zero punctuation: 3DS

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Richymisiak
Richymisiak

2589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Richymisiak
Member since 2007 • 2589 Posts

This week, Zero Punctuation reviews Nintendo's latest cash grab.

Avatar image for hayato_
hayato_

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hayato_
Member since 2007 • 5165 Posts

Funny. One of his better satire reviews.

I just can't get over this 3D function with the 3DS. Was playing Street Fighter 4 and honestly, it felt like I was holding up one of those cheap 3D cards to my face that you move back and forth and the image moves. I was like $250 for this :?

Highly dissapointed with this. Almost feels like a comparison of what the PSP Go was to the PSP 3000. Not needed. I'll stay optimistic though, especially since I still have high hopes.

Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#4 dzimm
Member since 2006 • 6615 Posts
He hates Nintendo with a passion, so I'm sure this will be a very fair and objective review.
Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

he hates 3ds

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

that thing he was saying bout street pass was one of his best moments in a while..made me laugh a fair bit.

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

I'm agree with his rant about 3D, but sadly, he was not as funny as always, well, to be fair, he hasn't been that funny since a long while.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

Hard to disagree with his review. Also am I the only one who thinks that having handheld games be the same price as console titles is insane?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
As i always said, 3ds is a cheap useless gimmick. As he said, there is no point of a handheld with motion controls when the 3d requires that you sit on a specific viewpoint.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
I didn't realize Yahtzee reviewed hardware? Anything to get on his anti-nintendo soapbox I suppose.
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

nameless12345

No. The Guy is funny sometimes and can make good points sometimes but I would never base a purchase of a game or hardware on his rants.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Hard to disagree with his review. Also am I the only one who thinks that having handheld games be the same price as console titles is insane?

rzepak

Not only the games, the hardware cost about the same as Ps3/360...

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Awesome. Speaks da tooth.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Bread_or_Decide
I know, there is no defending the awful launch lineup. you're kidding yourself if you don't think the library's going to get better though.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Shinobishyguy
I know, there is no defending the awful launch lineup. you're kidding yourself if you don't think the library's going to get better though.

Yeah...but I agree with Mr. Yahtzoo that porta don't cooont.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Bread_or_Decide
I know, there is no defending the awful launch lineup. you're kidding yourself if you don't think the library's going to get better though.

Yeah...but I agree with Mr. Yahtzoo that porta don't cooont.

and ports aren't the only good games coming out for the system.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

nameless12345

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 dzimm
Member since 2006 • 6615 Posts

am I the only one who thinks that having handheld games be the same price as console titles is insane?

rzepak

Good thing then that 3DS titles are $10 to $20 less than console titles. :)

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
He made some good points in the review.
Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

madsnakehhh

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

Sure he gets paid to rant but it's not like hes making anything up. Why wouldn't I take him seriously?
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#23 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Bread_or_Decide
Not really. I must be missing something, because I've never found him funny. Ever.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

PS2_ROCKS

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

Sure he gets paid to rant but it's not like hes making anything up. Why wouldn't I take him seriously?

He exaggerates the bad sides of what he "reviews".

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

I can't wait until he review the NGP.

Avatar image for Jolt_counter119
Jolt_counter119

4226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Jolt_counter119
Member since 2010 • 4226 Posts

I lol'd at the emphasizing keeping the system in a fixed position for 3d...then adding motion controls. His reviews arent supposed to be taken seriously but I have a hard time disputing anything he said.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Haziqonfire
Not really. I must be missing something, because I've never found him funny. Ever.

You are missing something because he's pretty damn funny.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

madsnakehhh

Sure he gets paid to rant but it's not like hes making anything up. Why wouldn't I take him seriously?

He exaggerates the bad sides of what he "reviews".

Well when something bugs him he focuses on it. Shrug. Just like when you love something you focus on the good stuff. In his never ending tirade of hatred he does say things about certain franchises and companies that needs to be said. The man has no love for electronic boxes. Unlike many here that do.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] Sure he gets paid to rant but it's not like hes making anything up. Why wouldn't I take him seriously?Bread_or_Decide

He exaggerates the bad sides of what he "reviews".

