End of Zelda

I've taken this from an article from CVG (computerandvideogames.com)

"While Mario and the Revolution linger provocatively on the horizon, there's one highly anticipated GameCube title preparing to charge defiantly down the hill toward expectant gamers, albeit looking slightly flushed for missing its train and turning up late. Miyamoto sends out a plea for patience amongst Zelda fans, frothing at the mouth over The Twilight Princess' recent delay. The big man is eager to stress that the wait will be worth it, promising the best Zelda title ever, and more intriguingly the very last time we'll see Link and his cheeky green tunic as we know them:

"This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form. I worked on it personally, more so than Wind Waker! I haven't invested as much into any game as I have this one. Our goal was to make the best Zelda game ever - the most rich, satisfying and melancholy. We've really improved it in just a few months. Everything's coming together much quicker. We may have some last minute ideas..."

This mean that zelda games will never be the same

no no no no no it says and i quote "This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form." so that mean this will be the last one made this way revolution will change everything.Skull_Kid_Rox

That can interpreted many different ways. Miyamoto would be just plain crazy to change Zelda so much and alienate longtime fans of the series. It has to be in same way shape or form similar to the ones before it. If you compare a Link to the Past and Ocarina of Time a lot of things changed but both games still kept the overall feel of a Zelda game. He probably just means that the new Zelda on the Revolution will be played a little differently to take advantage of what the Revolution has to offer to gaming that no other console will be able to do or at least that's my take on it.

[QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"]no no no no no it says and i quote "This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form." so that mean this will be the last one made this way revolution will change everything.Link2025

That can interpreted many different ways. Miyamoto would be just plain crazy to change Zelda so much and alienate longtime fans of the series. It has to be in same way shape or form similar to the ones before it. If you compare a Link to the Past and Ocarina of Time a lot of things changed but both games still kept the overall feel of a Zelda game. He probably just means that the new Zelda on the Revolution will be played a little differently to take advantage of what the Revolution has to offer to gaming that no other console will be able to do or at least that's my take on it.

are u argueing with me cuz thats what i said

[QUOTE="Link2025"]

[QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"]no no no no no it says and i quote "This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form." so that mean this will be the last one made this way revolution will change everything.Skull_Kid_Rox

That can interpreted many different ways. Miyamoto would be just plain crazy to change Zelda so much and alienate longtime fans of the series. It has to be in same way shape or form similar to the ones before it. If you compare a Link to the Past and Ocarina of Time a lot of things changed but both games still kept the overall feel of a Zelda game. He probably just means that the new Zelda on the Revolution will be played a little differently to take advantage of what the Revolution has to offer to gaming that no other console will be able to do or at least that's my take on it.

are u argueing with me cuz thats what i said

I'm not really agrueing and thats not really what you said at all. You said the revolution will change everything. I'm implying that the new Zelda game for the Rev can only be so much different and still be called Zelda.

[QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"][QUOTE="Link2025"]

[QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"]no no no no no it says and i quote "This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form." so that mean this will be the last one made this way revolution will change everything.Link2025

That can interpreted many different ways. Miyamoto would be just plain crazy to change Zelda so much and alienate longtime fans of the series. It has to be in same way shape or form similar to the ones before it. If you compare a Link to the Past and Ocarina of Time a lot of things changed but both games still kept the overall feel of a Zelda game. He probably just means that the new Zelda on the Revolution will be played a little differently to take advantage of what the Revolution has to offer to gaming that no other console will be able to do or at least that's my take on it.

are u argueing with me cuz thats what i said

I'm not really agrueing and thats not really what you said at all. You said the revolution will change everything. I'm implying that the new Zelda game for the Rev can only be so much different and still be called Zelda.

of course zelda has to retain its main gameplay

Maby they'll finally get rid of the Master Sword.qwertyuioppizza

maybe we should stop putting gel in our hair and start wearing blue jeans lets do that!!!!!!!

Maby they'll finally get rid of the Master Sword.qwertyuioppizza

Yeh, and maby they'll finally kill off Link and Zelda too. (sarcasm)

Maby they'll finally get rid of the Master Sword.qwertyuioppizza

[QUOTE="qwertyuioppizza"]Maby they'll finally get rid of the Master Sword.Link4554

Maybe be the next one will be a WW sequel and because the Master Sword is stuck at the bottom of the ocean Link will use the Four Sword from now on. The way I see it the sequel will be about Link and friends reaching a new and vast land, and a whole new adventure.BTW MS +bottom of ocean probably=MS replacement.

Twilight Princess will be the best Zelda.IkeXC07

[QUOTE="Link4554"][QUOTE="qwertyuioppizza"]Maby they'll finally get rid of the Master Sword.Celsius765

Maybe be the next one will be a WW sequel and because the Master Sword is stuck at the bottom of the ocean Link will use the Four Sword from now on. The way I see it the sequel will be about Link and friends reaching a new and vast land, and a whole new adventure.BTW MS +bottom of ocean probably=MS replacement.

WW sequeal will be for DS, and considering that A Link to the Past is the last game chronilogically Hyrule must get draind, and the master sword get back in the forrest somehow.

Twilight Princess will be the best Zelda.IkeXC07

only cuz of that terrible revolution controller

[QUOTE="Link2025"][QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"][QUOTE="Link2025"]

[QUOTE="Skull_Kid_Rox"]no no no no no it says and i quote "This will be, without a doubt, the last Zelda game as you know it in its present form." so that mean this will be the last one made this way revolution will change everything.Skull_Kid_Rox

That can interpreted many different ways. Miyamoto would be just plain crazy to change Zelda so much and alienate longtime fans of the series. It has to be in same way shape or form similar to the ones before it. If you compare a Link to the Past and Ocarina of Time a lot of things changed but both games still kept the overall feel of a Zelda game. He probably just means that the new Zelda on the Revolution will be played a little differently to take advantage of what the Revolution has to offer to gaming that no other console will be able to do or at least that's my take on it.

are u argueing with me cuz thats what i said

I'm not really agrueing and thats not really what you said at all. You said the revolution will change everything. I'm implying that the new Zelda game for the Rev can only be so much different and still be called Zelda.

of course zelda has to retain its main gameplay

but id like to see the gameplay change up from just real-time sword fights and stuff WHAT ABOUT A DECISION TREE THING? you know to give link a dark side

or something like jade empire!

I would rather not see Zelda start using decision trees. That's the path to the dark side. And by Dark Side, I mean RPG. Zelda should not be an RPG, as we all remember AoL. But seriously, why would we want to give Link the chance to develop into an evil character? He's the frikkin Hero of Time!ocarina_jedi

1. frikkin is FRICKIN if your using slang or if your not its FREAKING!

b. Link might not need decision trees maybe hell learn new techniques by the way he fights! or something like that!

3. i remember aol! and america online zelda aol! would of been better if it was released on this generation!

d. Link is also the hero of winds! your point?

5. SHUT UP!

f. how about the same concept as Shadow the hedgehog or Sonic adventure 2? play as one of ganons evil monsters or tingle! they are both evil

7. what if link could lead a squad of tingles? (I NEED TO STOP THINKIN ABOUT TINGLE)