xbox Live, and besides, those games aren't exclusive
Isn't that the Wii? Since 360 can do everything PS3 can (gaming wise) and vice versa?
Funconsole
If by Valve parterning up with EA he means the sucky Orange Box port for the PS3, then yes they did
Since when has Valve been partnered with EA? I think you confused Valve with Bioware[QUOTE="Funconsole"][QUOTE="hexashadow13"] 1. Hardware isn't a simple one is more powerful then the other. It's possible that techniques used on the PS3 can't be done on the 360. 2. Where have you been? EA has been sucking up to Sony since last E3. Valve is partnered with EA, so they've been praising the PS3 a lot since then. 3. idkDroidPhysX
If by Valve parterning up with EA he means the sucky Orange Box port for the PS3, then yes they did
Oh lol I don't think anybody wants to remember that. :PSmithers, this man is talking jibberish about Mass Effect 2 being multi-plat now.
Release the hounds!
Just because someone doesn't value the same things you like does not make them ignorant. People are buying the best console for them NOT you.
And the 360 is selling more than ever... microsoft are killing gaming.ThePsTripleBecause the average person thinks the X360 better suits their needs than the PS3? Lol
PS3 has been gaining momentum since 2006. 2011 will be the year of the PS3, and this year we Really..really...REALLY..mean it.The 360 sales were boosted from Halo Reach and a price drop and newly designed system. It's sales are decreasing now. Yes MS threw out a flashy game and a flashy new design, but it wont last long. PS3 is gaining momentum again.
clruff
its not bad for the new content, but since its ISP based and you might not be able to get that content it should be optional. If aything its about time to make all those good things on live gold cost extra but at least make playing games free. I can't help but feel I'm paying for more then I'm using which is only online gaming.I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
Raymundo_Manuel
[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]They are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possible Xbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2 well M$ is probably pretty accurate on the fanbase, exept I'm dry, 25 and have a slayer tshirt but close enough. Low tech? 360 isn't low tech at all its unified architecture is much much more efficient, ps3 might have more raw power but as far as I can tell its been a close race.. and the HDD's price? well the extra casing will inflate the price a bit, people don't realize casing is probably the most expensive part of electronics have the time. who cares about sucker punch? Unless they are owned by sony its possible to go to 360... xbox hasn't lost mass effect 2, and it won't loose l4d2, (though i doubt its coming to ps3 any way)I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
DogOfWarIII
[QUOTE="ThePsTriple"] Because the average person thinks the X360 better suits their needs than the PS3? Lolshadow8585
Yup, I completely agree. I own all 3 game consoles, because I love games. I didn't buy the consoles because of the hardware, but because of the software that would be played on them. For some reason, some people just don't get that. lol!!
********************************************************************************
[QUOTE="clruff"]The 360 sales were boosted from Halo Reach and a price drop and newly designed system. It's sales are decreasing now. Yes MS threw out a flashy game and a flashy new design, but it wont last long. PS3 is gaining momentum again.
bryn8150
Every year is suppose to be the year of the PS3. This was being said over and over again since the PS3 launched. It's pretty hilarious. The PS3 has lost every holiday and is still safely and securely in 3rd place.
Budget conscious consumers pay for the same online service twice and buy overpriced accesories? weird way to get conscious if you ask meOr maybe consumers are budget conscious since we are still in a trouble economy and want the cheapest way to play the latest HD games.
$200 is a very tempting price when the competition is at least $100 more expensive.
Zune_HD
[QUOTE="Zune_HD"]Budget conscious consumers pay for the same online service twice and buy overpriced accesories? weird way to get conscious if you ask me PSN and XBL are not the same service, all consoles manufacturers overprice their peripherals, and it costs $200 to play majority of the games out there today compared to a $300 PS3.Or maybe consumers are budget conscious since we are still in a trouble economy and want the cheapest way to play the latest HD games.
$200 is a very tempting price when the competition is at least $100 more expensive.
kuraimen
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Zune_HD"]Budget conscious consumers pay for the same online service twice and buy overpriced accesories? weird way to get conscious if you ask me PSN and XBL are not the same service, all consoles manufacturers overprice their peripherals, and it costs $200 to play majority of the games out there today compared to a $300 PS3. I'm talking about the online service you pay to your internet service provider and then have to pay Microsoft to let you use that service you're already paying for. That means you're paying twice for the same service. And companies overprice accesories but not as much as Microsoft, look at the ridiculous price of the hard drives. Truth is that truly budget conscious consumers will choose the truly cheaper experience and that delivers everything out of the box: the PS3.Or maybe consumers are budget conscious since we are still in a trouble economy and want the cheapest way to play the latest HD games.
$200 is a very tempting price when the competition is at least $100 more expensive.
Zune_HD
[QUOTE="Zune_HD"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Budget conscious consumers pay for the same online service twice and buy overpriced accesories? weird way to get conscious if you ask mekuraimenPSN and XBL are not the same service, all consoles manufacturers overprice their peripherals, and it costs $200 to play majority of the games out there today compared to a $300 PS3. I'm talking about the online service you pay to your internet service provider and then have to pay Microsoft to let you use that service you're already paying for. That means you're paying twice for the same service. And companies overprice accesories but not as much as Microsoft, look at the ridiculous price of the hard drives. Truth is that truly budget conscious consumers will choose the truly cheaper experience and that delivers everything out of the box: the PS3. No one is making you purchase XBL. It's completely optional. Yes their HDD are expensive, but look at PS MOVE or Wii controllers/Wii fit board, it's how console manufactures make a lot of their money. Yes the PS3 gives you better value, but it doesn't change the fact that the XBOX 360 is cheaper.
[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]They are all true Microsoft called their fanbase "Sweaty 30 year olds in metallica t shirts" Low tech= Overpriced periphals that should have been built in Sucker punch never going on 360 because they said themselves it isnt possible Xbox lost mass effect 2 and most likely L4D2 L4D2 and ME2 aren't exclusive. I love how cows make them exclusive when it suits their arguement.I'm pretty certain none of those are true.
Only thing they've done wrong recently would be the $10 increase on Xbox Live
DogOfWarIII
So wait...PC/360 games are considered exclusive now?
Gawd, this place is less consistent than Michigan's weather...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment