Foolz:
He has led the union for centuries and brought it up to 200 members. Over his time here, he has lied and sh!t. Beyond that he breathes. He continues as the leader today implementing sh!t wherever he can.
Rookie395
(XD I'm kidding I'm kidding!)
[QUOTE="sandyqbg"]I like the concept too. But I think putting up works would work out better than selecting a personRookie395
What I'm saying, is why not do both.Highlight a person and various works. It doesn't require too much effort and will allow members who may not be the best writers to get some attention.Agg, I too sleepy to think. (~_~) Sounds like a good idea, but I can't imagine why or how we should go about doing that.
Or maybe what you're talking about has already been implemented in the MotM poll..?
iloveflash
I wouldn't know.
For the member spotlight just choose a random member (someone who isn't an officer) do a little interview and maybe write a paragraph about what he/she has added to the union. Post it up and boom.
For inducting people into the hall of fame, have somewhere to have nominations and once someone is nominated (with a good reason), for example, if I were to nominate Foolz:
Foolz:
He has led the union for _____ and brought it up to 200 members. Over his time here, he has ____ and ___. Beyond that he _____. He continues as the leader today implementing ____ wherever he can.
Obviously thats incomplete, but I really don't know too much about who does what :P.
From there on, I'd say make it so people vote in a poll and if the person get's 75% yes votes from the members, induct him/her into the Hall of Fame. There you include a short bio about the person and list his/her achievements within the union.
Niether of them require too much work nor are they really that complex, at least not in my mind. My apologies if the preceding explanation was as clear as mud.
The main thing I'm wondering is whether this is strictly Hall of Fame business or does this tie in with the MotM and the interviews? Because your method pretty much does that. :P
Currently, the focus of the Hall of Fame is on peoples' works. The biography sounds nice, as does the interview, but listing their achievements along with all that would make the thread more of a catalog for their success than what it was intended to be--a single thread for listing the union's most highly acclaimed literature.
But your idea is great (I particularly like the idea to interview the MotM). If the other officers like it then I guess we'll work something out, but I say we keep the HoF's focus on writing and highlight the authors only where needed. The interviews and MotM threads will take care of the rest.
Oh, and we are currently working on a better way of nominating works. So far it's been decided that there will be a nomination thread at the end of the month for people to nominate their favorite works (as opposed to having you think up your own way to get yourself nominated), and then a voting thread to induct the best nominee (or nominees if we do it by category).
Log in to comment