Well, after the very negative comments from my last noise filter experiment, I was determined to make a better one, so here is it
Well, after the very negative comments from my last noise filter experiment, I was determined to make a better one, so here is it
How about some actual critizism? Don't post in my thread if you aren't going to actually comment on the sigPain9000000Sorry sorry.:P It's good, the flow seems decent, but could use some work, and it seems a bit overcontrasted, it blends well though, but could use some sharper affects.
Â
even if it is the same render dont use it twice in the same sig ..theres a ton of things you can fill your sigs with , try the following
Different types of textureC4D's set to colour dodge or soft light or anything in between
and PROPERLY placed C4D's set to normal :)
*shiver* So....annoying....so...very....annoying....Flamesingh1I was thinking you were saying that because of the artificial lighting until I saw the other thread :P
Anyway yeah..artificial lighting, unlike dax I don't think it's good :P
And noise filter > makes noise, noise > makes sigs look "dirty", I WANT CLEAN TAGS YO!
Don't rely on filers other than blur or sharpen, the rest are mostly beginner stuff that you're better off not using.
And yeah the 2 render thing is meh. because other than it not really working here the second render is a floating head.
Read tutorials..as I've said 2131321 times before.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment