Points Master(s)
Kinetic-Core
Voters will be required to give both characters a score. The definition of "Good" and "Better" is definitely in accordance of what you think it is. No guildelines, no influence, no right or wrong. It is all up to you to give any score to both characters. You are required to give BOTH characters a score.
Points Allocation Balance:
| 5pts - 1pts | 4pts - 2pts | 3pts - 3pts | 2pts - 4pts | 1pts - 5 pts|
You can choose to award Terra Branford with:
5 pts - Terra definitely wins! Ritz is nowhere compared to Terra.
4 pts - Terra is so much better than Ritz.
3 pts - Hmm... I can't really choose. They're both as good...
2 pts - Come on, Terra can't beat Ritz that easily!
1 pts - Terra?? Don't make me laugh... Ritz is 10 times the woman Terra is.
You can choose to award Ritz Malheur with:
5 pts - Ritz definitely wins! Terra is nowhere compared to Ritz.
4 pts - Ritz is so much better than Terra.
3 pts - Hmm... I can't really choose. They're both as good...
2 pts - Come on, Ritz can't beat Terra that easily!
1 pts - Ritz?? Don't make me laugh... Terra is 10 times the woman Ritz is.
This is how an example of a voter's post should be like:
EXAMPLE:
Terra : 3 pts | Ritz : 3 pts- I can't really distinguish the better or the worse one. I have to say they're both as good.
In the case of choosing variable pts for a single character, the other character must be given the extreme lowest of the points system. Please refer to the Points Allocation Balance. [above]
EXAMPLE: Terra : 4 pts | Ritz : 2 pts
Log in to comment