[QUOTE="neuro_killer"] [QUOTE="174IQ"]I thought at least neuro would have voted for AIG.addaminsain
I have ![:]](http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/5739/zlosliwyma6.gif)
Took you long enough. Procrastinating or just lacking interest? You have to realize that though the poll wasn't closed *I haven't bothered*, it was over on day 3 as GS had requested.
I promise all of you that I will uphold all duties apointed to me by the GS gods. 174IQ
Duties? How about your interaction with few users of this nearly deserted board? Are you're going to employ your I-net brashness to make the potential new ones go around this place on the highest radius possible as if it was a crap dump? Do tell us more about your spectacular leadership plans.
You make it sound like a "spectacular" leader is needed. Few unions are very active. This is about as good as it gets.
IQ: I don't think neuro has anything against you in particular, just against leadership/leaders in general.
I could be wrong though.addaminsain
Indeed you are mistaken to some degree. I do have a lot against wrong people taking the leadership and I think IQ is exactly such a person.
I already knew it was both. It isn't really conditional.
Surely people voting using multiple identities throws the validity of this poll into question?addaminsain
Nothing against the "right" people taking to power then?
There are 10 active users here? Hmm. I really can't recall such a huge herd. For me the poll results are thus null and void.
There are at least 6 active users. 9 of those votes actually counting as and only 8 make any difference as I nullified my own vote while voting for AIG. You fail to factor in lurkers who don't actually post but still visit (possibly regularly)..Evan was such a user at one point. Curlfro too.
Null and void you say? Absurd.
Um no, nine as one of the votes was from a secondary account
Had to do it so I wouldn't feel so bad about disregarding that coin toss >_>
Log in to comment