BCS Rematch?

Only if Florida and USC loses. Other than that.....no.

This year is the worst year for the BCS that i can remember since 3 teams went undefeated. I wasent a big fan of playoff system but now i can see their point. I would prefer like a 12 team playoff seed. Much like the NFL with top 4 teams having a bye week the first week.

I don't get it, why is everyone using the term 'rematch'.  Say the OSU-Michigan game never happened earlier this year, then would you want to see them in the National Championship.  You have to let the two best teams play in the National Championship, and Michigan and Ohio State are clearly 1-2 this year.bgres077

But it didnt. Plus I dont buy that Michigan is clearly the number 2 team. Florida, USC and ND all have 1 loss as well.........you cnt put the word "clearly" in that.

[QUOTE="bgres077"]I don't get it, why is everyone using the term 'rematch'. Say the OSU-Michigan game never happened earlier this year, then would you want to see them in the National Championship. You have to let the two best teams play in the National Championship, and Michigan and Ohio State are clearly 1-2 this year.Espurs117

But it didnt. Plus I dont buy that Michigan is clearly the number 2 team. Florida, USC and ND all have 1 loss as well.........you cnt put the word "clearly" in that.

i want to see two different teams who havent played each other, PLAY AGAINST EACH OTHER. its going to be boring to see mich play osu again. usc and osu might be a good game.Gunnerman007

[QUOTE="Gunnerman007"]i want to see two different teams who havent played each other, PLAY AGAINST EACH OTHER. its going to be boring to see mich play osu again. usc and osu might be a good game.bgres077

[QUOTE="bgres077"][QUOTE="Gunnerman007"]i want to see two different teams who havent played each other, PLAY AGAINST EACH OTHER. its going to be boring to see mich play osu again. usc and osu might be a good game.Gunnerman007

Better than USC and Texas? lol bro your hyping up a game too much.

[QUOTE="Gunnerman007"][QUOTE="bgres077"][QUOTE="Gunnerman007"]i want to see two different teams who havent played each other, PLAY AGAINST EACH OTHER. its going to be boring to see mich play osu again. usc and osu might be a good game.Espurs117

Better than USC and Texas? lol bro your hyping up a game too much.

Now last years NC game was one for the ages. Even though we lost, it was good football game, but when you lose after such expectations, its hard to enjoy that game, I still cant watch that game, and for the first few months VY haunted me.Fadedinline

I have it recorded......seen it plenty of times. Giants fan feel the same way today, Young owned them in the 4th quarter, coudlnt bring him down for the sack.

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"]Now last years NC game was one for the ages. Even though we lost, it was good football game, but when you lose after such expectations, its hard to enjoy that game, I still cant watch that game, and for the first few months VY haunted me.Espurs117

I have it recorded......seen it plenty of times. Giants fan feel the same way today, Young owned them in the 4th quarter, coudlnt bring him down for the sack.

Let's hope that Romo can make the Giants' D look just as bad next Sunday.

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"]Now last years NC game was one for the ages. Even though we lost, it was good football game, but when you lose after such expectations, its hard to enjoy that game, I still cant watch that game, and for the first few months VY haunted me.sith_acolyte15

I have it recorded......seen it plenty of times. Giants fan feel the same way today, Young owned them in the 4th quarter, coudlnt bring him down for the sack.

Let's hope that Romo can make the Giants' D look just as bad next Sunday.

Yes lets hope on that.

Well, due to the pollsters and the computers being completely retarded, it looks like it will be a USC vs. Ohio State national championship.Toucanbird

[QUOTE="Toucanbird"]Well, due to the pollsters and the computers being completely retarded, it looks like it will be a USC vs. Ohio State national championship.Fadedinline

While I do think that Michigan is a better team than USC, I don't think they deserve the shot at a NC over them yet. Now if USC and Florida both lose their next games, then I think it's definitely Michigan who should be there. The reason I don't think Michigan should get the shot over a 1-loss USC or Florida is because those teams would be conference champs while Michigan is not.sith_acolyte15

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

Toucanbird

[QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

jeebuscrust

The short answer: They don't.

[QUOTE="jeebuscrust"][QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

sith_acolyte15

The short answer: They don't.

[QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"][QUOTE="jeebuscrust"][QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

Fadedinline

The short answer: They don't.

When you have as tough a conference schedule as Florida does though, OOC schedules aren't as important.

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"][QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"][QUOTE="jeebuscrust"][QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

sith_acolyte15

The short answer: They don't.

When you have as tough a conference schedule as Florida does though, OOC schedules aren't as important.

The SEC is harder to go undefeated in than the Pac 10 is. The Pac 10 is basically a 1 team race every year now.sith_acolyte15

[QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"]The SEC is harder to go undefeated in than the Pac 10 is. The Pac 10 is basically a 1 team race every year now.Fadedinline

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"]Now last years NC game was one for the ages. Even though we lost, it was good football game, but when you lose after such expectations, its hard to enjoy that game, I still cant watch that game, and for the first few months VY haunted me.sith_acolyte15

I have it recorded......seen it plenty of times. Giants fan feel the same way today, Young owned them in the 4th quarter, coudlnt bring him down for the sack.

Let's hope that Romo can make the Giants' D look just as bad next Sunday.

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"][QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"]The SEC is harder to go undefeated in than the Pac 10 is. The Pac 10 is basically a 1 team race every year now.PeterTimpa

[QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"][QUOTE="jeebuscrust"][QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

Fadedinline

The short answer: They don't.

[QUOTE="Fadedinline"][QUOTE="sith_acolyte15"][QUOTE="jeebuscrust"][QUOTE="Toucanbird"]

I think even if Florida beats Arkansas and USC loses to UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Actually, I think if USC has a hard time beating UCLA, it should be Michigan in the national championship.

Unless Michigan gets beat in the Rose Bowl, which I'm guessing they will unfortunately get put this year, nothing will change my mind that they were the number two team and deserved to be in the national championship.

Also, I'm not a die hard Michigan fan. In fact, I don't even like Michigan. This is coming out of a talent evaluation and how screwed up the BCS is.

All I can say is, get rid of it. There's a contraversy almost every single year. The only year there hasn't been was last year when both USC and Texas by far were the two most deserving teams.

geaux321

The short answer: They don't.

every college team has to have some bye weeks during the season. thats why they put temple and duke on their schedule. so they can get an easy win and their players can rest up.Gunnerman007

[QUOTE="Gunnerman007"]every college team has to have some bye weeks during the season. thats why they put temple and duke on their schedule. so they can get an easy win and their players can rest up.geaux321

[QUOTE="geaux321"][QUOTE="Gunnerman007"]every college team has to have some bye weeks during the season. thats why they put temple and duke on their schedule. so they can get an easy win and their players can rest up.Gunnerman007