Well when something bugs him he focuses on it. Shrug. Just like when you love something you focus on the good stuff. In his never ending tirade of hatred he does say things about certain franchises and companies that needs to be said. The man has no love for electronic boxes. Unlike many here that do.

The man himself has said he ONLY focus on the bad side of the things and make them even bigger for the sake of the satire, though not a true reviewer, indeed he has some valid points, but hardly the most trusty reviewer, in fact, i wouldn't even call him a reviewer.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

He exaggerates the bad sides of what he "reviews".

madsnakehhh

Well when something bugs him he focuses on it. Shrug. Just like when you love something you focus on the good stuff. In his never ending tirade of hatred he does say things about certain franchises and companies that needs to be said. The man has no love for electronic boxes. Unlike many here that do.

The man himself has said he ONLY focus on the bad side of the things and make them even bigger for the sake of the satire, though not a true reviewer, indeed he has some valid points, but hardly the most trusty reviewer, in fact, i wouldn't even call him a reviewer.

It's a comedy video blog article infotainment type thing. Video game needs more entertaiment and less uber serious reviewer crap. This is why I visit gamesradar more than any other site. They're entertaining.
Avatar image for MIYAMOTOnext007
MIYAMOTOnext007

3061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MIYAMOTOnext007
Member since 2006 • 3061 Posts

suprised he didn't talk about its high price at all

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

suprised he didn't talk about its high price at all

MIYAMOTOnext007

Well he is rich. Atleast I think he is. Hes got a bar, a book and an awesome job...and has made games although I think they were free.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
He hates Nintendo with a passion, so I'm sure this will be a very fair and objective review.dzimm
No, he just hates casual-oriented Nintendo. He loves core-oriented Nintendo. I personally am indifferent to casual-oriented Nintendo, but lol'd at his jokes.
Avatar image for Another-World
Another-World

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Another-World
Member since 2011 • 784 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

madsnakehhh

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

I find your presumptiveness hilarious.

  • I take him much more seriously than IGN or Gamespot.
  • You're right when you say that he focuses on the negative things, but he happens to be spot-on correct 99% of the time. I know it hurts.
  • I agree ZP is no longer funny, but then i never watched the videos with an intent to glean 'lulz'. I watched them to see some major fallacies of a popular game/platform pointed out by a chap which clearly escaped the more 'eminent' and 'respectable' members of the critics community. Who I'm sure you happen to endorse.

BTW read his Extra Punctuation columns. I hope then you would understand some part of the genius of someone whom you have so instantly dismissed as 'paid to rant at everything' and having 'some valid points here and there'.

Some of the ideas he has would make game designers blush and want to leave their jobs. Go on, and read them.

You'd do yourself a favour.

Avatar image for nintendoman562
nintendoman562

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 nintendoman562
Member since 2007 • 5593 Posts

Why do I waste my time watching this guy's unfunny rants every week?

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="dzimm"]He hates Nintendo with a passion, so I'm sure this will be a very fair and objective review.foxhound_fox
No, he just hates casual-oriented Nintendo. He loves core-oriented Nintendo.

which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?
Avatar image for Another-World
Another-World

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Another-World
Member since 2011 • 784 Posts

Because you secretly have a NAGGING doubt that he is right? That's why.

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="dzimm"]He hates Nintendo with a passion, so I'm sure this will be a very fair and objective review.nintendoman562


No, he just hates casual-oriented Nintendo. He loves core-oriented Nintendo.

which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?

he bashed glaxy 2 because it was gaming copy-pasta.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoman562"] Because you secretly have a NAGGING doubt that he is right? That's why.

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]
No, he just hates casual-oriented Nintendo. He loves core-oriented Nintendo.

Another-World

which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?

he bashed glaxy 2 because it was gaming copy-pasta.

yet it's also one of the greatest games this gen

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#39 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?Shinobishyguy
Just because he likes a company doesn't mean he has to like all the games. And just because someone likes a game doesn't mean they can't criticize it. I love Shadow of the Colossus, but can not only see its flaws (thanks to repeated playing) but can express how it hurts the experience (lowered framerates are a negative). Its been a while since I watched the SMG2 review... I'll watch it again and see if your criticisms of him are founded (considering you long ago made your mind up against him, I doubt they will be).
Avatar image for Another-World
Another-World

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Another-World
Member since 2011 • 784 Posts

[QUOTE="Another-World"]

[QUOTE="nintendoman562"]which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?Shinobishyguy

he bashed glaxy 2 because it was gaming copy-pasta.

yet it's also one of the greatest games this gen

doesn't prevent it from being copy-pasta. the two things are mutually exclusive for me. Since I played galaxy 2 first, and i liked it a lot. Then I played galaxy, and it was pretty much the same.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="Another-World"]

[QUOTE="nintendoman562"]which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?Shinobishyguy

he bashed glaxy 2 because it was gaming copy-pasta.

yet it's also one of the greatest games this gen

Which is a comment on this gen.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]which explains why he bashed Galaxy 2?foxhound_fox
Just because he likes a company doesn't mean he has to like all the games. And just because someone likes a game doesn't mean they can't criticize it. I love Shadow of the Colossus, but can not only see its flaws (thanks to repeated playing) but can express how it hurts the experience (lowered framerates are a negative). Its been a while since I watched the SMG2 review... I'll watch it again and see if your criticisms of him are founded (considering you long ago made your mind up against him, I doubt they will be).

I'll admit that some of his reviews are genuinely funny. But when it comes to nintendo games though he's pretty damn predictable.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]I'll admit that some of his reviews are genuinely funny. But when it comes to nintendo games though he's pretty damn predictable.

So what is wrong with his Galaxy 2 review? All he basically says is that it is "more of the same" and "that's great for people who like that sort of thing" and "it is fun." Where is this "bashing" you talk so much about? He is criticizing Nintendo for reusing the same thing over and over again despite doing it well. I'll admit, as a platformer, SMG2 is one of the best (best 3D, but I prefer 2D)... but why does it have to be a Mario game? Why not something new? That is Yahtzee's point in the SMG2 review. And honestly, I agree with him. NSMBWii was great as well... but it was a dull Mario game, when it could have been a fantastic, and fresh new platformer with some new IP. I'll bring up a good example from this generation. Other M was a pretty okay game... but it was a horrible "Metroid" game. Yet, Shadow Complex, not even made by Nintendo, was the best "Metroid" game we've had this gen, by a long shot. So why can't these old patterns and formulas be refreshed into something new and exciting?
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

Another-World

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

I find your presumptiveness hilarious.

  • I take him much more seriously than IGN or Gamespot.
  • You're right when you say that he focuses on the negative things, but he happens to be spot-on correct 99% of the time. I know it hurts.
  • I agree ZP is no longer funny, but then i never watched the videos with an intent to glean 'lulz'. I watched them to see some major fallacies of a popular game/platform pointed out by a chap which clearly escaped the more 'eminent' and 'respectable' members of the critics community. Who I'm sure you happen to endorse.

BTW read his Extra Punctuation columns. I hope then you would understand some part of the genius of someone whom you have so instantly dismissed as 'paid to rant at everything' and having 'some valid points here and there'.

Some of the ideas he has would make game designers blush and want to leave their jobs. Go on, and read them.

You'd do yourself a favour.

I used to, last one i read was that about regen health, genious? i won't deny he had a good carrer by making games, but IMO far from a genious, i stand by my point, sometimes he has some valid points here and there, but in Zero Puntuation, he gets paid to rant on everything and i would never trust his reviews knowing this.

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"] Well when something bugs him he focuses on it. Shrug. Just like when you love something you focus on the good stuff. In his never ending tirade of hatred he does say things about certain franchises and companies that needs to be said. The man has no love for electronic boxes. Unlike many here that do. Bread_or_Decide

The man himself has said he ONLY focus on the bad side of the things and make them even bigger for the sake of the satire, though not a true reviewer, indeed he has some valid points, but hardly the most trusty reviewer, in fact, i wouldn't even call him a reviewer.

It's a comedy video blog article infotainment type thing. Video game needs more entertaiment and less uber serious reviewer crap. This is why I visit gamesradar more than any other site. They're entertaining.

I agree with been a comedy video blog, and that's the only thing i think his show is.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#46 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Awesome. Speaks da tooth. Bread_or_Decide
Not really. I must be missing something, because I've never found him funny. Ever.

You are missing something because he's pretty damn funny.

Not really. He's not funny at all.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

Another-World

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

I find your presumptiveness hilarious.

  • I take him much more seriously than IGN or Gamespot.
  • You're right when you say that he focuses on the negative things, but he happens to be spot-on correct 99% of the time. I know it hurts.
  • I agree ZP is no longer funny, but then i never watched the videos with an intent to glean 'lulz'. I watched them to see some major fallacies of a popular game/platform pointed out by a chap which clearly escaped the more 'eminent' and 'respectable' members of the critics community. Who I'm sure you happen to endorse.

BTW read his Extra Punctuation columns. I hope then you would understand some part of the genius of someone whom you have so instantly dismissed as 'paid to rant at everything' and having 'some valid points here and there'.

Some of the ideas he has would make game designers blush and want to leave their jobs. Go on, and read them.

You'd do yourself a favour.

He's a great writer.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]I'll admit that some of his reviews are genuinely funny. But when it comes to nintendo games though he's pretty damn predictable.foxhound_fox
So what is wrong with his Galaxy 2 review? All he basically says is that it is "more of the same" and "that's great for people who like that sort of thing" and "it is fun."

Did you miss the part where he goes into his usual "nintendo rehashing" diatribe?

He barely even reviewed the game. (Although there wasn't much to bash so maybe he went into that rant to fill up viewing time)

Avatar image for TheEpicGoat
TheEpicGoat

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 TheEpicGoat
Member since 2011 • 2006 Posts

The thing about the sky and sea got me pretty good

Avatar image for Another-World
Another-World

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Another-World
Member since 2011 • 784 Posts

[QUOTE="Another-World"]

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

I honestly don't think anyone take this guy seriously, i found hilariuos when people say this is the only trusty reviewer, when in reality, he gets paid to rant on everything, has some valid points here and there, but most of the time, as he already said before, only focus on the negative things.

madsnakehhh

I find your presumptiveness hilarious.

  • I take him much more seriously than IGN or Gamespot.
  • You're right when you say that he focuses on the negative things, but he happens to be spot-on correct 99% of the time. I know it hurts.
  • I agree ZP is no longer funny, but then i never watched the videos with an intent to glean 'lulz'. I watched them to see some major fallacies of a popular game/platform pointed out by a chap which clearly escaped the more 'eminent' and 'respectable' members of the critics community. Who I'm sure you happen to endorse.

BTW read his Extra Punctuation columns. I hope then you would understand some part of the genius of someone whom you have so instantly dismissed as 'paid to rant at everything' and having 'some valid points here and there'.

Some of the ideas he has would make game designers blush and want to leave their jobs. Go on, and read them.

You'd do yourself a favour.

I used to, last one i read was that about regen health, genious? i won't deny he had a good carrer by making games, but IMO far from a genious, i stand by my point, sometimes he has some valid points here and there, but in Zero Puntuation, he gets paid to rant on everything and i would never trust his reviews knowing this.

Well, i personally found the idea he suggested (the luck system) in his regen health very ingenious, plausible, easy-to-implement and in short great.

If you found that article meh, then honestly I don't know what to say. I guess it's just your opinion and you think it is correct and are happy with it. And so am I with mine.

So cheers. :D