I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
It says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
Yeah, and strangly, why is there two Ocarina of Time's? Why don't you add Twilight Princess inbetween Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. I don't think there is such thing as a Hyrule A and B :lol: :PIt says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
marshiemallowma
Here is my opinion, Orcarina, MM, TP, WW, PH,nintendomaniaYeah. And then you have Link To The Past, Link's Adventure, Link's Awakening, as the first few. The you would include Four Swords, Minish Cap, Oracle of Seasons inbetween.
U know that MM is a direct sequel to OOT right? like i mean only months after.I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
supersonic12
I believe LA must be a direct sequel to ALttP. The intro shows quite clear it's a sequel (sailing a way from hyrule for new adventures). I think that was mentioned in the game book too. Anyway, the latest game before LA was ALttP, so it is most likely that LA was a direct sequel to that one. Also, even if it was released after OoT (was it?) I think LA originally was the second Zelda game developed for the SNES that was never completed.
facit_90
[QUOTE="supersonic12"]U know that MM is a direct sequel to OOT right? like i mean only months after.That's why he included it in the Hyrule A, which I would assume would be the child ending of OoT. Since in the adult ending Link did not become a child again, MM can't happen after that. ...right?I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
zeldafreak4life
[QUOTE="zeldafreak4life"][QUOTE="supersonic12"]U know that MM is a direct sequel to OOT right? like i mean only months after.That's why he included it in the Hyrule A, which I would assume would be the child ending of OoT. Since in the adult ending Link did not become a child again, MM can't happen after that. ...right?I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
BGCD
[QUOTE="BGCD"][QUOTE="zeldafreak4life"][QUOTE="supersonic12"]U know that MM is a direct sequel to OOT right? like i mean only months after.That's why he included it in the Hyrule A, which I would assume would be the child ending of OoT. Since in the adult ending Link did not become a child again, MM can't happen after that. ...right?I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
Gary_Jinfield
[QUOTE="Gary_Jinfield"][QUOTE="BGCD"][QUOTE="zeldafreak4life"][QUOTE="supersonic12"]U know that MM is a direct sequel to OOT right? like i mean only months after.That's why he included it in the Hyrule A, which I would assume would be the child ending of OoT. Since in the adult ending Link did not become a child again, MM can't happen after that. ...right?I have made a Timeline! Hoorah! It uses the Evil Link Theory.
Hyrule A:
OoT
MM
WW
PH
Hyrule B:
OoT
TP
This Timeline is made from games I've Played.
zeldafreak4life
[QUOTE="marshiemallowma"]Yeah, and strangly, why is there two Ocarina of Time's? Why don't you add Twilight Princess inbetween Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. I don't think there is such thing as a Hyrule A and B :lol: :P Um... IT says in the game majora's mask is a direct sequel to ocarina of time. That is a perfect timeline.It says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
GamerGirlPwnz
[QUOTE="GamerGirlPwnz"][QUOTE="marshiemallowma"]Yeah, and strangly, why is there two Ocarina of Time's? Why don't you add Twilight Princess inbetween Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. I don't think there is such thing as a Hyrule A and B :lol: :P Um... IT says in the game majora's mask is a direct sequel to ocarina of time. That is a perfect timeline.It says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
gigabrowser12
[QUOTE="gigabrowser12"][QUOTE="GamerGirlPwnz"][QUOTE="marshiemallowma"]Yeah, and strangly, why is there two Ocarina of Time's? Why don't you add Twilight Princess inbetween Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. I don't think there is such thing as a Hyrule A and B :lol: :P Um... IT says in the game majora's mask is a direct sequel to ocarina of time. That is a perfect timeline.It says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
GamerGirlPwnz
[QUOTE="GamerGirlPwnz"][QUOTE="gigabrowser12"][QUOTE="GamerGirlPwnz"][QUOTE="marshiemallowma"]Yeah, and strangly, why is there two Ocarina of Time's? Why don't you add Twilight Princess inbetween Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. I don't think there is such thing as a Hyrule A and B :lol: :P Um... IT says in the game majora's mask is a direct sequel to ocarina of time. That is a perfect timeline.It says it's from the games you've played, but Phantom Hourglass is on there. But we all know it comes directly after WW, so that would be it's right spot anyways.
Would you care to explain why the games are in that specific order?
zeldafreak4life
Its really tough to make any direct sense to the method of chronology to the LoZ series because in some games link has family members and in many others he doesn't. So maybe, Link to the Past and link's Awakening occur right before OoT because link has an uncle in Link to the Past. So perhaps OoT is what happens to him after his uncle diesJukedSolid
finaly, a timeline I agree with, but your missing MC, Minish cap is the first game in thein chronological order , it's been confirmed glennwintonSeriously? Minish Cap is the first game in the chronological order? :? I thought it would be somewhere with Four Swords or the Oracle of Seasons... :shock:
As far as timeline theories go, I recommend this. Head over to www.gametrailers.com and search for 'zelda retrospective part 6' (the first 5 parts of the retrospective were examinations of all of the games leading up to Twilight Princess). This video is their own idea of the timeline. I don't agree with it 100% (in fact I disagree with a lot of it, and now that Twilight Princess is out, it disproves more of it), but it's a good starting point for making a timeline.ocarina_jedi
Â
You'd be better off forming your own opinion really by playing the games and coming to your own conclusions as a starting point. If anyone really wants to learn more about timelines, I would suggest this thread , although it is out of date and slightly bias towards a particular timeline.
[QUOTE="ocarina_jedi"]As far as timeline theories go, I recommend this. Head over to www.gametrailers.com and search for 'zelda retrospective part 6' (the first 5 parts of the retrospective were examinations of all of the games leading up to Twilight Princess). This video is their own idea of the timeline. I don't agree with it 100% (in fact I disagree with a lot of it, and now that Twilight Princess is out, it disproves more of it), but it's a good starting point for making a timeline.Gary_Jinfield
Â
You'd be better off forming your own opinion really by playing the games and coming to your own conclusions as a starting point. If anyone really wants to learn more about timelines, I would suggest this thread , although it is out of date and slightly bias towards a particular timeline.
Â
I have played all of the games (except for Four Swords, and I haven't finished Adventure of Link), but I thought that that video brought up a few good ideas that I hadn't thought of, even though I have played just about the entire series. Anybody else in need of a similar starting point could look here, I feel.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment