http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/reviews/1711/Turok.html
:lol:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
boohoohoo no aim assist :cry: lol.[spoiler] What they failed to realize was, the sensitivity was just too high. Like GT mentioned. [/spoiler]
But why didn't the developers insert some great/original weapons from previous turok games in this game ?
R4gn4r0k
PS: This is not a spoiler on the game. It's the review's.
Its not a bad game but its not a game I'd pay more then 6$ for a night to rent (NZ dollars). As for the AI being good...I hope that was just a bad joke on her part cause the human and dinosaur AIs suck, sure they can interact with each other but against the player on the controller end they are a joke.Zenkuso
Who cares, Xplay isn't very good anyways
ZP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Xplay
[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]Its not a bad game but its not a game I'd pay more then 6$ for a night to rent (NZ dollars). As for the AI being good...I hope that was just a bad joke on her part cause the human and dinosaur AIs suck, sure they can interact with each other but against the player on the controller end they are a joke.Lonelynight
Who cares, Xplay isn't very good anyways
ZP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Xplay
Oh now come on lonely its not nice to pick on special people :P
Its not a bad game but its not a game I'd pay more then 6$ for a night to rent (NZ dollars). As for the AI being good...I hope that was just a bad joke on her part cause the human and dinosaur AIs suck, sure they can interact with each other but against the player on the controller end they are a joke.Zenkuso
Agreed. Although, I don't think they-Adam and Morgan-actually write out the review but rather a complete n00b. The AI was a joke too, I agree and because the person who wrote the review can't play a game without aim assist, he/she assumes that the game's AI is difficult.
[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]Its not a bad game but its not a game I'd pay more then 6$ for a night to rent (NZ dollars). As for the AI being good...I hope that was just a bad joke on her part cause the human and dinosaur AIs suck, sure they can interact with each other but against the player on the controller end they are a joke.soulsofblayck
Agreed. Although, I don't think they-Adam and Morgan-actually write out the review but rather a complete n00b. The AI was a joke too, I agree and because the person who wrote the review can't play a game without aim assist, he/she assumes that the game's AI is difficult.
[QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]who cares? They gave The Darkness 2 stars kaos-hero
In my view, the Turok series hasnt been good since the N64 games. Im a bit wary of other developers picking up franchises or buying them from other companies. By the sounds of the plot, they removed everything about the game that prevented it from becoming another generic shooter in the first place. Poor show.
They call it Turok, but where is he exactly? Oh wait, isnt he a marine or something now? :roll:
[QUOTE="numba1234"]They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... mo0ksiAnd they also complained about SupCom for having too much depth.
They also gave Jedi Outcast a 2/5
They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... numba1234
And they also complained about SupCom for having too much depth.[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="numba1234"]They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... Lonelynight
They also gave Jedi Outcast a 2/5
I quite liked the demo on the X360.
While a slight aim assist would be welcome, I wouldn't complain. So many games aren't using it, why complain about this one.
The only issue I had was that the weapons need to be slightly more effective.
But 3 out of 5 that isn't bad, that's why scoring out of 5 is useless. If it was out of 10 they could say 6 or 7 and that would be a clear distinction, but out of 5, 3 would have to be "quite good", 4 "great" and 5 "perfect".
Using 5 means 2 would be a drastic down from 3 to "poor" and 5 would be used too often.
People can use 5 but the actual reviews would have to have a lot of meat on them with an intelligent, critical analysis, you can't just pull a review like that out, its just lazy.
And they also complained about SupCom for having too much depth.[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="numba1234"]They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... Lonelynight
They also gave Jedi Outcast a 2/5
And they gave Killzone: Liberation a 2/5 for being "too hard."
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]And they also complained about SupCom for having too much depth.[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="numba1234"]They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... leviathan91
They also gave Jedi Outcast a 2/5
And they gave Killzone: Liberation a 2/5 for being "too hard."
I guess we can all I agree that most of their reviews suck
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]And they also complained about SupCom for having too much depth.[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="numba1234"]They gave Crysis a 3/5 for having glitches... leviathan91
They also gave Jedi Outcast a 2/5
And they gave Killzone: Liberation a 2/5 for being "too hard."
And they gave Halo 3 a 5/5 for being Halo.lol they forgot to adjust the aim speed. They say the AI is good XD
:lol: that review was awful.
kingman03
can u say a jeffy scandal? they got paid off! lol
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment