Video
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It looks good. They should have enough time to polish up the AI and add couple cool, new multiplayer game types.
Also, they should add some more sci-fi guns. Rocket launcher and regular assualt rifles really don't do anything for me. Hopefully, a flamethrower is in the game.
[QUOTE="rickjamesxx"]its going to flop warmaster670
kinda like this post?
no kind of like all of guerrillas gameskillzone 1?
shellshock?
Looking good but I'm still worried about the gameplay itself, especially the lack of secondary fire and the weapons itself. A.I. seems to be improved but still needs some work. Overall, it looks like Killzone 2 is going to be a good game. :)
OK, can i get an answer: WHERE is the appeal in KZ2s gameplay?? srsly it's like shoot the 1 kind of enemies that appear in front of you. you have an assualt rifle. the best way of doing so is by running around in a semicircle until he is dead. i mean it's bad enough for single player... now multiplayer? :(
Looking alright, but really saw nothing to set it apart form other FPS. Although the multiplayer may be great.
I think Guerrilla is trying their best to make a great game with KZ2 and hopefully avoid the problems that KZ1 had. The problem though is that I have NO FAITH they can accomplish this...AvIdGaMeR444
Judging from your posting history, you don't have faith in videogames at all.
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]I think Guerrilla is trying their best to make a great game with KZ2 and hopefully avoid the problems that KZ1 had. The problem though is that I have NO FAITH they can accomplish this...Pro_wrestler
Judging from your posting history, you don't have faith in videogames at all.
I lol'd. A bit harsh, but I lol'd.
Looks ok, i still don't understand why its being hyped though, even if it wasn't for the first killzone or shellshock it just doesn't look that great, and I'm not just talking about graphics.Mayhem48
Maybe because it looks FUN?
good?
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]Killzone 2 will be 2009's Haze.
SHuN_G0Ku
:lol: nice try fanboy..
Haze was ok, but Killzone 2 blows it outta the water..
btw, since you have a PS3 i'm assuming you've played Killzone 2 also.. what was your PSN ID again?
Ya never know, anything can happen...
This is Guerrilla...
If Free Radical has trouble, then I don't know why so much confidence is put into Killzone.
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]Killzone 2 will be 2009's Haze.
SHuN_G0Ku
:lol: nice try fanboy..
Haze was ok, but Killzone 2 blows it outta the water..
btw, since you have a PS3 i'm assuming you've played Killzone 2 also.. what was your PSN ID again?
Killzone 1 wasn't that bad in it's core concepts and ideas. It nailed down pretty good gunplay, level design and immersion.
It just had graphical glitches, crappy sound (e.g. There was only ONE single sound for the Helghast's death), AI that made Timesplitters look good and some terrible design choices such as most combat was just Helghans running at you, kill them rinse repeat for the entire game. From the videos they seemed to have fixed certain parts of this, with such a budget I doubt they can have the graphical glitches or the sound. The AI seem alot better, and the combat seems to have some variety and different ideas in it, also there seems to be some variety in sound.
[QUOTE="SHuN_G0Ku"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]Killzone 2 will be 2009's Haze.
thrones
:lol: nice try fanboy..
Haze was ok, but Killzone 2 blows it outta the water..
btw, since you have a PS3 i'm assuming you've played Killzone 2 also.. what was your PSN ID again?
Killzone 1 wasn't that bad in it's core concepts and ideas. It nailed down pretty good gunplay, level design and immersion.
It just had graphical glitches, crappy sound (e.g. There was only ONE single sound for the Helghast's death), AI that made Timesplitters look good and some terrible design choices such as most combat was just Helghans running at you, kill them rinse repeat for the entire game. From the videos they seemed to have fixed certain parts of this, with such a budget I doubt they can have the graphical glitches or the sound. The AI seem alot better, and the combat seems to have some variety and different ideas in it, also there seems to be some variety in sound.
Now heres a smart guy...
/THREAD.
Looking good but I'm still worried about the gameplay itself, especially the lack of secondary fire and the weapons itself. A.I. seems to be improved but still needs some work. Overall, it looks like Killzone 2 is going to be a good game. :)
leviathan91
95% of the weapons in KZ had a secondary fire :). You shouldn't worry about it in KZ2.
When a developer mentions how theatrical the game is and then relates it to hollywood yet again it kind of worries me. The gameplay is looking really stale. Kind of reminds me of the game Black, where all you do is shoot guys and barrels that blow up.-Wheels-
and what do you do in Halo and COD4..shoot the enemies and blow stuff up?
you judging a game, based on short footages. you haven't seen or played the full game to even say such nonsense.
thank you.
so will banjo[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="rickjamesxx"]its going to flop jeezers
wat makes u think he gives a rats ass about banjo.
so i guess u read members minds and knows he doesnt care about itWhen a developer mentions how theatrical the game is and then relates it to hollywood yet again it kind of worries me. The gameplay is looking really stale. Kind of reminds me of the game Black, where all you do is shoot guys and barrels that blow up.-Wheels-
same, though black was decent, "had great graphics" the gameplay was very linear and boring, killzone2 reminds alot of that game as well.
[QUOTE="warmaster670"][QUOTE="rickjamesxx"]its going to flop rickjamesxx
kinda like this post?
no kind of like all of guerrillas gameskillzone 1?
shellshock?
Killzone Liberation? Oh wait.If I'd seen this before COD 4, I'd be more impressed.
They'd better bring it like nobody has ever brung it before, because right now, it's looking impressive, but not awesome.
Killzone 2 can't just be impressive.They have to knock this one out the park. Anything less is pretty much a failure.
If I'd seen this before COD 4, I'd be more impressed.
They'd better bring it like nobody has ever brung it before, because right now, it's looking impressive, but not awesome.
Killzone 2 can't just be impressive.They have to knock this one out the park. Anything less is pretty much a failure.
heretrix
You did see it before CoD4:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21584.html
[QUOTE="heretrix"]If I'd seen this before COD 4, I'd be more impressed.
They'd better bring it like nobody has ever brung it before, because right now, it's looking impressive, but not awesome.
ya the amount of time theve had to make this game is insane, i mean killzone 2 was announced before the ps3 was even out. weve gone through cod2,cod3,and cod4 , weve seen gears, and we will see gears 2 before killzone 2, if this game doesnt get a 9 or higher, it will be a complete failure.
Killzone 2 can't just be impressive.They have to knock this one out the park. Anything less is pretty much a failure.
thrones
You did see it before CoD4:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21584.html
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment