What ever did happen to O'Neil?

Hey? I know that O'Neil hasn't been in Season 9 except 2 guest appearences, but why did they get rid of him? I mean, he was General of SGC and then BOOM. Gone. Why though? My brother said he just wanted to be done with Stargate completly? Is this true? Please if anyone knows, tell me. Thank you.

Sincerely,

PSXBOX363

He could get demoted because he called the president a jackass, that would be a thing Jack would do.Kneller1

When did he do that?

[QUOTE="Kneller1"]He could get demoted because he called the president a jackass, that would be a thing Jack would do.PSXBOX363

When did he do that?

He didn't......Yet lol

Hecouldget demoted

[QUOTE="PSXBOX363"]

[QUOTE="Kneller1"]He could get demoted because he called the president a jackass, that would be a thing Jack would do.shockwave04

When did he do that?

He didn't......Yet lol

Hecouldget demoted

As in: This could be a way the writers could get rid of him.

[QUOTE="shockwave04"][QUOTE="PSXBOX363"]<p>[QUOTE="Kneller1"]He could get demoted because he called the president a jackass, that would be a thing Jack would do.Sarge_Maximus2

was that in series 9?Kneller1

their was not much discussion who was the leader in season 9 although mitchell was giving the orders but in season 10 they will clear it up

Didn't he die?Kneller1

dont think so

Didn't he die?Kneller1

No, he is still the king of that planet.

Unfourtantly, I believe that SG-1 is doing the stereotypical thing. Taking a main character, and replacing them with another character. Mitchell isn't bad, he isn't totally an O'Neil.

As for Mitchell being the leader of SG-1... I definatly say no. It's really hard to say who should be the leader. Sam has become more of a scientist, Danial is an archaeologist, and Teal'c is still bound to the Jaffa council. But Teal'c and Danial couldn't become leaders because their not part of the Airforce. I believe that right now, there should be no leader. O'Neil was the SG-1 leader. He has/had leader aspects. Mitchell doesn't have leader aspects. Mitchell is weaker than O'Neil, as a leader.

Sarge, I know you believe that Mitchell is a clone of O'Neil, but I don't think so. Mitchell is more of a kid, while O'Neil is more of an adult. Not that Mitchell is a kid, and O'Neil is an adult, but O'Neil has more experiance in everthing, while Mitchell is more of a newbie.

I think he meant jonas? or did he? It could have been either.Sarge_Maximus2

Accually I ment Kawalski, I allyays get them two mixed up.

It will probably be Mitchell since he is already the new leader they probably won't want to change it to Sam, even though Sam deserves it more than Mitchell.KnightsofRound

Why ???

None of the current SG-1 personal really are leader quality.

[QUOTE="KnightsofRound"]It will probably be Mitchell since he is already the new leader they probably won't want to change it to Sam, even though Sam deserves it more than Mitchell.shockwave04

Why ???